断背斜储层物性演化及流固耦合数值模拟——以库车坳陷克拉苏构造带白垩系储层为例

汪顺宇 ,  王健 ,  李勇 ,  王阿瑞 ,  陈美伊 ,  刘可禹

东北石油大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2) : 30 -45.

PDF (16871KB)
东北石油大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2) : 30 -45. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2025.02.003
油气地质与勘探

断背斜储层物性演化及流固耦合数值模拟——以库车坳陷克拉苏构造带白垩系储层为例

作者信息 +

Evolution of petrophysical properties and coupled hydraulic-mechanical modelling for fault-related anticline reservoirs: example from Cretaceous reservoirs in the Kelasu Structural Belt, Kuqa Depression

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (17275K)

摘要

以库车坳陷克拉苏构造带逆冲断层相关褶皱为研究对象,分析断背斜储层的粒间体积分布特征,采用流固耦合数值方法模拟断背斜的形成过程与物性演化,评价构造挤压与流体流动对储层物性演化的控制作用。结果表明:在库车坳陷克拉苏构造带的断背斜形成过程中,储层处于压应变状态,受外弧扩张作用和逆断层的影响,断背斜的枢纽和后翼是高孔隙度储层的优势发育部位。晚期构造挤压型超压对储层储集空间的保护作用有限,保护孔隙度为0.25%~0.47%和0.18%~0.43%的断背斜枢纽和后翼免受构造挤压应力的破坏。压应变演化路径控制储层孔隙度演化,早期强压应变导致孔隙度快速下降,后期外弧扩张作用抵消部分压应变,早期损失的储层孔隙度不能完全恢复。该结果为挤压背景下的断背斜优质储层分布及预测提供依据。

Abstract

To better study the effects of structural strain and fluid overpressure on reservoir properties, this research focuses on the thrust-related folds in the Kelasu Structural Belt, Kuqa Depression. The intergranular volume distribution characteristics of the reservoir and a fluid-solid coupling numerical method are applied to analyze the formation process and property evolution of the faulted anticline. The study quantitatively evaluated the controlling effects of tectonic compression and fluid flow on the evolution of reservoir physical properties. The results showed that during the formation of a fault-related anticline on Kelasu Structural Belt, Kuqa Depression, the reservoir formation would be under compressive strain. Due to the stretching of the outer-arc of an anticline and associated thrust faulting, the hinge and back-limb of the fault-related anticline would become favorable reservoirs with relatively high porosity. In the late-stage, tectonic compression-induced overpressure would provide little protection on reservoir porosity, with merely 0.25%~0.47% and 0.18%~0.43% increases at the hinge and back-limb of the fault-related anticline, respectively. The evolution paths of the compressive strain controlled the porosity evolution of the reservoir. Early-stage strong compressive strain may cause a rapid decrease of porosity, while the late-stage outer-arc tensile can partially offset of the compressive strain. The porosity loss of the reservoir during the early-stage compression cannot be fully restored. This study provides a theoretical basis for predicting the distribution of high-quality reservoirs on the fault-related anticline under the compressional tectonic condition.

关键词

储层物性演化 / 流固耦合数值模拟 / 构造 / 流体 / 断背斜 / 有限元 / 白垩系 / 克拉苏构造带 / 库车坳陷

Key words

evolution of reservoir petrophysical properties / coupled hydraulic-mechanical modelling / structure / fluid / fault-related anticlines / finite element simulation / Cretaceous / Kelasu Structural Belt / Kuqa Depression

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
汪顺宇,王健,李勇,王阿瑞,陈美伊,刘可禹. 断背斜储层物性演化及流固耦合数值模拟——以库车坳陷克拉苏构造带白垩系储层为例[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2025, 49(2): 30-45 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2025.02.003

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

漆家福, 雷刚林, 李明刚, . 库车坳陷-南天山盆山过渡带的收缩构造变形模式[J]. 地学前缘, 2009, 16(3): 120-128.

