巴中地区凉高山组湖相页岩储层孔隙特征及控制因素

解祎恬 ,  胡明毅 ,  魏思乐 ,  邓庆杰 ,  罗浩渝

东北石油大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6) : 16 -31.

PDF (39436KB)
东北石油大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6) : 16 -31. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2025.06.002
油气地质与勘探

巴中地区凉高山组湖相页岩储层孔隙特征及控制因素

作者信息 +

Pore characteristics and controlling factors of lacustrine shale reservoirs in the Lianggaoshan Formation, Bazhong Area

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (40381K)

摘要

四川盆地巴中地区凉高山组是页岩油气勘探的重点区域。以凉高山组湖相页岩储层为研究对象,基于岩心、薄片观察和 XRD 矿物等测试资料,建立研究区页岩岩相分类体系;采用扫描电镜、低温氮气吸附实验等测试方法,研究储层孔隙类型和孔径分布,探讨储层孔隙特征及控制因素。结果表明:研究区湖相页岩共识别中高碳纹层状粉砂质页岩岩相、低碳中厚层状混合质泥岩岩相和含碳中厚层状粉砂质页岩岩相 3 种类型,中高碳纹层状粉砂质页岩岩相物性最好,含碳中厚层状粉砂质页岩岩相物性最差;孔隙类型主要为黏土矿物片间孔、长石颗粒溶孔、有机质孔和少量微裂缝,孔径以介孔为主,大孔最少,微孔介于二者之间。研究区页岩储层物性受多种因素耦合控制,其中岩相和沉积环境决定原生孔隙的发育质量,发育纹层构造和具有高黏土矿物含量岩相的储层物性最好;有机质类型和热演化程度决定有机质孔的发育程度,热演化程度高有助于次生有机质孔形成;早成岩时期压实作用和胶结作用破坏孔隙结构,中成岩时期有机酸溶蚀和黏土矿物转化为储集空间改善提供关键条件。该结果为四川盆地湖相页岩勘探开发提供指导。

Abstract

The Lianggaoshan Formation in the Bazhong Area of the Sichuan Basin is a key target for shale oil and gas exploration. Focusing on the lacustrine shale reservoir of the Lianggaoshan Formation, a classification system for shale lithofacies in the study area was established based on core analysis, thinsection observations, and XRD mineral data. Methods such as scanning electron microscopy and lowtemperature N2 adsorption experiments were employed to investigate pore types and size distribution, as well as to discuss pore characteristics and controlling factors. The results indicate that three lithofacies types were identified in the lacustrine shale of the study area: medium-high carbon laminated silty shale, low-carbon medium-thick layered mixed mudstone, and carbon-bearing medium-thick layered silty shale. The medium-high carbon laminated silty shale lithofacies exhibits the best physical properties, while the carbon-bearing medium-thick layered silty shale lithofacies shows the poorest. The main pore types include inter-clay mineral pores, dissolved feldspar grain pores, organic pores, and a small number of micro-fractures. Pore sizes are predominantly mesoporous, with macropores being the least abundant and micropores falling between the two. The physical properties of the shale reservoir in the study area are controlled by the coupling of multiple factors. Lithofacies and sedimentary environment determine the quality of primary pore development, with reservoirs featuring laminated structures and high clay mineral content exhibiting the best physical properties. Organic matter type and thermal maturity determine the development of organic pores, where high thermal maturity facilitates the formation of secondary organic pores. Compaction and cementation during early diagenesis damage the pore structure, while organic acid dissolution and clay mineral transformation during middle diagenesis provide key conditions for reservoir space improvement. These findings offer guidance for the exploration and development of lacustrine shale in the Sichuan Basin.

关键词

四川盆地 / 巴中地区 / 凉高山组 / 页岩 / 岩相划分 / 储层物性 / 控制因素

Key words

Sichuan Basin / Bazhong Area / Lianggaoshan Formation / shale / lithofacies classification / reservoir physical properties / reservoir controlling factors

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
解祎恬,胡明毅,魏思乐,邓庆杰,罗浩渝. 巴中地区凉高山组湖相页岩储层孔隙特征及控制因素[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2025, 49(6): 16-31 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2025.06.002

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

冯小龙, 敖卫华, 唐玄. 陆相页岩气储层孔隙发育特征及其主控因素分析:以鄂尔多斯盆地长 7 段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3):678-692.

