大庆长垣中部青山口组页岩油层地质参数测井解释方法与分类评价

Logging interpretation methods and classification evaluation of geological parameters for shale oil reservoirs in the Qingshankou Formation, Central Daqing Placanticline

摘要

页岩储层的地质参数是页岩油藏勘探开发的重要指标。以大庆长垣青山口组泥页岩层为研究对象，利用测井、岩心分析和测试等资料，采用测井曲线响应特征和数理统计分析等方法，建立大庆长垣青山口组测井解释模型，对页岩油层地质参数进行分类评价。结果表明：采用测井解释模型计算和解释长垣中部青山口组页岩油储层的岩性、物性、含油性和烃源岩特征，具有较好的精准度；长垣青山口组储层整体黏土矿物占比较高（主要介于 35.0 \mathrm{\%} \sim 50.6 \mathrm{\%}），有效孔隙度高（主要介于 7.0 \mathrm{\%} \sim 11.0 \mathrm{\%}），总有机碳质量分数高（主要介于 1.0 \mathrm{\%} \sim 3.0 \mathrm{\%}）、游离烃含量（主要介于 0.2 \sim 3.0 \mathrm{m} \mathrm{g} \cdot {\mathrm{g}}^{-1}）和成熟度（介于 0.53 \mathrm{\%} \sim 0.94 \mathrm{\%}）较低；青一段页岩发育二类和三类油层，二类页岩油层分布于研究区西北部和东部，三类页岩油层分布于研究区中部和南部。青二、三段发育三类页岩油层，分布于研究区西北部和东南部。该结果可为大庆长垣中部青山口组页岩油的勘探和开发提供地质参考。

Abstract

The geological parameters of shale reservoirs are crucial indicators for the exploration and development of shale oil reservoirs. Taking the muddy shale layers of the Qingshankou Formation in the Daqing Placanticline as the research object, this study utilized data from logging, core analysis, and testing, adopted methods such as logging curve response characteristics and mathematical statistical analysis, established a logging interpretation model for the Qingshankou Formation in the Daqing Placanticline, and conducted classified evaluation of the geological parameters of shale oil layers. The results show that: the lithology, physical properties, oil-bearing property, and source rock characteristics of the shale oil reservoirs in the Qingshankou Formation in the central part of the placanticline, calculated and interpreted using the logging interpretation model, have good accuracy when compared with core analysis data. For the reservoirs of the Qingshankou Formation in the placanticline, the content of clay minerals is relatively high(mainly ranging from 35.0% to 50.6%), the effective porosity is high(mainly ranging from 7.0% to 11.0%), while the total organic carbon mass fraction is high (mainly ranging from 1.0% to 3.0%), and the free hydrocarbon content (mainly ranging from 0.2 to 3.0mg⋅g^-1) and maturity(ranging from 0.53% to 0.94%) are relatively low. Class II and Class III oil layers are developed in the shale of member 1 of the Qingshankou Formation. Specifically, Class II oil layers are distributed in the northwest and east of the study area, while Class III oil layers are distributed in the central part and south of the study area. For members 2 and 3 of the Qingshankou Formation, only Class III oil layers are developed, which are distributed in the northwest and southeast of the study area. These results can provide a reference for the exploration and development of shale oil in the Qingshankou Formation in the central part of the Daqing Placanticline.

关键词

大庆长垣 / 青山口组 / 页岩油 / 测井解释 / 分类评价 / 储层特征

Key words

Daqing Placanticline / Qingshankou Formation / shale oil / logging interpretation / evaluation criteria / reservoir characteristics

参考文献

[1] 赵文智, 胡素云, 侯连华, 等. 中国陆相页岩油类型、资源潜力及与致密油的边界[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(1):1-10.

[2] ZHAO Wenzhi, HU Suyun, HOU Lianhua, et al. Types and resource potential of continental shale oil in China and its boundary with tight oil[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(1):1-10.

[3] 孙龙德, 刘合, 朱如凯, 等. 中国页岩油革命值得关注的十个问题[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12):2007-2019.

[4] SUN Longde, LIU He, ZHU Rukai, et al. Ten noteworthy issues on shale oil revolution in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44 (12):2007-2019.

[5] 姚玉来, 肖飞, 李士超, 等. 松辽盆地齐家凹陷南部青山口组一段基质型页岩油富集模式[J]. 地质学报, 2024, 98(11):3393-3407.

