婴幼儿回应性喂养评价工具的构建及信效度检验

方宇杰 ,  张曼 ,  张娜 ,  周淑益 ,  李振珲 ,  马冠生

中国妇幼健康研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8) : 1 -9.

PDF (939KB)
中国妇幼健康研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8) : 1 -9. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2025.08.001
专题研究

婴幼儿回应性喂养评价工具的构建及信效度检验

作者信息 +

Construction and test of reliability and validity of a responsive feeding assessment tool for infants and young children

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (960K)

摘要

目的 构建婴幼儿回应性喂养评价工具并进行信效度检验。方法 根据前期制定的婴幼儿回应性喂养核心信息构建评价工具,邀请专家进行评分以检验评价工具的内容效度,通过预调查结果检验评价工具的难度、区分度、信度及结构效度。结果 评价工具包括0~6月龄、7~12月龄和13~36月龄三个问卷,内容涵盖回应性喂养基本知识与理念、喂养环境、喂养互动与喂养方式.专家评分结果显示各月龄问卷内容效度指数分别为0.91、0.90、0.93;题目难度在0.15~0.85范围内的比例分别为88.5%、90.9%、90.9%;区分度在0.2以上的比例分别为88.5%、84.8%、84.8%;各月龄问卷的总体Cronbach's α系数分别为0.623、0.699、0.743,Guttman分半系数分别为0.684、0.749、0.767;通过探索性因子分析最终提取8个因子(概括为“喂养知识”、“喂养理念”、“家庭喂养环境”、“喂养支持”、“喂养策略”、“喂养信号”、“特殊情况下喂养策略”、“效果评价”),累计方差解释率为34.1%。结论 本研究所构建的婴幼儿回应性喂养评价工具难度适宜,有一定的区分度,且信效度均可接受,能适用于0~3岁婴幼儿照护者的回应性喂养水平评价.

Abstract

Objective To develop a responsive feeding assessment tool for infants and young children and to test its reliability and validity. Methods Based on previously established core messages on responsive feeding for infants and young children, experts were invited to rate content validity of the assessment tool. A pilot study was conducted to examine difficulty and discrimination of the assessment tool. Cronbach's α coefficient and Guttman split-half coefficient were used to test reliability of the assessment tool, and exploratory factor analysis was used to assess structural validity of the assessment tool. Results The assessment tool consisted of three questionnaires for different age groups of infants: a questionnaire for 0-6 months aged infants, a questionnaire for 7-12 months aged infants, and a questionnaire for 13-36 months aged infants and young children. It covered key aspects of responsive feeding, including fundamental knowledge and concepts, feeding environment, feeding interactions, and feeding patterns. The experts' scoring results shown that the content validity indexes for the three questionnaires were 0.91, 0.90 and 0.93 respectively. The proportions of items with difficulty values in a range of 0.15-0.85 of the three questionnaires were 88.5%, 90.9% and 90.9% respectively, while the proportions of question items with discrimination above 0.2 of the three questionnaire were 88.5%, 84.8% and 84.8% respectively. The overall Cronbach's α coefficients of the three questionnaires were 0.623, 0.699 and 0.743 respectively, and the Guttman split-half coefficients were 0.684, 0.749 and 0.767 respectively. Eight factors such as feeding knowledge, feeding concepts, family feeding environment, feeding support, feeding strategy, feeding signal, feeding strategy in special conditions and effect evaluation were extracted through exploratory factor analysis, with a cumulative variance explanation rate of 34.1%. Conclusion The responsive feeding assessment tool developed in this study has appropriate difficulty, a certain degree of discrimination, and acceptable reliability and validity. It is suitable for evaluating responsive feeding levels of caregivers for infants and young children aged 0-3 years.

关键词

婴幼儿 / 回应性喂养 / 评价工具 / 信效度检验

Key words

infant and young children / responsive feeding / assessment tool / reliability and validity test

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
方宇杰,张曼,张娜,周淑益,李振珲,马冠生. 婴幼儿回应性喂养评价工具的构建及信效度检验[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2025, 36(8): 1-9 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2025.08.001

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Black M M, Walker S P, Fernald L C H, et al. Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course[J]. Lancet (London, England), 2017, 389(10064): 77-90.

