甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与夜间高血压的关联及其识别不同夜间高血压临床表型的价值

邹家亮 ,  杜雨星 ,  全滕皓 ,  魏茂提 ,  付家瑞 ,  杨宁 ,  李玉明

中华高血压杂志(中英文) ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7) : 634 -646.

PDF (1186KB)
中华高血压杂志(中英文) ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7) : 634 -646. DOI: 10.16439/j.issn.1673-7245.2025-0269
论著

甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与夜间高血压的关联及其识别不同夜间高血压临床表型的价值

作者信息 +

The triglyceride-glucose index and nocturnal hypertension: association and utility for discriminating clinical phenotypes

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1213K)

摘要

目的 探讨甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数(TyG 指数)与夜间高血压(NH)之间的关系,以及 TyG 指数识别不同 NH 表型的价值。方法 本研究收集了 2023 年 9 月至 2025 年 7 月期间,天津康汇医院高血压科就诊的 1 492 例患者资料进行横断面分析。根据 24 h 动态血压监测和是否服用抗高血压药结果分为四组:单纯夜间高血压(INH)组、日间-夜间持续性高血压组、其他 NH 组(包括正在接受降压治疗且日间血压控制达标但夜间血压升高者、NH 延续至清晨高血压者,以及老年直立性低血压合并夜间卧位高血压者)和夜间血压正常组。采集人口学资料、生活方式、病史、实验室指标并计算 TyG 指数。采用 logistic 回归评估 TyG 指数与及不同临床表型的独立关联,并进行交互与分层分析;限制性立方样条检验非线性关系;受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线、校准曲线及决策曲线分析评价区分价值、校准效能及临床净获益。结果 夜间血压正常组与 NH 各组在人口学特征、既往病史、血压参数、代谢指标上四组间总体差异显著(均 P<0.05)。多因素无序 logistic 回归结果显示,调整相关因素后,TyG 指数每增加 1 单位,INH、日夜持续性高血压与其他 NH 的 OR 分别为 7.14(95%CI: 4.82~10.59)、4.70(3.39~6.53)、3.99(2.88~5.51)。分层分析提示该关联在女性和年龄 ≥ 65 岁人群中更强。限制性立方样条曲线分析显示,TyG 指数与 INH 风险呈线性关系(校正后 P非线性 = 0.755),而与其他 NH 表型存在非线性递增趋势。ROC 分析表明,TyG 指数对不同 NH 类型均具有区分价值,其中对 INH 的区分效能最佳(AUC = 0.814,95%CI: 0.778~0.850)。校准曲线和决策曲线支持 TyG 指数联合传统危险因素用于 NH 筛查与临床风险分层,在识别 INH 中 TyG 指数可单独使用[Brier 分数:0.167 比 0.144,净获益:0.220~0.706 比 0.280~0.713(阈值 0.200~0.700)]。结论 TyG 指数与多种 NH 表型均呈独立正相关,其中对 INH 的识别效能最高。该关联在女性及老年人群中更为显著,且存在非线性趋势。

Abstract

Objective To investigate the association between the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index and nocturnal hypertension (NH), and to evaluate its value for identifying different NH phenotypes. Methods This cross-sectional study included 1 492 patients who visited the Hypertension Department of Tianjin Kanghui Hospital between September 2023 and July 2025. Based on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and antihypertensive medication use, participants were categorized into four groups: isolated nocturnal hypertension (INH), sustained day-night hypertension, other forms of NH (including treated patients with controlled daytime but elevated nighttime blood pressure, NH extending to morning hypertension, and elderly patients with orthostatic hypotension accompanied by nocturnal supine hypertension), and normal nocturnal blood pressure. Demographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, medical history, and laboratory parameters were collected to calculate the TyG index. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent association between the TyG index and NH as well as its subtypes, followed by interaction and stratified analyses. Restricted cubic spline models were applied to assess potential non-linear relationships. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate discriminatory performance, calibration, and clinical net benefit. Results Significant overall differences were observed among the four groups in demographic characteristics, medical history, blood pressure parameters, and metabolic indices (all P < 0.05). Multivariate ordinal logistic regression showed that after adjusting for confounders, each 1-unit increase in the TyG index was independently associated with higher odds of INH (OR = 7.14, 95%CI: 4.82 to 10.59), sustained day-night hypertension (OR = 4.70, 95%CI: 3.39 to 6.53), and other NH (OR = 3.99, 95%CI: 2.88 to 5.51). Stratified analysis indicated stronger associations in females and individuals aged ≥ 65 years. Restricted cubic spline analysis revealed a linear relationship between the TyG index and INH risk (adjusted P for non-linear = 0.755), while non-linear increasing trends were observed for other NH phenotypes. ROC analysis demonstrated that the TyG index had good discriminatory ability for all NH types, with the highest performance for INH (AUC = 0.814, 95%CI: 0.778 to 0.850). Calibration and decision curve analyses supported the use of the TyG index combined with traditional risk factors for NH screening and clinical risk stratification, and suggested that the TyG index alone was adequate for identifying INH (Brier score: 0.167 vs. 0.144; net benefit: 0.220 to 0.706 vs. 0.280 to 0.713 at thresholds of 0.200 to 0.700). Conclusion The TyG index is independently and positively associated with multiple NH phenotypes, with the strongest predictive value for INH. This association is more pronounced in women and older adults and demonstrates a potential non-linear pattern across different NH types.

