海南热带雨林国家公园高速公路穿越段的土壤重金属风险评估

张怡 ,  姚小兰 ,  任明迅

热带生物学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (5) : 863 -872.

PDF (5365KB)
热带生物学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (5) : 863 -872. DOI: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20250136
海南热带雨林国家公园

海南热带雨林国家公园高速公路穿越段的土壤重金属风险评估

作者信息 +

Risk assessment of soil heavy metals in the expressway section crossing Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (5492K)

摘要

海南热带雨林国家公园是中国唯一有高速公路穿越的国家公园。为揭示高速公路穿越段对海南热带雨林国家公园的潜在影响,本研究选取高速公路穿越段的 3 个地点(什运、毛阳、番阳),研究了道路两侧不同距离及对照样地的表层土壤铬(Cr)、镍(Ni)、铅(Pb)、铜(Cu)、锌(Zn)的含量、空间分布及其主要来源。结果表明:1)Cr 和 Ni 是土壤中主要的累积元素,特别是什运和毛阳路段土壤 Cr 含量超出对照样地分别达 100% 和 83.33%;2)土壤重金属含量总体上呈现随道路距离增加而降低或先增后减的趋势,含量峰值多出现在高速公路 0~10 m 的范围;3)地累积指数显示,部分地点 Cr、Ni 和 Zn 处于无污染到低污染水平;整体生态风险低;4)土壤 Cr 的主要来源为交通排放;Pb、Cu、Zn 主要受成土母质影响,Ni 则为混合来源。海南热带雨林国家公园的高速公路穿越段当前土壤重金属生态风险较低,但 Cr 和 Ni 呈现逐渐累积的趋势。建议加强高速公路穿越段的植被恢复与管理、完善道路径流收集处理措施、重点监测高速公路跨越昌化江路段等生态敏感及脆弱点的动态,防控土壤重金属累积及迁移,保障海南热带雨林国家公园生态安全和高质量建设。

Abstract

Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park is the only national park in China with an expressway traversing the Park. To reveal possible potential impacts of the expressway section crossing the National Park, three sites (Zayun, Maoyang, Fanyang) along the expressway section were selected to determine the soil heavy metal (Cr, Ni, Pb, Cu and Zn) contents and analyze the distribution pattern of the heavy metals on both sides of the expressway section. The main sources and affecting factors of each heavy metal were also examined. The results showed that Cr and Ni were the main heavy metals with the highest accumulative rate in the soil, particularly at Zayun and Maoyang, where the soil Cr content exceeded that of the control by 100% and 83.33%, respectively. Soil heavy metal content showed a decreasing trend with increased distance from the expressway or an increasing and then decreasing trend, with the peak appearing within 0−10 m from the expressway. The Geo-accumulation Index showed that the soil Cr, Ni and Zn were at the level of non-pollution or low pollution and thus the overall ecological risk was low. The main source of the soil Cr was traffic emission, while the soil Pb, Cu and Zn were mainly affected by the parent material, with the soil Ni showing mixed sources. All these results suggested that the current ecological risk of soil heavy metal along the expressway section was low, but the soil Cr and Ni were gradually accumulated in the soil near the expressway. It is recommended to strengthen the vegetation restoration and management of the expressway section, to improve the measures for collection and treatment of the expressway runoffs, and to focus on monitoring the dynamics at ecological sensitive sites such as Changhua River, which are crucial for preventing the potential accumulation and migration of soil heavy metals and to ensure the ecological security and high-quality construction of Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park.

关键词

热带雨林 / 道路径流 / 土壤重金属 / 分布格局 / 生态风险

Key words

tropical rainforest / road runoffs / soil heavy metals / distribution pattern / ecological risk

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
张怡,姚小兰,任明迅. 海南热带雨林国家公园高速公路穿越段的土壤重金属风险评估[J]. 热带生物学报, 2026, 17(5): 863-872 DOI:10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20250136

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Francisco-Ortega J, Wang Z S, Wang F G, et al. Seed plant endemism on Hainan Island: a framework for conservation actions[J]. The Botanical Review, 2010, 76(3): 346-376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-010-9055-7

[2]

Li L M, Tang H N, Lei J R, et al. Spatial autocorrelation in land use type and ecosystem service value in Hainan Tropical Rain Forest National Park[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 137: 108727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108727

[3]

Zhai J, Hou P, Cao W, et al. Ecosystem assessment and protection effectiveness of a tropical rainforest region in Hainan Island, China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018, 28(4): 415-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1481-1

[4]

Yao X L, Zhou L, Wu T X, et al. Ecosystem services in National Park of Hainan Tropical Rainforest of China: spatiotemporal dynamics and conservation implications[J]. Journal for Nature Conservation, 2024, 80: 126649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126649

[5]

姚小兰, 周琳, 吴挺勋, 等. 海南热带雨林国家公园高速公路穿越段景观动态与生态风险评估[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(16): 6695-6703. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb202006191601

[6]

徐莹. 触媒理论下的城市废弃铁路景观再生设计研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2018.

[7]

吴挺勋, 姚小兰, 任明迅. 海南热带雨林国家公园道路分布及其对景观完整性的影响[J]. 热带生物学报, 2022, 13(2): 101-111. https://doi.org/10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2022.02.001

[8]

Falahi-Ardakani A. Contamination of environment with heavy metals emitted from automotives[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 1984, 8(2): 152-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-6513(84)90057-5

[9]

Faiz Y, Tufail M, Javed M T, et al. Road dust pollution of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn along Islamabad Expressway, Pakistan[J]. Microchemical Journal, 2009, 92(2): 186-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2009.03.009

[10]

Fan P, Lu X W, Yu B, et al. Spatial distribution, risk estimation and source apportionment of potentially toxic metal(loid)s in resuspended megacity street dust[J]. Environment International, 2022, 160: 107073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.107073

[11]

Li R D, Zheng H, Polasky S, et al. Ecosystem restoration on Hainan Island: can we optimize for enhancing regulating services and poverty alleviation?[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2020, 15(8): 084039. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8f5e

[12]

姚小兰,

[13]

Larry L, 任明迅. 海南热带雨林国家公园高速公路穿越段的生态修复社会化参与方式[J]. 自然保护地, 2023, 3(1): 82-90. https://doi.org/10.12335/2096-8981.2022083004

[14]

DB46/T 687- 2025 土壤环境背景值[S].

