松基比对巨厚松散层下开采地表移动影响研究——以菏泽矿区为例

聂浩然 ,  何春桂 ,  刘辉 ,  苏丽娟 ,  朱晓峻 ,  张鹏飞

河北工程大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3) : 95 -104.

PDF (8122KB)
河北工程大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3) : 95 -104. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9469.2026.03.011

松基比对巨厚松散层下开采地表移动影响研究——以菏泽矿区为例

作者信息 +

Research on the Impact of Loose-to-Base Ratio on Surface Movement of Mining Under the Thick Loose Layer: Taking Heze Mining Area as an Example

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (8316K)

摘要

为深入研究巨厚松散层下开采的地表移动规律,以山东菏泽矿区为例,基于地表变形现场实测数据,采用 FLAC3D 软件建立了 12 种不同松基比(0.25 ~ 5.00)下的数值计算模型。获取了地表变形参数,分析了覆岩应力与地表变形特征,研究了地表变形参数的变化规律。结果表明:(1)受巨厚松散层和含水层失水沉降的耦合影响,地表下沉系数偏大,地表沉陷响应较迅速,起动距为 0.2H(H 为平均深度)。下沉盆地边界区域的衰退特征明显,下沉盆地范围先急剧扩张随后减缓直至最终收敛。(2)在采深不变的情况下,当松基比不断增大时,地表下沉系数先增大后减小,水平移动系数先增大后减小最终趋于稳定,主要影响角正切先增大后减小。松基比为 1.50~2.00 时,地表变形达最大值。(3)采空区中心上方覆岩破坏以拉破坏为主,随松基比增大拉应力先增大后减小。采空区边界上方由拉应力和压应力共同作用,采空区两侧压应力随松基比增大而减小。

Abstract

In order to deeply study the surface movement law during mining under a thick loose layer, taking the Heze mining area in Shandong Province as an example and based on the field measurements of surface deformation, 12 numerical models were established using FLAC 3D at different thickness ratios of the loose layer to the bedrock (hereinafter referred to as the loose-to-base ratios) ranging from 0.25 to 5.00. The surface deformation parameters were obtained, analyses were carried out on the stress of the overlying rock and the characteristics of surface deformation, and studies were conducted on the variation law of the surface deformation parameters. The results are as follows: (1) The surface subsidence coefficient is relatively large and the surface subsidence response is rapid because of the combined influence of the thick loose layer and the aquifer subsidence caused by water loss. The starting distance is 0.2H (H represents the average depth). The recession characteristics of the boundary area of the subsidence basin are obvious, and expand rapidly first and then slow down until finally converging. (2) When the mining depth remains constant, as the loose-to-base ratio keeps rising, the subsidence coefficient initially goes up and then declines. The horizontal movement coefficient first increases, subsequently decreases, and ultimately becomes stable. The tangent of the main influence angle also shows an upward-then-downward trend. It is found that when the loose-to-base ratio ranges from 1.50 to 2.00, the surface deformation attains its peak value. (3) Above the center of the goaf, the failure of the overlying rock is mainly tensile failure. As the loose-to-base ratio increases, the tensile stress first increases and then decreases. Above the boundary of the goaf, it is affected by both tensile and compressive stresses. The compressive stresses on both sides of the goaf decrease as the loose-to-base ratio increases.

关键词

巨厚松散层 / 开采沉陷 / 数值模拟 / 地表变形参数 / 松基比

Key words

thick loose layer / mining subsidence / numerical simulation / surface deformation parameters / loose-to-base ratio

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
聂浩然,何春桂,刘辉,苏丽娟,朱晓峻,张鹏飞. 松基比对巨厚松散层下开采地表移动影响研究——以菏泽矿区为例[J]. 河北工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 43(3): 95-104 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-9469.2026.03.011

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

BEHERA S K, MISHRA D P, GHOSH C N, et al. Characterization of lead—zinc mill tailings, fly ash and their mixtures for paste backfilling in underground metalliferous mines[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2019, 78(14): 394.

