收缩压目标范围内时间与左心室增大的关系

王思雨 ,  王建姣 ,  桂满 ,  刘阳 ,  陈朔华 ,  吴寿岭 ,  黄玮

中华高血压杂志(中英文) ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6) : 540 -549.

PDF (889KB)
中华高血压杂志(中英文) ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6) : 540 -549. DOI: 10.16439/j.issn.1673-7245.2025-0221
论著

收缩压目标范围内时间与左心室增大的关系

作者信息 +

Relationship between time in target range for systolic blood pressure and left ventricular enlargement

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (909K)

摘要

目的 评估收缩压目标范围内时间(SBP-TTR)与左心室增大的关系。方法 对来自开滦研究的 33 907 名参与者进行分析,他们完成了 2006—2020 年度至少两次健康体检和末次体检后的超声心动图检查。使用线性插值法计算 SBP-TTR,收缩压的目标范围分别设定为标准目标(120~140 mmHg)和强效目标(110~130 mmHg)。根据 SBP-TTR 的四分位数,将参与者分为四组。采用泊松回归模型评估 SBP-TTR 与左心室增大的关系。采用限制性立方样条可视化 SBP-TTR 与左心室增大风险的剂量-反应关系。结果 收缩压目标范围为标准目标时,SBP-TTR 0%~25%、>25%~50%、>50%~75%、>75%~100% 组左心室增大比例分别为 14.10%(1 962/13 916)、10.40%(683/6 565)、9.38%(586/6 250)、9.99%(717/7 176),4 组比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 141.628,P<0.001)。校正混杂因素后,泊松回归分析显示:当收缩压的目标范围为标准目标时,与 SBP-TTR 为 0~25% 组相比,其他三组的左心室增大风险逐渐降低(P趋势 = 0.008),RR(95%CI)值分别为 0.99(0.90~1.08)、0.92(0.84~1.02)和 0.89(0.82~0.98),SBP-TTR 每增加一个标准差,左心室增大风险降低 4%(RR = 0.96,95%CI:0.93~0.99)。当收缩压的目标范围为强效目标时,与 SBP-TTR 为 0~25% 组参与者相比,其他三组的左心室增大风险仍逐渐降低(P趋势<0.001),RR(95%CI)值分别为 0.95(0.86~1.05)、0.86(0.77~0.96)和 0.72(0.65~0.80);SBP-TTR 每增加一个标准差,左心室增大风险降低 11%(RR = 0.89,95%CI:0.85~0.92)。校正基线收缩压和传统危险因素后,SBP-TTR 与左心室增大的关联依然有统计学意义。结论 SBP-TTR 与左心室增大呈负相关,并且强效降压效果更显著。

Abstract

Objective To assess the association between time in target range for systolic blood pressure (SBP-TTR) and left ventricular enlargement. Methods A total of 33 907 participants from the Kailuan Study who completed at least two health check-ups between 2006 and 2020 and underwent echocardiography after their last check-up were analyzed. The SBP-TTR was calculated using the linear interpolation method, with the target ranges of systolic blood pressure (SBP) set as the standard target (120 to 140 mmHg) and the intensive target (110 to 130 mmHg), respectively. Participants were divided into four groups according to the quartiles of SBP-TTR. Poisson regression model was used to investigate the association between SBP-TTR and left ventricular enlargement. Restricted cubic splines were used to visualize the dose-response relationship between SBP-TTR and the risk of left ventricular enlargement. Results When the target range of SBP was the standard target, the proportions of left ventricular enlargement in the SBP-TTR 0% to 25%, > 25% to 50%, > 50% to 75%, and > 75% to 100% groups were 14.10% (1 962/13 916), 10.40% (683/6 565), 9.38% (586/6 250), and 9.99% (717/7 176), respectively. A comparison among the four groups showed statistically significant differences (χ2 = 141.628, P<0.001). After adjusting for confounding factors, Poisson regression analysis showed that when the target range of SBP was the standard target, compared with the group with SBP-TTR of 0 to 25%, the risk of left ventricular enlargement in the other three groups gradually decreased ( P for trend = 0.008), with RR (95%CI) values of 0.99 (0.90 to 1.08), 0.92 (0.84 to 1.02), and 0.89 (0.82 to 0.98); SBP-TTR per 1-SD increase was associated with a 4% lower risk of left ventricular enlargement (RR = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.93 to 0.99). When the target range of SBP was the intensive target, compared with the group with SBP-TTR of 0 to 25%, the risk of left ventricular enlargement in the other three groups still gradually decreased (P for trend < 0.001), with RR (95%CI) values of 0.95 (0.86 to 1.05), 0.86 (0.77 to 0.96), and 0.72 (0.65 to 0.80); SBP-TTR per 1-SD increase was associated with an 11% lower risk of left ventricular enlargement (RR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.85 to 0.92). After adjusting for baseline systolic blood pressure and traditional risk factors, the association between SBP-TTR and left ventricular enlargement remained statistically significant. Conclusion SBP-TTR is negatively correlated with left ventricular enlargement, and the intensive antihypertensive effect is more significant.