[15]

HJ/T 166- 2004 土壤环境监测技术规范[S].

[16]

GB/T 17141-1997 土壤质量 铅、镉的测定 石墨炉原子吸收分光光度法[S].

[17]

HJ 491- 2019 土壤和沉积物 铜、锌、铅、镍、铬的测定 火焰原子吸收分光光度法[S].

[18]

Müller G. Index of geoaccumulation in sediments of the Rhine River[J]. Geochemical Journal, 1969, 2(3): 108-118.

[19]

Hakanson L. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control. A sedimentological approach[J]. Water Research, 1980, 14(8): 975-1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(80)90143-8

[20]

戴树桂, 朱坦, 白志鹏. 受体模型在大气颗粒物源解析中的应用和进展[J]. 中国环境科学, 1995, 15(4): 252-257.

[21]

王瑞琦, 陆敏, 杨毅, 等. 非负约束因子分析和 PMF 模型解析黄浦江表层沉积物中多环芳烃的来源 [J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(8): 1617-1624. https://doi.org/10.11654/jaes.2014.08.021

[22]

Xu C, Pu J, Wen B, et al. Potential ecological risks of heavy metals in agricultural soil alongside highways and their relationship with landscape[J]. Agriculture, 2021, 11(8): 800. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080800

[23]

吴挺勋. 海南热带雨林国家公园道路分布格局及其生态风险[D]. 海口: 海南大学, 2022. https://doi.org/10.27073/d.cnki.ghadu.2022.000393

[24]

Wang M E, Zhang H Z. Accumulation of heavy metals in roadside soil in urban area and the related impacting factors[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15(6): 1064. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061064

[25]

杨乐, 王春森, 夏建国. 成乐高速两侧农田土壤重金属污染及潜在生态危害评价 [J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2020, 38(2): 168-175. https://doi.org/10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2020.02.007

[26]

Wang M E, Bai Y Y, Chen W P, et al. A GIS technology based potential eco-risk assessment of metals in urban soils in Beijing, China[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2012, 161: 235-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.09.030

[27]

Werkenthin M, Kluge B, Wessolek G. Metals in European roadside soils and soil solution-a review[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2014, 189: 98-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.02.025

[28]

Forman R T T, Sperling D, Bissonette J A, et al. Road ecology: science and solutions[M]. Washington: Island Press, 2003: 192-287.

[29]

Wang Q, Lu X W, Pan H Y. Analysis of heavy metals in the re-suspended road dusts from different functional areas in Xi'an, China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 23(19): 19838-19846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7200-5

[30]

Różański S, Jaworska H, Matuszczak K, et al. Impact of highway traffic and the acoustic screen on the content and spatial distribution of heavy metals in soils[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24(14): 12778-12786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8910-z

[31]

罗娅君, 王照丽, 张露, 等. 成绵高速公路两侧土壤中 4 种重金属的污染特征及分布规律 [J]. 安全与环境学报 , 2014, 14(3): 283-287. https://doi.org/10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2014.03.063

[32]

仝致琦, 谷蕾, 段海静, 等. 基于 Kriging 插值的路旁土壤重金属含量空间分布:以 310 国道郑州-开封段为例 [J]. 环境科学学报 , 2012, 32(12): 3030-3038. https://doi.org/10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2012.12.020

[33]

王晓云. 郑州市地面灰尘重金属季节变化及健康风险分析[D]. 开封: 河南大学, 2011. https://doi.org/10.7666/d.d145161

[34]

Mo W B, Wang Y, Zhang Y X, et al. Impacts of road network expansion on landscape ecological risk in a megacity, China: a case study of Beijing[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 574: 1000-1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.048

[35]

Niu L C, Ye H Z, Pang L, et al. Ecological environment restoration of roadside vegetation in expressway of alpine regions[J]. Ekoloji, 2019, 28(107): 2629-2641.

[36]

Kuklová M, Hniličková H, Hnilička F, et al. Impact of expressway on physiology of plants and accumulation of risk elements in forest ecosystems[J]. Plant, Soil and Environment, 2019, 65(1): 46-53. https://doi.org/10.17221/585/2018-PSE

[37]

Jaganathan G K, Dalrymple S E, Liu B L. Towards an understanding of factors controlling seed bank composition and longevity in the alpine environment[J]. The Botanical Review, 2015, 81(1): 70-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-014-9150-2

[38]

Wadak, Simpson R, Kishimoto N, et al. Motor vehicle wash-off water as a source of phosphorus in roadway runoff[J]. Journal of Water and Environment Technology, 2020, 18(1): 9-16. https://doi.org/10.2965/jwet.19-047

[39]

吴振斌, 任明迅, 付贵萍, 等. 垂直流人工湿地水力学特点对污水净化效果的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2001, 22(5): 45-49. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0250-3301.2001.05.011

[40]

吴振斌, 梁威, 成水平, 等. 人工湿地植物根区土壤酶活性与污水净化效果及其相关分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2001, 21(5): 622-624. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0253-2468.2001.05.023

基金资助

海南省重点研发项目(ZDYF2025SHFZ037)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (5365KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