咪唑立宾与吗替麦考酚酯在肾移植受者中的疗效及安全性比较:一项单中心回顾性研究

杨新纪 ,  石伟龙 ,  宋再伟 ,  谢志飞 ,  朱和荣 ,  张文斌 ,  张洪宪 ,  刘磊 ,  赵磊 ,  王璐 ,  王智丹 ,  张树栋 ,  张启鸣 ,  侯小飞

器官移植 ›› 2026, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4) : 625 -634.

PDF (785KB)
器官移植 ›› 2026, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4) : 625 -634. DOI: 10.12464/j.issn.1674-7445.2026041
论著·临床研究

咪唑立宾与吗替麦考酚酯在肾移植受者中的疗效及安全性比较:一项单中心回顾性研究

作者信息 +

Comparison of efficacy and safety of mizoribine and mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplant recipients: a single-center retrospective study

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (803K)

摘要

目的 比较肾移植受者采用咪唑立宾(MZR)或吗替麦考酚酯(MMF)联合他克莫司(Tac)及糖皮质激素的三联免疫抑制方案在术后1年的临床疗效与安全性差异。方法 采用单中心回顾性队列研究设计,纳入北京大学第三医院在2022年1月至2024年12月首次接受同种异体肾移植的156例患者的临床资料。根据术后初始免疫抑制方案分为MZR组(78例)与MMF组(78例)。比较两组受者的基线资料、术后1年用药情况、血常规等指标、不良事件与临床结局。对于重复测量的纵向数据,采用重复测量方差分析,评估指标的组间主效应、时间主效应及其交互效应。结果 在主要疗效终点上,两组受者术后1年生存率、移植物存活率及急性排斥反应发生率差异均无统计学意义(均为 P>0.05)。在用药模式及实验室检查指标上,Tac剂量存在时间主效应和“时间×组别”交互效应(均为 P<0.05),术后2~3个月MZR组Tac剂量低于MMF组,术后7~12个月、术后1年后MZR组Tac剂量均高于MMF组,MZR组术后1个月后的白细胞计数均高于MMF组,且术后1年后血小板计数更高(均为 P<0.05)。感染方面,MZR组新型冠状病毒及耶氏肺孢子菌肺炎感染发生率均更低(均为 P<0.05)。在代谢指标上,MZR组术后尿酸水平优于MMF组,但其术后1年后总胆固醇水平较高(均为 P<0.05)。肝功能方面,MZR组术后早期转氨酶有短暂轻度升高。结论 术后为期1年的随访中,MZR与MMF方案在中国肾移植受者中展现出相当的免疫抑制疗效与总体安全性。MZR方案在减少特定感染风险、减轻骨髓抑制以及改善尿酸代谢方面显示出明确优势,但其对血脂的潜在影响需予以关注。因此,MZR可作为肾移植受者,尤其是高感染风险、血液系统耐受性差或合并高尿酸血症受者的有效且安全的替代免疫抑制选择。

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety differences between the triple immunosuppressive regimen of mizoribine (MZR) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) combined with tacrolimus (Tac) and glucocorticoids of kidney transplant recipients in one year after transplantation. Methods A single-center retrospective cohort study design was adopted. The clinical data of 156 patients who underwent the first allogeneic kidney transplantation at the Third Hospital of Peking University from January 2022 to December 2024 were included. The patients were divided into the MZR group (78 cases) and the MMF group (78 cases) based on the initial immunosuppressive regimen after transplantation. The baseline data, medication use in one year after transplantation, blood routine indicators, adverse events and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. For the repeated-measurement longitudinal data, repeated-measurement analysis of variance was used to evaluate the main effects of the groups, time and their interaction effects. Results At the primary efficacy endpoint, there were no statistically significant differences in the one-year survival rate, graft survival rate and incidence of acute rejection between the two groups (all P > 0.05). In terms of medication patterns and laboratory test indicators, there were significant time main effects and "time × group" interaction effects for Tac dosage (all P < 0.05). The Tac dosage in the MZR group was lower than that in the MMF group from 2 to 3 months after transplantation, and it was higher in the MZR group than in the MMF group from 7 to 12 months and one year after transplantation. White blood cell count in the MZR group was higher at one month after transplantation, and the platelet count was higher one year after transplantation (all P < 0.05). In terms of infection, the incidence of novel coronavirus and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia infections in the MZR group was lower (all P < 0.05). In terms of metabolic indicators, the post-transplantation uric acid level was better in the MZR group than in the MMF group, but the total cholesterol level was higher one year after transplantation (all P < 0.05). In terms of liver function, there was a brief and mild increase in transaminase in the early stage after transplantation in the MZR group. Conclusions During the one-year follow-up after transplantation, both the MZR and MMF regimens demonstrate comparable immunosuppressive efficacy and overall safety in Chinese kidney transplant recipients. The MZR regimen shows clear advantages in reducing specific infection risks, alleviating bone marrow suppression and improving uric acid metabolism, but its potential impact on blood lipids needs to be monitored. Therefore, the MZR regimen may be an effective and safe alternative immunosuppressive option for kidney transplant recipients, especially those with high infection risk, poor hematological tolerance, or comorbid hyperuricemia.

