GPX3抑制ROS介导的NET形成减轻肾移植缺血-再灌注损伤

裴军 ,  唐虹宇 ,  吴谋东 ,  彭金普 ,  安妮妮 ,  潘星羽

器官移植 ›› 2026, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4) : 602 -609.

PDF (29853KB)
器官移植 ›› 2026, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4) : 602 -609. DOI: 10.12464/j.issn.1674-7445.2026080
论著·实验研究

GPX3抑制ROS介导的NET形成减轻肾移植缺血-再灌注损伤

作者信息 +

GPX3 attenuates ischemia-reperfusion injury in kidney transplantation by inhibiting ROS-mediated NET formation

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (30569K)

摘要

目的 探讨谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶3(GPX3)在肾移植缺血-再灌注损伤中的作用和潜在机制。方法 将C57BL/6小鼠按照干预条件分为4组,分别为假手术组(Sham组)、肾移植组(KT组)、肾移植+GPX3过表达组(KT+GPX3组)和肾移植+GPX3过表达+活性氧簇(ROS)激动剂组(KT+GPX3+CADD522组)。模型建立24 h后,取下腔静脉血检测血尿素氮(BUN)和血清肌酐(Scr)。取左侧肾脏组织,免疫荧光染色检测ROS和NADPH氧化酶2(NOX2),酶联免疫吸附试验检测粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白(NGAL)、肾损伤分子1(KIM-1)、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α和白细胞介素(IL)-1β,蛋白质印迹法检测髓过氧化物酶(MPO)和瓜氨酸化组蛋白H3(CitH3)。结果 与Sham组比较,KT组GPX3表达水平降低;与KT组相比,KT+GPX3组GPX3表达水平升高;与KT+GPX3组比较,KT+GPX3+CADD522组GPX3表达水平降低(均为 P<0.05)。与Sham组比较,KT组Scr、BUN、NGAL和KIM-1表达水平升高;与KT组比较,KT+GPX3组Scr、BUN、NGAL和KIM-1表达水平下降;与KT+GPX3组比较,KT+GPX3+CADD522组Scr、BUN、NGAL和KIM-1表达水平升高(均为 P<0.05)。与Sham组比较,KT组NOX2和ROS表达水平升高;与KT组相比,KT+GPX3组NOX2和ROS表达水平降低;与KT+GPX3组比较,KT+GPX3+CADD522组NOX2和ROS表达水平升高(均为 P<0.05)。与Sham组比较,KT组MPO和CitH3表达水平升高;与KT组比较,KT+GPX3组MPO和CitH3表达水平降低;与KT+GPX3组比较,KT+GPX3+CADD522组MPO和CitH3表达水平升高(均为 P<0.05)。与Sham组比较,KT组TNF-ɑ和IL-1β表达水平升高;与KT组比较,KT+GPX3组TNF-ɑ和IL-1β表达水平降低;与KT+GPX3组比较,KT+GPX3+CADD522组TNF-ɑ和IL-1β表达水平升高(均为 P<0.05)。结论 GPX3可能通过抑制ROS介导的中性粒细胞胞外诱捕网(NET)形成,减轻肾脏组织中的炎症反应,进而缓解肾移植IRI。

