网络欺凌情境下大学生感知严重性对旁观者助人意愿的影响:一个有调节的中介模型

Effecy of college students' perceived severity on bystander helping willingness in cyberbullying situations: a moderated mediation model

摘要

探讨网络欺凌情境下大学生感知严重性对旁观者助人意愿的影响及其心理机制.设置虚拟网络欺凌情景,采用感知严重性问卷、旁观者助人意愿问卷、感知责任问卷、防御自我效能感问卷对1022名大学生进行调查.结果显示:1)感知严重性能够显著正向预测旁观者助人意愿;2)感知责任在感知严重性与旁观者助人意愿之间起部分中介作用;3)防御自我效能感在感知严重性与感知责任之间起调节作用,当防御自我效能感较高时,感知严重性对感知责任的预测作用更强.研究认为,在网络欺凌情境下,旁观者感知严重性不仅直接影响旁观者助人意愿,而且通过感知责任间接影响旁观者助人意愿,防御自我效能感调节了中介效应的前半段路径.

Abstract

This study explored the impact of college students' perceived severity on bystander helping willingness in cyberbullying situations and its underlying psychological mechanisms. A simulated cyberbullying scenario was set up, and 1022 college students were surveyed using the Perceived Severity Scale, the Bystander Helping Willingness Scale, the Perceived Responsibility Scale, and the Defensive Self-efficacy Scale. The results showed that: 1) Perceived severity could significantly and positively predict bystander helping willingness. 2) Perceived responsibility played a partial mediating role between perceived severity and bystander helping willingness. 3) Defensive self-efficacy moderated the relationship between perceived severity and perceived responsibility. Specifically, when defensive self-efficacy was higher, the predictive effect of perceived severity on perceived responsibility was stronger. The research concludes that in cyberbullying situations, bystanders' perceived severity not only directly affects their helping willingness but also indirectly influences it through perceived responsibility. Defensive self-efficacy moderates the first half of this mediating pathway.

关键词

网络欺凌 / 感知严重性 / 感知责任 / 防御自我效能感 / 旁观者助人意愿

Key words

cyberbullying / perceived severity / perceived responsibility / defensive self-efficacy / bystander helping willingness

参考文献

[1] HINDUJA S, PATCHIN J W. Connecting adolescent suicide to the severity of bullying and cyberbullying[J]. Journal of School Violence, 2019, 18(3): 333-346.

[2] ZENG Y Z, XIAO J Z, LI D F, et al. The influence of victim self-disclosure on bystander intervention in cyberbullying[J]. Behavioral Sciences, 2023, 13(10): 829.

[3] SCHNEIDER S K, O'DONNELL L, STUEVE A, et al. Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: a regional census of high school students[J]. American Journal of Public Health, 2012, 102(1): 171-177.

[4] HUANG J Y, ZHONG Z H, ZHANG H Y, et al. Cyberbullying in social media and online games among Chinese college students and its associated factors[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(9): 4819.

[5] YUDES C, REY L, EXTREMERA N. Predictive factors of cyberbullying perpetration amongst Spanish adolescents[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(11): 3967.

[6] SAMPASA-KANYINGA H, ROUMELIOTIS P, XU H. Associations between cyberbullying and school bullying victimization and suicidal ideation, plans and attempts among Canadian schoolchildren[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(7): e102145.

[7] 石绪亮, 朱亚, 张耀倩, 等. 大学生网络受欺凌经历与自杀行为的关系:睡眠障碍与抑郁症状的链式中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2020, 28(6): 1125-1129.

[8] BAI Q Y, HUANG S, HSUEH F H, et al. Cyberbullying victimization and suicide ideation: a crumbled belief in a just world[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2021, 120: 106679.

[9] KOWALSKI R M, LIMBER S P. Electronic bullying among middle school students[J]. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2007, 41(6): S22-S30.

[10] MACHACKOVA H. Bystander reactions to cyberbullying and cyberaggression: individual, contextual, and social factors[J]. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2020, 36: 130-134.

[11] WANG S. Standing up or standing by: bystander intervention in cyberbullying on social media[J]. New Media & Society, 2021, 23(6): 1379-1397.

[12] 黄勖喆, 褚晓伟, 刘庆奇, 等. 网络欺负中的旁观者行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1248-1257.

[13] SLONJE R, SMITH P K, FRISÉN A. The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, 29(1): 26-32.

[14] ANDERSON J, BRESNAHAN M, MUSATICS C. Combating weight-based cyberbullying on Facebook with the dissenter effect[J]. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 2014, 17(5): 281-286.

[15] RUNIONS K, SHAPKA J D, DOOLEY J, et al. Cyber-aggression and victimization and social information processing: integrating the medium and the message[J]. Psychology of Violence, 2013, 3(1): 9-26.

