强光对小白菜光合作用能力的影响

赵颖 ,  张厂 ,  王旭

热带生物学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4) : 656 -664.

PDF (624KB)
热带生物学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4) : 656 -664. DOI: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20250047
植物保护

强光对小白菜光合作用能力的影响

作者信息 +

Effect of high light on the photosynthetic capacity of bok choy (Brassica campestris ssp. chinensis)

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (638K)

摘要

为探究强光对小白菜光合作用能力的影响,本研究以海南地区主栽小白菜品种‘华王’和‘矮脚黄’为材料,通过 LED 模拟强光 (1 500 μmol·m−2·s−1),探究强光对小白菜光合作用能力的影响。结果表明,强光处理初期(0~5 d),两品种净光合速率(Pn)、气孔导度(Gs)和蒸腾速率(Tr)显著升高,胞间 CO2 浓度(Ci)下降;但长期强光(5~20 d)导致 Pn、Gs、Tr 持续下降,Ci 趋于稳定。强光处理 10 d 的光响应曲线显示,‘华王’和‘矮脚黄’两个品种小白菜叶片的最大净光合速率(Pnmax)均显著提升,表观量子效率 AQY 显著下降。强光下两个品种的光系统Ⅱ(PSⅡ)最大光能转化效率 Fv/Fm、实际光量子产量 ΦPSⅡ和光化学淬灭系数(qP)显著下降,‘矮脚黄’降幅更大;两个品种的非光化学猝灭系数 NPQ 在强光处理 5 d 时显著升高,但长期强光处理下 NPQ 及调节性能量耗散量子产量 Y(NPQ) 下降,而非调节性能量耗散量子产量 Y(NO) 持续上升;此外,强光下电子传递速率 ETR 在‘华王’中呈先升后降趋势,而‘矮脚黄’持续下降。综合分析表明,‘华王’在长期强光下的光系统修复能力表现出更强适应性,而‘矮脚黄’虽短期响应迅速,但光保护机制较弱。

Abstract

Two main varieties of bok choy cultivated in Hainan, ‘Huawang’ and ‘Aijiaohuang’ were selected to investigate the effects of high light on their photosynthetic capacity. High light stress was simulated using LEDs at an intensity of 1 500 μmol·m−2·s−1. The results indicated that the high light treatment significantly increased the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), and transpiration rate (Tr) of both the bok choy varieties, ‘Huawang’ and ‘Aijiaohuang,’ at the initial stage (0~5 days), and decreased the intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci). However, prolonged high light stress (5~20 days) led to a continuous decline in Pn, Gs, and Tr, and Ci tended to stabilize. The light response curve after 10 days of high light treatment showed that the maximum net photosynthetic rate (Pnmax) of the leaves in both the bok choy varieties was significantly increased, while the apparent quantum efficiency (AQY) significantly decreased. Under high light, both the bok choy varieties decreased significantly in maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem Ⅱ (PSⅡ) represented by Fv/Fm, actual photochemical quantum yield (ΦPSII), and photochemical quenching coefficient (qP), with a greater decline observed in Aijiaohuang. The non-photochemical quenching coefficient (NPQ) of both the varieties significantly increased at 5 days of high light stress, but under prolonged high light stress, NPQ and the regulated energy dissipation quantum yield Y(NPQ) decreased, while the unregulated energy dissipation quantum yield Y(NO) continuously increased. Moreover, the electron transport rate (ETR) under high light showed an initial increase followed by a decrease in the bok choy variety Huawang, while the ETR continuously declined in Aijiaohuang. Overall analysis indicated that Huawang exhibited a higher adaptive capacity for photosystem repair under prolonged high light conditions, whereas Aijiaohuang responded rapidly in the short term but demonstrated a weaker photoprotection mechanism.

