ICU经鼻置管患者鼻黏膜压力性损伤预防护理最佳证据的应用审查及障碍分析

宋金杰 ,  李婷 ,  郭琪 ,  熊司琦 ,  路冰晶 ,  黄英

昆明医科大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (7) : 164 -173.

PDF (822KB)
昆明医科大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (7) : 164 -173. DOI: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20260719
护理园地

ICU经鼻置管患者鼻黏膜压力性损伤预防护理最佳证据的应用审查及障碍分析

作者信息 +

Application Review and Barrier Analysis of the Best Evidence for the Preventive Care of Nasal Mucosal Pressure Injury in ICU Patients with Nasal Tube Placement

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (840K)

摘要

目的 了解重症监护室经鼻置管患者预防鼻黏膜压力性损伤证据临床应用现状,制定审查指标,分析障碍及促进因素,并据此制定变革策略。方法 依据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs institute,JBI)循证卫生保健模式,形成预防经鼻置管患者鼻黏膜压力性损伤的最佳护理策略,据此制订审查指标并于2025年3月至6月选取昆明市某三甲医院ICU经鼻置管患者60例及重症医学科护士27名进行临床审查,根据i-PARIHS概念框架理论,从“变革、变革接受者及组织环境”三方面剖析实践推进阶段的障碍与促进因素,构建相对应的实施策略。结果 最终纳入20项最佳证据,并据此制定30项审查指标。仅有8项指标达成100%的临床执行率,9项指标临床执行率不足60%,另有11项指标的临床执行率为零。分析障碍因素主要为:缺乏对应的评估及护理流程、护理人员对鼻腔护理的重视程度欠缺以及培训考核机制尚不成熟等;促进因素包括护士态度积极、医护配合良好、变革领导者大力支持、科研基础扎实等。实施相应对策后,30条审查指标中27条依从率为100%。结论 鼻黏膜压力性损伤预防的循证证据与临床应用之间存在着明显的脱节,精准梳理实践推进过程中的有利条件与阻碍原因,配套落实干预举措,可有效促进循证证据融入临床工作。

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the current clinical application of evidence for preventing nasal mucosal pressure injury in patients with nasal catheterization in the intensive care unit, develop audit criteria, analyze obstacles and facilitating factors, and formulate corresponding improvement strategies. Methods According to the JBI evidence-based healthcare model, best nursing strategies for the prevention of nasal mucosal pressure injury in patients with nasal tube placement were developed. Corresponding audit criteria were formulated, and a clinical audit was conducted from March to June 2025, involving 60 ICU patients with nasal tube placement and 27 nurses from the Department of Critical Care Medicine in a tertiary hospital in Kunming. According to the i-PARIHS conceptual framework, obstacles and facilitators during the implementation phase were analyzed from three aspects: "innovation, recipients and context", and the corresponding implementation strategies were constructed. Results A total of 20 pieces of best evidences were ultimately included, based on which 30 audit criteria were developed. Only 8 criteria achieved 100% clinical compliance, 9 criteria had compliance rate below 60%, and another 11 criteria had a clinical compliance rate of zero. Major obstacles included the lack of corresponding evaluation and nursing process, insufficient attention to nasal care among nursing staff, and immature training and assessment mechanisms. Facilitators included positive attitude of nurses, good cooperation between medical and nursing care, strong support from change leaders, and a solid scientific research foundation. After implementing the targeted strategies, 27 of the 30 audit criteria reached 100% compliance. Conclusion There is a significant gap between the evidence for the prevention of nasal mucosal pressure injury and its clinical application. Accurately identifying facilitators and obstacles in the implementation process and implementing targeted interventions can effectively promote the integration of evidence-based practices into clinical care.