[2]

李飞, 周家兴, 王金安 . 深部多场耦合作用的非线性地应力构建方法[J]. 煤炭学报, 2021, 46(S1): 116-129.

[3]

LI F, ZHOU J X, WANG J A . Method of nonlinear in—situ stress construction with deep multi—field coupling[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2021, 46(S1): 116-129.

[4]

王家臣, 唐岳松, 王兆会, . 千米深井综采工作面覆岩微震显现特征与损伤度计算方法[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2023, 52(3): 417-431.

[5]

WANG J C, TANG Y S, WANG Z H, et al. Characteristics of microseismic events and damage degree calculation method in kilometer deep fully mechanical longwall panel[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2023, 52(3): 417-431.

[6]

YANG S Q, CHEN M, JING H W, et al. A case study on large deformation failure mechanism of deep soft rock roadway in Xin′An coal mine, China[J]. Engineering Geology, 2017, 217: 89-101.

[7]

余华婷, 秦续峰, 李云昊, . 深部开采条件下地表沉陷规律研究[J]. 科技风, 2023(27): 74-77+129.

[8]

YU H T, QIN X F, LI Y H, et al. Study on surface subsidence law under deep mining conditions[J]. Technology Wind, 2023(27): 74-77+129.

[9]

王永华, 张旺, 张代军, . 东部矿区开采深度对地表移动参数的影响规律研究[J]. 中国矿业, 2020, 29(8): 133-137.

[10]

WANG Y H, ZHANG W, ZHANG D J, et al. Influences of surface movement parameters due to mining depth in eastern mining area[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2020, 29(8): 133-137.

[11]

郭玉芳, 孟凡迪, 陈俊杰 . 厚松散层开采条件下地表沉陷数值模拟分析[J]. 煤炭工程, 2014, 46(6): 103-105.

[12]

GUO Y F, MENG F D, CHEN J J . Numerical simulation analysis on surface subsidence mining under thick alluvial[J]. Coal Engineering, 2014, 46(6): 103-105.

[13]

张广超, 陶广哲, 孟祥军, . 巨厚松散层下软弱覆岩破坏规律[J]. 煤炭学报, 2022, 47(11): 3998-4010.

[14]

ZHANG G C, TAO G Z, MENG X J, et al. Failure law of weak overburden stratum underlying extra—thick alluvium[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(11): 3998-4010.

[15]

ZHOU D W, WU K, MIAO X X, et al. Combined prediction model for mining subsidence in coal mining areas covered with thick alluvial soil layer[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2018, 77(1): 283-304.

[16]

万芳芳, 罗文柯, 李树清, . 厚松散层矿区地表动态移动预计研究[J]. 煤炭工程, 2018, 50(4): 105-109.

[17]

WAN F F, LUO W K, LI S Q, et al. Study on prediction of surface dynamic movement in thick unconsolidated mining area[J]. Coal Engineering, 2018, 50(4): 105-109.

[18]

李路 . 招贤矿侏罗系软弱覆岩导水裂缝带时空演化研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2019.

[19]

LI L . Spatiotemporal evolution of water flowing fractured zone in Jurassic weak overburden in Zhaoxian mine[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2019.

[20]

LIU W T, PANG L F, XU B C, et al. Study on overburden failure characteristics in deep thick loose seam and thick coal seam mining[J]. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 2020, 11(1): 632-653.

[21]

刘辉, 李玉, 苏丽娟, . 厚松散层薄基岩下开采地表变形规律——以鲁南矿区为例[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2023, 51(9): 11-23.

[22]

LIU H, LI Y, SU L J, et al. Surface deformation law of mining under thick loose layer and thin bedrock: taking the southern Shandong Mining Area as an example[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2023, 51(9): 11-23.

