玛湖凹陷西斜坡夏子街组砂砾岩储层差异性特征及控制因素

朱政文 ,  陈佳萌 ,  马钰卓 ,  余兴 ,  师政 ,  王俊熙 ,  秦余端

东北石油大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5) : 81 -90.

PDF (27012KB)
东北石油大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5) : 81 -90. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2025.05.007
油气地质与勘探

玛湖凹陷西斜坡夏子街组砂砾岩储层差异性特征及控制因素

作者信息 +

The different characteristics and controlling factors of glutenite reservoirs of Xiazijie Formation in the west slope of Mahu Sag

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (27659K)

摘要

砂砾岩储层形成机制对盆地油气聚集具有重要影响。采用岩心观察与描述、铸体薄片鉴定、物性测试分析和成岩过程重建等方法,结合构造背景和地层埋藏史,分析玛湖凹陷西斜坡(南区和北区)二叠系夏子街组储层差异性成岩-成储过程及控制因素。结果表明:玛湖凹陷西斜坡二叠系夏子街组储层为扇三角洲前缘亚相砂砾岩,分选性差一中等,颗粒多为次棱角一次圆状,成分成熟度和结构成熟度较低,非均质性强。南区和北区储层的差异性明显。南区储层发育在西斜坡二级坡折带上,颗粒较粗,有机酸溶蚀沸石类胶结物产生的次生孔隙是最主要储集空间,平均孔隙度为 8.65% ,平均渗透率为 0.25 × 10 - 3 μ   m 2 ;北区储层发育在坡折带以下低位凹槽区,颗粒较细,碳酸盐岩胶结物及长石、岩屑等产生的次生溶孔为最主要的储集空间,平均孔隙度为 11.27% ,平均渗透率为 0.39 × 10 - 3 μ   m 2 。储层经历压实、胶结和溶蚀等成岩作用,处于中成岩期 B 阶段。多种控制因素共同作用造成储层的差异性。沉积相带决定储层的物质基础,埋藏条件和成岩环境控制储层的流体性质和演化过程。该结果为研究区储量规模的有效动用提供支持。

Abstract

The formation mechanism of the glutenite reservoirs have an important influence on the hydrocarbon accumulation in the basin. The differential diagenesis process of the Permian Xiazijie Formation reservoirs in the western slope of the Mahu Sag(south zones and north zones) is systematically analyzed by applying the techniques of core observation and description, cast thin-section identification, physical property test analysis and diagenesis process reconstruction, and combining with the tectonic background and stratigraphic burial history. And the controlling factors of the reservoir are analyzed. The results show that the Permian Xiazijie Formation reservoirs in the western slope of the Mahu Sag consist of gravelly sandstones from the fan delta front subfacies. They have poor to moderate sorting, with particles mainly being sub-angular to sub-rounded. The compositional and structural maturity are relatively low, resulting in high heterogeneity. The differences of reservoirs in different areas are obvious. The reservoir in the south area, with coarser particles, is developed in the secondary slope folding zone of the western slope. The secondary pores generated by the dissolution of zeolite cement by organic acid are the most important storage space. The average porosity is 8.65%, and the average permeability is 0.25 × 10 - 3 μ   m 2. In contrast, the reservoir in the north area, with finer particles, is developed in the low groove zone below the slope folding zone. And the secondary pores generated are the most important storage space. The structural components of dissolution include carbonate cement as well as feldspars and rock debris. The average porosity is 11.27%, and the average permeability is 0.39 × 10 - 3 μ   m 2. The reservoir has undergone compaction, cementation, and dissolution, and is currently in the middle diage-netic stage B. The variability of reservoir is controlled by multiple factors. The sedimentary facies zone determines the material basis of the reservoir, while burial conditions and diagenetic environment control the fluid properties and evolution process of the reservoir. The results provide theoretical support for the effective exploitation of reserve scale in the next phase.

关键词

玛湖凹陷 / 夏子街组 / 砂砾岩储层 / 储层特征 / 成岩演化 / 控制因素

Key words

Mahu Sag / Xiazijie Formation / glutenite reservoirs / reservoir characteristics / diagenetic evolution / controlling factors

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
朱政文,陈佳萌,马钰卓,余兴,师政,王俊熙,秦余端. 玛湖凹陷西斜坡夏子街组砂砾岩储层差异性特征及控制因素[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2025, 49(5): 81-90 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2025.05.007

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

支东明, 唐勇, 郑孟林, . 玛湖凹陷源上砾岩大油区形成分布与勘探实践[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2018, 39(1):1-8.

[2]

ZHI Dongming, TANG Yong, ZHENG Menglin, et al.Discovery, distribution and exploration practice of large oil provinces of abovesource conglomerate in Mahu Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018, 39(1):1-8.

[3]

唐勇, 郭文建, 王霞田, . 玛湖凹陷砾岩大油区勘探新突破及启示[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(2):127-137.

[4]

TANG Yong, GUO Wenjian, WANG Xiatian, et al. A new break-through in exploration of large conglomerate oil province in Mahu Sag and its implications[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(2):127-137.