Abstract

Objective To investigate the role and potential mechanism of glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPX3) in ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) during kidney transplantation. Methods C57BL/6 mice were divided into four groups according to different interventions: sham operation group (Sham group), kidney transplantation group (KT group), kidney transplantation + GPX3 overexpression group (KT+GPX3 group) and kidney transplantation + GPX3 overexpression + reactive oxygen species (ROS) agonist group (KT+GPX3+CADD522 group). Twenty-four hours after model establishment, inferior vena cava blood was collected to detect blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine (Scr). Left renal tissues were harvested for immunofluorescence staining to detect ROS and NADPH oxidase 2 (NOX2). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to measure neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-1β. Western blotting was used to detect myeloperoxidase (MPO) and citrullinated histone H3 (CitH3). Results Compared with the Sham group, the expression level of GPX3 was decreased in the KT group; compared with the KT group, GPX3 expression was increased in the KT+GPX3 group; compared with the KT+GPX3 group, GPX3 expression was reduced in the KT+GPX3+CADD522 group (all P<0.05). Compared with the Sham group, the levels of Scr, BUN, NGAL and KIM-1 were elevated in the KT group; compared with the KT group, the above indicators were decreased in the KT+GPX3 group; compared with the KT+GPX3 group, the levels of Scr, BUN, NGAL and KIM-1 were increased in the KT+GPX3+CADD522 group (all P<0.05). Compared with the Sham group, the expression levels of NOX2 and ROS were increased in the KT group; compared with the KT group, NOX2 and ROS levels were decreased in the KT+GPX3 group; compared with the KT+GPX3 group, NOX2 and ROS levels were upregulated in the KT+GPX3+CADD522 group (all P<0.05). Compared with the Sham group, the expression levels of MPO and CitH3 were increased in the KT group; compared with the KT group, MPO and CitH3 levels were decreased in the KT+GPX3 group; compared with the KT+GPX3 group, MPO and CitH3 levels were increased in the KT+GPX3+CADD522 group (all P<0.05). Compared with the Sham group, the expression levels of TNF-α and IL-1β were increased in the KT group; compared with the KT group, TNF-α and IL-1β levels were decreased in the KT+GPX3 group; compared with the KT+GPX3 group, TNF-α and IL-1β levels were increased in the KT+GPX3+CADD522 group (all P<0.05). Conclusions GPX3 may alleviate renal tissue inflammation by inhibiting ROS-mediated neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation, thereby attenuating IRI in renal transplantation.

关键词

肾移植 / 谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶3 / 缺血-再灌注损伤 / 中性粒细胞胞外诱捕网 / NADPH氧化酶2 / 活性氧簇 / 髓过氧化物酶 / 瓜氨酸化组蛋白H3

Key words

Kidney transplantation / Glutathione peroxidase 3 / Ischemia-reperfusion injury / Neutrophil extracellular trap / NADPH oxidase 2 / Reactive oxygen species / Myeloperoxidase / Citrullinated histone H3

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
裴军,唐虹宇,吴谋东,彭金普,安妮妮,潘星羽. GPX3抑制ROS介导的NET形成减轻肾移植缺血-再灌注损伤[J]. 器官移植, 2026, 17(4): 602-609 DOI:10.12464/j.issn.1674-7445.2026080

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

GHELICHI-GHOJOGH M, MOHAMMADIZADEH F, JAFARI F, et al. The global survival rate of graft and patient in kidney transplantation of children: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Pediatr, 2022, 22(1): 503. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-022-03545-2.

[2]

李昕, 杨宏伟, 何龙, 等 . 基于肾移植数据库与小程序的肾移植随访管理研究[J]. 中国临床实用医学, 2024, 15(6): 16-19. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115570-20241023-00669.

[3]

LI X, YANG H W, HE L, et al. Study on follow-up management of kidney transplantation based on kidney transplantation database and application[J]. Chin Clin Pract Med, 2024, 15(6): 16-19. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115570-20241023-00669.

[4]

YANG W, LI X, HE L, et al. Empagliflozin improves renal ischemia-reperfusion injury by reducing inflammation and enhancing mitochondrial fusion through AMPK-OPA1 pathway promotion[J]. Cell Mol Biol Lett, 2023, 28(1): 42. DOI: 10.1186/s11658-023-00457-6.

[5]

张洁, 杨正飞. 单细胞测序在缺血再灌注领域的研究进展[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2025, 46(1): 1-10. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).2025.0101.

[6]

ZHANG K, YANG Z F . Research progress in single-cell sequencing for ischemia-reperfusion injury[J]. J Sun Yat-sen Univ Med Sci, 2025, 46(1): 1-10. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).2025.0101.

[7]

ZHAO Z B, MARSCHNER J A, IWAKURA T, et al. Tubular epithelial cell HMGB1 promotes AKI-CKD transition by sensitizing cycling tubular cells to oxidative stress: a rationale for targeting HMGB1 during AKI recovery[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2023, 34(3): 394-411. DOI: 10.1681/asn.0000000000000024.

[8]

HE J, WU X, QIAO J, et al. Tubular specific glutathione peroxidase 3 deletion exacerbates kidney damage in IRI-AKI mice[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA Mol Basis Dis, 2025, 1871(6): 167895. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2025.167895.

[9]

PEI J, ZHANG J, YU C, et al. Selenoprotein GPX3 regulates NADPH oxidase expression by inhibiting the MAPK signaling pathway and thereby attenuating the inflammatory response in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury[J]. Genes Dis, 2025, 13(2): 101640. DOI: 10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101640.

