依托扭动运动阶段全身运动质量评估对高危儿进行个性化早期综合干预的效果分析

Analysis of effect of individualized early comprehensive intervention on high-risk infants based on general movements in writhing movements stage

摘要

目的 依托扭动运动阶段全身运动质量(GMs)评估结果,给予高危儿个性化早期综合干预并进行效果分析,旨在观察GMs质量评估在高危儿发育监测和早期干预中的临床应用价值,为高危儿早期干预提供研究线索。方法 选取2020年1月至2022年7月在儿童保健科随访并且GMs扭动运动评估结果异常的高危儿460例,分为观察组(n=261)和对照组(n=199).对照组接受儿童保健科常规指导,观察组在此基础上给予个性化早期综合干预.比较两组儿童不安运动(FMs)结果分布情况,并采用Gesell发育诊断量表(GDS)对两组儿童6月龄和12月龄(早产儿采用矫正月龄)的发育商(DQ)进行评估。结果 干预前,两组儿童GMs扭动运动异常结果分布无差异(χ²=1.568,P=0.210).干预后,观察组正常FMs比例(末次)高于对照组(χ²=6.803,P=0.009).Gesell发育评估结果显示,观察组6月龄(近期效果)粗动作能、精细动作能、应物能、语言能和应人能DQ均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t值介于2.035~4.728之间,P<0.05);6个月后(12月龄),观察组儿童除外语言能DQ,对照组儿童除外粗动作能DQ,两组儿童其余能区均较6月龄时增加(均P<0.05);观察组12月龄(远期效果)各能区DQ均高于对照组,两组差距增大(t值介于6.861~9.305之间,P<0.05)。结论 个性化早期综合干预可提高正常FMs的发生率,促进高危儿神经系统发育,依托扭动运动阶段全身运动质量评估对高危儿进行个性化早期综合干预具有指导意义.

Abstract

Objective To analyse effect of individualized early comprehensive intervention on high-risk infants based on results of general movements assessment (GMs) in writhing movements stage, so as to explore clinical application value of GMs in development monitoring of high-risk infants. Methods 460 infants who had abnormal results of GMs assessment in writhing movements stage and were followed up in our hospital from January 2020 to July 2022 were selected. The infants were randomly divided into observation group (n=261) and control group (n=199). The infants in the control group received routine nursing, feeding and exercise guidance, while those infants in the observation group received individualized comprehensive intervention. The distributions of fidgety movements (FMs) assessment results in the infants were compared between the two groups. Gesell developmental schedule (GDS) was used to evaluate developmental quotient (DQ) of the subjects at respective 6 months of age and 12 months of age (corrected month age was used for preterm infants). Results Before intervention, there was no difference in distribution of abnormal GMs results in writhing movements stage between the two groups (χ²=1.568, P=0.210). After intervention, the proportion of normal FMs results at the last time assessment in the infants in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (χ²=6.803, P=0.009). GDS showed that the DQs in gross motor repertoire, fine motor repertoire, object-adaptive behavior, language skill and personal-social ability at 6 month of age (short-term effect) were higher than those in the control group, and the differences were significant (t=2.035-4.728, all P<0.05). After 6 months of intervention (at 12 months of age), except DQ in language skills in the observation group and DQ in gross motor skills in the control group, DQs in other domains of the infants in the two groups were higher than those at 6 months of age (all P<0.05). At 12 months of age (long-term effect), the DQs in all domains of the infants in the observation group were all higher than those in the control group (t=6.861-9.305, all P<0.05). Conclusion Individualized comprehensive intervention can increase incidence of normal FMs and promote neural development of those high-risk infants. Assessment of GMs in writhing movements stage has guiding significance for early individualized comprehensive intervention on high-risk infants.

关键词

高危儿 / 全身运动质量评估 / 扭动运动 / 个性化早期综合干预 / Gesell发育评估

Key words

high-risk infant / general movement assessment / writhing movement / individualized comprehensive intervention / Gesell developmental assessment

参考文献

[1] Blasi A, Lloyd-Fox S, Sethna V, et al. Atypical processing of voice sounds in infants at risk for autism spectrum disorder[J]. Cortex, 2015, 71: 122-133.

[2] 刘喜红. 高危儿的营养支持与健康管理[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(2): 120-123.

[3] 倪钰飞, 顾秋燕, 杨卫超, 等. 婴儿运动表现测试在早产儿运动发育促进性干预中的价值[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2020, 31(8): 1050-1053.

[4] 杨玉凤. 高危儿健康管理新理念[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2019, 27(2): 117-122.

[5] Hintz S R, Hess R L. Defining outcomes for high-risk infants: Problems and possibilities[J]. Semin Perinatol, 2016, 40(8): 495-496.

[6] Benfer K A, Novak I, Morgan C, et al. Community-based parent-delivered early detection and intervention programme for infants at high risk of cerebral palsy in a low-resource country (Learning through Everyday Activities with Parents (LEAPCP)): protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(6): e021186.

