不同岩相泥页岩生烃能力与含油性特征——以玛湖凹陷风城组玛页1井为例

何晋译 ,  冷筠滢 ,  李志明 ,  何文军 ,  刘得光 ,  杨森 ,  李楚雄

东北石油大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (1) : 1 -17.

PDF (19915KB)
东北石油大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (1) : 1 -17. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2025.01.001
油气地质与勘探

不同岩相泥页岩生烃能力与含油性特征——以玛湖凹陷风城组玛页1井为例

作者信息 +

Hydrocarbon generation capacity and oil-bearing properties of shale with different lithofacies: a case study of well Maye 1 in Fengcheng Formation, Mahu Sag

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (20391K)

摘要

以玛湖凹陷玛页1井风城组岩心为研究对象,采用全岩 X 线衍射、薄片观察、岩石热解和多温阶热解等方法,在岩相划分的基础上,分析不同岩相泥页岩生烃能力与含油性特征。结果表明:玛湖凹陷风城组主要发育块状长英质泥岩、块状云质泥岩、纹层状长英质泥岩、纹层状灰质泥岩、纹层状云质泥岩、树根状泥岩和雪花状泥岩 7 类岩相;纹层状长英质泥岩、纹层状灰质泥岩、纹层状云质泥岩、树根状泥岩和雪花状泥岩为中等一好烃源岩,块状云质泥岩为差一中等烃源岩,块状长英质泥岩烃源岩品质差。纹层状长英质泥岩、纹层状云质泥岩、树根状泥岩和雪花状泥岩含油性和可动性好,为页岩油甜点岩相;生烃能力、排烃和外来烃运移是影响泥岩含油性与可动性的主要因素。玛页 1 井风城组深度在 4625.0 4635.0 4665.0 4685.0 4730.0 4770.0   m 之间发育优势岩相,为页岩油勘探开发的有利层段。该结果为玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油下一步勘探部署与有效开发提供依据。

Abstract

The study on hydrocarbon generation capacity and oil-bearing properties of shale with different lithofacies is of great significance to the evaluation of high-quality source rocks. Mudstone samples from well Maye 1, Fengcheng Formation, Mahu Sag, were selected to determine the hydrocarbon generation capacity and oil-bearing properties of shale with different lithofacies through X-ray diffraction, thin section observation, rock pyrolysis and multi-temperature pyrolysis. The results show that mudstones of Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag can be divided into 7 types of lithofacies: massive felsic mudstone, massive dolomitic mudstone, laminated felsic mudstone, laminated calcareous mudstone, laminated dolomitic mudstone, tree-root shaped mudstone and snowflake mudstone. The laminated felsic mudstone, laminated calcareous mudstone, laminated dolomitic mudstone, tree-root shaped mudstone and snowflake mudstone are medium-good source rocks. The source rock quality of massive dolomitic mudstone is poor-medium source rock. The massive felsic mudstone is poor source rock. The laminated felsic mudstone, laminated dolomitic mudstone, tree-root shaped mudstone and snowflake mudstone are the sweet facies of shale oil with high oil content and good mobility. Hydrocarbon generation capacity, hydrocarbon expulsion and hydrocarbon migration are the main factors affecting the oil content of mudstones. The depth intervals of 4625.0-4635.0,4665.0-4685.0 and 4730.0-4770.0 m of well Maye 1 are favorable for shale oil exploration and development, which dominant lithofacies developed at. The research results can provide theoretical basis and technical support for further exploration and development of the shale oil in the Fengcheng Formation, Mahu Sag.

关键词

玛湖凹陷 / 风城组 / 玛页1井 / 页岩油 / 岩相 / 生烃能力 / 含油性

Key words

Mahu Sag / Fengcheng Formation / well Maye 1 / shale oil / lithofacies / hydrocarbon generation capacity / oil-bearing properties

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
何晋译,冷筠滢,李志明,何文军,刘得光,杨森,李楚雄. 不同岩相泥页岩生烃能力与含油性特征——以玛湖凹陷风城组玛页1井为例[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2025, 49(1): 1-17 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2025.01.001

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

JARVIE D M. Shale resource systems for oil and gas:part 1-shale-gas resource systems[J]. AAPG Memoir, 2012,97:89-119.