[2]

Richter L M, Daelmans B, Lombardi J, et al. Investing in the foundation of sustainable development: pathways to scale up for early childhood development[J]. Lancet (London, England), 2017, 389(10064): 103-118.

[3]

Integrating Early Childhood Development (ECD) activities into Nutrition Programmes in Emergencies[EB/OL]. [ 2024-12-20]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/integrating-early-childhood-development-(ecd)activities-into-nutrition-programmes-in-emergencies.

[4]

Morandi A, Tommasi M, Soffiati F, et al. Prevention of obesity in toddlers (PROBIT): a randomised clinical trial of responsive feeding promotion from birth to 24 months[J]. International Journal of Obesity (2005), 2019, 43(10): 1961-1966.

[5]

Black M M, Tofail F, Hodges E A, et al. Rethinking responsive feeding: insights from bangladesh[J]. Nutrients, 2022, 14(15): 3156.

[6]

何宛君, 尤梁惠, 张敏. 婴幼儿回应性照护与体重管理[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2023, 34(3): 113-118.

[7]

中国健康促进与教育协会营养素养分会. 0~3岁婴幼儿回应性喂养核心信息[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2024.

[8]

孙昕霙. 健康调查问卷谁及原理与实践[M]. 北京: 北京大学医学出版社, 2020.

[9]

Stevens J. Applied Multivariate Statistics For The Social Sciences[J]. Journal of Educational Statistics, 2002, 47(2).

[10]

戴海崎, 张锋. 心理与教育测量[M]. 广州: 暨南大学出版社, 2018.

[11]

朱英. 国家卫生健康委办公厅关于印发3岁以下婴幼儿健康养育照护指南(试行)的通知_国务院部门文件_中国政府网[EB/OL]. [ 2024-12-18]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-11/29/content_5729421.htm.

[12]

Infant and Young Child Feeding: Model Chapter for Textbooks for Medical Students and Allied Health Professionals[M]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2009.

[13]

Engle P L, Pelto G H. Responsive feeding: implications for policy and program implementation[J]. The Journal of Nutrition, 2011, 141(3): 508-511.

[14]

Black M M, Hurley K M. Responsive Feeding: Strategies to Promote Healthy Mealtime Interactions[J]. Nestle Nutrition Institute Workshop Series, 2017, 87: 153-165.

[15]

中国营养学会. 中国居民膳食指南[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2022.

[16]

邵洁, 童梅玲, 张悦, 等. 婴幼儿养育照护专家共识[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2020, 28(9): 1063-1068.

[17]

Liu Y, Yu G, Li Z, et al. A responsive feeding questionnaire based on self-determination theory for caregivers of Chinese toddlers[J]. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 2023, 55(6): 447-456.

[18]

Sall N S, Bégin F, Dupuis J B, et al. A measurement scale to assess responsive feeding among Cambodian young children[J]. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 2020, 16(3): e12956.

[19]

P P, Tc A, Sb A, et al. Measuring responsive feeding in sri lanka: development of the responsive feeding practices assessment tool[J]. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 2021, 53(6).

[20]

Lindsay A C, Le Q, Greaney M L. Infant feeding beliefs, attitudes, knowledge and practices of Chinese immigrant mothers: an integrative review of the literature[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2017, 15(1): 21.

[21]

Reinbott A, Jordan I. Determinants of child malnutrition and infant and young child feeding approaches in Cambodia[J]. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2016, 115: 61-67.

[22]

WHO Guideline for complementary feeding of infants and young children 6-23 months of age[M]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2023.

[23]

Dewey K. Guiding principles for complementary feeding of the breastfed child[J]. 2003.

[24]

China Preventive Medicine Association, Society of Child Health. 婴幼儿喂养与营养指南[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2019,30(4):392-417.

[25]

Mm B, Fe A. Responsive feeding is embedded in a theoretical framework of responsive parenting[J]. The Journal of nutrition, 2011, 141(3).

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(81673146)

国际计划家庭教育项目资料开发和支持项目(2022G1)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (939KB)

104

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