关键词

小白菜 / 强光处理 / 光合速率 / 叶绿素荧光

Key words

bok choy / high light treatment / photosynthetic rate / chlorophyll fluorescence

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
赵颖,张厂,王旭. 强光对小白菜光合作用能力的影响[J]. 热带生物学报, 2026, 17(4): 656-664 DOI:10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20250047

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

罗蛟, 丁新宇, 徐燕妮, 等. 生长光强对黄瓜叶片光合机构活性影响研究[J]. 植物生理学报, 2022, 58(9): 1790-1800. https://doi.org/10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.100038

[2]

王玉卓, 谷宇琛, 巢建国, 等. 强光胁迫对茅苍术生长、生理生化及关键酶基因表达的影响[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2020, 26(10): 119-127. https://doi.org/10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20201011

[3]

陈建明, 俞晓平, 程家安. 叶绿素荧光动力学及其在植物抗逆生理研究中的应用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2006, 18(1): 51-55. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2006.01.012

[4]

陈子义, 赵硕, 章竞瑾, 等. 光照强度对普通白菜生长特性及膳食纤维含量的影响[J]. 上海农业学报, 2021, 37(6): 10-15. https://doi.org/10.15955/j.issn1000-3924.2021.06.03

[5]

丁娟娟, 杨振超, 王鹏勃, 等. LED 光强对不结球小白菜生长与光合特性的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 43(3): 113-118. https://doi.org/10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2015.03.007

[6]

Samuolienė G, Brazaitytė A, Jankauskienė J, et al. LED irradiance level affects growth and nutritional quality of Brassica microgreens[J]. Open Life Sciences, 2013, 8(12): 1241-1249. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-013-0246-1

[7]

Schuster M, Yang G, Schöttler M A, et al. Limited responsiveness of chloroplast gene expression during acclimation to high light in tobacco[J]. Plant Physiology, 2019, 182(1): 424-435. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.19.00953

[8]

Kim T W, Michniewicz M, Bergmann D C, et al. Brassinosteroid regulates stomatal development by GSK3-mediated inhibition of a MAPK pathway[J]. Nature, 2012, 482(7385): 419-422. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10794

[9]

Vaistij F E, Goldschmidt-clermont M, Wostrikoff K, et al. Stability determinants in the chloroplast psbB/T/H mRNAs of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [J]. The Plant Journal, 2000, 21(5): 469-482. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00700.x

[10]

李雯琳, 郁继华, 张国斌, 等. LED 光源不同光质对叶用莴苣幼苗叶片气体参数和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2010, 45(1): 47-51. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-4315.2010.01.010

[11]

吴琼. 香果树对高光胁迫的生理响应及转录组分析[D]. 上海: 上海应用技术大学, 2023. doi: 10.27801/d.cnki.gshyy.2023.000385

[12]

付倩倩, 李航霄, 吴海龙, 等. 光强对缘管浒苔 (Ulva linza) 光合生理特性和短期温度效应的影响 [J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2018, 49(5): 967-974. https://doi.org/10.11693/hyhz20180400074

[13]

徐凯, 郭延平, 张上隆, 等. 草莓叶片光合作用对强光的响应及其机理研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(1): 73-78.

[14]

柴胜丰, 韦霄, 史艳财, 等. 强光胁迫对濒危植物金花茶幼苗生长和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 植物研究, 2012, 32(2): 159-164.

[15]

林琭, 李志强, 蔚露, 等. 苹果两种树形叶片对光强和 CO2 浓度互作的光合响应及光抑制特性 [J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(11): 2073-2085. https://doi.org/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2020-0062

[16]

高璐, 李晓锋, 董言笑, 等. 不结球白菜光合作用及叶绿素荧光参数分析[J/OL]. 分子植物育种, 2023, 23: 1-8.

[17]

庞强强, 孙晓东, 蔡兴来, 等. 海南夏秋季设施叶菜栽培技术[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2021(5): 27-28.

[18]

黄俊, 郭世荣, 吴震, 等. 6 个不结球白菜品种光合作用特性的研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2006, 26(6): 1183-1189. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2006.06.015

[19]

秦舒浩, 王娜, 张文莉. 高温强光胁迫对西葫芦幼苗光合生理特性及荧光参数的影响[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2011, 32(1): 26-29.

[20]

邹琦, 许长成, 赵世杰, 等. 午间强光胁迫下 SOD 对大豆叶片光合机构的保护作用[J]. 植物生理学报, 1995, 21(4): 397-401.

[21]

曾光辉. 杨梅光抑制的研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2004.

[22]

孙永娣, 王玉卓, 谷巍, 等. 强光胁迫对茅苍术光合荧光参数的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2021(22): 112-116. https://doi.org/10.11937/bfyy.20211111

[23]

冯建灿, 张玉洁. 喜树光合速率日变化及其影响因子的研究[J]. 林业科学, 2002, 38(4): 34-39. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2002.04.006

[24]

王翼龙. 黄土高原半干旱区两典型林分主要树种光合耗水特性及影响因素研究[D]. 杨凌: 中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心), 2010.