[2]

WANG M, SHERWOOD N, LI Z, et al. Shale oil occurring between salt intervals in the Dongpu Depression,Bohai Bay Basin,China[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2015,152:100-112.

[3]

MISCH D, GROSS D, MAHLSTEDT N, et al. Shale gas/shale oil potential of Upper Visean black shales in the Dniepr-Donets Basin (Ukraine)[J]. Marine & Petroleum Geology, 2016,75:203-219.

[4]

KUMAR S, OJHA K, BASTIA R, et al. Evaluation of Eocene source rock for potential shale oil and gas generation in North Cambay Basin,India[J]. Marine & Petroleum Geology, 2017,88:141-154.

[5]

CHEN Z, JIANG W, ZHANG L, et al. Organic matter,mineral composition,pore size,and gas sorption capacity of lacustrine mudstones:implications for the shale oil and gas exploration in the Dongying Depression,Eastern China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2018, 102 (8):1565-1600.

[6]

高攀明. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴起地区长 7 页岩油烃源岩特征及生排烃潜力[J]. 非常规油气, 2024, 11(3):10-18.

[7]

GAO Panming. Characteristics and hydrocarbon generation and expulsion potential of Chang 7 shale oil source rocks in Wuqi Area, Ordos Basin[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2024, 11(3):10-18.

[8]

邹才能, 潘松圻, 荆振华, . 页岩油气革命及影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1):1-12.

[9]

ZOU Caineng, PAN Songqi, JING Zhenhua, et al. Shale oil and gas revolution and its impact[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(1): 1-12.

[10]

HOU L, MA W, LUO X, et al. Hydrocarbon generation-retention-expulsion mechanism and shale oil producibility of the Permian Lucaogou shale in the Junggar Basin as simulated by semi-open pyrolysis experiments[J]. Marine & Petroleum Geology, 2021, 125:104880.

[11]

马永生, 蔡勋育, 赵培荣, . 中国陆相页岩油地质特征与勘探实践[J]. 地质学报, 2022, 96(1):155-171.

[12]

MA Yongsheng, CAI Xunyu, ZHAO Peirong, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration practices of continental shale oil in China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2022, 96(1):155-171.

[13]

杨雷, 金之钧. 全球页岩油发展及展望[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5):553-559.

[14]

YANG Lei, JIN Zhijun. Global shale oil development and prospects[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5):553-559.

[15]

金之钧, 朱如凯, 梁新平, . 当前陆相页岩油勘探开发值得关注的几个问题[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(6):1276-1287.

[16]

JIN Zhijun, ZHU Rukai, LIANG Xinping, et al. Several issues worthy of attention in current lacustrine shale oil exploration and development[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(6):1276-1287.

[17]

周庆凡, 金之钧, 杨国丰, . 美国页岩油勘探开发现状与前景展望[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3):469-477.

[18]

ZHOU Qingfan, JIN Zhijun, YANG Guofeng, et al. Shale oil exploration and production in the U.S.:status and outlook[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3):469-477.

[19]

杜金虎, 胡素云, 庞正炼, . 中国陆相页岩油类型、潜力及前景[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5):560-568.

[20]

DU Jinhu, HU Suyun, PANG Zhenglian, et al. The types, potentials and prospects of continental shale oil in China[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5):560-568.

[21]

刘朝全, 姜学峰. 2016 年国内外油气行业发展报告[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社,2017:176-248.

[22]

LIU Chaoquan, JIANG Xuefeng. Report of developments for international oil and gas industry in 2016[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press,2017:176-248.

[23]

支东明, 宋永, 何文军, . 准噶尔盆地中一下二叠统页岩油地质特征、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(4):389-401.

[24]

ZHI Dongming, SONG Yong, HE Wenjun, et al. Geological characteristics,resource potential and exploration direction of shale oil in Middle-Lower Permian,Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(4):389-401.

[25]

王民, 马睿, 李进步, . 济阳坳陷古近系沙河街组湖相页岩油赋存机理[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(4):789-802.

[26]

WANG Min, MA Rui, LI Jinbu, et al. Occurrence mechanism of lacustrine shale oil in the Paleogene Shahejie Formation of Jiyang Depression,Bohai Bay Basin,China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(4):789-802.

