筒仓形地下车库地震响应分析

赵玉成 ,  白佳星 ,  王权 ,  陈思萌

河北工程大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4) : 1 -11.

PDF (18838KB)
河北工程大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4) : 1 -11. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9469.2026.04.001

筒仓形地下车库地震响应分析

作者信息 +

Earthquake Response Analysis of Silo-shaped Underground Parking Garage

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (19289K)

摘要

为研究地震作用下筒仓形地下车库结构响应的变化规律,基于振动台试验和数值模拟方法,通过监测结构应力分布、位移、变形响应以及加速度等指标,分析了不同入射方向、峰值加速度、加载频率的地震波对结构响应的影响。结果表明:不同入射方向地震波作用下,应力集中区域不变;水平地震波作用时,结构水平(平行于地面)方向响应大于竖向(重力方向),竖向地震波作用时则相反,楼板竖向响应明显;水平方向-竖向耦合地震波加剧土体振动,结构应力增大;峰值加速度变化不改变应力分布,但会使应力集中现象更显著;频率过高或过低,径向应力变化不大。综合来看,应力主要集中在筒壁与底板、柱与楼板连接处,是抗震设计重点区域。

Abstract

To study the variation law of the response of silo-shaped parking garages under the seismic action, vibration table tests and numerical simulation methods were employed. The effect of seismic waves with different incident directions, peak accelerations, and loading frequencies on the seismic response of the structure was analyzed by monitoring the stress distribution, displacement, deformation response, and acceleration of the structure. The results show that the stress concentration areas remain unchanged under different incident directions. When the horizontal seismic wave acts, the response of the structure in the horizontal direction (the direction parallel to the ground) is greater than that in the vertical direction (gravity direction), while when the vertical seismic wave acts, the opposite is true, and the vertical response of the floor slab is obvious. The horizontal-vertical coupled seismic wave intensifies the vibration of the soil and increases the structural stress. The change of peak acceleration does not cause a change in stress distribution, but will make the stress concentration phenomenon more significant. When the frequency is too high or too low, the change of radial stress is not significant. Overall, the stress mainly concentrates at the joints between the cylinder wall and the bottom plate, as well as those between the columns and the floor slabs, which are the key areas for aseismic design.

关键词

地震作用 / 筒仓形车库 / 应力分布 / 变形响应 / 时程分析

Key words

seismic action / silo-shaped parking garage / stress distribution / deformation response / time history analysis

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
赵玉成,白佳星,王权,陈思萌. 筒仓形地下车库地震响应分析[J]. 河北工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 43(4): 1-11 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-9469.2026.04.001

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

静安共和新路街道 : 代表联手破题小区“停车难”[J]. 上海人大月刊, 2024(7): 48.

[2]

Gonghexin Road Street,Jing′an:representatives join hands to solve the problem of "parking difficulties" in residential areas[J]. Shanghai Renda Yuekan, 2024(7): 48.

[3]

蒋蕾, 张向东, 邢景超, . 地下停车场建设的综述与展望[J]. 科技风, 2020(23): 101+112.

[4]

Jiang Lei, Zhang Xiangdong, Xing Jingchao, et al. Summary and prospect of underground parking lot construction[J]. Kejifeng, 2020(23): 101+112.

[5]

焦申华, 贾力宏, 李莹 . 北京市某地下车库基坑工程及事故处理[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 30(S1): 588-591.

[6]

Jiao Shenhua, Jia Lihong, Li Ying . Foundation pit project and its treatment of an underground garage in Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(S1): 588-591.

[7]

李庆来, 申伟强, 曹伟飚, . 上海国际会议中心地下车库兴建所产生的环境土工问题及对策[J]. 地下工程与隧道, 2001(3): 7-11+48.

[8]

Li Qinglai, Shen Weiqiang, Cao Weibiao, et al. Environmental geo-technique issues and solutions caused by deep excavation of underground garage of Shanghai international conference center[J]. Underground Engineering and Tunnels, 2001(3): 7-11+48.

[9]

李艳星 . 圆柱型停车库设计与建设实践研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2018.