[10]

FIORENTINO M, BAGAGLI F, DELEONARDIS A, et al. Acute kidney injury in kidney transplant patients in intensive care unit: from pathogenesis to clinical management[J]. Biomedicines, 2023, 11(5): 1474. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11051474.

[11]

MOHIDIN B, MARKS S D. Acute kidney injury in paediatric kidney transplant recipients[J]. Pediatr Nephrol, 2025, 40(7): 2161-2175. DOI: 10.1007/s00467-025-06655-y.

[12]

PENG J, WANG S, PAN X, et al. Identification of ALDH2 as a novel target for the treatment of acute kidney injury in kidney transplantation based on WGCNA and machine learning algorithms and exploration of its potential mechanism of action using animal experiments[J]. Front Immunol, 2025, 16: 1536800. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1536800.

[13]

罗子寰, 孙启全. 2024年肾脏移植研究大盘点: 来自中国的声音[J]. 器官移植, 2025, 16(3): 359-367. DOI: 10.12464/j.issn.1674-7445.2025119.

[14]

LUO Z H, SUN Q Q . Research highlights of kidney transplantation in 2024: voice from China[J]. Organ Transplant, 2025, 16(3): 359-367. DOI: 10.12464/j.issn.1674-7445.2025119.

[15]

FAN H, LIU J, SUN J, et al. Advances in the study of B cells in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury[J]. Front Immunol, 2023, 14: 1216094. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1216094.

[16]

HUANG A J, SHARMA G K, PARIKH R, et al. Molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets of ischemia-reperfusion injury in kidney transplantation[J]. Curr Issues Mol Biol, 2025, 47(4): 282. DOI: 10.3390/cimb47040282.

[17]

SU L, ZHANG J, GOMEZ H, et al. Mitochondria ROS and mitophagy in acute kidney injury[J]. Autophagy, 2023, 19(2): 401-414. DOI: 10.1080/15548627.2022.2084862.

[18]

LEE B, KANG W, OH S H, et al. In vivo imaging of renal microvasculature in a murine ischemia-reperfusion injury model using optical coherence tomography angiography[J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1): 6396. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33295-9.

[19]

PEI J, PAN X, WEI G, et al. Research progress of glutathione peroxidase family (GPX) in redoxidation[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2023, 14: 1147414. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1147414.

[20]

WU Y, PEI J, XU Y, et al. Selenium: 48-year journey of global clinical trials[J]. Mol Cell Biochem, 2025, 480(6): 3253-3265. DOI: 10.1007/s11010-024-05202-x.

[21]

SCHWEIZER U, FABIANO M. Genetics of selenoproteins and selenoprotein metabolism-an overview of current concepts and emerging aspects[J]. Redox Biol, 2026, 91: 104083. DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2026.104083.

[22]

TUROVSKY E A, VARLAMOVA E G. Exogenous selenoprotein V induces apoptosis in murine testicular teratoma cells via mitochondrial dysfunction and ROS overproduction[J]. Biomolecules, 2025, 15(12): 1733. DOI: 10.3390/biom15121733.

[23]

FERREIRA R R, CARVALHO R V, COELHO L L, et al. Current understanding of human polymorphism in selenoprotein genes: a review of its significance as a risk biomarker[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2024, 25(3): 1402. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25031402.

[24]

NIRGUDE S, CHOUDHARY B. Insights into the role of GPX3, a highly efficient plasma antioxidant, in cancer[J]. Biochem Pharmacol, 2021, 184: 114365. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114365.

[25]

ZHANG R, CHEN Y, XU S, et al. Identification of GPX3 and JUN as tumor suppressors in thyroid cancer through integrated WGCNA and Mendelian randomization[J]. J Cancer, 2025, 16(6): 1814-1831. DOI: 10.7150/jca.104687.

[26]

ZHANG C, MA L, SHAO Y, et al. Selenoprotein GPX3 suppresses gastric adenocarcinoma proliferation and improves patient survival[J]. Free Radic Res, 2025, 59(8/9): 583-591. DOI: 10.1080/10715762.2025.2551031.