[25]

王亚楠, 董丽娜, 丁彦芬, 等. 遮阴对 4 种紫堇属植物光合特性和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 应用生态学, 2020, 31(3): 769-777. https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202003.004

[26]

高渐飞, 周玮, 孙燕, 等. 干旱胁迫对药用植物马比木叶片光合特性的影响[J]. 信阳师范学院学报(自然科学版), 2022, 35(4): 549-556. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-0972.2022.04.006

[27]

潘月, 张宪权, 叶康, 等. 不同八仙花品种对遮阴和强光处理的生理响应与评价[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 50(1): 36-48. https://doi.org/10.13323/j.cnki.j.fafu(nat.sci.).2021.01.006

[28]

冯建灿, 胡秀丽, 毛训甲. 叶绿素荧光动力学在研究植物逆境生理中的应用[J]. 经济林研究, 2002, 20(4): 14-18. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-8981.2002.04.004

[29]

Barták M, Hájek J, Vráblíková H, et al. High-light stress and photoprotection in Umbilicaria antarctica monitored by chlorophyll fluorescence imaging and changes in zeaxanthin and glutathione [J]. Plant Biology, 2004, 6(3): 333-341. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-820877

[30]

Sáez P L, Bravo L A, Latsague M I, et al. Light energy management in micropropagated plants of Castanea sativa, effects of photoinhibition [J]. Plant Science, 2013, 201-202: 12-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.11.008

[31]

师生波, 陈文杰, 师瑞, 等. 青海香日德农业区春小麦旗叶 PSⅡ光化学效率及对强太阳光的适应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(9): 2613-2622. https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.20140618.004

[32]

Osório M L, Osório J, Romano A. Photosynthesis, energy partitioning, and metabolic adjustments of the endangered Cistaceae species Tuberaria major under high temperature and drought [J]. Photosynthetica, 2013, 51(1): 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-012-0080-0

[33]

杜尧东, 李键陵, 王华, 等. 高温胁迫对水稻剑叶光合和叶绿素荧光特征的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(10): 2541-2548. https://doi.org/10.13292/j.1000-4890.2012.0365

[34]

宋旭丽, 胡春梅, 孟静静, 等. NaCl 胁迫加重强光胁迫下超大甜椒叶片的光系统 II 和光系统 I 的光抑制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(6): 681-686.

[35]

卢广超, 许建新, 薛立, 等. 低温胁迫对 4 种幼苗的叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014, 34(2): 44-49. https://doi.org/10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2014.02.014

[36]

路涛. 亚高温强光胁迫下番茄幼苗光抑制及光保护机制研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2016.

[37]

Galvez-valdivieso G, Fryer M J, Lawson T, et al. The high light response in Arabidopsis involves ABA signaling between vascular and bundle sheath cells [J]. The Plant Cell, 2009, 21(7): 2143-2162. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.061507

[38]

Kitao M, Tobita H, Utsugi H, et al. Photosynthetic traits around budbreak in pre-existing needles of Sakhalin spruce (Picea glehnii) seedlings grown under elevated CO2 concentration assessed by chlorophyll fluorescence measurements [J]. Tree Physiology, 2012, 32(8): 998-1007. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tps048

[39]

Kramer D M, Johnson G, Kiirats O, et al. New fluorescence parameters for the determination of QA redox state and excitation energy fluxes [J]. Photosynthesis Research, 2004, 79(2): 209-218. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PRES.0000015391.99477.0d

[40]

师生波, 李天才, 李妙, 等. 土壤干旱和强光对高山嵩草叶片 PSII 反应中心非光化学猝灭的交互影响分析[J]. 植物生理学报, 2015, 51(10): 1678-1686. https://doi.org/10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2015.1020

[41]

Pallardy S G. Physiology of woody plants[M]. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2012.

[42]

娄永峰. 毛竹光保护及相关基因功能研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2016.

[43]

Li A J, You T T, Pang X J, et al. Structural basis for an early stage of the photosystem II repair cycle in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [J]. Nature Communications, 2024, 15(1): 5211. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49532-2

基金资助

海南省重点研发计划项目(ZDYF2022SHFZ061)

海南省自然科学基金高层次人才项目(321RC1032)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (624KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