MDT门诊在胎盘植入性疾病管理中的作用

佘广彤 ,  王慧艳 ,  沈晓慧 ,  贾赛玉 ,  陈楚楚 ,  张永成 ,  熊佳丽 ,  夏丹丹 ,  张晨影

中国妇幼健康研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (7) : 69 -76.

PDF (1003KB)
中国妇幼健康研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (7) : 69 -76. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2026.07.010

MDT门诊在胎盘植入性疾病管理中的作用

作者信息 +

Role of multi-disciplinary team clinic in management of placenta accreta spectrum

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1026K)

摘要

目的 评价门诊多学科团队诊疗(MDT)在胎盘植入性疾病(PAS)亚专科管理中的作用和对母婴结局的影响。方法 采用回顾性队列研究分析2020-2024年本院定期产检并分娩,最终诊断为前置胎盘伴胎盘植入的140例患者,按管理方式不同分为常规组和MDT组。常规组为2020年1月-2022年11月期间实行产科一贯制管理的前置胎盘伴胎盘植入患者(n=50),MDT组为2022年12月-2024年12月期间参加胎盘植入MDT门诊,并进行亚专科管理的患者(n=90),通过管理方式的改进,对患者实行全孕期个体化精细管理,采用t检验、Kappa检验、χ2检验、Fisher精确概率法、Mann-Whitney U检验比较两组母婴结局的变化。结果 和常规组比较,MDT组PAS分级诊断的一致性显著提高(χ2=12.963,P<0.001)。MDT组母亲术中出血量(t=1.995,P=0.048)和产后24小时出血量(t=2.043,P=0.043)显著下降,MDT组的产后出血发生率(χ2=18.485,P<0.001)、异体红细胞输注率(χ2=6.718,P=0.010)、血浆输注率(χ2=4.032,P=0.045)、ICU入住率(χ2=13.594,P<0.001)均显著下降,MDT组新生儿出生后5分钟Apgar评分较常规组显著好转(Z=-8.073,P<0.001)。结论 多学科团队诊疗门诊提升了胎盘植入性疾病精准化诊疗质量,联合产科一贯制管理后有利于改善母婴结局,推动亚专科建设。

Abstract

Objective Evaluation of the role of multi-disciplinary team (MDT) diagnosis and treatment in the management of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) in the outpatient setting and its impact on maternal and infant outcomes. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze 140 patients diagnosed with placenta previa and placenta accreta spectrum who underwent regular prenatal examinations and deliveries at our hospital from 2020 to 2024. The patients were divided into the conventional group and the MDT group based on different management methods. The conventional group consisted of 50 patients with placenta accreta spectrum and placenta accreta spectrum who received consistent obstetric management from January 2020 to November 2022, while the MDT group consisted of 90 patients who participated in the placenta accreta spectrum MDT clinic and received sub-specialty management from December 2022 to December 2024. Through the improvement of management methods, individualized and precise management was implemented throughout the pregnancy for the patients. t test, Kappa test, χ 2 test, Fisher's exact probability method, and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the changes in maternal and infant outcomes between the two groups. Results Compared with the conventional group, the consistency of PAS diagnosis in the MDT group significantly improved (χ 2=12.963, P<0.001). The intraoperative blood loss during surgery (t=1.995, P=0.048) and the 24-hour postpartum blood loss (t=2.043, P=0.043) in the MDT group were significantly reduced. The postpartum hemorrhage rate (χ 2=18.485, P<0.001), the rate of allogeneic red blood cell transfusion (χ 2=6.718, P=0.010), the plasma transfusion rate (χ 2=4.032, P=0.045), and the intensive care unit admission rate (χ 2=13.594, P<0.001) in the MDT group were significantly lower. The 5-minute Apgar score of the newborns in the MDT group was significantly better than that in the conventional group (Z=-8.073, P<0.001). Conclusion The MDT clinic has improved the quality of precise diagnosis and treatment of placenta accreta spectrum. Combined with consistent obstetric management, it is beneficial to improve maternal and infant outcomes and promote the construction of sub-specialties.