关键词

肾移植 / 咪唑立宾 / 吗替麦考酚酯 / 他克莫司 / 用药剂量 / 疗效 / 安全性 / 估算肾小球滤过率

Key words

Kidney transplantation / Mizoribine / Mycophenolate mofetil / Tacrolimus / Dosage / Efficacy / Safety / Estimated glomerular filtration rate

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
杨新纪,石伟龙,宋再伟,谢志飞,朱和荣,张文斌,张洪宪,刘磊,赵磊,王璐,王智丹,张树栋,张启鸣,侯小飞. 咪唑立宾与吗替麦考酚酯在肾移植受者中的疗效及安全性比较:一项单中心回顾性研究[J]. 器官移植, 2026, 17(4): 625-634 DOI:10.12464/j.issn.1674-7445.2026041

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

FRANCIS A, HARHAY M N, ONG A C M, et al. Chronic kidney disease and the global public health agenda: an international consensus[J]. Nat Rev Nephrol, 2024, 20(7): 473-485. DOI: 10.1038/s41581-024-00820-6.

[2]

DE BOER S E, KNOBBE T J, KREMER D, et al. Kidney transplantation improves health-related quality of life in older recipients[J]. Transpl Int, 2024, 37: 12071. DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12071.

[3]

MUDIAYI D, SHOJAI S, OKPECHI I, et al. Global estimates of capacity for kidney transplantation in world countries and regions[J]. Transplantation, 2022, 106(6): 1113-1122. DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003943.

[4]

GO A, CHERTOW G, FAN D. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2005, 41(1): 177. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.10.020.

[5]

石炳毅, 袁铭. 中国肾移植受者免疫抑制治疗指南(2016版)[J]. 器官移植, 2016, 7(5): 327-331. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2016.05.001.

[6]

SHI B Y, YUAN M . Guidelines for immunosuppressive therapy of renal transplant recipients in China (2016 edition)[J]. Organ Transplant, 2016, 7(5): 327-331. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2016.05.001.

[7]

ALLISON A C, EUGUI E M. Immunosuppressive and other effects of mycophenolic acid and an ester prodrug, mycophenolate mofetil[J]. Immunol Rev, 1993, 136(1): 5-28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.1993.tb00652.x.

[8]

王璇璐, 胡颖, 彭年春, 等 . 甲泼尼龙联合吗替麦考酚酯治疗中重度活动性Graves眼病[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024, 40(21): 3067-3075. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.21.017.

[9]

WANG X L, HU Y, PENG N C, et al. Observation on the therapeutic effect of methylprednisolone combined with mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of moderate to severe active Graves eye disease[J]. J Pract Med, 2024, 40(21): 3067-3075. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.21.017.

[10]

中华医学会器官移植学分会. 器官移植免疫抑制剂临床应用技术规范(2019版)[J]. 器官移植, 2019, 10(3): 213-226. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2019.03.001.

[11]

Branch of Organ Transplantation of Chinese Medical Association . Technical specification for clinical application of immunosuppressants in organ transplantation (2019 edition)[J]. Organ Transplant, 2019, 10(3): 213-226. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2019.03.001.

[12]

KOYAMA H, TSUJI M. Genetic and biochemical studies on the activation and cytotoxic mechanism of bredinin, a potent inhibitor of purine biosynthesis in mammalian cells[J]. Biochem Pharmacol, 1983, 32(23): 3547-3553. DOI: 10.1016/0006-2952(83)90301-5.

[13]

YOSHIMURA N, USHIGOME H, AKIOKA K, et al. The beneficial effect of high-dose mizoribine combined with cyclosporine, basiliximab, and corticosteroids on CMV infection in renal transplant recipients[J]. Clin Exp Nephrol, 2013, 17(1): 127-133. DOI: 10.1007/s10157-012-0669-4.

[14]

LI P, CHENG D, WEN J, et al. Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to mizoribine in the early stages of BK polyomavirus infection could improve kidney allograft prognosis: a single-center study from China[J]. BMC Nephrol, 2021, 22(1): 328. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-021-02527-3.