[16] 耿耀国, 赵卓, 郭银梅, 等. 网络受欺凌对消极情绪的影响:感知严重性的中介作用和马基雅维利主义的调节作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2024, 32(4): 761-766.

[17] VAN NOORDEN T H J, BUKOWSKI W M, HASELAGER G J T, et al. Disentangling the frequency and severity of bullying and victimization in the association with empathy[J]. Social Development, 2016, 25(1): 176-192.

[18] GAHAGAN K, VATERLAUS J M, FROST L R. College student cyberbullying on social networking sites: conceptualization, prevalence, and perceived bystander responsibility[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016, 55: 1097-1105.

[19] KOEHLER C, WEBER M. Do I really need to help?! Perceived severity of cyberbullying, victim blaming, and bystanders' willingness to help the victim[J]. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2018, 12(4): Article 4.

[20] 褚晓伟. 网络欺负中的旁观者效应:基于网络群组的研究[D].武汉:华中师范大学, 2020.

[21] CRAIG W, PEPLER D, BLAIS J. Responding to bullying: What works?[J]. School Psychology International, 2007, 28(4): 465-477.

[22] BASTIAENSENS S, VANDEBOSCH H, POELS K, et al. Cyberbullying on social network sites. An experimental study into bystanders' behavioural intentions to help the victim or reinforce the bully[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 31: 259-271.

[23] FISCHER P, KRUEGER J I, GREITEMEYER T, et al. The bystander-effect: a meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 2011, 137(4): 517-537.

[24] HUANG L, LI W Q, XU Z K, et al. The severity of cyberbullying affects bystander intervention among college students: the roles of feelings of responsibility and empathy[J]. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 2023, 16: 893-903.

[25] ZHANG Q, LIU C C, WANG Z H, et al. The college students' sense of responsibility for innovation and entrepreneurship[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, 11: 2049.

[26] OBERMAIER M, FAWZI N, KOCH T. Bystanding or standing by? How the number of bystanders affects the intention to intervene in cyberbullying[J]. New Media & Society, 2016, 18(8): 1491-1507.

[27] THORNBERG R, WÄNSTRÖM L, HONG J S, et al. Classroom relationship qualities and social-cognitive correlates of defending and passive bystanding in school bullying in Sweden: a multilevel analysis[J]. Journal of School Psychology, 2017, 63: 49-62.

[28] BANDURA A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change[J]. Psychological Review, 1977, 84(2): 191-215.

[29] BERMAN S G. Children's social consciousness and the development of social responsibility[M]. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.

[30] CASEY E A, LINDHORST T, STORER H L. The situational-cognitive model of adolescent bystander behavior: modeling bystander decision-making in the context of bullying and teen dating violence[J]. Psychology of Violence, 2017, 7(1): 33-44.

[31] CHEN Y L, WANG S Y, LIU S, et al. Belief in a just world and bullying defending behavior among adolescents: roles of self-efficacy and responsibility[J]. Current Psychology, 2023, 42(25): 21532-21540.

[32] 马倩倩. 网络欺负中受害者反应影响旁观者行为的心理机制研究[D].武汉:华中师范大学, 2022.

[33] CLARK M, BUSSEY K. The role of self-efficacy in defending cyberbullying victims[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2020, 109: 106340.

[34] ZHAO Y J, CHU X W, RONG K X. Cyberbullying experience and bystander behavior in cyberbullying incidents: the serial mediating roles of perceived incident severity and empathy[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2023, 138: 107484.

[35] WANG S, KIM K J. Effects of victimization experience, gender, and empathic distress on bystanders' intervening behavior in cyberbullying[J]. The Social Science Journal, 2024, 61(4): 853-862.

[36] OLENIK-SHEMESH D, HEIMAN T, EDEN S. Bystanders' behavior in cyberbullying episodes: active and passive patterns in the context of personal-socio-emotional factors[J]. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2017, 32(1): 23-48.

[37] FISCHER P, GREITEMEYER T, POLLOZEK F, et al. The unresponsive bystander: Are bystanders more responsive in dangerous emergencies?[J]. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2006, 36(2): 267-278.

[38] 李亦菲, 王喆. 旁观者助人行为“阶段动机模型”的建构与应用[J]. 中小学心理健康教育, 2024(12): 4-8.

[39] FEHR E, FISCHBACHER U. Third-party punishment and social norms[J]. Evolution and Human Behavior, 2004, 25(2): 63-87.

[40] CHU X W, ZHAO Y J, LI X, et al. The sense of responsibility and bystanders' prosocial behavior in cyberbullying: the mediating role of compassion and the moderating roles of moral outrage and moral disgust[J]. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2024, 18(3): Article 8.

[41] TAYLOR S E, BROWN J D. Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1988, 103(2): 193-210.

基金资助

河南省社会科学界联合会调研课题(SKL-2025-340)