[2]

QI Jiafu , LEI Ganglin , LI Minggang , et al. A model of contractional structure for transition belt between Kuche Depression and Southern Tianshan Uplift [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2009, 16(3): 120-128.

[3]

史玲玲, 唐雁刚, 汪斌, . 库车坳陷克深5井区巴什基奇克组应力垂向分层特征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2016, 37(4): 430-435.

[4]

SHI Lingling , TANG Yangang , WANG Bin , et al. Characteristics of vertical zonation of Bashijigike Reservoir by stress intervals in well block Keshen-5 in Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin [J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2016, 37(4): 430-435.

[5]

倪玲梅, 李忠, 郭春涛, . 储层成岩流体系统特征及其影响:以塔里木盆地库车坳陷依奇克里克构造带阿合组为例[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2022, 46(2): 45-57.

[6]

NI Lingmei , LI Zhong , GUO Chuntao , et al. Properties of diagenetic fluid systems and their influences: taking Ahe Formation reservoir in Yigikelike Structural Belt of the Kuqa Depression Tarim Basin as an example [J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2022, 46(2): 45-57.

[7]

罗富文, 柳少波, 卓勤功, . 库车坳陷秋里塔格构造带中东段油气充注期次及成藏模式[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2024, 48(1): 26-38.

[8]

LUO Fuwen , LIU Shaobo , ZHUO Qingong , et al. Hydrocarbon charging stage and accumulation model in the middle-east section of Qiulitag Structural Belt, Kuqa Depression [J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2024, 48(1): 26-38.

[9]

田军, 杨海军, 吴超, . 博孜9井的发现与塔里木盆地超深层天然气勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(1): 11-19.

[10]

TIAN Jun , YANG Haijun , WU Chao , et al. Discovery of well Bozi 9 and ultra-deep natural gas exploration potential in the Kelasu Tectonic Zone of the Tarim Basin [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(1): 11-19.

[11]

杨海军, 李勇, 唐雁刚, . 塔里木盆地克拉苏盐下深层大气田的发现[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(1): 12-20.

[12]

YANG Haijun , LI Yong , TANG Yangang , et al. Discovery of Kelasu subsalt deep large gas field, Tarim Basin [J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(1): 12-20.

[13]

周鹏, 尹宏伟, 周露, . 断背斜应变中和面张性段储层主控因素及预测方法:以克拉苏冲断带为例[J]. 大地构造与成矿, 2018, 42(1): 50-59.

[14]

ZHOU Peng , YIN Hongwei , ZHOU Lu , et al. Reservoir controlling factor and forecast of tensional zone in geostrain neutral plane of faulted anticline: example from Kelasu Fold-Thrust Belt [J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2018, 42(1): 50-59.

[15]

SUN S , HOU G , ZHENG C . Fracture zones constrained by neutral surfaces in a fault-related fold: insights from the Kelasu Tectonic Zone, Kuqa Depression [J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2017, 104: 112-124.

[16]

韩登林, 李忠, 寿建峰 . 背斜构造不同部位储集层物性差异:以库车坳陷克拉2气田为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2011, 38(3): 282-286.

[17]

HAN Denglin , LI Zhong , SHOU Jianfeng . Reservoir property difference between structural positions in the anticline: a case study from Kela-2 Gas Field in the Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin, NW China [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(3): 282-286.

[18]

FREHNER M. The neutral lines in buckle folds [J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2011, 33(10): 1501-1508.

[19]

RAMSAY J . Folding and fracturing of rocks [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1967: 1.

[20]

史超群, 王佐涛, 朱文慧, . 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克拉苏构造带大北地区超深储层裂缝特征及其对储层控制作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(12): 1687-1699.

[21]

SHI Chaoqun , WANG Zuotao , ZHU Wenhui , et al. Fracture characteristic and its impact on reservoir quality of ultra-deep reservoir in Dabei Region, Kelasu Tectonic Belt, Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin [J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2020, 31(12): 1687-1699.

[22]

毛亚昆, 钟大康, 李勇, . 构造挤压背景下深层砂岩压实分异特征:以塔里木盆地库车前陆冲断带白垩系储层为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(6): 1113-1122.