[15]

SHI Y, LIU H, CHEN X G, et al. Efficacy and safety of mizoribine combined with tacrolimus in living donor kidney transplant recipients: 3-year results by a Chinese single center study[J]. Transplant Proc, 2019, 51(5): 1337-1342. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.03.014.

[16]

KURAMOTO T, DAIKOKU T, YOSHIDA Y, et al. Novel anticytomegalovirus activity of immunosuppressant mizoribine and its synergism with ganciclovir[J]. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 2010, 333(3): 816-821. DOI: 10.1124/jpet.109.160630.

[17]

XING S, YANG J, ZHANG X, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of mizoribine with mycophenolate mofetil for Asian renal transplantation-a meta-analysis[J]. Clin Biochem, 2014, 47(7/8): 663-669. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.01.014.

[18]

PRACKWIESER J, HOUTMAN R, KIEVITS T, et al. Data mining historical Chinese medical recipe collections and nuclear receptor profiling identify plant fractions that modulate glucocorticoid receptor activity[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2026, 16: 1681729. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1681729.

[19]

ISHIDA H, TAKAHARA S, AMADA N, et al. A prospective randomized, comparative trial of high-dose mizoribine versus mycophenolate mofetil in combination with tacrolimus and basiliximab for living donor renal transplant: a multicenter trial[J]. Exp Clin Transplant, 2016, 14(5): 518-525. DOI: 10.6002/ect.2015.0326.

[20]

陈人腆, 袁泽华, 蒋鸿涛, 等 . 肾移植术后血液高凝状态的影响因素、临床表现与预防策略[J]. 器官移植, 2025, 16(4): 640-647. DOI: 10.12464/j.issn.1674-7445.2025055.

[21]

CHEN R T, YUAN Z H, JIANG H T, et al. Influencing factors, clinical manifestations and preventive strategies of hypercoagulable state after kidney transplantation[J]. Organ Transplant, 2025, 16(4): 640-647. DOI: 10.12464/j.issn.1674-7445.2025055.

[22]

LYSAKOWSKI S, WEISHEIMER ROHDE R, PASCUAL VITOLA S, et al. Pediatric kidney transplantation: outcomes with under and over 6-year-old donors[J]. J Pediatr, 2024, 100(1): 67-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2023.07.005.

[23]

USHIGOME H, UCHIDA K, NISHIMURA K, et al. Efficacy and safety of high-dose mizoribine combined with cyclosporine, basiliximab, and corticosteroids in renal transplantation: a Japanese multicenter study[J]. Transplant Proc, 2016, 48(3): 794-798. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.12.117.

[24]

国家传染病医学中心, 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中国康复医学会器官移植康复专业委员会, 等 . 实体器官移植受者新型冠状病毒感染诊疗专家共识(2023年版)[J]. 器官移植, 2023, 14(2): 163-182. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2023.02.001.

[25]

National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Branch of Organ Transplantation of Chinese Medical Association, Organ Transplant Rehabilitation Committee of China Association Rehabilitation Medicine, et al. Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection in solid organ transplant recipients (2023 edition)[J]. Organ Transplant, 2023, 14(2): 163-182. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2023.02.001.

[26]

MAHALINGASIVAM V, SU G, IWAGAMI M, et al. COVID-19 and kidney disease: insights from epidemiology to inform clinical practice[J]. Nat Rev Nephrol, 2022, 18(8): 485-498. DOI: 10.1038/s41581-022-00570-3.

[27]

CHEN J, LIU H, YIN W, et al. The efficacy and safety of mizoribine versus mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of renal transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Comput Intell Neurosci, 2022, 2022: 5717068. DOI: 10.1155/2022/5717068.

[28]

卫芬, 李宁, 王明君, 等 . 肾移植受者新型冠状病毒肺炎的流行病学特征: 单中心回顾性研究[J]. 器官移植, 2023, 14(5): 700-707. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2023098.

[29]

WEI F, LI N, WANG M J, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in kidney transplant recipients: a single-center retrospective study[J]. Organ Transplant, 2023, 14(5): 700-707. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2023098.

[30]

AZZI Y, BARTASH R, SCALEA J, et al. COVID-19 and solid organ transplantation: a review article[J]. Transplantation, 2021, 105(1): 37-55. DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003523.

[31]

栗泽鹏, 薛武军. 重视肾移植受者BK病毒感染治疗中的免疫抑制方案调整[J/OL]. 实用器官移植电子杂志, 2025, 13(2): 97-102. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5332.2025.02.001.

[32]

LI Z P, XUE W J . Pay attention to the adjustment of immunosuppressive regimen in the treatment of BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients[J/OL]. Pract J Organ Transplant (Electr Vers), 2025, 13(2): 97-102. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5332.2025.02.001.

