儿童急性髓系白血病基因突变、染色体核型及融合基因与预后关联分析

潘俞夙 ,  王文鹏 ,  高吉照

中国妇幼健康研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6) : 7 -12.

PDF (1332KB)
中国妇幼健康研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6) : 7 -12. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2025.06.002
专题研究

儿童急性髓系白血病基因突变、染色体核型及融合基因与预后关联分析

作者信息 +

Association analysis of gene mutation, chromosome karyotype and fusion gene with prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia in children

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1363K)

摘要

目的 分析儿童急性髓系白血病(AML)基因突变、染色体核型及融合基因与预后的关联性。方法 选择2015年12月至2022年12月徐州医科大学附属医院儿科收治的92例初发AML患儿为研究对象,通过二代测序检测基因突变、染色体R带分析核型、RT-PCR法检测融合基因.生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法,各组生存之间的比较采用log-rank检验;独立预后因素的评估采用Cox比例风险模型。结果 92例患儿随访中位时间37(1~87)个月,3年总生存率(OS)、无事件生存率(EFS)分别为(74.4±4.9)%、(58.4±5.4)%.单因素分析结果表明C-KIT突变、FLT3-ITD突变及TLS-ERG融合基因阳性是降低OS的因素(χ2值分别为9.039、4.376、4.279,P<0.05);C-KIT突变是降低EFS的因素(χ2=19.626,P<0.05);Cox回归分析结果显示C-KIT突变是影响AML患儿OS及EFS的危险因素,其HR(95%CI)值分别为3.508(1.514~8.129)、3.342(1.744~6.403),P<0.05。结论 C-KIT突变是影响AML患儿预后的独立危险因素.

Abstract

Objective To analyze the association between gene mutations, chromosomal karyotypes, and fusion genes with prognosis in children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods A total of 92 newly diagnosed pediatric AML patients admitted to the Pediatric Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from December 2015 to December 2022 were enrolled. Gene mutations were detected using next-generation sequencing (NGS), chromosomal karyotypes were analyzed by R-banding, and fusion genes were identified using RT-PCR. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and comparisons between groups were performed using the log-rank test. Independent prognostic factors were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results The median follow-up time for the 92 patients was 37 months (range: 1-87 months). The 3-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates were (74.4±4.9)% and (58.4±5.4)%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that C-KIT mutation, FLT3-ITD mutation, and TLS-ERG fusion gene positivity were associated with decreased OS (χ2=9.039, 4.376 and 4.279, respectively, P<0.05), while C-KIT mutation was also associated with reduced EFS (χ2=19.626, P<0.05). Cox regression analysis revealed that C-KIT mutation was an independent adverse prognostic factor for both OS and EFS in pediatric AML, with HR (95%CI) values of 3.508 (1.514-8.129) and 3.342 (1.744-6.403), respectively (P<0.05). Conclusion C-KIT mutations are an independent risk factor for the outcome of children with AML.

关键词

急性髓系白血病 / 基因突变 / 染色体核型 / 融合基因 / 儿童 / 生存率

Key words

acute myeloid leukemia / gene mutation / chromosome karyotype / fusion gene / child / survival rate

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
潘俞夙,王文鹏,高吉照. 儿童急性髓系白血病基因突变、染色体核型及融合基因与预后关联分析[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2025, 36(6): 7-12 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2025.06.002

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Allen C, Hills R K, Lamb K, et al. The importance of relative mutant level for evaluating impact on outcome of KIT, FLT3 and CBL mutations in core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Leukemia, 2013, 27(9): 1891-1901.

[2]

Shafik N F, Ibraheem D, Selim M M, et al. The prognostic significance of c-KIT mutations in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk, 2021, 22(6): e363-e375.

[3]

Padmakumar D, Chandraprabha V, Gopinath P, et al. A concise review on the molecular genetics of acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Leuk Res, 2021, 111(1): 106727.

