海南三亚辣椒害虫调查及蓟马种群动态与气象因子的关系

韩小龙 ,  吴明月 ,  罗丰 ,  刘勇 ,  邹祥 ,  林樱桃 ,  谢文 ,  孔祥义

热带生物学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4) : 699 -708.

PDF (1110KB)
热带生物学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4) : 699 -708. DOI: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20250131
植物保护

海南三亚辣椒害虫调查及蓟马种群动态与气象因子的关系

作者信息 +

Survey of pest species in pepper fields and the relationship between thrips population dynamics and meteorological factors in Sanya, Hainan

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1136K)

摘要

为明确海南三亚地区辣椒田间主要害虫种类组成及蓟马种群动态与气象因子的关系,于 2024 年 11 月-2025 年 5 月辣椒生长季,对辣椒田间害虫种类及蓟马种群动态规律进行了系统调查,并分析了蓟马种群与关键气象因子的关联。结果表明,三亚辣椒田间的优势害虫为蓟马类害虫,其中瓜蓟马(Thrips palmi)和花蓟马(Frankliniella intonsa)为优势种。蓟马类害虫在辣椒各生育期均有发生,但种群动态呈现明显阶段性差异:苗期为发生低谷期,开花挂果期为种群高峰期,且此阶段花蓟马数量显著超过瓜蓟马;开花采收期危害程度降低,调查末期瓜蓟马数量再度占据优势。相关性分析表明,开花挂果期的气象因子对蓟马类害虫种群数量的影响显著,其与平均气温、最低气温、平均地表气温、日最高/最低地表气温及最高湿度均呈显著正相关。本研究揭示了辣椒田间为害害虫种类、为害害虫优势种群、优势种群蓟马类为害动态及气象因子对蓟马类害虫种群动态的关键影响,为三亚地区辣椒蓟马类害虫的精准监测与防治策略制定提供了科学依据。

Abstract

To clarify the species composition of major pests in pepper fields in Sanya, Hainan, and the relationship between thrips population dynamics and meteorological factors, a systematic survey of pest species and thrips population dynamics was conducted during the pepper growing season from November 2024 to May 2025, and their association with key meteorological factors was analyzed. The results showed that the dominant pests in Sanya pepper fields were thrips, with Thrips palmi and Frankliniella intonsa being the dominant species. Thrips pests occurred at all the growth stages of pepper, but their population dynamics exhibited distinct growth stage-specific differences: the seedling stage was a low-incidence period, and the flowering and fruit-setting stages were the peak population period, during which the number of F. intonsa significantly exceeded that of T. palmi. The damage decreased during the flowering and harvesting stages, and by the end of the survey, T. palmi once again became dominant. Correlation analysis indicated that meteorological factors during the flowering and fruit-setting stages had a significant influence on thrips population numbers, showing significant positive correlations with average temperature, minimum temperature, average surface temperature, daily maximum/minimum surface temperature, and maximum humidity. All these findings reveal the pest species composition, dominant pest populations, dynamics of dominant thrips pests, and the key influence of meteorological factors on thrips population dynamics in pepper fields, providing a scientific basis for the precise monitoring and formulation of control strategies against thrips pests in pepper fields in the Sanya region.

关键词

辣椒 / 蓟马 / 种群动态 / 优势种群 / 海南三亚 / 气象因子

Key words

pepper / thrips / population dynamics / dominant species / Sanya, Hainan / meteorological factors.

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
韩小龙,吴明月,罗丰,刘勇,邹祥,林樱桃,谢文,孔祥义. 海南三亚辣椒害虫调查及蓟马种群动态与气象因子的关系[J]. 热带生物学报, 2026, 17(4): 699-708 DOI:10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20250131

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

简玮, 朱月季. 海南辣椒产销模式存在的问题与对策 [J]. 中国蔬菜, 2019(9): 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1928/j.cnki.1000-6346.2019.09.003

[2]

梁伟红, 罗微, 刘燕群, 等. 海南冬季瓜菜产业风险及可持续发展对策研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2013, 41(10): 431-433. https://doi.org/10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2013.10.056

[3]

海南省统计局, 国家统计局海南调查总队. 海南统计年鉴 2024[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2024: 4-5.

[4]

王春乙. 海南气候[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2014: 7-8.

[5]

韩冬银, 李磊, 陈俊谕, 等. 气象因素对芒果蓟马种群数量动态的影响 [J]. 环境昆虫学报 , 2019, 41(3): 553-558. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2019.03.15

[6]

Reitz S R, Yearby E L, Funderburk J E, et al. Integrated management tactics for Frankliniella thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in field-grown pepper [J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2003, 96(4): 1201-1214. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/96.4.1201

[7]

Moritz G, Kumm S, Mound L. Tospovirus transmission depends on thrips ontogeny [J]. Virus Research, 2004, 100(1): 143-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2003.12.022

[8]

Wijkamp I, Almarza N, Goldbach R, et al. Distinct levels of specificity in thrips transmission of tospoviruses [J]. Phytopathology, 1995, 85(10): 1069-1074. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-85-1069

[9]

吴佳教, 张维球, 梁广文. 温度对节瓜蓟马发育及产卵力的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 1995, 16(4): 14-19.