关键词

夜间高血压 / 单纯夜间高血压 / 临床表型 / 甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数

Key words

nocturnal hypertension / isolated nocturnal hypertension / clinical phenotype / triglyceride–glucose index

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
邹家亮,杜雨星,全滕皓,魏茂提,付家瑞,杨宁,李玉明. 甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与夜间高血压的关联及其识别不同夜间高血压临床表型的价值[J]. 中华高血压杂志(中英文), 2026, 34(7): 634-646 DOI:10.16439/j.issn.1673-7245.2025-0269

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Liu J, Li Y, Asayama K, et al. Asian expert consensus on NH management[J]. Hypertension, 2025, 82(6): 945-956.

[2]

中国高血压联盟《夜间高血压管理中国专家共识》委员会 . 夜间高血压管理中国专家共识[J]. 中华高血压杂志, 2023, 31(7): 610-618.

[3]

Joint Committee for Guideline Revision . 2018 Chinese guidelines for prevention and treatment of hypertension—a report of the Revision Committee of Chinese Guidelines for prevention and treatment of hypertension[J]. J Geriatr Cardiol, 2019, 16(3): 182-241.

[4]

Cheng Y, Li Y, Wang J . Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for the management of hypertension[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2022, 135(9): 1027-1035.

[5]

Barochiner J, Díaz RR, Martínez R . Prevalence and characteristics of isolated nocturnal hypertension and masked nocturnal hypertension in a tertiary hospital in the city of buenos aires[J]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2023, 13(8): 1-15.

[6]

Kario K, Hoshide S, Nagai M, et al. Sleep and cardiovascular outcomes in relation to NH: the J—HOP nocturnal blood pressure study[J]. Hypertens Res, 2021, 44(12): 1589-1596.

[7]

Kario K, Williams B . NH and heart failure: mechanisms, evidence, and new treatments[J]. Hypertension, 2021, 78(3): 564-577.

[8]

Yousefalizadeh S, Esmaili H, Jafarnejad S . A narrative review on the interplay between blood pressure, anxiety/depression, and probiotics: unraveling the underlying mechanisms[J]. Heart and Mind, 2024, 8(3): 194-205.

[9]

Fan HQ, Li Y, Thijs L, et al. Prognostic value of isolated nocturnal hypertension on ambulatory measurement in 8711 individuals from 10 populations[J]. J Hypertens, 2010, 28(10): 2036-2045.

[10]

Tao LC, Xu JN, Wang TT, et al. Triglyceride—glucose index as a marker in cardiovascular diseases: landscape and limitations[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2022, 21(1): 68.

[11]

Li W, Shen C, Kong W et al. Association between the triglyceride glucose—body mass index and future cardiovascular disease risk in a population with cardiovascular—kidney—metabolic syndrome stage 0—3: a nationwide prospective cohort study[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2024, 23(1): 1-11.

[12]

Che B, Zhong C, Zhang R, et al. Triglyceride—glucose index and triglyceride to high—density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio as potential cardiovascular disease risk factors: an analysis of UK biobank data[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2023, 22(1): 34.

[13]

Miroslawska AK, Gjessing PF, Solbu MD, et al. Metabolic effects two years after renal denervation in insulin resistant hypertensive patients. The Re—Shape CV—risk study[J]. Clin Nutr, 2021, 40(4): 1503-1509.

[14]

Brown A, Gandy S, McCrimmon R, et al. A randomized controlled trial of dapagliflozin on left ventricular hypertrophy in people with type two diabetes: the DAPA—LVH trial[J]. Eur Heart J, 2020, 41(36): 3421-3432.

[15]

Huang Z, Ding X, Yue Q, et al. Triglyceride—glucose index trajectory and stroke incidence in patients with hypertension: a prospective cohort study[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2022, 21(1): 141.