[5]

雷德文, 陈刚强, 刘海磊, . 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷大油(气)区形成条件与勘探方向研究[J]. 地质学报, 2017, 91(7):1604-1619.

[6]

LEI Dewen, CHEN Gangqiang, LIU Hailei, et al. Study on the forming conditions and exploration fields of the Mahu giant oil(gas) province,Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2017, 91(7):1604-1619.

[7]

王惠民, 吴华, 靳涛, . 准噶尔盆地西北缘油气富集规律[J]. 新疆地质, 2005, 23(3):278-282.

[8]

WANG Huimin, WU Hua, JIN Tao, et al. Rule of hydrocarbon accumulation in the northwest edge of Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2005, 23(3):278-282.

[9]

何登发, 吴松涛, 赵龙, . 环玛湖凹陷二叠一三叠系沉积构造背景及其演化[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2018, 39(1):35-47.

[10]

HE Dengfa, WU Songtao, ZHAO Long, et al. Tectono-depositional setting and its evolution during Permian to Triassic around Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018, 39(1):35-47.

[11]

何登发, 尹成, 杜社宽, . 前陆冲断带构造分段特征:以准噶尔盆地西北缘断裂构造带为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2004, 11(3):91-101.

[12]

HE Dengfa, YIN Cheng, DU Shekuan, et al. Characteristics of structural segmentation of foreland thrust belt:a case study of the fault belts in the northwestern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2004, 11(3):91-101.

[13]

蒋庆平, 孔垂显, 李维锋, . 陆相湖盆大型扇三角洲沉积特征与演化规律:以准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷西斜坡区三叠系百口泉组为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2020, 38(5):923-932.

[14]

JIANG Qingping, KONG Chuixian, LI Weifeng, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and evolution law of a lacustrine largescale fan delta:a case study from the Triassic Baikouquan Formation on the west slope of Mahu Sag[J]. Atca Sedimentologica Sinica, 2020, 38 (5):923-932.

[15]

马永平, 王国栋, 张献文, . 粗粒沉积次生孔隙发育模式:以准噶尔盆地西北缘二叠系夏子街组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 34-43.

[16]

MA Yongping, WANG Guodong, ZHANG Xianwen, et al. Development model of secondary pores in coarse-grained deposits:a case study of Permian Xiazijie Formation in northwestern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(5):34-43.

[17]

杨帆, 卞保力, 刘慧颖, . 玛湖凹陷二叠系夏子街组限制性湖盆扇三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5):63-72.

[18]

YANG Fan, BIAN Baoli, LIU Huiying, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of fan delta in restricted lacustrine basin of Permian Xiazijie Formation in Mahu Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(5):63-72.

[19]

杨帆, 卫延召, 阿布力米提•依明, . 准噶尔盆地环玛湖凹陷中一上二叠统有利储盖组合优选[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2016, 37(2): 131-137.

[20]

YANY Fan, WEI Yanzhao, Abulimiti, et al. Optimization of favorable reservoir-caprock assemblages of Middle-Upper Permian in Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2016, 37(2):131-137.

[21]

陈静, 陈军, 李卉, . 准噶尔盆地玛中地区二叠系一三叠系叠合成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1):71-80.

[22]

CHEN Jing, CHEN Jun, LI Hui, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of Permian-Triassic superimposed reservoirs in central Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(1):71-80.

[23]

雷德文, 吕焕通, 刘振宇, . 准噶尔盆地西北缘斜坡区冲积扇储集层预测与效果[J]. 新疆石油地质, 1998, 19(6):470-472.

[24]

LEI Dewen, LYU Huantong, LIU Zhenyu, et al. Prediction of alluvial fan reservoir on slope in northwestern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 1998, 19(6):470-472.

[25]

陶国亮, 胡文瑄, 张义杰, . 准噶尔盆地西北缘北西向横断裂与油气成藏[J]. 石油学报, 2006, 27(4):23-28.

[26]

TAO Guoliang, HU Wenxuan, ZHANG Yijie, et al. Northwest-trending transverse faults and hydrocarbon accumulation in the northwestern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2006, 27(4):23-28.

[27]

张昌民, 尹太举, 唐勇, . 准噶尔盆地西北缘及玛湖凹陷沉积储集层研究进展[J]. 古地理学报, 2020, 22(1):129-146.

[28]

ZHANG Changmin, YIN Taiju, TANG Yong, et al. Advances in sedimentological reservoir research in Mahu Sag and northwest margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2020, 22(1):129-146.

[29]

王小军, 王婷婷, 曹剑. 玛湖凹陷风城组碱湖烃源岩基本特征及其高效生烃[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2018, 39(1):9-15.

[30]

WANG Xiaojun, WANG Tingting, CAO Ji'an. Basic characteristics and highly efficient hydrocarbon generation of alkaline lacustrine source rocks in Fengcheng Formation of Mahu Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018, 39(1):9-15.

[31]

陈永波, 程晓敢, 张寒, . 玛湖凹陷斜坡区中浅层断裂特征及其控藏作用[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(6):985-994.