[23]

MAO Yakun , ZHONG Dakang , LI Yong , et al. Differential compaction of deep sandstones in compressive tectonic setting: a case study of Cretaceous reservoirs in Kuqa foreland thrust belt, Tarim Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(6): 1113-1122.

[24]

杨宪彰, 毛亚昆, 钟大康, . 构造挤压对砂岩储层垂向分布差异的控制:以库车前陆冲断带白垩系巴什基奇克组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(4): 591-599.

[25]

YANG Xianzhang , MAO Yakun , ZHONG Dakang , et al. Tectonic compression controls the vertical property variation of sandstone reservoir: an example of Cretaceous Bashijiqike Formation in Kuqa foreland thrust belt, Tarim Basin [J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(4): 591-599.

[26]

周红波, 刘永雷, 刘军, . 克拉苏构造带褶皱中和面地质特征与纵向位置确定:以克拉苏构造带S构造为例[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2016, 30(3): 69-72.

[27]

ZHOU Hongbo , LIU Yonglei , LIU Jun , et al. Determination of geological characteristics and longitudinal position of the neural plane in the Kelasu Tectonic Belt: a case from the S Structure of the Kelasu Tectonic Belt [J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2016, 30(3): 69-72.

[28]

罗晓容 . 构造应力超压机制的定量分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2004, 47(6): 1086-1093.

[29]

LUO Xiaorong . Quantitative analysis on overpressure mechanism resulted from tectonic stress [J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2004, 47(6): 1086-1093.

[30]

赵靖舟, 李军, 徐泽阳 . 沉积盆地超压成因研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(9): 973-998.

[31]

ZHAO Jingzhou , LI Jun , XU Zeyang . Advances in the origin of overpressures in sedimentary basins [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(9): 973-998.

[32]

张凤奇, 王震亮, 钟红利, . 沉积盆地主要超压成因机制识别模式及贡献[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(6): 1151-1158.

[33]

ZHANG Fengqi , WANG Zhenliang , ZHONG Hongli , et al. Recognition model and contribution evaluation of main overpressure formation mechanisms in sedimentary basins [J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(6): 1151-1158.

[34]

曾联波, 刘本明 . 塔里木盆地库车前陆逆冲带异常高压成因及其对油气成藏的影响[J]. 自然科学进展, 2005, 15(12): 1485-1491.

[35]

ZENG Lianbo , LIU Benming . Causes of anomalous high pressure in the Kuqa foreland thrust zone in the Tarim Basin and its influence on hydrocarbon accumulation [J]. Advances in Natural Sciences, 2005, 15(12): 1485-1491.

[36]

OBRADORS-PRATS J , ROUAINIA M , APLIN A C , et al. Assessing the implications of tectonic compaction on pore pressure using a coupled geomechanical approach [J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2017, 79: 31-43.

[37]

BURGREEN-CHAN B , MEISLING K E , GRAHAM S . Basin and petroleum system modelling of the East Coast Basin, New Zealand: a test of overpressure scenarios in a convergent margin [J]. Basin Research, 2015, 28(4): 536-567.

[38]

管树巍, 陈竹新, 李本亮, . 再论库车克拉苏深部构造的性质与解释模型[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(5): 531-536.

[39]

GUAN Shuwei , CHEN Zhuxin , LI Benliang , et al. Discussions on the character and interpretation model of Kelasu deep structures in the Kuqa Area [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(5): 531-536.

[40]

陈治军, 刘洛夫, 王伟力, . 塔中Ⅰ号断裂带上奥陶统油气藏特征及主控因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(4): 409-415.

[41]

CHEN Zhijun , LIU Luofu , WANG Weili , et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of the Upper Ordovician petroleum reservoirs in the Tazhong No.1 Fault Belt, Tarim Basin [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(4): 409-415.

[42]

HUDLESTON P J , TREAGUS S H . Information from folds: a review [J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2010, 32(12): 2042-2071.