[27]

张君峰, 徐兴友, 白静, . 松辽盆地南部白垩系青一段深湖相页岩油富集模式及勘探实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(4): 637-652.

[28]

ZHANG Junfeng, XU Xingyou, BAI Jing, et al. Enrichment and exploration of deep lacustrine shale oil in the first member of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation,Southern Songliao Basin,NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(4):637-652.

[29]

付金华, 刘显阳, 李士祥, . 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长 7 段页岩油勘探发现与资源潜力[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(5):1-11.

[30]

FU Jinhua, LIU Xianyang, LI Shixiang, et al. Discovery and resource potential of shale oil of Chang 7 Member,Triassic Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(5):1-11.

[31]

赵晨旭, 李忠诚, 郭世超, . 松辽盆地南部长岭断陷青一段陆相页岩地球化学和沉积环境特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6):55-61.

[32]

ZHAO Chenxu, LI Zhongcheng, GUO Shichao, et al. Characteristics of geochemistry and depositional environment of terrestrial shales in the first member of Qingshankou Formation of Changling Fault Depression in the Southern Songliao Basin[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2023, 30(6):55-61.

[33]

姚红生, 昝灵, 高玉巧, . 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油富集高产主控因素与勘探重大突破[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(5):776-783.

[34]

YAO Hongsheng, ZAN Ling, GAO Yuqiao, et al. Main controlling factors for the enrichment of shale oil and significant discovery in second member of Paleogene Funing Formation,Qingtong Sag,Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(5): 776-783.

[35]

仲米剑, 刘喜杰, 万欢, . 苏北盆地曲塘次凹阜宁组三段储层特征及主控因素[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2022, 46(1):36-46.

[36]

ZHONG Mijian, LIU Xijie, WAN Huan, et al. Reservoir characteristics and main control factors of the 3rd member of Funing Formation in Qutang Subsag,Subei Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2022, 46(1):36-46.

[37]

何文渊, 何海清, 王玉华, . 川东北地区平安 1 井侏罗系凉高山组页岩油重大突破及意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(1):40-49.

[38]

HE Wenyuan, HE Haiqing, WANG Yuhua, et al. Major breakthrough and significance of shale oil of the Jurassic Lianggaoshan Formation in well Pingan 1 in Northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(1):40-49.

[39]

蒲秀刚, 马超, 郭彬程, . 渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷歧北次凹沙三上亚段页岩岩相特征及含油性差异[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2023, 47 (2):55-69.

[40]

PU Xiugang, MA Chao, GUO Bincheng, et al. Shale lithofacies characteristics and shale oil bearing differences in Es3 s of Qibei Subsag,Qikou Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2023, 47(2):55-69.

[41]

李映艳, 邓远, 徐田录, . 吉木萨尔凹陷页岩油赋存特征及含油下限[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2022, 46(6):52-62.

[42]

LI Yingyan, DENG Yuan, XU Tianlu, et al. Occurrence characteristics of shale oil and lower-limit of oil-bearing in Jimsar Sag[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2022, 46(6):52-62.

[43]

宋永, 杨智峰, 何文军, . 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组碱湖型页岩油勘探进展[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(1):60-72.

[44]

SONG Yong, YANG Zhifeng, HE Wenjun, et al. Exploration progress of alkaline lake type shale oil of the Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(1):60-72.

[45]

支东明, 唐勇, 郑孟林, . 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油藏地质特征与成藏控制因素[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5):615-623.

[46]

ZHI Dongming, TANG Yong, ZHENG Menglin, et al. Geological characteristics and accumulation controlling factors of shale reservoirs in Fengcheng Formation,Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5):615-623.

[47]

何文军, 钱永新, 赵毅, . 玛湖凹陷风城组全油气系统勘探启示[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(6):641-655.

[48]

HE Wenjun, Q1AN Yongxin, ZHAO Yi, et al. Exploration implications of total petroleum system in Fengcheng Formation,Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(6):641-655.

[49]

何文军, 王绪龙, 邹阳, . 准噶尔盆地石油地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 海相油气地质, 2019, 24(2):75-84.