[32]

CHEN Yongbo, CHENG Xiaogan, ZHANG Han, et al. Fault characteristics and control on hydrocarbon accumulation of middleshallow layers in the slope zone of Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin,Northwest China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(6):985-994.

[33]

李振华, 邱隆伟, 师政, . 准噶尔盆地中拐地区佳二段沸石类矿物成岩作用及其对油气成藏的意义[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 38(1):1-7.

[34]

LI Zhenhua, QIU Longwei, SHI Zheng, et al. Diagenesis of zeolite minerals and its significance for hydrocarbon accumulation in the second member of Jiamuhe Formation of Zhongguai Area,Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2014, 38(1):1-7.

[35]

王小娟, 张少敏, 庞小婷, . 四川盆地天府气田中侏罗统沙溪庙组砂岩储层致密化机理及其与油气充注的耦合关系[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(6):33-43.

[36]

WANG Xiaojuan, ZHANG Shaomin, PANG Xiaoting, et al. Coupling relationship between tight sand reservoir formation mechanism and hydrocarbon charge in Shaximiao Formation of Tianfu Gas Field in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2024, 44 (6):33-43.

[37]

汪孝敬, 白保军, 芦慧, . 深层一超深层高温极强超压砂砾岩储层特征及主控因素:以准噶尔盆地南缘四棵树凹陷高泉地区白垩系清水河组为例[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2022, 46(3):54-65.

[38]

WANG Xiaojing, BAI Baojun, LU Hui, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of deep and ultra-deep glutenite reservoirs with high temperature and very strong over presure:a case study from the Cretaceous Qingshuihe Formation in Gaoquan Area,Sikeshu Sag,southern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2022, 46(3):54-65.

[39]

何周, 史基安, 唐勇, . 准噶尔盆地西北缘二叠系碎屑岩储层成岩相与成岩演化研究[J]. 沉积学报, 2011, 29(6):1069-1078.

[40]

HE Zhou, SHI Jian, TANG Yong, et al. Characteristics of diagenesis and diagenetic facies of Permian clastic reservoir in northwest margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2011, 29(6):1069-1078.

[41]

朱世发, 朱筱敏, 吴冬, . 准噶尔盆地西北缘下二叠统油气储层中火山物质蚀变及控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(1): 77-85.

[42]

ZHU Shifa, ZHU Xiaomin, WU Dong, et al. Alteration of volcanics and its controlling factors in the Lower Permian reservoirs at northwestern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35(1):77-85.

[43]

唐勇, 袁云峰, 李辉, . 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷二叠系上乌尔禾组砂砾岩储层特征及发育模式[J]. 石油实验地质, 2024, 46(5): 965-978.

[44]

TANG Yong, YUAN Yunfeng, LI Hui, et al. Glutenite reservoir characteristics and development model of Permain Upper Wuerhe Formation in Fukang Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2024, 46(5):965-978.

[45]

张新涛, 曲希玉, 许鹏, . 渤海湾盆地深层砂砾岩储层孔一缝成因机制及演化特征:以渤中19-6构造古近系孔店组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(3):707-719.

[46]

ZHANG Xintao, QU Xiyu, XU Peng, et al. Genesis and evolution of pore-fractures in deep sandy conglomerate reserviors in Bohai Bay Basin:taking the Paleogene Kongdian Formation in Bozhong 19-6 structure as an example[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 707-719. Xi'an:Northwest University,2019:1-99.

[47]

曹江骏, 王继平, 张道锋, . 深层致密砂岩储层成岩演化对含气性的影响:以鄂尔多斯盆地西南部庆阳气田二叠系山 1 段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 42(11):169-184.

[48]

CAO Jiangjun, WANG Jiping, ZHANG Daofeng, et al. Effects of diagenetic evolution on gas-bearing properties of deep tight sandstone reservoirs:a case study of reservoirs in the 1st member of the Permian Shanxi Formation in the Qingyang Gas Field,Southwestern Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 42(11):169-184.

[49]

孟子圆, 孙卫, 刘登科, . 联合压汞法的致密储层微观孔隙结构及孔径分布特征:以鄂尔多斯盆地吴起地区长 6 储层为例[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(2):208-216.

[50]

MENG Ziyuan, SUN Wei, LIU Dengke, et al. Combined mercury porosimetry to characterize the microscopic pore structure and pore size distribution of tight reservoirs:a case of Chang 6 Reservoir in Wuqi Area,Ordos Basin[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2019, 38(2):208-216.

[51]

时丕同, 高喜龙, 杨鹏飞, . 渤海湾埕北低凸起东斜坡东营组储层特征及其控制因素[J]. 沉积与特堤斯地质, 2009, 29(3):47-55.

[52]

SHI Pitong, GAO Xilong, YANG Pengfei, et al. Reservoir quality and controlling factors of the Dongying Formation sandstone reservoirs in the eastern slope zone of the Chengbei low uplift in the Bohai Bay[J]Sedimentation and Tethys Geology, 2009, 29(3):47-55.

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(41972099)

贵州省基础研究计划项目(黔科合基础-ZK[2024]一般513)

贵州理工学院高层次人才引进项目(2023GCC081)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (27012KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/