[33]

文吉秋, 陈劲松, 程东瑞, 等 . 肾移植感染高危受者术后序贯切换咪唑立宾的临床观察[J]. 肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志, 2013, 22(6): 520-525.

[34]

WEN J Q, CHEN J S, CHENG D R, et al. The conversion from the MMF to mizoribine after renal transplantation in the receipts of high risks of infection[J]. Chin J Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2013, 22(6): 520-525.

[35]

BERGER M, BALIKER M, VAN GELDER T, et al. Chronic active antibody-mediated rejection: opportunity to determine the role of interleukin-6 blockade[J]. Transplantation, 2024, 108(5): 1109-1114. DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004822.

[36]

魏江浩, 窦古枫, 王振, 等 . 肾移植术后慢性活动性抗体介导排斥反应的激素冲击治疗效果分析[J]. 山东医药, 2024, 64(32): 16-21. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2024.32.004.

[37]

WEI J H, DOU G F, WANG Z, et al. Effect of methylprednisolone pulse therapy on chronic active antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation[J]. Shandong Med J, 2024, 64(32): 16-21. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2024.32.004.

[38]

DE NATTES T, BEADLE J, ROUFOSSE C. Biopsy-based transcriptomics in the diagnosis of kidney transplant rejection[J]. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens, 2024, 33(3): 273-282. DOI: 10.1097/mnh.0000000000000974.

[39]

梁雯, 刘晓晨, 李锋. 经皮超声引导下肾脏穿刺活检的技巧经验分享[J]. 中国实用医药, 2024, 19(5): 83-86. DOI: 10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2024.05.020.

[40]

LIANG W, LIU X C, LI F . Experience sharing of percutaneous ultrasound guided renal biopsy[J]. China Pract Med, 2024, 19(5): 83-86. DOI: 10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2024.05.020.

[41]

中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中国医疗保健国际交流促进会肾脏移植学分会. 中国肾脏移植受者移植物功能延迟恢复临床诊疗指南[J]. 器官移植, 2024, 15(5): 684-699. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2024156.

[42]

Branch of Organ Transplantation of Chinese Medical Association, Branch of Kidney Transplantation of China International Exchange and Promotive Association for Medical and Health Care. Guidelines for clinical diagnosis and treatment of delayed graft function in kidney transplant recipients in China[J]. Organ Transplant, 2024, 15(5): 684-699. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2024156.

[43]

杨新纪, 石伟龙, 朱和荣, 等 . 肾移植受者睡眠障碍的研究进展[J]. 器官移植, 2025, 16(5): 798-804. DOI: 10.12464/j.issn.1674-7445.2025167.

[44]

YANG X J, SHI W L, ZHU H R, et al. Research advances on sleep disorders in kidney transplant recipients[J]. Organ Transplant, 2025, 16(5): 798-804. DOI: 10.12464/j.issn.1674-7445.2025167.

[45]

YAN T Z, WU X Q, RONG L. A four-drug combination therapy consisting of low-dose tacrolimus, low-dose mycophenolate mofetil, corticosteroids, and mizoribine in living donor renal transplantation: a randomized study[J]. SAGE Open Med, 2016, 4: 2050312116643672. DOI: 10.1177/2050312116643672.

[46]

SHIMIZU M, KITAMURA M, ONO Y, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil-induced multiple ileal ulcerations in a renal transplant recipient: diagnostic challenges and management[J]. Intern Med, 2026, 65(11): 1473-1476. DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.5971-25.

[47]

BADROUCHI S, BACHA M M, AHMED A, et al. Predicting long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation in the era of artificial intelligence[J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13: 21273. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48645-w.

[48]

NICA A, MEJIA M V, ABDELRHEEM A, et al. Leveraging machine learning to predict delayed graft function occurrence and length in kidney transplant recipients[J]. Clin Transplant, 2026, 40(3): e70514. DOI: 10.1111/ctr.70514.

[49]

GARCIA VALENCIA O A, THONGPRAYOON C, MIAO J, et al. AI-generated explanations in kidney transplantation: accuracy vs. readability and implications for patient education[J]. Front Artif Intell, 2026, 9: 1806516. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2026.1806516.

[50]

BABAEE A, SHANK D B, CANFIELD C, et al. Five tensions of artificial intelligence adoption for organ allocation: applying the technology-organization-environment framework[J]. Digit Health, 2026, 12: 20552076261425344. DOI: 10.1177/20552076261425344.

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(72304007)

吴阶平医学基金会临床科研专项资助基金(320.6750.2022-03-45)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (785KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