关键词

收缩压 / 目标范围内时间 / 左心室增大

Key words

systolic blood pressure / time in target range / left ventricular enlargement

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
王思雨,王建姣,桂满,刘阳,陈朔华,吴寿岭,黄玮. 收缩压目标范围内时间与左心室增大的关系[J]. 中华高血压杂志(中英文), 2026, 34(6): 540-549 DOI:10.16439/j.issn.1673-7245.2025-0221

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Yildiz M, Oktay AA, Stewart MH, et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy and hypertension[J]. Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 2020, 63(1): 10-21.

[2]

Vasan RS, Song RJ, Xanthakis V, et al. Hypertension—mediated organ damage: prevalence, correlates, and prognosis in the community[J]. Hypertension, 2022, 79(3): 505-515.

[3]

Bluemke DA, Kronmal RA, Lima JA, et al. The relationship of left ventricular mass and geometry to incident cardiovascular events: the MESA (Multi—Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) study[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008, 52(25): 2148-2155.

[4]

Stewart MH, Lavie CJ, Shah S, et al. Prognostic implications of left ventricular hypertrophy[J]. Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 2018, 61(5/6): 446-455.

[5]

Soliman EZ, Ambrosius WT, Cushman WC, et al. Effect of intensive blood pressure lowering on left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertension: SPRINT (systolic blood pressure intervention trial)[J]. Circulation, 2017, 136(5): 440-450.

[6]

Pierdomenico SD, Cuccurullo F . Risk reduction after regression of echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension: a meta—analysis[J]. Am J Hypertens, 2010, 23(8): 876-881.

[7]

Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration . Pharmacological blood pressure lowering for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease across different levels of blood pressure: an individual participant—level data meta—analysis[J]. Lancet, 2021, 397(10285): 1625-1636.

[8]

Brown DW, Giles WH, Greenlund KJ . Blood pressure parameters and risk of fatal stroke, NHANES Ⅱ mortality study[J]. Am J Hypertens, 2007, 20(3): 338-341.

[9]

Doumas M, Tsioufis C, Fletcher R, et al. Time in therapeutic range, as a determinant of all—cause mortality in patients with hypertension[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2017, 6(11): e007131.

[10]

Lin Z, Xiao Z, Chen W, et al. Association of long—term time in target range for systolic blood pressure with cardiovascular risk in the elderly: a Chinese veteran cohort study[J]. Eur J Prev Cardiol, 2023, 30(10): 969-977.

[11]

Fatani N, Dixon DL, Van Tassell BW, et al. Systolic blood pressure time in target range and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertension[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2021, 77(10): 1290-1299.

[12]

Wang J, Li W, Gui M, et al. The impact of time—in—target range for systolic blood pressure on left ventricular hypertrophy[J]. Am J Hypertens, 2025, 38(12): 1068-1075.

[13]

帅文亮, 张航诚, 林子昕, . 血压目标范围内时间在临床应用中的研究进展[J]. 中华高血压杂志 (中英文), 2025, 33(8): 709-713.

[14]

Wang C, Yuan Y, Zheng M, et al. Association of age of onset of hypertension with cardiovascular diseases and mortality[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2020, 75(23): 2921-2930.

[15]

Wu S, Jin C, Li S, et al. Aging, arterial stiffness, and blood pressure association in Chinese adults[J]. Hypertension, 2019, 73(4): 893-899.

[16]

Zhou YF, Chen S, Wang G, et al. Effectiveness of a workplace—based, multicomponent hypertension management program in real—world practice: a propensity—matched analysis[J]. Hypertension, 2022, 79(1): 230-240.

[17]

Wu S, Huang Z, Yang X, et al. Prevalence of ideal cardiovascular health and its relationship with the 4—year cardiovascular events in a northern Chinese industrial city[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 2012, 5(4): 487-493.