关键词

胎盘植入 / 产科一贯制 / 多学科诊疗 / 母婴结局 / 亚专科管理

Key words

placenta accreta spectrum / continuity of maternity care / multi-disciplinary team / maternal and infant outcome / subspecialty management

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
佘广彤,王慧艳,沈晓慧,贾赛玉,陈楚楚,张永成,熊佳丽,夏丹丹,张晨影. MDT门诊在胎盘植入性疾病管理中的作用[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2026, 37(7): 69-76 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2026.07.010

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组, 中国医师协会妇产科分会母胎医学专委会. 胎盘植入性疾病诊断和处理指南(2023)[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2023,26(8): 617-627.

[2]

Ming Y, Zeng X, Zheng T, et al. Epidemiology of placenta accreta spectrum disorders in Chinese pregnant women:a multicenter hospital-based study[J]. Placenta, 2022,126: 133-139.

[3]

Lee S, Kim S C. Clinical insights into placenta accreta spectrum:a comprehensive review[J]. Obstet Gynecol Sci, 2026,69(1): 1-15.

[4]

Orujova L, Melekogˇlu R, Yılmaz E, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in placenta accreta spectrum:influence of antenatal diagnosis and surgical strategy[J]. Turk J Obstet Gynecol, 2026,23(1): 8-33.

[5]

种轶文, 张爱青, 王妍, . 超声评分系统预测胎盘植入凶险程度的价值[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2016,19(9): 705-709.

[6]

杨慧霞, 闫婕, 刘兴会, . “胎盘植入性疾病”在中国进行规范化命名和分级的倡议[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2021,56(6): 377-379.

[7]

Kirovakov Z, Yordanov A, Tsoneva E. Placenta accreta spectrum:diagnostic challenges and management strategies[J]. Diagnostics, 2026,16(5): 760.

[8]

Jauniaux E, Jurkovic D, Hussein A M, et al. New insights into the etiopathology of placenta accreta spectrum[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2022,227(3): 384-391.

[9]

Kaur A, Mangal K, Sharma A K, et al. Paving the path to prevent peripartum hysterectomies:risk stratification in placenta accreta spectrum[J]. J Mother Child, 2025,29(1): 83-92.

[10]

Chandraharan E, Hartopp R, Thilaganathan B, et al. How to set up a regional specialist referral service for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders?[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2021,72: 92-101.

[11]

郭晓玥, 石慧峰, 史晓明, . 胎盘植入性疾病的精细化管理[J]. 中国卫生质量管理, 2022,29(3): 37-39,60.

[12]

王雯雯, 周航, 杨燕, . 胎盘植入性疾病管理流程改进对母儿结局的影响[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2023,26(8): 628-634.

[13]

文燕青, 漆洪波. 多学科团队诊疗——提高救治效果[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2024,40(10): 978-981.

[14]

Jauniaux E, Kingdom J C, Silver R M. A comparison of recent guidelines in the diagnosis and management of placenta accreta spectrum disorders[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2021,72: 102-116.

[15]

林容, 翁晓英, 林靓. 多学科团队合作诊疗在胎盘植入性疾病中的临床应用[J]. 创伤与急诊电子杂志, 2022,10(2): 91-96.

[16]

Huras H, Cnota W, Czajkowski K, et al. Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS)-prenatal diagnosis and management.The polish society of gynecologists and obstetricians guidelines[J]. Ginekol Pol, 2024,95(11): 902-920.

[17]

Jauniaux E, Jurkovic D, Hussein A M, et al. New insights into the etiopathology of placenta accreta spectrum[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2022,227(3): 384-391.

[18]

Bonanni G, Lopez-Giron M C, Allen L, et al. Guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders:a systematic review[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2025,8(7): e2521909.

[19]

Hobson S R, Kingdom J C, Murji A, et al. No.383-screening,diagnosis,and management of placenta accreta spectrum disorders[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2019,41(7): 1035-1049.

[20]

何怡潇, 陈敦金, 胡淼, . 大语言模型对胎盘植入性疾病患者咨询响应的准确性与全面性研究[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2025,105(40): 3650-3656.

[21]

Chen K, Xue M, Meng X, et al. Artificial intelligence (AI) in the diagnosis and prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes for placenta accreta spectrum disorders (PAS):a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy[J]. Int J Surg, 2026,112(3):p8478- 8490.

基金资助

常州市十四五高层次领军人才(2022CZLJ023)

南京医科大学常州医学中心项目(CMCC202410)

常州市卫生健康委青年项目(QN202374)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1003KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/