替戈拉生联合米诺环素二联疗法根除老年患者幽门螺杆菌感染的疗效和安全性评价*

李建新 ,  田健 ,  李长锋

国际老年医学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (06) : 670 -674.

PDF (1128KB)
国际老年医学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (06) : 670 -674. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7593.2025.06.006
论著

替戈拉生联合米诺环素二联疗法根除老年患者幽门螺杆菌感染的疗效和安全性评价*

作者信息 +

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan combined with minocycline dual therapy for eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection in elderly patients

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1154K)

摘要

目的 评估替戈拉生联合米诺环素二联疗法根除老年患者幽门螺杆菌 (Hp) 感染的疗效和安全性。方法 选取 Hp 感染老年患者 100 例, 以随机数字表法分为治疗组及对照组, 各 50 例。治疗组采取替戈拉生联合米诺环素二联疗法治疗, 对照组采取传统含铋剂四联疗法治疗。两组疗程均为 14 d, 治疗过程中的第 7 天及第 14 天进行电话或微信随访, 记录患者的服药情况和不良反应发生情况。治疗结束后 4 周复查碳-13 或碳-14 尿素呼气试验。采用意向性治疗 (ITT) 分析、改良意向性治疗 (MITT) 分析和符合方案 (PP) 分析来比较两组患者 Hp 根除率, 同时比较不良反应发生率和依从性。结果 治疗组及对照组 ITT 分析根除率分别为 88.0%、76.0%, MITT 分析根除率分别为 89.8%、77.6%, PP 分析根除率分别为 91.7%、90.5%; 在这 3 种分析方法中, 治疗组的根除率均高于对照组, 差异均无统计学意义 (P>0.05)。治疗组的依从性良好率高于对照组, 差异无统计学意义 (P>0.05)。治疗组不良反应发生率低于对照组, 差异有统计学意义 (P<0.05)。结论 替戈拉生联合米诺环素二联疗法治疗老年患者 Hp 感染安全有效, 且相较于含铋剂四联疗法不良反应更少, 值得临床推广应用。

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan combined with minocycline dual therapy in eradicating Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection in elderly patients. Methods A total of 100 elderly patients with Hp infection were selected and randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group, with 50 patients in each group. The treatment group received a combination therapy of tegoprazan and minocycline, while the control group received a traditional four-drug regimen containing bismuth. The treatment duration for both groups was 14 days. Telephone or WeChat follow-up was conducted on days 7 and 14 of treatment to record medication adherence and adverse reactions. A carbon-13 or carbon-14 urea breath test was performed 4 weeks after treatment completion. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, modified intention-to-treat (MITT) analysis, and per-protocol (PP) analysis were used to compare Helicobacter pylori eradication rates between the two groups, as well as to compare adverse reaction incidence rates and treatment adherence. Results The eradication rates of the treatment group and the control group were 88.0% and 76.0% by ITT analysis, 89.8% and 77.6% by MITT analysis, and 91.7% and 90.5% by PP analysis, respectively; among these three analysis methods, the eradication rates of the treatment group were higher than those of the control group, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The compliance rate of the treatment group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the treatment group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The combination therapy of tegoprazan and minocycline is safe and effective for treating Helicobacter pylori infection in elderly patients, and compared with the bismuth-containing quadruple therapy, it has fewer adverse reactions, making it worthy of clinical promotion and application.

关键词

幽门螺杆菌感染 / 替戈拉生 / 米诺环素

Key words

Helicobacter pylori infection / Tegoprazan / Minocycline

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
李建新,田健,李长锋. 替戈拉生联合米诺环素二联疗法根除老年患者幽门螺杆菌感染的疗效和安全性评价*[J]. 国际老年医学杂志, 2025, 46(06): 670-674 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7593.2025.06.006

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Hooi J, Lai WY, Ng WK, et al. Global prevalence of helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta—analysis[J]. Gastroenterology, 2017, 153(2): 420-429.

[2]

Xie L, Liu GW, Liu YN, et al. Prevalence of helicobacter pylori infection in China from 2014—2023: a systematic review and meta—analysis[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2024, 30(43): 4636-4656.

[3]

廖专, 孙涛, 吴浩, . 中国早期胃癌筛查及内镜诊治共识意见 (2014 年 4 月·长沙)[J]. 胃肠病学, 2014, 19(7): 408-427.

[4]

Liao Z, Sun T, Wu H, et al. Consensus on early gastric cancer screening and endoscopic diagnosis and treatment in China (April 2014, Changsha)[J]. Chin J Gastroenterol, 2014, 19(7): 408-427.

[5]

牛占岳, 周丽雅 . 全球耐药趋势下中国幽门螺杆菌根除治疗进展[J]. 中华消化杂志, 2021, 41(10): 711-714.

[6]

Niu ZY, Zhou LY. Progress of helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in China under the global drug resistance trend[J]. Chin J Dig, 2021, 41(10): 711-714.

[7]

季红莉, 路琴, 黄慧, . 老年患者幽门螺杆菌感染根除失败的原因[J]. 中华老年多器官疾病杂志, 2019, 18(1): 26-29.

[8]

Ji HL, Lu Q, Huang H, et al. Reasons for the failure of helicobacter pylori eradication in elderly patients[J]. Chin J Mult Organ Dis Elderly, 2019, 18(1): 26-29.

[9]

Wang H, Kong QZ, Li YY, et al. High—dose dual therapy versus bismuth—containing quadruple therapy for the eradication of helicobacter pylori: a systematic review and meta—analysis[J]. J Dig Dis, 2024, 25(3): 163-175.

[10]

杨雅名, 孙路, 何利华, . 中国代表性地区幽门螺杆菌菌株米诺环素流行病学界值的建立[J]. 疾病监测, 2025, 40(6): 771-776.

