《职业人群健康管理专家共识(2026)》计划书

职业人群健康管理专家共识工作组

中华高血压杂志(中英文) ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8) : 709 -712.

PDF (698KB)
中华高血压杂志(中英文) ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8) : 709 -712. DOI: 10.16439/j.issn.1673-7245.2026-0212
指南与共识计划书

《职业人群健康管理专家共识(2026)》计划书

作者信息 +

The plan of “Expert consensus on health management among occupational population(2026)”

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (713K)

摘要

职业人群健康直接影响国家经济发展和社会稳定,目前职业人群健康管理仍存在管理体系不完善、管理内容覆盖不足、缺乏专业性指导文件等问题,严重影响了职业人群健康促进。为进一步规范职业人群健康监测、评估和管理,由开滦总医院等机构组织国内职业人群健康管理专家成立共识工作组,拟开展《职业人群健康管理专家共识》制订工作。本计划书详细阐述了共识制订的背景、目的、目标人群、使用人群、共识制订组成员、健康管理问题的收集与遴选、证据的检索与评价,以及推荐意见的形成等共识制订方法和过程,旨在为科学制订该共识提供指导性的实施方案。

Abstract

The health of the occupational population directly affects the socio-economic development and stability of the country. However, there are problems such as incomplete management systems, incomplete management content and lack of professional health management guidelines, which seriously affect the health promotion in occupational population. To further standardize the health monitoring, evaluation, and management in occupational population, Kailuan General Hospital and other institutions formed a consensus working group with Chinese health management experts. The group aims to formulate the expert consensus on health management among occupational population. This protocol provides a comprehensive overview of the background, objectives, target population, intended users, members of the consensus working group, the process of collecting and selecting health management issues, evidence retrieval and evaluation, and the development of consensus, in order to provide a guiding implementation plan for the scientific development of the consensus.

关键词

职业人群 / 健康管理 / 专家共识 / 计划书

Key words

occupational population / health management / expert consensus / plan

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
职业人群健康管理专家共识工作组. 《职业人群健康管理专家共识(2026)》计划书[J]. 中华高血压杂志(中英文), 2026, 34(8): 709-712 DOI:10.16439/j.issn.1673-7245.2026-0212

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

国家电网公司北京电力医院, 国网山东省电力公司电力科学研究院, 航天中心医院 . 工作场所职业人群健康管理指南[J]. 健康体检与管理20234(2): 91-100.

[2]

中华人民共和国统计局 . 中国统计年鉴 2025[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2025.

[3]

GBD 2023 Disease and Injury and Risk Factor Collaborators . Burden of 375 diseases and injuries, risk-attributable burden of 88 risk factors, and healthy life expectancy in 204 countries and territories, including 660 subnational locations, 1990-2023: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023[J]. Lancet2025406(10513): 1873-1922.

[4]

Wang Z, Wang X, Shen Y, et al. Effect of a workplace-based multicomponent intervention on hypertension control: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Cardiol2020, 5(5): 567-575.

[5]

Wang Y, Zhao L, Gao L, et al. Health policy and public health implications of obesity in China[J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol20219(7): 446-461.

[6]

张秀琴, 张小聪, 王冬燕 . 我国职业人群抑郁现状及影响因素[J]. 循证护理202612(2): 385-390.

[7]

Arena R, Arnett DK, Terry PE, et al. The role of worksite health screening: a policy statement from the American Heart Association[J]. Circulation2014130(8): 719-734.

[8]

陈耀龙, 杨克虎, 王小钦, . 中国制订/修订临床诊疗指南的指导原则 (2022 版)[J]. 中华医学杂志2022102(10): 697-703.

[9]

单帅帅, 王庆伟, 文建国 . 临床指南和专家共识的基本概念与制定规范[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志202041(2): 107-111.

[10]

《企业员工健康管理机构建设与服务规范专家共识》专家组 . 企业员工健康管理机构建设与服务规范专家共识 (2026)[J]. 数字医学与健康20264(2): 108-114.

[11]

OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group . The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence[EB/OL]. [2026-06-09]. https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/files/levels-of-evidence/cebm-levels-of-evidence-2-1.pdf.

[12]

高深甚, 王瑞平 . 德尔菲专家会商法在定性研究中的应用[J]. 上海医药202445(7): 41-44, 70.

[13]

Chen Y, Yang K, Marušic A, et al. A reporting tool for practice guidelines in health care: the RIGHT statement[J]. Ann Intern Med2017166(2): 128-132.

[14]

李昊东, 赵俊贤, 秦艺珊, . 生物医学领域共识方法报告规范(ACCORD) 解读[J]. 协和医学杂志202617(2): 534-545.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (698KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/