[2]

FENG Xiaolong, AO Weihua, TANG Xuan. Characteristics of pore development and its main controlling factors of continental shale gas reservoirs:a case study of Chang 7 Member in Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(3): 678-692.

[3]

邹才能, 朱如凯, 董大忠, . 页岩油气科技进步、发展战略及政策建议[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(12):1675-1686.

[4]

ZOU Caineng, ZHU Rukai, DONG Dazhong, et al. Scientific and technological progress,development strategy and policy suggestion regarding shale oil and gas[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(12):1675-1686.

[5]

NIU Xiaobing, LYU Chengfu, FENG Shengbin, et al. Lamina combination characteristics and differential shale oil enrichment mechanisms of continental organic-rich shale:a case study of Triassic Yanchang Formation Chang 73 Sub-member,Ordos Basin,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2025, 52(2):316-329.

[6]

付金华, 牛小兵, 淡卫东, . 鄂尔多斯盆地中生界延长组长 7 段页岩油地质特征及勘探开发进展[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5): 601-614.

[7]

FU Jinhua, NIU Xiaobing, DAN Weidong, et al. The geological characteristics and the progress on exploration and development of shale oil in Chang 7 Member of Mesozoic Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5):601-614.

[8]

李军亮, 王民, 秦峰, . 陆相富碳酸盐页岩纹层组合对页岩油富集的控制作用:以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷古近系沙河街组页岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2025, 46(2):392-406.

[9]

LI Junliang, WANG Min, QIN Feng, et al. Controlling effects of lamina assemblages on shale oil enrichment for lacustrine carbonaterich shales:a case study of shales in the Paleogene Shahejie Formation Jiyang Depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2025, 46(2):392-406.

[10]

李军, 邹友龙, 路菁. 陆相页岩油储层可动油含量测井评价方法:以苏北盆地古近系阜宁组二段页岩油为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3):816-826.

[11]

LI Jun, ZOU Youlong, LU Jing. Well-log-based assessment of movable oil content in lacustrine shale oil reservoirs:a case study of the 2nd member of the Paleogene Funing Formation,Subei Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(3):816-826.

[12]

邢乐乐, 段宏亮, 董足华, . 陆相页岩优势储集空间及其主控因素:以苏北盆地古近系为例[J/OL]. 断块油气田,1-12[2025-05-14]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/41.1219.TE.20250220.1857.002.html.

[13]

XING Lele, DUAN Hongliang, DONG Zuhua, et al. Advantage reservoir space in continental shale and its controlling factors:a case study of Paleogene in Subei Basin[J/OL]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,1-12[2025-05-14]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/41. 1219.TE.20250220.1857.002.html.

[14]

陈旋, 苟红光, 张有锦, . 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷北部芦草沟组高产页岩油特征及地质意义:以奇探1井为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2025, 36(1):1-12.

[15]

CHEN Xuan, GOU Hongguang, ZHANG Youjin, et al. Characteristics and geological significance of high-yield shale oil from the Lucaogou Formation in the Northern Jimsar Sag of Junggar Basin:a case study of well Qitan 1[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2025, 36 (1):1-12.

[16]

康家豪, 王兴志, 曾德铭, . 岩相对于湖相页岩孔隙结构特征及孔隙演化的控制机理:以四川盆地中部侏罗系大安寨段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2025, 46(2):491-509.

[17]

KANG Jiahao, WANG Xingzhi, ZENG Deming, et al. Effects of lithofacies on pore structure characteristics and evolution of lacustrine shales:a case study of the Jurassic Dáanzhai Member,Central Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2025, 46(2):491-509.

[18]

赵琳, 鲜本忠, 刘乙辰, . 天文旋回约束下的湖相泥页岩岩相发育规律:以四川盆地凉高山组为例[J/OL]. 古地理学报, 1-19[2025- 05-14]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.4678.P.20241230.1057.002.html.

[19]

ZHAO Lin, XIAN Benzhong, LIU Yichen, et al. Development patterns of shale facies under astronomical forcing:a case study of the Lianggaoshan Formation in Sichuan Basin[J/OL]. Journal of Palaeogeography,1-19[2025-05-14]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/ detail/11.4678.P.20241230.1057.002.html.