[50]

HE Wenjun, WANG Xulong, ZOU Yang, et al. The geological conditions,resource potential and exploration direction of oil in Junggar Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2019, 24(2):75-84.

[51]

黎茂稳, 马晓潇, 蒋启贵, . 北美海相页岩油形成条件、富集特征与启示[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1):13-28.

[52]

LI Maowen, MA Xiaoxiao, JIANG Qigui, et al. Enlightenment from formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of marine shale oil in North America[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1):13-28.

[53]

白国平, 邱海华, 邓舟舟, . 美国页岩油资源分布特征与主控因素研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4):524-532.

[54]

BAI Guoping, QIU Haihua, DENG Zhouzhou, et al. Distribution and main controls for shale oil resources in USA[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(4):524-532.

[55]

曹剑, 雷德文, 李玉文, . 古老碱湖优质烃源岩:准噶尔盆地下二叠统风城组[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(7):781-790.

[56]

CAO Jian, LEI Dewen, LI Yuwen, et al. Ancient high-quality alkaline lacustrine source rocks discovered in the Lower Permian Fengcheng Formation,Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(7):781-790.

[57]

王小军, 王婷婷, 曹剑. 玛湖凹陷风城组碱湖烃源岩基本特征及其高效生烃[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2018, 39(1):9-15.

[58]

WANG Xiaojun, WANG Tingting, CAO Jian. Basic characteristics and highly efficient hydrocarbon generation of alkaline-lacustrine source rocks in Fengcheng Formation of Mahu Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018, 39(1):9-15.

[59]

龚德瑜, 刘泽阳, 何文军, . 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组有机质多元富集机制[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2024, 51(2):260-272.

[60]

GONG Deyu, LIU Zeyang, HE Wenjun, et al. Multiple enrichment mechanisms of organic matter in the Fengcheng Formation of Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2024, 51(2):260-272.

[61]

倪敏婕, 祝贺暄, 何文军, . 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组沉积环境与沉积模式分析[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(5):1194-1207.

[62]

NI Minjie, ZHU Hexuan, HE Wenjun, et al. Depositional environment and sedimentary model of the Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(5):1194-1207.

[63]

支东明, 曹剑, 向宝力, . 玛湖凹陷风城组碱湖烃源岩生烃机理及资源量新认识[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2016, 37(5):499-506.

[64]

ZHI Dongming, CAO Jian, XIANG Baoli, et al. Fengcheng alkaline lacustrine source rocks of Lower Permian in Mahu Sag in Junggar Basin:hydrocarbon generation mechanism and petroleum resources reestimation[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2016, 37(5): 499-506.

[65]

夏刘文, 曹剑, 边立曾, . 准噶尔盆地玛湖大油区二叠纪碱湖生物一环境协同演化及油源差异性[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2022, 52 (4):732-746.

[66]

XIA Liuwen, CAO Jian, BIAN Lizeng, et al. Co-evolution of paleo-environment and bio-precursors in a Permian alkaline lake,Mahu mega-oil province,Junggar Basin:implications for oil sources[J]. Science China:Earth Sciences, 2022, 52(4):732-746.

[67]

白雨, 汪飞, 牛志杰, . 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩生烃动力学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4):116-127.

[68]

BAI Yu, WANG Fei, NIU Zhijie, et al. Hydrocarbon generation kinetics of source rocks of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(4):116-127.

[69]

刘得光, 周路, 李世宏, . 玛湖凹陷风城组烃源岩特征与生烃模式[J]. 沉积学报, 2020, 38(5):946-955.

[70]

LIU Deguang, ZHOU Lu, LI Shihong, et al. Characteristics of source rocks and hydrocarbon generation models of Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2020, 38(5):946-955.

[71]

吕倩, 李水福, 胡守志, . 泌阳凹陷深凹区页岩非均质性与含油性特征分析[J]. 断块油气田, 2016, 23(3):284-289.

[72]

LYU Qian, LI Shuifu, HU Shouzhi, et al. Heterogeneity and oil-bearing property of shale in Biyang Depression and their influencing factors[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2016, 23(3):284-289.

[73]

龙海岑, 李绍鹏. 泥页岩层系非均质性及其控制因素研究:以苏北盆地阜二段为例[J]. 非常规油气, 2022, 9(4):78-90.