[4]

Liao X Y, Fang J P, Zhou D H, et al. CEBPA are independent good prognostic factors in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Hematol Oncol, 2021, 40(2): 258-268.

[5]

Su L, Shi Y Y, Liu Z Y, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia with CEBPA mutations: current progress and future directions[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12(1): 806137.

[6]

Rahul E, Goel H, Chopra A, et al. An updated account on molecular heterogeneity of acute leukemia[J]. Am J Blood Res, 2021, 11(1): 22-43.

[7]

Liu X, Ye Q, Zhao X P, et al. RAS mutations in acute myeloid leukaemia patients: a review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2019, 489(1): 254-260.

[8]

Dos F V, Andrade F G, Sardou-Cezar I, et al. Childhood myeloid neoplasms with PTPN11 mutations in brazil[J]. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk, 2020, 20(8): e496-e505.

[9]

Czogała M, Czogała W, Pawińska-Wąsikowska K, et al. Characteristics and outcome of FLT3-ITD-positive pediatric acute myeloid leukemia-experience of polish pediatric leukemia and lymphoma study group from 2005 to 2022[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2023, 15(18): 4557.

[10]

Chappell G, Geer M, Gatza E, et al. Maintenance sorafenib in FLT3-ITD AML following allogeneic HCT favorably impacts relapse and overall survival[J]. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2019, 54(9): 1518-1520.

[11]

Kim K, Berna H B, Martin Z, et al. Prognostic significance of chromosomal abnormalities at relapse in children with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective cohort study of the relapsed AML 2001/01 study[J]. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2021, 69(1): e29341.

[12]

陈茜, 李培岭, 刘豹, 等. 儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病临床特征及预后因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2020, 31(10): 1368-1373.

[13]

Mandoli A, Singh A A, Prange K, et al. The hematopoietic transcription factors RUNX1 and ERG prevent AML1-ETO oncogene overexpression and onset of the apoptosis program in t(8;21) AMLs[J]. Cell Rep, 2016, 17(8): 2087-2100.

[14]

Chen X, Zong S, Yi M, et al. Minimal residual disease monitoring via AML1-ETO breakpoint tracing in childhood acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Transl Oncol, 2021, 14(8): 101119.

[15]

Talami A, Bettelli F, Pioli V, et al. How to improve prognostication in acute myeloid leukemia with CBFB-MYH11 fusion transcript: focus on the role of molecular measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring[J]. Biomedicines, 2021, 9(8): 953.

[16]

Sepúlveda-Robles O, Jiménez-Hernández E, Domínguez C, et al. Analytical study of RUNX1-RUNXT1, PML-RARA, CBFB-MYH11, BCR-ABL1p210, and KMT2-MLLT3 in Mexican children with acute myeloid leukemia: a multicenter study of the Mexican interinstitutional group for the identification of the causes of childhood leukemia (MIGICCL) [J]. Front Pediatr, 2022, 10(1): 946690.

[17]

Takashi T, Daisuke T, Hiroyuki T, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia in children: current status and future directions[J]. Pediatr Int, 2016, 58(2): 71-80.

[18]

Noort S, Zimmermann M, Reinhardt D, et al. Prognostic impact of t(16;21)(p11;q22) and t(16;21)(q24;q22) in pediatric AML: a retrospective study by the I-BFM study group[J]. Blood, 2018, 132(15): 1584-1592.

[19]

Qin Y, Chen Y, Xu L, et al. Outcome and minimal residual disease monitoring in patients with t(16;21) acute myelogenous leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation[J]. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 2018, 24(1): 163-168.

[20]

Meyer C, Burmeister T, Gröger D, et al. The MLL recombinome of acute leukemias in 2017[J]. Leukemia, 2018, 32(2): 273-284.

[21]

Ricky T, Katarzyna S, Paul M, et al. Epigenetic regulator genes direct lineage switching in MLL/AF4 leukaemia[J]. Blood, 2022, 140(17): 1875-1890.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1332KB)

93

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