[6] YAO Yulai, XIAO Fei, LI Shichao, et al. Enrichment model of tight shale oil in the first member of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in the Southern Qijia Sag,Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2024, 98(11):3393-3407.

[7] 徐浩, 解启来, 陈孔全, 等. 彰武断陷九佛堂组页岩油气潜力分析[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2015, 39(3):94-103.

[8] XU Hao, XIE Qilai, CHEN Kongquan, et al. Shale oil and gas potential analysis of Jiufotang Formation in Zhangwu Fault Depression[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2015, 39(3):94-103.

[9] 王濡岳, 胡宗全, 周形, 等. 四川盆地及其周缘五峰组一龙马溪组页岩裂缝发育特征及其控储意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42 (6):1295-1306.

[10] WANG Ruyue, HU Zongquan, ZHOU Tong, et al. Characteristics of fractures and their significance for reservoirs in Wufeng-Longmaxi shale,Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(6):1295-1306.

[11] 朱国文, 王小军, 白雪峰, 等. 松辽盆地北部致密油勘探新领域及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(1):33-47.

[12] ZHU Guowen, WANG Xiaojun, BAI Xuefeng, et al. New exploration fields and resource potential of tight oil in Northern Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2025, 46(1):33-47.

[13] LIU B, WANG H, FU X, et al. Lithofacies and depositional setting of a highly prospective lacustrine shale oil succession from the Upper Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in the Gulong Sag,Northern Songliao Basin,Northeast China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2019, 103(2):405-432.

[14] 朱国文, 王小军, 张金友, 等. 松辽盆地陆相页岩油富集条件及勘探开发有利区[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1):110-124.

[15] ZHU Guowen, WANG Xiaojun, ZHANG Jinyou, et al. Enrichment conditions and favorable zones for exploration and development of continental shale oil in Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(1):110-124.

[16] 孙龙德, 贾承造, 张君峰, 等. 松辽盆地古龙页岩油资源潜力[J/OL]. 石油学报, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2128.TE.20241210.1528.002.

[17] SUN Longde, JIA Chengzao, ZHANG Junfeng, et al. Resource potential of Gulong shale oil in Songliao Basin[J/OL]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2128.TE.20241210.1528.002.

[18] 柳波, 吕延防, 冉清昌, 等. 松辽盆地北部青山口组页岩油形成地质条件及勘探潜力[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(2):280-285.

[19] LIU Bo, LYU Yanfang, RAN Qingchang, et al. Geological conditions and exploration potential of shale oil in Qingshankou Formation,Northern Songliao Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35(2):280-285.

[20] 王凤兰, 付志国, 王建凯, 等. 松辽盆地古龙页岩油储层特征及分类评价[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2021, 40(5):144-156.

[21] WANG Fenglan, FU Zhiguo, WANG Jiankai, et al. Characteristics and classification evaluation of Gulong shale oil reservoir in Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2021, 40(5):144-156.

[22] 郑建东, 王春燕, 章华兵, 等. 松辽盆地古龙页岩油储层七性参数和富集层测井评价方法[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2021, 40(5): 87-97.

[23] ZHENG Jiandong, WANG Chunyan, ZHANG Huabing, et al. Logging evaluating methods of seven property parameters and enriched layers for Gulong shale oil reservoir in Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2021, 40(5):87-97.

[24] 冯子辉, 霍秋立, 曾花森, 等. 松辽盆地古龙页岩地球化学特征与油气资源评价方法[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2025, 44(3):1-10.

[25] FENG Zihui, HUO Qiuli, ZENG Huasen, et al. Geochemical characteristics and hydrocarbon resource evaluation method of Gulong shale in Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2025, 44(3):1-10.

[26] 向才富, 冯子辉, 王富东, 等. 构造控制的油气晚期快速成藏:松辽盆地大庆长垣流体包裹体和自生伊利石证据[J]. 地质学报, 2012, 86(11):1799-1808.

[27] XIANG Caifu, FENG Zihui, WANG Fudong, et al. Tectonically controlled rapid hydrocarbon accumulation in the big Daqing Anticline of Songliao Basin:evidence from fluid inclusions and illite dating[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2012, 86(11):1799-1808.

[28] 关德范. 大庆长垣成因及油气生成条件的探讨[J]. 大庆石油学院学报, 1981, 24(1):11-22.

[29] GUAN Defan. Discussion on the origin of the Daqing Placanticline and the conditions for hydrocarbon generation[J]. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 1981, 24(1):11-22.