[27]

WANG Y, FANG J, YUAN Q, et al. GPX3 as a novel and potential therapeutic target in the shared molecular mechanisms of traumatic brain injury and Parkinson’s disease[J]. J Inflamm Res, 2025, 18: 1911-1928. DOI: 10.2147/jir.s506891.

[28]

WANG Z, HU Y, LI M, et al. GPX3 marks adipocyte lineage commitment in bone marrow stromal cells[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2025, 20(1): 502. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05908-8.

[29]

LI L, LU M, PENG Y, et al. Oxidatively stressed extracellular microenvironment drives fibroblast activation and kidney fibrosis[J]. Redox Biol, 2023, 67: 102868. DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2023.102868.

[30]

WU Y, SHI H, XU Y, et al. Targeted restoration of GPX3 attenuates renal ischemia/reperfusion injury by balancing selenoprotein expression and inhibiting ROS-mediated mitochondrial apoptosis[J]. Transplantation, 2024, 108(12): 2351-2365. DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005068.

[31]

LI X, XIAO S, FILIPCZAK N, et al. Role and therapeutic targeting strategies of neutrophil extracellular traps in inflammation[J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2023, 18: 5265-5287. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S418259.

[32]

ZHANG Y, LI C, JIANG Q, et al. Unraveling neutrophil extracellular traps: a new frontier in kidney disease therapy[J]. Life Sci, 2025, 379: 123892. DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2025.123892.

[33]

DAI S, ZHENG Z, ZHANG C, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps released by CD177+ neutrophils aggravated inflammation and neuronal impairment post-SCI [J]. Cell Commun Signal, 2025, 24(1): 22. DOI: 10.1186/s12964-025-02553-w.

[34]

ZHANG X, XU J, FAN Y, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps aggravate neuronal apoptosis and neuroinflammation via neddylation after traumatic brain injury[J]. Theranostics, 2025, 15(15): 7327-7345. DOI: 10.7150/thno.111512.

[35]

MA N, LIANG X N, CHEN Q F, et al. Proteogenomic verifies targets underlying erythromycin alleviate neutrophil extracellular traps-induced inflammation[J]. Respir Res, 2025, 26(1): 155. DOI: 10.1186/s12931-025-03226-5.

[36]

RAVINDRAN M, KHAN M A, PALANIYAR N. Neutrophil extracellular trap formation: physiology, pathology, and pharmacology[J]. Biomolecules, 2019, 9(8): 365. DOI: 10.3390/biom9080365.

[37]

CHEN Y, HU H, TAN S, et al. The role of neutrophil extracellular traps in cancer progression, metastasis and therapy[J]. Exp Hematol Oncol, 2022, 11(1): 99. DOI: 10.1186/s40164-022-00345-3.

[38]

VAN ZYL M, CRAMER E, SANDERS J F, et al. The role of neutrophil extracellular trap formation in kidney transplantation: implications from donors to the recipient[J]. Am J Transplant, 2024, 24(9): 1547-1557. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.04.018.

[39]

NAKAZAWA D, MASUDA S, NISHIBATA Y, et al. Neutrophils and NETs in kidney disease[J]. Nat Rev Nephrol, 2025, 21(6): 383-398. DOI: 10.1038/s41581-025-00944-3.

[40]

PIGNATARO G, GEMMA S, PETRUCCI M, et al. Unraveling NETs in sepsis: from cellular mechanisms to clinical relevance[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2025, 26(15): 7464. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26157464.

[41]

LIU T, LV X, XU Q, et al. Stroke-homing peptide-DNase1 alleviates intestinal ischemia reperfusion injury by selectively degrading neutrophil extracellular traps[J]. Cell Prolif, 2025, 58(8): e70010. DOI: 10.1111/cpr.70010.

[42]

ZHANG F, WU J, LI Z, et al. Interleukin-33 promotes neutrophil extracellular trap formation to aggravate renal ischemia-reperfusion injury through ST2/PI3K/Akt and ST2/PAD4 pathways[J]. Inflammation, 2026, 49(1): 56. DOI: 10.1007/s10753-025-02364-8.

基金资助

贵州省科技厅基础研究计划青年引导项目(黔科合基础QN(2025)407)

贵州省人民医院人才基金项目(院人才项目(2025)-1)

贵州省卫生健康委科学技术基金项目(gzwkj2026-297)

上海交通大学医学院附属上海儿童医学中心贵州医院院级科研项目基金资助(YG2025-GJ01001)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (29853KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