[23]

程桦, 彭世龙, 姚直书, . 厚松散层薄基岩地层井筒偏斜综合治理技术[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2023, 51(1): 260-271.

[24]

CHENG H, PENG S L, YAO Z S, et al. Comprehensive treatment technology for wellbore deflection in thick loose bed and thin bedrock formation[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2023, 51(1): 260-271.

[25]

程桦, 张亮亮, 姚直书, . 厚松散层薄基岩非对称开采井筒偏斜机理[J]. 煤炭学报, 2022, 47(1): 102-114.

[26]

CHENG H, ZHANG L L, YAO Z S, et al. Mechanism of shaft deflection caused by asymmetric mining in thin bedrock and deep loose strata[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(1): 102-114.

[27]

彭世龙, 程桦, 姚直书, . 厚松散层底含直覆薄基岩开采地表沉陷预计及特征研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2022, 47(12): 4417-4430.

[28]

PENG S L, CHENG H, YAO Z S, et al. Study on prediction and characteristics of surface subsidence in mining when the bottom aquifer of thick loose layer directly covers thin bedrock[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(12): 4417-4430.

[29]

徐祝贺, 朱润生, 何文瑞, . 厚松散层浅埋煤层大工作面开采沉陷模型研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2020, 37(2): 264-271.

[30]

XU Z H, ZHU R S, HE W R, et al. Subsidence model of large working face in shallow buried coal seam with thick loose layer[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2020, 37(2): 264-271.

[31]

隋旺华, 陈奇 . 简论煤层开采沉陷土体变形的研究意义、现状、机理及预测方法[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 1995, 6(1): 1-7.

[32]

SUI W H, CHEN Q . Simple comment on research meaning, present situation, mechanism of soil mass settlement deformation caused by coal bed mining and the way of forecast[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 1995, 6(1): 1-7.

[33]

袁勋 . 巨厚松散层下深部开采地表沉陷规律研究[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2018.

[34]

YUAN X. Study on law of ground subsidence in deep mining under extremely thick unconsolidated formation[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2018.

[35]

张杰, 王斌 . 浅埋间隔采空区隔离煤柱稳定性及覆岩失稳特征研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2020, 37(5): 936-942.

[36]

ZHANG J, WANG B . Stability of isolated coal pillar and overburden instability in shallow—buried interval gob[J]. Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering, 2020, 37(5): 936-942.

[37]

李树刚, 刘李东, 赵鹏翔, . 综采工作面覆岩压实区裂隙动态演化规律影响因素分析[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2022, 50(1): 95-104.

[38]

LI S G, LIU L D, ZHAO P X, et al. Analysis and application of fracture evolution law of overburden compacted area on fully—mechanized mining face under multiple factors[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2022, 50(1): 95-104.

[39]

王永辉, 冯园, 李兰兰 . 巨厚松散层下开采沉陷岩土体移动变形规律[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 47(6): 733-741.

[40]

WANG Y H, FENG Y, LI L L . Regularity of movement and deformation of rock and soil mass in mining subsidence under giant thick loose layer[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2020, 47(6): 733-741.

[41]

刘辉, 左建宇, 苏丽娟, . 巨厚含水松散层下开采地表移动变形规律研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2022, 50(5): 49-56.

[42]

LIU H, ZUO J Y, SU L J, et al. Study on surface movement and deformation laws in mining under thick water—bearing loose layer[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2022, 50(5): 49-56.

[43]

来兴平, 张旭东, 单鹏飞, . 厚松散层下三软煤层开采覆岩导水裂隙发育规律[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2021, 40(9): 1739-1750.

[44]

LAI X P, ZHANG X D, SHAN P F, et al. Study on development law of water—conducting fractures in overlying strata of three soft coal seam mining under thick loose layers[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, 40(9): 1739-1750.

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(52174156)

安徽省高校协同创新项目(GXXT-2020-055)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (8122KB)

3

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/