[16]

Huang Y, Zhou Y, Xu Y, et al. Inflammatory markers link triglyceride—glucose index and obesity indicators with adverse cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension: insights from three cohorts[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2025, 24(1): 11.

[17]

GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators . Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990—2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019[J]. Lancet, 2020, 396(10258): 1223-1249.

[18]

Hao G, Wang X, Chen Z et al. Prevalence of heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction in China: the China hypertension survey, 2012—2015[J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2019, 21(11): 1329-1337.

[19]

Drucker AM, Hollestein L, Na Y, et al. Association between antihypertensive medications and risk of skin cancer in people older than 65 years: a population—based study[J]. CMAJ, 2021, 193(15): E508-E516.

[20]

Jaeger BC, Booth JN 3rd, Butler M, et al. Development of predictive equations for NH and nondipping systolic blood pressure[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2020, 9(2): e013696.

[21]

Narita K, Hoshide S, Ae R, et al. Simple predictive score for NH and masked NH using home blood pressure monitoring in clinical practice[J]. J Hypertens, 2022, 40(8): 1513-1521.

[22]

Vickers AJ, Van Calster B, Steyerberg EW . Net benefit approaches to the evaluation of prediction models, molecular markers, and diagnostic tests[J]. BMJ, 2016, 352(6): 1-5.

[23]

Liu X, Tan Z, Huang Y, et al. Relationship between the triglyceride—glucose index and risk of cardiovascular diseases and mortality in the general population: a systematic review and meta—analysis[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2022, 21(1): 124.

[24]

王志军, 张士博, 刘杰, . 高血压患者三酰甘油葡萄糖体质量指数与夜间高血压的相关性分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2025, 28(18): 2212-2221.

[25]

Wang L, Zhou B, Zhao Z, et al. Body—mass index and obesity in urban and rural China: findings from consecutive nationally representative surveys during 2004—2018[J]. Lancet, 2021, 398(10294): 53-63.

[26]

Kachur S, Morera R, De Schutter A, et al. Cardiovascular risk in patients with prehypertension and the metabolic syndrome[J]. Curr Hypertens Rep, 2018, 20(2): 15.

[27]

Camargo PF, Ditomaso—Luporini L, Tinoco Arêas GP, et al. Impact of obstructive sleep apnea on cardiac autonomic control during the respiratory sinus arrhythmia maneuver in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Heart and Mind, 2023, 7(2): 80-88.

[28]

Franklin SS, O'Brien E, Staessen JA . Masked hypertension: understanding its complexity[J]. Eur Heart J, 2017, 38(15): 1112-1118.

[29]

Feng T, Ou Q, Shan G, et al. Sleep—disordered breathing and metabolic syndrome across gender, age, and sleep subtypes in East Asians[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2025, 16: 1519638.

[30]

Stewart NR, Heiston EM, Miller SL, et al. Role of blood pressure responses to exercise and vascular insulin sensitivity with nocturnal blood pressure dipping in metabolic syndrome[J]. J Vasc Res, 2022, 59(3): 151-162.

[31]

Nolde JM, Kiuchi MG, Lugo—Gavidia LM, et al. NH: a common phenotype in a tertiary clinical setting associated with increased arterial stiffness and central blood pressure[J]. J Hypertens, 2021, 39(2): 250-258.

[32]

Nayak SS, Kuriyakose D, Polisetty LD, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of triglyceride glucose index: a comprehensive evaluation of meta—analysis[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2024, 23(1): 310.

[33]

Xin F, He S, Zhou Y, et al. The triglyceride glucose index trajectory is associated with hypertension: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2023, 22(1): 347.

[34]

Mallamaci F, Torino C, Tripepi G . Hypertension burden in CKD: is NH the primary culprit?[J]. Clin Kidney J, 2025, 18(9): sfaf229.

[35]

中国高血压防治指南修订委员会, 高血压联盟 (中国), 中国医疗保健国际交流促进会高血压病学分会 . 中国高血压防治指南(2024 年修订版)[J]. 中华高血压杂志 (中英文), 2024, 32(7): 603-700.

[36]

杨雅涵, 黄刚 . 夜间高血压伴射血分数保留型心力衰竭的研究进展[J]. 中华高血压杂志 (中英文), 2025, 33(9): 828-840.

[37]

Maruhashi T, Kinoshita Y, Ozono R, et al. Association between estimated daily salt intake from spot urine and nocturnal blood pressure in hypertensive patients under antihypertensive treatment[J]. Am J Hypertens, 2025, 38(10): 818-825.

基金资助

中华医学会心血管病学分会临床研究专项基金(CSCF2023A02)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1186KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/