[11]

Yang YM, Sun L, He LH, et al. Establishment of epidemiological cut—off value for minocycline against Helicobacter pylori in representative regions of China[J]. Dis Surveill, 2025, 40(6): 771-776.

[12]

薛建华, 田建广, 陶琦, . 幽门螺杆菌感染与老年相关疾病的关系研究进展[J]. 现代预防医学, 2022, 49(20): 3829-3835.

[13]

Xue JH, Tian JG, Tao Q, Yang, et al. Research progress on the relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and elderly—related diseases[J]. Mod Prev Med, 2022, 49(20): 3829-3835.

[14]

Amieva M, Peek RM Jr . Pathobiology of Helicobacter pylori—Induced gastric cancer[J]. Gastroenterology, 2016, 150(1): 64-78.

[15]

Leung WK, Wong I, Cheung KS, et al. Effects of helicobacter pylori treatment on incidence of gastric cancer in older individuals[J]. Gastroenterology, 2018, 155(1): 67-75.

[16]

王涛, 徐炳欣, 吴斌 . 根除幽门螺杆菌对老年心脑血管疾病患者长期服用小剂量阿司匹林所致消化道出血的影响[J]. 慢性病学杂志, 2018, 19(4): 391-393.

[17]

Wang T, Xu BX, Wu B. Impact of helicobacter pylori eradication on gastrointestinal bleeding caused by long—term low—dose aspirin use in elderly patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases[J]. J Chronic Dis, 2018, 19(4): 391-393.

[18]

苟铃珠, 许慧梅, 贠建蔚, . 老年感染者幽门螺杆菌根除治疗研究进展[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2024, 44(4): 326—331, 337.

[19]

Gou LZ, Xu HM, Yun JW, et al. Research progress on Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in elderly infected patients[J]. Chin J Pract Intern Med, 2024, 44(4): 326—331, 337.

[20]

Yan TL, Gao JG, Wang JH, et al. Current status of Helicobacter pylori eradication and risk factors for eradication failure[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2020, 26(32): 4846-4856.

[21]

中华医学会消化病学分会幽门螺杆菌学组 . 2022 中国幽门螺杆菌感染治疗指南[J]. 胃肠病学, 2022, 27(3): 150-162.

[22]

Helicobacter pylori Study Group , Chinese Society of Gastroenterology , Chinese Medical Association . 2022 Chinese guidelines for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection[J]. Chin J Gastroentrol, 2022, 27(3): 150-162.

[23]

Yang Q, He C, Hu Y, et al. 14—day pantoprazole—and amoxicillin—containing high—dose dual therapy for helicobacter pylori eradication in elderly patients: a prospective, randomized controlled trial[J]. Front pharmacol, 2023, 14: 1096103.

[24]

Gao W, Ye H, Deng X, et al. Rabeprazole—amoxicillin dual therapy as first—line treatment for H pylori eradication in special patients: a retrospective, real—life study[J]. Helicobacter, 2020, 25(5): e12717.

[25]

Gao W, Li JW, Ye H, et al. Real—world evidence on the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan—amoxicillin dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori treatment in elderly patients[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2025, 31(1): 101463.

[26]

Cicali EJ, Elchynski A, Thomas CD, et al. Implementation of CYP2C19 genotyping to guide proton pump inhibitor use at an academic health center[J]. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 2023, 80(15): 994-1003.

[27]

Jin T, Wu W, Zhang L, et al. The efficacy and safety of Vonoprazan and Tegoprazan in Helicobacter pylori eradication: a comprehensive systematic review and meta—analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Therap Adv Gastroenterol, 2025, 18: 17562848251314801.

[28]

Jung YS, Jung BW, Park CH . Comparative efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy between tegoprazan—based concomitant and bismuth quadruple therapies: a real—world evidence[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2025, 40(1): 159-165.

[29]

Graham DY, Fischbach L . Helicobacter pylori treatment in the era of increasing antibiotic resistance[J]. Gut, 2010, 59(8): 1143-1153.

[30]

Ji Z, Han F, Meng F, et al. The association of age and antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori: a study in Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province, China[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016, 95(8): e2831.

[31]

Liu DS, Wang YH, Zeng ZR, et al. Primary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori in Chinese patients: a multiregion prospective 7—year study[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2018, 24(7): 780.e5-780.e8.

[32]

Blumenthal KG, Peter JG, Trubiano JA, et al. Antibiotic allergy[J]. Lancet (London, England), 2019, 393(10167): 183-198.

[33]

Xie J, Peng J, Liu D, et al. Treatment failure is a key factor in the development of Helicobacter pylori resistance[J]. Helicobacter, 2024, 29(3): e13091.

[34]

Brogden RN, Speight TM, Avery GS . Minocycline: a review of its antibacterial and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use[J]. Drugs, 1975, 9(4): 251-291.

[35]

You S, Tang X, Zhou J, et al. Minocycline/Amoxicillin—based bismuth quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a pilot study[J]. Microorganisms, 2024, 12(3): 429.

[36]

Wang X, Teng G, Dong X, et al. The efficacy and safety of a simple 14—day vonoprazan—minocycline dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a retrospective pilot study[J]. Therap Adv Gastroenterol, 2024, 17: 17562848241299734.

[37]

Claussen CF, Claussen E . Antivertiginous action of vitamin B6 on experimental minocycline—induced vertigo in man[J]. Arzneimittelforschung, 1988, 38(3): 396-399.

[38]

Guan JL, Xu TT, Lin Y, et al. High—dose dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication inducing less impact on the gut microbiota[J]. Gut Pathog, 2025, 17(1): 7.

基金资助

*吉林大学横向科研项目(LXQT-2025-291)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1128KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/