[43]

于璇, 侯贵廷, 能源, . 库车坳陷构造裂缝发育特征及分布规律[J]. 高校地质学报, 2016, 22(4): 644-656.

[44]

YU Xuan , HOU Guiting , NENG Yuan , et al. Development and distribution characteristics of tectonic fractures in Kuqa Depression [J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2016, 22(4): 644-656.

[45]

胡建宁, 能源, 姜帅, . 克拉苏构造带博孜段古隆起及盐层对盐下冲断带的控制[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2023, 47(4): 57-69.

[46]

HU Jianning , NENG Yuan , JIANG Shuai , et al. The control of paleo-uplift and salt layer on subsalt thrust belt in Bozi Section of Kelasu Tectonic Belt [J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2023, 47(4): 57-69.

[47]

刘立炜, 周慧, 张承泽, . 库车坳陷克拉苏构造带协同变形机制及盆山耦合关系[J]. 地质科学, 2022, 57(1): 61-72.

[48]

LIU Liwei , ZHOU Hui , ZHANG Chengze , et al. Synergistic deformation mechanisms and basin-mountain coupling of Kelasu Structural Belt in Kuqa Depression [J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2022, 57(1): 61-72.

[49]

肖建新, 林畅松, 刘景彦 . 塔里木盆地北部库车坳陷白垩系沉积古地理[J]. 现代地质, 2005, 19(2): 253-260.

[50]

XIAO Jianxin , LIN Changsong , LIU Jingyan . Depositional palaeogeography of Cretaceous of Kuqa Depression in Northern Tarim Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2005, 19(2): 253-260.

[51]

马玉杰, 张荣虎, 唐雁刚, . 塔里木盆地库车坳陷白垩系巴什基奇克组岩相古地理[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2016, 37(3): 249-256.

[52]

MA Yujie , ZHANG Ronghu , TANG Yangang , et al. Lithofacies paleogeography of Cretaceous Bashijiqike Formation in Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin [J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2016, 37(3): 249-256.

[53]

陈戈, 黄智斌, 张惠良, . 塔里木盆地库车坳陷白垩系巴什基奇克组物源精细分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(6): 1025-1033.

[54]

CHEN Ge , HUANG Zhibin , ZHAN Huiliang , et al. Provenance analysis of clastic rocks in the Cretaceous Bashijiqike Formation at Kuqa Depression [J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(6): 1025-1033.

[55]

蔡振忠, 王健, 莫涛, . 库车坳陷克拉苏构造带博孜段巴什基奇克组超深储层特征及成岩演化[J]. 非常规油气, 2024, 11(6): 8-16.

[56]

CAI Zhenzhong , WANG Jian , MO Tao , et al. Characteristics and diagenesis evolution of ultra deep Bashijike Formation reservoir in Bozi Section of Kelasu Structural Belt, Kuqa Depression [J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2024, 11(6): 8-16.

[57]

王珂, 张荣虎, 曾庆鲁, . 库车坳陷博孜-大北地区下白垩统深层-超深层储层特征及成因机制[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2022, 51(2): 311-328.

[58]

WANG Ke , ZHANG Ronghu , ZENG Qinglu , et al. Characteristics and formation mechanism of Lower Cretaceous deep and ultra-deep reservoir in Bozi-Dabei Area, Kuqa Depression [J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2022, 51(2): 311-328.

[59]

何登发, 周新源, 杨海军, . 库车坳陷的地质结构及其对大油气田的控制作用[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2009, 33(1): 19-32.

[60]

HE Dengfa , ZHOU Xinyuan , YANG Haijun , et al. Geological structure and its controls on giant oil and gas fields in Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin: a clue from new shot seismic data [J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2009, 33(1): 19-32.

[61]

谢会文, 李勇, 漆家福, . 库车坳陷中部构造分层差异变形特征和构造演化[J]. 现代地质, 2012, 26(4): 682-690.

[62]

XIE Huiwen , LI Yong , QI Jiafu , et al. Differential structural deformation and tectonic evolution in the middle part of Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2012, 26(4): 682-690.