[20]

张晨雨, 刘子驿, 王斌, . 川中侏罗系自流井组大安寨段二亚段页岩油赋存特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2024, 46(6):1215-1225.

[21]

ZHANG Chenyu, LIU Ziyi, WANG Bin, et al. Occurrence characteristics of shale oil in the second submember of Da’anzhai Member of Jurassic Ziliujing Formation,Central Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2024, 46(6):1215-1225.

[22]

张美洲, 朱筱敏, 姜振学, . 陆相淡水湖盆页岩有机质富集主控因素研究:以四川盆地东北部侏罗系自流井组为例[J]. 古地理学报, 2023, 25(4):806-822.

[23]

ZHANG Meizhou, ZHU Xiaomin, JIANG Zhenxue, et al. Main controlling factors of organic matter enrichment in continental freshwater lacustrine shale:a case study of the Jurassic Ziliujing Formation in Northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2023, 25(4):806-822.

[24]

王濡岳, 胡宗全, 赖富强, . 川东北地区下侏罗统自流井组大安寨段陆相页岩脆性特征及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(2):366-378.

[25]

WANG Ruyue, HU Zongquan, LAI Fuqiang, et al. Brittleness features and controlling factors of continental shale from Da'anzhai Member of the Lower Jurassic Ziliujing Formation,Northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(2):366-378.

[26]

舒志国, 舒逸, 陈绵琨, . 陆相页岩岩相非均质性及储层孔隙发育特征:以四川盆地自流井组东岳庙段页岩为例[J]. 地质科技通报, 2024, 43(2):1-15.

[27]

SHU Zhiguo, SHU Yi, CHEN Miankun, et al. Litholacies heterogeneity and reservoir pore development characteristics of continental shale:a case study of the Dongyuemiao shale of the Ziliujing Formation in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2024, 43(2):1-15.

[28]

舒志国, 周林, 李雄, . 四川盆地东部复兴地区侏罗系自流井组东岳庙段陆相页岩凝析气藏地质特征及勘探开发前景[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1):212-223.

[29]

SHU Zhiguo, ZHOU Lin, LI Xiong, et al. Geological characteristics of gas condensate reservoirs and their exploration and development prospect in the Jurassic continental shale of the Dongyuemiao Member of Ziliujing Formation,Fuxing Area,Eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(1):212-223.

[30]

朱彤, 龙胜祥, 王烽, . 四川盆地湖相泥页岩沉积模式及岩石相类型[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 36(8):22-28.

[31]

ZHU Tong, LONG Shengxiang, WANG Feng, et al. Sedimentary models and lithofacies types of lacustrine mud shale in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(8):22-28.

[32]

车正强, 崔永旭, 王泽宇, . 川东北地区陆相页岩油气储层特征及控制因素[J]. 录井工程, 2025, 36(1):130-136.

[33]

CHE Zhengqiang, CUI Yongxu, WANG Zeyu, et al. Characteristics and control factors of continental shale oil & gas reservoirs in Northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Mud Logging Engineering, 2025, 36(1):130-136.

[34]

刘忠宝, 刘光祥, 胡宗全, . 陆相页岩层系岩相类型、组合特征及其油气勘探意义:以四川盆地中下侏罗统为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(12):10-21.

[35]

LIU Zhongbao, LIU Guangxiang, HU Zongquan, et al. Lithofacies types and assemblage features of continental shale strata and their significance for shale gas exploration:a case study of the Middle and Lower Jurassic strata in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(12):10-21.

[36]

李进, 张洪安, 王学军, . 高演化湖相页岩储层特征及其主控因素:以普光地区中侏罗统千佛崖组千一段为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2021, 28(1):1-8.

[37]

LI Jin, ZHANG Hongan, WANG Xuejun, et al. Reservoir characteristics of high-evolution lacustrine shale and its main controlling factors:a case study of the 1st member of Qianfoya Formation of Middle Jurassic in Puguang Area[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2021, 28(1):1-8.

[38]

李跃纲, 周安富, 谢伟, . 四川盆地南部泸州地区五峰组-龙一 1 亚段页岩岩相划分及储层发育主控因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42 (8):112-123.

[39]

LI Yuegang, ZHOU Anfu, XIE Wei, et al. Lithofacies division and main controlling factors of reservoir development in Wufeng Formation-Long 1 1 Sub-member shale in the Luzhou Region,South Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(8):112-123.