[30] 黄磊, 童亨茂, 杨东辉, 等. 松辽盆地大庆长垣中浅层断层形成演化的新模式[J]. 地质学报, 2019, 93(3):597-605.

[31] HUANG Lei, TONG Hengmao, YANG Donghui, et al. A new model for the formation and evolution of middle-shallow faults in the Daqing Placanticline,Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2019, 93(3):597-605.

[32] 陆加敏, 杨懋新, 李军辉, 等. 松辽盆地青山口组介壳滩的分布特征及控制因素[J/OL].大庆石油地质与开发, https://link.cnki.net/ urlid/23.1286.TE.20241119.1020. 001.

[33] LU Jiamin, YANG Maoxin, LI Junhui, et al. Distribution characteristics and controlling factors of ostracod beaches in the Qingshankou Formation of the Songliao Basin[J/OL].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, https://link.cnki.net/ urlid/23.1286.TE.20241119.1020. 001.

[34] 黄越, 常健, 邱楠生, 等. 松辽盆地齐家一古龙凹陷青山口组压力场特征和超压成因[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(12):1800-1817.

[35] HUANG Yue, CHANG Jian, QIU Nansheng, et al. Pressure field characteristics and overpressure geneses of Qingshankou Formation in Qijia-Gulong Sag,Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2024, 45(12):1800-1817.

[36] 于德水, 何宇航, 邢宝荣, 等. 大庆长垣高台子油层沉积演化分布及沉积模式[J]. 沉积学报, 2024, 42(1):238-250.

[37] YU Deshui, HE Yuhang, XING Baorong, et al. Sedimentary evolution, distribution and sedimentary model of Gaotaizi oil reservoir in Daqing Placanticline[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2024, 42(1):238-250.

[38] 何文渊, 柳波, 张金友, 等. 松辽盆地古龙页岩油地质特征及关键科学问题探索[J]. 地球科学, 2023, 48(1):49-62.

[39] HE Wenyuan, LIU Bo, ZHANG Jinyou, et al. Geological characteristics and key scientific and technological problems of Gulong shale oil in Songliao Basin[J]. Earth Science, 2023, 48(1):49-62.

[40] 肖佃师, 卢双舫, 陈海峰, 等. 基于频谱分解的测井曲线标准化方法[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(1):129-136.

[41] XIAO Dianshi, LU Shuangfang, CHEN Haifeng, et al. Logging data normalization based on frequency spectral decomposition[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34(1):129-136.

[42] 肖佃师, 黄文彪, 张小刚, 等. 王府凹陷青山口组含油气泥页岩层的测井曲线标准化[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2014, 38(1):46-53.

[43] XIAO Dianshi, HUANG Wenbiao, ZHANG Xiaogang, et al. Normalization of logging data of oil bearing mud shale of Qingshankou Formation in Wangfu Depression[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2014, 38(1):46-53.

[44] 付光明, 严加永, 张昆, 等. 岩性识别技术现状与进展[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2017, 32(1):26-40.

[45] FU Guangming, YAN Jiayong, ZHANG Kun, et al. Current status and progress of lithology identification technology[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2017, 32(1):26-40.

[46] 赵显令, 王贵文, 周正龙, 等. 地球物理测井岩性解释方法综述[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2015, 30(3):1278-1287.

[47] ZHAO Xianling, WANG Guiwen, ZHOU Zhenglong, et al. A review of lithology interpretation methods using geophysical well logs[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2015, 30(3):1278-1287.

[48] 闫伟林, 田中元, 马陆琴. 利用毛管压力和测井资料评价 H 油田碳酸盐岩储层的含油饱和度[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2008, 27(3): 121-123.

[49] YAN Weilin, TIAN Zhongyuan, MA Luqin. Evaluation on oil saturation of carbonate reservoir in H Oilfield using capillary pressure and logging data[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2008, 27(3):121-123.

[50] 杨胜来, 胡学军, 李辉. 密闭取心流体饱和度误差的影响因素及修正方法[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 28(6):64-67.

[51] YANG Shenglai, HU Xuejun, LI Hui. Influencing factors and correction method for error of fluid saturation calculation during sealed coring[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum(Natural Science Edition), 2004, 28(6):64-67.

[52] 张洁, 罗健, 夏瑜, 等. 阿尔奇公式的适用性分析及其拓展[J]. 地球物理学报, 2018, 61(1):311-322.