[63]

陈戈, 赵继龙, 张荣虎 . 库车前陆盆地白垩系构造演化与沉积响应[J]. 地质学报, 2013, 87(增刊1): 185.

[64]

CHEN Ge , ZHAO Jilong , ZHANG Ronghu . Cretaceous tectonic evolution and sedimentary response in the Kuqa Foreland Basin [J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2013, 87(Supp.1): 185.

[65]

王珂, 杨海军, 李勇, . 塔里木盆地库车坳陷北部构造带地质特征与勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(7): 885-905.

[66]

WANG Ke , YANG Haijun , LI Yong , et al. Geological characteristics and exploration potential of the northern tectonic belt of Kuqa Depression in Tarim Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(7): 885-905.

[67]

XU Y , CAO Y , LIU C , et al. The history of transgressions during the Late Paleocene-Early Eocene in the Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin: constraints from C-O-S-Sr isotopic geochemistry [J]. Minerals, 2020, 10(9): 834.

[68]

李曰俊, 杨海军, 赵岩, . 南天山区域大地构造与演化[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2009, 33(1): 94-104.

[69]

LI Yuejun , YANG Haijun , ZHAO Yan , et al. Tectonic framework and evolution of South Tianshan NW China [J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2009, 33(1): 94-104.

[70]

JIN Z , YANG M , LU X , et al. The tectonics and petroleum system of the Qiulitagh fold and thrust belt, Northern Tarim Basin, NW China [J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2008, 25(8): 767-777.

[71]

吴海, 赵孟军, 鲁雪松, . 膏盐岩层控藏机制研究进展[J]. 地质科技情报, 2016, 35(3): 77-86.

[72]

WU Hai , ZHAO Mengjun , LU Xuesong , et al. Research progress of hydrocarbon accumulation mechanism controlled by salt [J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2016, 35(3): 77-86.

[73]

王冰, 邱楠生, 王祥, . 库车坳陷克拉苏-依奇克里克构造带构造挤压型超压识别与计算[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(8): 1107-1121.

[74]

WANG Bing , QIU Nansheng , WANG Xiang , et al. Identification and calculation of tectonic compression overpressure of Kelasu-Yiqikelike Tectonic Belt in Kuqa Depression [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(8): 1107-1121.

[75]

赵承锦, 蒋有录, 刘景东, . 基于正演与反演结合的孔隙度演化恢复方法:以川东北地区须家河组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(6): 708-723.

[76]

ZHAO Chengjin , JIANG Youlu , LIU Jingdong , et al. A recovery method of porosity evolution based on forward and inverse analyses: a case study of the tight sandstone of Xujiahe Formation, Northeast Sichuan Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(6): 708-723.

[77]

MCBRIDE E F , DIGGS T N . Compaction of Wilcox and Carrizo sandstones (Paleocene-Eocene) to 4420 m, Texas Gulf Coast [J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1991, 61(1): 73-85.

[78]

ATHY L F . Density, porosity, and compaction of sedimentary rocks [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1930, 14: 1-24.

[79]

李宝帅 . 库车坳陷克拉苏构造带深层致密砂岩气成藏机制[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(5): 17-22.

[80]

LI Baoshuai . Accumulation mechanism of deep tight sandstone gas reservoir in Kelasu Structural Belt, Kuqa Depression [J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2021, 28(5): 17-22.

[81]

王阿瑞 . 库车坳陷白垩系超深层碎屑岩储层原生粒间孔隙保存机理[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东), 2022: 64.

[82]

WANG Arui . Preservation mechanism of primary intergranular pores of Cretaceous ultra-deep clastic reservoirs in the Kuqa Depression [D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2022: 64.

[83]

潘荣, 朱筱敏, 谈明轩, . 库车坳陷克拉苏冲断带深部巴什基奇克组致密储层孔隙演化定量研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2018, 25(2): 159-169.

[84]

PAN Rong , ZHU Xiaomin , TAN Mingxuan , et al. Quantitative research on porosity evolution of deep tight reservoir in the Bashijiqike Formation in Kelasu Structure Zone, Kuqa Depression [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2018, 25(2): 159-169.