[40]

尹嘉. 深层页岩超压的形成演化及对储层孔隙特征的影响[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京),2023:53-65.

[41]

YIN Jia. Study on generation and evolution of overpressure in deep shale and its influence on reservoir pore characteristics:an example from the Longmaxi Formation shale in the Southern Sichuan Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences(Beijing),2023: 53-65.

[42]

姜龙燕, 钱门辉, 何发岐, . 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区三叠系延长组长 7 页岩油特征及其主控因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2024, 46(5): 941-953.

[43]

JIANG Longyan, QIAN Menhui, HE Faqi, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of Chang 7 shale oil in Triassic Yanchang Formation,Fuxian Area,Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2024, 46(5):941-953.

[44]

钟雪峰, 林良彪, 余瑜, . 四川盆地北部中侏罗统凉高山组致密砂岩储层特征与孔隙发育因素差异对比研究[J]. 矿物岩石, 2025, 45 (2):171-185.

[45]

ZHONG Xuefeng, LIN Liangbiao, YU Yu, et al. Comparative study of reservoir characteristics and porosity development factors of tight sandstone reservoirs in the Lower Jurassic Lianggaoshan Formation in the Northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Mineralogy and Petrology, 2025, 45(2):171-185.

[46]

张釜源, 祝海华, 张本健, . 四川盆地中侏罗统凉高山组物源特征及沉积演化模式[J]. 古地理学报, 2025, 27(4):886-902.

[47]

ZHANG Fuyuan, ZHU Haihua, ZHANG Benjian, et al. Provenance characteristics and sedimentary evolutionary model of the Middle Jurassic Lianggaoshan Formation,Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2025, 27(4):886-902.

[48]

刘君龙, 纪友亮, 张克银, . 川西前陆盆地侏罗系沉积体系变迁及演化模式[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(6):743-756.

[49]

LIU Junlong, JI Youliang, ZHANG Keyin, et al. Jurassic sedimentary system transition and evolution model in Western Sichuan Foreland Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(6):743-756.

[50]

JIA D, WEI G, CHEN Z, et al. Longmen Shan fold-thrust belt and its relation to the Western Sichuan Basin in Central China:new insights from hydrocarbon exploration[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2006, 90(9):1425-1447.

[51]

张天舒, 陶士振, 吴因业, . 层序演化对三角洲一滩坝沉积体系有利储层类型与分布的控制作用:以四川盆地中部侏罗系凉高山组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(9):1286-1300.

[52]

ZHANG Tianshu, TAO Shizhen, WU Yinye, et al. Control of sequence stratigraphic evolution on the types and distribution of favorable reservoir in the delta and beach-bar sedimentary system:case study of Jurassic Lianggaoshan Formation in Central Sichuan Basin,China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(9):1286-1300.

[53]

易娟子, 张少敏, 蔡来星, . 川东地区下侏罗统凉高山组地层-沉积充填特征与油气勘探方向[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3):795-815.

[54]

YI Juanzi, ZHANG Shaomin, CAI Laixing, et al. Strata and sedimentary filling characteristics of the Lower Jurassic Lianggaoshan Formation and its hydrocarbon exploration in Eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52 (3):795-815.

[55]

付小平, 刘苗苗. 涪陵地区凉高山组富有机质泥岩微相特征及油气富集规律[J]. 断块油气田, 2023, 30(2):230-237.

[56]

FU Xiaoping, LIU Miaomiao. Microfacies characteristics of organic-rich mudstone and oil and gas enrichment law of Lianggaoshan Formation in Fuling Area[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2023, 30(2):230-237.

[57]

邹才能, 董大忠, 王社教, . 中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(6):641-653.

[58]

ZOU Caineng, DONG Dazhong, WANG Shejiao, et al. Geological characteristics,formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(6):641-653.

[59]

邹才能, 张光亚, 陶士振, . 全球油气勘探领域地质特征、重大发现及非常规石油地质[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(2):129-145.

[60]

ZOU Caineng, ZHANG Guangya, TAO Shizhen, et al. Geological features,major discoveries and unconventional petroleum geology in the global petroleum exploration[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(2):129-145.

[61]

LOUCKS R G, REED R M, RUPPEL S C, et al. Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2012, 96(6):1071-1098.