[74]

LONG Haicen, LI Shaopeng. The research on the heterogeneity of shale formations and its controlling factors:a case study of the second member of Funing Formation in Subei Basin[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2022, 9(4):78-90.

[75]

石蕾, 宗文明, 孙求实, . 泥页岩有机非均质性评价及其在烃源岩分级评价中的应用:以辽西拗陷中元古界藓县系为例[J]. 地质与资源, 2022, 31(3):367-374.

[76]

SHI Lei, ZONG Wenming, SUN Qiushi, et al. Shale organic heterogeneity evaluation method and its application in source rocks grading evaluation:a case study of Mesoproterozoic Jixianian in Liaoxi Depression[J]. Geology and Resources, 2022, 31(3):367-374.

[77]

张迈, 唐友军, 徐兴友, . 松辽盆地长岭凹陷青山口组一段泥页岩非均质性评价:以吉页油 1 井为例[J]. 地质与资源, 2021, 30(3): 265-272.

[78]

ZHANG Mai, TANG Youjun, XU Xingyou, et al. Heterogeneity evaluation of shale in the first member of Qingshankou Formation in Changling Sag,Songliao Basin:a case study of JYY1 Well[J]. Geology and Resources, 2021, 30(3):265-272.

[79]

钟红利, 卓自敏, 张风奇, . 鄂尔多斯盆地甘泉地区长 7 页岩油储层非均质性及其控油规律[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4):10-18.

[80]

ZHONG Hongli, ZHUO Zimin, ZHANG Fengqi, et al. Heterogeneity of Chang 7 shale oil reservoir and its oil control law in Ganquan Area,Ordos Basin[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2023, 30(4):10-18.

[81]

张鹏, 黄宇琪, 张金川, . 湘鄂西页岩非均质性研究:以 Ld1 井龙马溪组为例[J]. 地质学报, 2020, 94(5):1568-1577.

[82]

ZHANG Peng, HUANG Yuqi, ZHANG Jinchuan, et al. Study on shale heterogeneity in Western Hunan and Hubei:a case studie of Longmaxi Formation in well Ld1[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2020, 94(5):1568-1577.

[83]

曾翔, 蔡进功, 董哲, . 泥页岩沉积特征与生烃能力:以东营凹陷沙河街组三段中亚段一沙河街组四段上亚段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(1):31-43.

[84]

ZENG Xiang, CAI Jingong, DONG Zhe, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and hydrocarbon generation potential of mudstone and shale:a case study of middle submember of member 3 and upper submember of member 4 in Shahejie Formation in Dongying Sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(1):31-43.

[85]

李晓慧, 姜振学, 黄立良, . 玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油富集主控因素及有利富集层段[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2022, 46(2):33-44.

[86]

LI Xiaohui, JIANG Zhenxue, HUANG Liliang, et al. Main controlling factors of shale oil enrichment and optimization of favorable enrichment intervals of Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2022, 46(2):33-44.

[87]

钱门辉, 王绪龙, 黎茂稳, . 玛页 1 井风城组页岩含油性与烃类赋存状态[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6):693-703.

[88]

QIAN Menhui, WANG Xulong, LI Maowen, et al. Oil-bearing properties and hydrocarbon occurrence states of Fengcheng Formation shale in well Maye-1,Mahu Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(6):693-703.

[89]

柳波, 石佳欣, 付晓飞, . 陆相泥页岩层系岩相特征与页岩油富集条件:以松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组一段富有机质泥页岩为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(5):828-838.

[90]

LIU Bo, SHI Jiaxin, FU Xiaofei, et al. Petrological characteristics and shale oil enrichment of lacustrine fine-grained sedimentary system:a case study of organic-rich shale in first member of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Gulong Sag,Songliao Basin,NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(5):828-838.

[91]

杨万芹, 蒋有录, 王勇. 东营凹陷沙三下一沙四上亚段泥页岩岩相沉积环境分析[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(4): 19-26.

[92]

YANG Wanqin, JIANG Youlu, WANG Yong. Study on shale facies sedimentary environment of Lower E3-Upper E4 in Dongying Sag[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2015, 39(4):19-26.