[53] ZHANG Jie, LUO Jian, XIA Yu, et al. Limitation analysis and modification of the Archie equation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2018, 61(1):311-322.

[54] 孙建孟, 王克文, 李伟. 测井饱和度解释模型发展及分析[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(1):101-107.

[55] SUN Jianmeng, WANG Kewen, LI Wei. Development and analysis of logging saturation interpretation models[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2008, 35(1):101-107.

[56] 李潮流, 闫伟林, 武宏亮, 等. 富黏土页岩储集层含油饱和度计算方法:以松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组一段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(6):1168-1178.

[57] LI Chaoliu, YAN Weilin, WU Hongliang, et al. Calculation of oil saturation in clay-rich shale reservoirs:a case study of Qing 1 Member of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Gulong Sag,Songliao Basin,NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(6):1168-1178.

[58] LE DOAN T V, BOSTROM N W, BURNHAM A K, et al. Green river oil shale pyrolysis:semi-open conditions[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27(11):6447-6459.

[59] 侯庆杰, 金强, 牛成民, 等. 辽东湾地区主力烃源岩分布特征与主控因素[J]. 地球科学, 2018, 43(6):2160-2171.

[60] HOU Qingjie, JIN Qiang, NIU Chengmin, et al. Distribution characteristics and main controlling factors of main source rocks in Liaodong Bay Area[J]. Earth Science, 2018, 43(6):2160-2171.

[61] 霍志鵬, 姜涛, 庞雄奇, 等. 塔中地区深层低丰度碳酸盐岩有效烃源岩评价及其对油气藏贡献[J]. 地球科学, 2016, 41(12):2061-2074.

[62] HUO Zhipeng, JIANG Tao, PANG Xiongqi, et al. Evaluation of deep carbonate source rocks with low TOC and contribution to oilgas accumulation in Tazhong Area,Tarim Basin[J]. Earth Science, 2016, 41(12):2061-2074.

[63] 宋春彦, 王剑, 付修根, 等. 羌塘盆地东部上三叠统巴贡组烃源岩特征及意义[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2018, 42(5):104-114.

[64] SONG Chunyan, WANG Jian, FU Xiugen, et al. Geochemical characteristics and the significance of the Upper Triassic hydrocarbon source rocks of the Bagong Formation in the Eastern Qiangtang Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2018, 42(5): 104-114.

[65] 武田田, 商斐, 陈睿倩, 等. 松辽盆地青山口组页岩有机碳含量分布特征[J]. 地球科学, 2022, 47(11):4309-4318.

[66] WU Tiantian, SHANG Fei, CHEN Ruiqian, et al. Organic carbon distribution characteristics of Qingshankou shale in Songliao Basin[J]. Earth Science, 2022, 47(11):4309-4318.

[67] JARVIE D M. Shale resource systems for oil and gas:part 2:shale-oil resource systems[M]//BREYER J A.Shale reservoirs-giant resources for the 21st century.Tulsa:American Association of Petroleum Geologists,2012:89-119.

[68] 何晋译, 冷笉滢, 李志明, 等. 不同岩相泥页岩生烃能力与含油性特征:以玛湖凹陷风城组玛页 1 井为例[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2025, 49(1):1-17.

[69] HE Jinyi, LENG Junying, LI Zhiming, et al. Hydrocarbon-generating potential and oil-bearing characteristics of mud shales with different lithofacies:a case study of well maye-1 in Fengcheng Formation of Mahu Sag[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2025, 49(1):1-17.

[70] WANG Ruyue, WANG Guanping, ZHAO Gang, et al. Geological characteristics and resources potential of shale oil in Chang 7 Member of Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in Fuxian Area,Southern Ordos Basin,Western China[J]. Unconventional Resources, 2023,3:237-247.

[71] OEDER, DANIEL J.The successful development of gas and oil resources from shales in North America[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018,163:399-420.

[72] 姜在兴, 张文昭, 梁超, 等. 页岩油储层基本特征及评价要素[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(1):184-196.

[73] JIANG Zaixing, ZHANG Wenzhao, LIANG Chao, et al. Characteristics and evaluation elements of shale oil reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(1):184-196.

[74] 崔宝文, 王瑞, 白云风, 等. 古龙页岩油勘探开发进展及发展对策[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2024, 43(4):125-136.

基金资助

国家自然科学基金面上项目(42372150)

黑龙江省自然科学基金联合引导项目(LH2024D010)