[10]

韩云, 唐良德, 付步礼, 等. 土壤含水量和土壤类型对豆大蓟马蛹期发育和羽化的影响[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2015, 37(4): 710-714. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2015.04.2

[11]

曲明静, 刘爱娜, 曾庆朝, 等. 气象因子对青岛市花生田西花蓟马种群数量的影响[J]. 花生学报, 2019, 48(4): 43-48. https://doi.org/10.14001/j.issn.1002-4093.2019.04.007

[12]

Selvaraj S, Adiroubane D. Influence of weather parameters on the incidence of thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindemann in cotton[J]. Journal of Cotton Research and Development, 2012, 26, 234-237.

[13]

中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 植物保护机械 诱虫板: GB/T 24689.4-2009[S]. 2009.

[14]

陈芳, 刘宇鹏, 曾晓珊, 等. 移栽期对辣椒产量、光合特性及气象因子的响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(10): 109-119.

[15]

Mao L G, Chang Y M, Yang F L, et al. Attraction effect of different colored cards on thrips Frankliniella intonsa in cowpea greenhouses in China [J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1): 13603. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32035-8

[16]

陈华平, 贝亚维, 顾秀慧, 等. 棕榈蓟马 (Thrips palmi) 对不同颜色粘卡的嗜好及其蓝色粘卡诱虫量的研究 [J]. 应用生态学报, 1997, 8(3): 335-337.

[17]

张巍巍, 李元胜. 中国昆虫生态大图鉴[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2011: 139-140.

[18]

韩运发. 中国经济昆虫志 第五十五册: 缨翅目[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1997: 263-270.

[19]

赵海燕, 秦双, 吉训聪, 等. 海南茄子田昆虫群落结构与时序动态[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2015, 35(12): 9-15. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-6820.2015.12.002

[20]

程春喜. 海南南部地区瓜菜上蓟马发生及传毒调查分析[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2023. https://doi.org/10.27018/d.cnki.gfjnu.2023.000712

[21]

张安盛, 于毅, 庄乾营, 等. 棕榈蓟马成虫在日光温室菜椒上的种群动态和空间分布[J]. 植物保护学报, 2014, 41(2): 210-215. https://doi.org/10.13802/j.cnki.zwbhxb.2014.02.013

[22]

蒋兴川, 李志华, 蒋智林, 等. 云南不同生态区辣椒花期蓟马种类及多样性指数比较[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2013, 28(4): 451-457. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2013.04.001

[23]

穆常青, 杨海霞, 谷培云, 等. 9 种药剂对温室彩椒西花蓟马的田间防效评价[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2014(10): 37-39. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6346.2014.10.008

[24]

刘至幸, 李光平, 王轶辉, 等. 昆明地区西花蓟马田间种群抗药性监测及药剂防治效果评价[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2025, 62(3): 699-707. https://doi.org/10.7679/j.issn.2095-1353.2025.066

[25]

吴明月, 李少卡, 李启珊, 等. 三亚辣椒害虫发生规律及蓟马种群动态分析[J]. 热带生物学报, 2024, 15(6): 655-663. https://doi.org/10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20240109

[26]

孙建伟, 张暄翊, 张愉力, 等. 花蓟马在黄花菜上的发生动态及抽样技术研究[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2025, 60(1): 240-248. https://doi.org/10.13432/j.cnki.jgsau.2025.01.026

[27]

渠汇, 啜泽润, 张文兵, 等. 花蓟马发生与防治研究进展[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2023, 43(8): 18-24. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-6820.2023.08.005

[28]

蒋兴川, 李志华, 曹志勇, 等. 蔬菜花期蓟马的种群动态与空间分布研究[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2013, 50(6): 1628-1636.

[29]

李姣. 花蓟马聚集信息素人工合成及其活性评估[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2014. https://doi.org/10.27244/d.cnki.gnjnu.2014.000009

[30]

Moraiet M A, Ansari M S, Ahmad S. Screening of onion cultivars for resistance against Thrips tabaci in relation to weather conditions [J]. Indian Journal of Plant Protection, 2020, 44(3): 296-303.

基金资助

“十四五”国家重点研发计划项目(No.2024YFD1400100)

海南省科技专项(No.ZDYF2024XDNY250)

海南省自然科学基金项目(No.321QN377)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1110KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