[93]

谢宗奎. 柴达木台南地区第四系细粒沉积岩相与沉积模式研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2009, 16(5):245-250.

[94]

XIE Zongkui. Research on the Quaternary fine-fraction lithofacies and sedimentation model in Tainan Area Qaidam Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2009, 16(5):245-250.

[95]

ZHANG J, JIANG Z, JIANG X, et al. Oil generation induces sparry calcite formation in lacustrine mudrock,Eocene of East China[J]. Marine & Petroleum Geology, 2016,71:344-359.

[96]

何文军, 吴和源, 杨森, . 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油储层岩相划分与类型评价[J]. 西北地质, 2023, 56(1):217-231.

[97]

HE Wenjun, WU Heyuan, YANG Sen, et al. Lithofacies division and type evaluation of shale oil reservoir in Fengcheng Formation of Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2023, 56(1):217-231.

[98]

常佳琦, 姜振学, 高之业, . 玛湖凹陷风城组不同岩相页岩含油性及可动性特征[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 53(9): 3354-3367.

[99]

CHANG Jiaqi, JIANG Zhenxue, GAO Zhiye, et al. Oil bearing and mobility characteristics of different lithofacies shales in Fengcheng Formation,Mahu Sag[J]. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 2022, 53(9):3354-3367.

[100]

姜福杰, 胡美玲, 胡涛, . 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油富集主控因素与模式[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(4):706-718.

[101]

JIANG Fujie, HU Meiling, HU Tao, et al. Controlling factors and models of shale oil enrichment in Lower Permian Fengcheng Formation,Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(4):706-718.

[102]

康淑娟, 仰云峰, 王华建, . 松辽盆地中央坳陷区三肇凹陷上白垩统青山口组一段页岩含油性特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(1): 89-98.

[103]

KANG Shujuan, YANG Yunfeng, WANG Huajian, et al. Oil-bearing capacity of shale in the first member of Upper Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation,Sanzhao Sag,Central Depression,Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(1):89-98.

[104]

金之钧, 梁新平, 王小军, . 玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油富集机制与甜点段优选[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6):631-639.

[105]

JIN Zhijun, LIANG Xinping, WANG Xiaojun, et al. Shale oil enrichment mechanism and sweet spot selection of Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(6):631-639.

[106]

蒋启贵, 黎茂稳, 钱门辉, . 不同赋存状态页岩油定量表征技术与应用研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(6):842-849.

[107]

JIANG Qigui, LI Maowen, QIAN Menhui, et al. Quantitative characterization of shale oil in different occurrence states and its application[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(6):842-849.

[108]

李志明, 刘鹏, 钱门辉, . 湖相泥页岩不同赋存状态油定量对比:以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷页岩油探井取心段为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2018, 47(6):1252-1263.

[109]

LI Zhiming, LIU Peng, QIAN Menhui, et al. Quantitative comparison of different occurrence oil for lacustrine shale:a case from cored interval of shale oil special drilling wells in Dongying Depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2018, 47(6):1252-1263.

[110]

李志明, 陶国亮, 黎茂稳, . 渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷沾化凹陷 L69 井古近系沙三下亚段取心段页岩油勘探有利层段[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(2):236-247.

[111]

LI Zhiming, TAO Guoliang, LI Maowen, et al. Favorable interval for shale oil prospecting in coring well L69 in the Paleogene Es3 L in Zhanhua Sag,Jiyang Depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(2):236-247.

[112]

李志明, 陶国亮, 黎茂稳, . 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部彬长区块三叠系延长组7段3亚段页岩油勘探前景探讨[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3):558-570.

[113]

LI Zhiming, TAO Guoliang, LI Maowen, et al. Discussion on prospecting potential of shale oil in the 3rd sub-member of the Triassic Chang 7 Member in Binchang Block,Southwestern Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3):558-570.

[114]

胡涛, 姜福杰, 庞雄奇, . 页岩油微运移识别、评价及其石油地质意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2024, 51(1):114-126.

[115]

HU Tao, JIANG Fujie, PANG Xiongqi, et al. Identification and evaluation of shale oil micro-migration and its petroleum geological significance[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2024, 51(1):114-126.

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(42090022)

中国石化勘探开发研究院重点课题(YK-2023-18)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (19915KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/