[7] Marcroft C, Khan A, Embleton N D, et al. Movement recognition technology as a method of assessing spontaneous general movements in high risk infants[J]. Front Neurol, 2014, 5: 284.

[8] Kepenek V B, Caliskan M, Ince Z, et al. The comparison of general movements assessment and neurological examination during early infancy[J]. Turk J Pediatr, 2016, 58(1): 54-62.

[9] Novak I, Morgan C, Adde L, et al. Early accurate diagnosis and early intervention in cerebral palsy: advances in diagnosis and treatment[J]. JAMA Pediatric, 2017, 171(9): 897-907.

[10] Peyton C, Einspieler C. General Movements: a behavioral biomarker of later motor and cognitive dysfunction in NICU graduates[J]. Pediatric Ann, 2018, 47(4): e159-e164.

[11] 杨红, 邵肖梅. 全身运动质量评估[J]. 中国循证儿科杂志, 2007, 2(2): 138-143.

[12] 李洪华, 单玲, 王冰, 等. 运动识别技术在评估早产儿自发性全身运动中的应用[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2017, 19(12).

[13] 周雪, 李欣欣, 李可蒙 等. 不安运动阶段影响婴儿全身运动质量的影响因素分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2019, 27(4): 436-439.

[14] Arnold G, Catherine S A. Development Diagnosis. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1945, 101(1): 24-30.

[15] 林传家, 李寄平, 张秀玲, 等. 婴幼儿发育检查手册. 北京: 北京市儿童保健所, 1986: 1-91.

[16] Dimitrijevic L, Bjelakovic B, Colovic H, et al. Assessment of general movements and heart rate variability in prediction of neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants[J]. Early Hum Dev, 2016, 99: 7-12.

[17] Hadders-Algram. Neural substrate and clinical significance of general movements: an update[J]. Dev Med Child Neurol, 60(1): 39-46.

[18] 闫, 沈鹏, 倪仙玉, 等. 早产儿全身运动质量评估等新生儿神经运动发育评估的相关性研究[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2019, 30(8): 919-921.

[19] Manacero S A, Marsehik P S, Nunes M L, et al. Is it possible to predict the infant's neurodevelopmental outcome at 14 months of age by means of a single preterm assessment of General Movements? [J]. Early Hum Dev, 2012, 88(1): 39-43.

[20] De Vries N, Bos A. The motor repertoire of extremely low birth weight infants at term in relation to their neurological outcome[J]. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2011, 53(10): 933-937.

[21] Einspieler C, Bos A F, Libertus M E, et al. The general movement assessment helps us to identify preterm infants at risk for cognitive dysfunction[J]. Front Psychol, 2016, 7: 406.

[22] 毛旭洁, 赵益伟, 阮旦青, 等. 全身运动质量评估在脑损伤高危新生儿脑发育随访中的应用[J]. 浙江临床医学, 2022, 24,(1): 72-73.

[23] 张静, 刘苓, 袁盛, 等. 全身运动质量评估在高危儿随访中的作用[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报2020, 45(5): 619-623.

[24] Einspieler C, Peharz R, Marschik P B. Fidgety movements tiny in appearance, but huge in impact[J]. J Pediatrc, 2016, 92(3): S64-S70.

[25] 马良, 孟令丹, 王宝宏, 等. 早期干预对早产儿不安运动阶段全身运动质量的影响[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2014, 20(12): 1147-1149.

[26] 宋文亚, 倪育, 罗翠仪, 等. 全身运动评估与婴儿运动表现测试的相关性研究[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2022, 33(2): 1-4.

[27] 朱清, 王勇, 刘玉娟. 早期认知语言康复训练对发育迟缓患儿的影响[J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2018, 16(6): 463-465.

[28] Zatorre R J, Fields R D, Johansenberg H. Plasticity in gray and white: neuroimaging change in brain structure during learning[J]. Nat Neurosci, 2012, 15(4): 528-536.

[29] 湾明月, 夏锐, 林慧颖, 等. 身体活动对大脑可塑性影响的研究进展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2020, 26(9): 1071-1075.

[30] Byrne R, Noritz G, Maitre N L, et al. Implementation of early diagnosis and intervention guidelines for cerebral palsy in a high-risk infant follow-up clinic[J]. Pediatr Neurol, 2017, 76: 66-71.

[31] Spittle A J, Morgan C, Olsen J E, et al. Early diagnosis and treatment of cerebral palsy in children with a history of preterm birth[J]. Clin Perinatol, 2018, 45(3): 409-420.

[32] Festante F, Antonelli C, Chom A, et al. Parent-infant interaction during the first year of life in infants at high risk for cerebral palsy: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Neural Plast, 2019: 5759694.

基金资助

医疗技术扶持项目(BB1907)