[18]

Wu Z, Jin C, Vaidya A, et al. Longitudinal patterns of blood pressure, incident cardiovascular events, and all—cause mortality in normotensive diabetic people[J]. Hypertension, 2016, 68(1): 71-77.

[19]

Sun ZJ, Wang JW, Chang DY, et al. Unstably controlled systolic blood pressure trajectories are associated with markers for kidney damage in prediabetic population: results from the INDEED cohort study[J]. J Transl Med, 2020, 18(1): 194.

[20]

Liu M, Xu X, Chen X, et al. Body weight time in target range and cardiovascular outcomes in adults with overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes[J]. Eur J Prev Cardiol, 2023, 30(12): 1263-1271.

[21]

Mancia G, Kreutz R, Brunström M, et al. 2023 ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension: Endorsed by the International Society of Hypertension (ISH) and the European Renal Association (ERA)[J]. J Hypertens, 2023, 41(12): 1874-2071.

[22]

Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines[J]. Hypertension, 2018, 71(6): 1269-1324.

[23]

中华医学会超声医学分会超声心动图学组 . 中国成年人超声心动图检查测量指南[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2016, 25(8): 645-666.

[24]

Kim HC, Ihm SH, Kim GH, et al. 2018 Korean Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension: part Ⅰ—epidemiology of hypertension[J]. Clin Hypertens, 2019, 25: 16.

[25]

Tian X, Zhang Y, Chen S, et al. Systolic blood pressure time in target range within 24 hours and incident heart failure: insights from the real—world setting[J]. Hypertens Res, 2025, 48(1): 223-232.

[26]

Park CH, Kim HW, Joo YS, et al. Findings from the KNOW—CKD study indicate that higher systolic blood pressure time in target range is associated with a lower risk of chronic kidney disease progression[J]. Kidney Int, 2024, 105(4): 835-843.

[27]

Li W, Liu Z, Zhao J, et al. Association of systolic blood pressure time in target range with carotid atherosclerotic plaque and carotid intima—media thickness in hypertensive patients[J]. Sci Rep, 2025, 15(1): 17347.

[28]

Cuspidi C, Lonati L, Sampieri L, et al. Impact of blood pressure control on prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy in treated hypertensive patients[J]. Cardiology, 2000, 93(3): 149-154.

[29]

Deng Y, Liu W, Yang X, et al. Intensive blood pressure lowering improves left ventricular hypertrophy in older patients with hypertension: the STEP trial[J]. Hypertension, 2023, 80(9): 1834-1842.

[30]

Lorell BH, Carabello BA . Left ventricular hypertrophy: pathogenesis, detection, and prognosis[J]. Circulation, 2000, 102(4): 470-479.

[31]

中华医学会心血管病学分会, 海峡两岸医药卫生交流协会高血压专业委员会, 中国康复医学会心血管疾病预防与康复专业委员会 . 中国高血压临床实践指南[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2024, 52(9): 985-1032.

[32]

Mcevoy JW, Mccarthy CP, Bruno RM, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension[J]. Eur Heart J, 2024, 45(38): 3912-4018.

[33]

Goupil R, Tsuyuki RT, Santesso N, et al. Hypertension Canada guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in adults in primary care[J]. Can Fam Physician, 2025, 71(7/8): 467-482.

[34]

Nwabuo CC, Vasan RS . Pathophysiology of hypertensive heart disease: beyond left ventricular hypertrophy[J]. Curr Hypertens Rep, 2020, 22(2): 11.

[35]

Zhou TL, Henry R, Stehouwer C, et al. Blood pressure variability, arterial stiffness, and arterial remodeling[J]. Hypertension, 2018, 72(4): 1002-1010.

[36]

Angeli F, Reboldi G, Verdecchia P . Blood pressure variability and risk of stroke in chronic kidney disease[J]. J Hypertens, 2020, 38(4): 599-602.

[37]

Kim KI, Lee JH, Chang HJ, et al. Association between blood pressure variability and inflammatory marker in hypertensive patients[J]. Circ J, 2008, 72(2): 293-298.

[38]

Wu S, Tian X, Xu Q, et al. Visit—to—visit blood pressure variability and the risk of cardiovascular disease: a prospective cohort analysis[J]. Hypertens Res, 2023, 46(12): 2622-2634.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (889KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/