[10]

Li Yanxing . Research on design and construction of cylindrical parking garage[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2018.

[11]

彭四明 . 圆筒状地下车库内力及变形数值模拟分析[D]. 郑州: 河南工业大学, 2016.

[12]

Peng Siming . Numerical simulation of internal forces and distortion analysis for the cylindrical underground garage[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan University of Technology, 2016.

[13]

魏奇科, 韩亮, 王振强, . 双仓地下管廊抗震性能振动台试验研究[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2021, 41(5): 1052-1061.

[14]

Wei Qike, Han Liang, Wang Zhenqiang, et al. Shaking table test study on seismic performance of double box underground utility tunnel[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2021, 41(5): 1052-1061.

[15]

韩俊艳, 王小强, 郭之科, . 纵向非一致激励下埋地管道的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2022, 41(6): 1256-1266.

[16]

Han Junyan, Wang Xiaoqiang, Guo Zhike, et al. Shaking table test of buried pipelines under longitudinal non-uniform excitation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 41(6): 1256-1266.

[17]

王彤辉, 李小军, 陈红娟, . 场地-隧道-地上建筑结构体系地震响应的振动台试验[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2023, 43(4): 742-751.

[18]

Wang Tonghui, Li Xiaojun, Chen Hongjuan, et al. Shaking table test of seismic response of site-tunnel-aboveground building structure system[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2023, 43(4): 742-751.

[19]

Rabeti Moghadam M, Baziar M H . Seismic ground motion amplification pattern induced by a subway tunnel: shaking table testing and numerical simulation[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 83: 81-97.

[20]

GB/T 50011-2010 建筑抗震设计标准[S].

[21]

GB/T 50011-2010 Standard for seismic design of buildings[S].

[22]

刘应慈 . 重塑软土震陷引起的单桩负摩阻力振动台试验对比研究[D]. 廊坊: 防灾科技学院, 2022.

[23]

Liu Yingci . Comparative study on shaking table test of single pile negative friction caused by seismic settlement of remolded soft soil[D]. Langfang: Institute of Disaster Prevention, 2022.

[24]

陈虹羽, 蒋关鲁, 何晓龙, . 正弦波与EL波作用下桩身土压力响应对比研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2023, 20(5): 1708-1717.

[25]

Chen Hongyu, Jiang Guanlu, He Xiaolong, et al. Comparative study on soil pressure response of pile under sine wave and EL wave[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2023, 20(5): 1708-1717.

[26]

徐鹏, 蒋关鲁, 邱俊杰, . 整体刚性面板加筋土挡墙振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 998-1004.

[27]

Xu Peng, Jiang Guanlu, Qiu Junjie, et al. Shaking table tests on reinforced soil retaining walls with full-height rigid facing[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 998-1004.

[28]

张庆龙 . 震撼日本的兵库县南部地震[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 1996(4): 24-26.

[29]

Zhang Qinglong . The Southern Hyogo prefecture earthquake that shook Japan[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 1996(4): 24-26.

[30]

李腾雁, 马宁, 严斌 . 日本阪神大地震概要[J]. 工程抗震, 1996(1): 34-38.

[31]

Li Tengyan, Ma Ning, Yan Bin . Summary of the great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake in Japan[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 1996(1): 34-38.

[32]

董凯, 米占宽 . 弹性和柔性地基上动力人工边界及地震动输入方法[J]. 水电能源科学, 2020, 38(5): 101-105.

[33]

Dong Kai, Mi Zhankuan . Seismic wave input methods of artificial boundary on elastic and flexible foundations[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2020, 38(5): 101-105.

[34]

薛景宏, 陆大伟, 李东瑞, . 地震波斜入射下埋地腐蚀管道地震响应分析[J]. 河北工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 41(4): 18-27+35.

[35]

Xue Jinghong, Lu Dawei, Li Dongrui, et al. Seismic response analysis of buried corroded pipelines under incident seismic waves[J]. Journal of Hebei University of Engineering (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 41(4): 18-27+35.

基金资助

中央引导地方科技发展资金项目(236Z5409G)

国家自然科学基金青年科学基金资助项目(52308458)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (18838KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/