[62]

冯子辉, 霍秋立, 曾花森, . 松辽盆地古龙页岩有机质组成与有机质孔形成演化[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2021, 40(5):40-55.

[63]

FENG Zihui, HUO Qiuli, ZENG Huasen, et al. Organic matter compositions and organic pore evolution in Gulong shale of Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2021, 40(5):40-55.

[64]

THOMMES M, KANEKO K, NEIMARK A V, et al. Physisorption of gases,with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution(IUPAC Technical Report)[J]. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 2015, 87(9/10):1051-1069.

[65]

国家能源局. 页岩全孔径分布的测定压汞一吸附联合法:NB/T 14008-2021[S]. 北京: 石油工业出版社,2021:1-10.

[66]

National Energy Administration. Analysis of full-scale pore size distribution of shale-method combined by mercury porosimetry and gas adsorption:NB/T 14008-2021[S]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press,2021:1-10.

[67]

徐明慧, 王峰, 田景春, . 湖相富有机质泥页岩岩相划分及沉积环境:以鄂尔多斯盆地长 73 亚段为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2025, 43(4):1489-1506.

[68]

XU Minghui, WANG Feng, TIAN Jingchun, et al. Classification of lacustrine organic-rich mud shale petrography and the depositional environment:an example from the Chang 73 Sub-member in the Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2025, 43(4): 1489-1506.

[69]

戚明辉, 曹茜, 杨帅, . 川东南地区 X1 井自流井组富有机质页岩储集空间发育特征与主控因素[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 49(4):442-453.

[70]

QI Minghui, CAO Qian, YANG Shuai, et al. The development characteristics of reservoir space structure and associated major controlling factors for Jurassic Ziliujing Formation organic-rich shale in well XI,Southeastern Sichuan,China[J]. Journal of Chengdu U- niversity of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2022, 49(4):442-453.

[71]

李楠, 洪海涛, 赵正望, . 川东地区侏罗系大安寨段页岩储层特征及发育控制因素[J]. 断块油气田, 2024, 31(2):187-196.

[72]

LI Nan, HONG Haitao, ZHAO Zhengwang, et al. Characteristics and development controlling factors of shale reservoirs of Jurassic Da'anzhai Member in Eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2024, 31(2):187-196.

[73]

LOUCKS R G, REED R M, RUPPEL S C, et al.Morphology,genesis,and distribution of nanometer scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett Shale[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2009, 79(12):848-861.

[74]

LI F, WANG M, LIU S, et al. Pore characteristics and influencing factors of different types of shales[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019,102:391-401.

[75]

CURTIS M E, CARDOTT B J, SONDERGELD C H, et al. Development of organic porosity in the Woodford shale with increasing thermal maturity[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2012,103:26-31.

[76]

马中良, 郑伦举, 徐旭辉, . 富有机质页岩有机孔隙形成与演化的热模拟实验[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(1):23-30.

[77]

MA Zhongliang, ZHENG Lunju, XU Xuhui, et al. Thermal simulation experiment on the formation and evolution of organic pores in organic rich shale[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(1):23-30.

[78]

DONG T, HARRIS N B. The effect of thermal maturity on porosity development in the Upper Devonian-Lower Mississippian Woodford Shale,Permian Basin,US:insights into the role of silica nanospheres and microcrystalline quartz on porosity preservation[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2020,217:103-346.

[79]

MASTALERZ M, SCHIMMELMANN A, DROBNIAK A, et al. Porosity of Devonian and Mississippian New Albany shale across a maturation gradient:insights from organic petrology,gas adsorption,and mercury intrusion[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2013, 97(10): 1621-1643.

[80]

邵红梅, 高波, 潘会芳, . 松辽盆地古龙页岩成岩-孔隙演化[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2021, 40(5):56-67.

[81]

SHAO Hongmei, GAO Bo, PAN Huifang, et al. Diagenesis-pore evolution for Gulong shale in Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2021, 40(5):56-67.

[82]

腾格尔, 卢龙飞, 俞凌杰, . 页岩有机质孔隙形成、保持及其连通性的控制作用[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(4):687-699.

[83]

TENG Geer, LU Longfei, YU Lingjie, et al.Formation, preservation and connectivity control of organic pores in shale[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(4):687-699.

基金资助

国家科技重大专项(2025ZD1400205)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (39436KB)

369

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/