[85]

张荣虎, 杨海军, 王俊鹏, . 库车坳陷超深层低孔致密砂岩储层形成机制与油气勘探意义[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(6): 1057-1069.

[86]

ZHANG Ronghu , YANG Haijun , WANG Junpeng , et al. The formation mechanism and exploration significance of ultra-deep, low porosity and tight sandstone reservoirs in Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(6): 1057-1069.

[87]

JU W , ZHONG Y , LIANG Y , et al. Factors influencing fault-propagation folding in the Kuqa Depression: insights from geomechanical models [J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2023, 168: 104826.

[88]

LIU X , ECKERT A , CONNOLLY P , et al. Visco-elastic parasitic folding: influences on the resulting porosity distribution [J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2020, 130: 103892.

[89]

ECKERT A , CONNOLLY P , LIU X . Large-scale mechanical buckle fold development and the initiation of tensile fractures [J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2014, 15(11): 4570-4587.

[90]

LIU X , ECKERT A , CONNOLLY P . Stress evolution during 3D single-layer visco-elastic buckle folding: implications for the initiation of fractures [J]. Tectonophysics, 2016, 679: 140-155.

[91]

ECKERT A , LIU X , CONNOLLY P . Pore pressure evolution and fluid flow during visco-elastic single-layer buckle folding [J]. Geofluids, 2015, 16(2): 231-248.

[92]

BIOT M A , WILLIS D G . The elastic coefficients of the theory of consolidation [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1957, 24(4): 594-601.

[93]

KHALIFEH-SOLTANI A , ALAVI S A , GHASSEMI M R , et al. Geomechanical modelling of fault-propagation folds: estimating the influence of the internal friction angle and friction coefficient [J]. Tectonophysics, 2021, 815: 228992.

[94]

SMART K J , FERRILL D A , MORRIS A P , et al. Geomechanical modeling of stress and strain evolution during contractional fault-related folding [J]. Tectonophysics, 2012, 576/577: 171-196.

[95]

张院成, 邓飞 . 砂岩蠕变模型及参数演化规律[J]. 矿业研究与开发, 2024, 44(3): 136-142.

[96]

ZHANG Yuancheng , DENG Fei . Creep model and parameter evolution law of sandstone [J]. Mining Research and Development, 2024, 44(3): 136-142.

[97]

焦明, 谢涛, 张磊, . 巨厚盐膏岩蠕变特性实验研究[J]. 非常规油气, 2019, 6(3): 87-90.

[98]

JIAO Ming , XIE Tao , ZHANG Lei , et al. Experimental study on creep properties of thick salt-gypsum rock [J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2019, 6(3): 87-90.

[99]

DEUDÉ V , DORMIEUX L , MAGHOUS S , et al. Compaction process in sedimentary basins: the role of stiffness increase and hardening induced by large plastic strains [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2004, 28(13): 1279-1303.

[100]

李春光, 王水林, 郑宏, . 多孔介质孔隙率与体积模量的关系[J]. 岩土力学, 2007, 28(2): 293-296.

[101]

LI Chunguang , WANG Shuilin , ZHENG Hong , et al. Relationship between bulk modulus and porosity of porous medium [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007, 28(2): 293-296.

[102]

LUO J , STEVENS R . Porosity-dependence of elastic moduli and hardness of 3Y-TZP ceramics [J]. Ceramics International, 1999, 25(3): 281-286.

[103]

TAO M , YE CHAO Y , JIE C , et al. Investigation on the permeability evolution of gypsum interlayer under high temperature and triaxial pressure [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2017, 50(8): 2059-2069.

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(92055204)

国家自然科学基金项目(42172146)

中国石油集团公司重大科技项目(ZD2019-183-01-04)

山东省泰山学者青年专家项目(tsqn202312111)

中国石油大学(华东)深层油气国家重点实验室自主研究课题(SKL-DOG2024-ZYRC-05)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (16871KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/