关键词

重症医学科 / 经鼻置管 / 鼻黏膜压力性损伤 / 审查指标 / 障碍因素 / 循证实践

Key words

Department of Critical Care Medicine / Nasal intubation / Pressure injury of nasal mucosa / Audit criteria / Barriers / Evidence-based practice

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
宋金杰,李婷,郭琪,熊司琦,路冰晶,黄英. ICU经鼻置管患者鼻黏膜压力性损伤预防护理最佳证据的应用审查及障碍分析[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2026, 47(7): 164-173 DOI:10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20260719

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

徐雲, 赵琦, 蒋红, . ICU患者医疗器械相关压力性损伤的调查分析[J]. 上海护理, 2022, 22(2): 22-25.

[2]

Fulbrook P, Lovegrove J, Miles S, et al. Systematic review: Incidence and prevalence of mucous membrane pressure injury in adults admitted to acute hospital settings[J]. Int Wound J, 2022, 19(2): 278-293.

[3]

笪俊, 辛辰, 李斗艳, . 老年住院患者高危压力性损伤预防个案管理护理方案的构建及效果评价[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2021, 42(10): 178-184.

[4]

顾梦倩, 赵燕燕, 陈圣枝, . 2019年版国际《压力性损伤的预防与治疗: 临床实践指南》解读[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2021, 42(5): 497-500.

[5]

Nan R, Su Y, Pei J, et al. Characteristics and risk factors of nasal mucosal pressure injury in intensive care units[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2023, 32(1-2): 346-356.

[6]

刘天贶, 龙玉娟, 刘欢, . ICU患者不同部位黏膜压力性损伤的特征及护理研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(8): 35-39.

[7]

Shapira-Galitz Y, Karp G, Cohen O, et al. Evaluation and predictors for nasogastric tube associated pressure ulcers in critically ill patients[J]. Isr Med Assoc J, 2018, 20(12): 731-736.

[8]

DiCenso A, Bayley L, Haynes R B. Accessing pre-appraised evidence: Fine-tuning the 5S model into a 6S model[J]. Evid Based Nurs, 2009, 12(4): 99.2-9101.

[9]

胡雁, 郝玉芳. 循证护理学[M]. 2版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 116-119.

[10]

张立华, 顾莺. 临床实践变革的概念框架: 从PARIHS到i-PARIHS[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2019, 19(6): 741-747.

[11]

孙蜓, 徐瑶, 李嘉琪, . 鼻饲病人鼻黏膜压力性损伤预防及护理的最佳证据总结[J]. 肠外与肠内营养, 2024, 31(6): 370-375.

[12]

谢利民, 王文岳. 《临床指南研究与评价系统Ⅱ》简介[J]. 中西医结合学报, 2012, 10(2): 160-165.

[13]

周英凤, 胡雁, 朱政, . JBI循证卫生保健中心文本证据的质量评价清单[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2024, 39(10): 1075-1080.

[14]

朱政, 胡雁, 周英凤, . 推动证据向临床转化(五)证据临床转化研究中的文献质量评价[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2020, 35(11): 996-1000.

[15]

高杰. ICU经鼻留置胃管病人鼻黏膜压力性损伤预测模型的构建及验证[D]. 南充: 川北医学院, 2024.

[16]

Richard AH, Liliana B. Inpatient placement and management of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes in adults[EB/OL]. (2023-03-20)[2025-03-10]. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/inpatient placement and management of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes in adults.

[17]

邓子银, 刘加婷, 赵丽蓉, . 成人患者经鼻胃管喂养临床实践指南(2023年更新版)[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2024, 39(7): 673-679.

[18]

European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel, Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers/injuries: clinical practice guideline[EB/OL]. (2019-11-15)[2024-08-01]. https://npiap.com/page/Guidelines.

[19]

Schroeder J, Sitzer V. Nursing care guidelines for reducing hospital-acquired nasogastric tube-related pressure injuries[J]. Crit Care Nurse, 2019, 39(6): 54-63.

[20]

Lyu Y, Huang Y L, Li Z Y, et al. Interventions and strategies to prevent medical device-related pressure injury in adult patients: A systematic review[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2023, 32(19-20): 6863-6878.

[21]

陈金, 王琴, 张岚, . 医疗器械相关压力性损伤预防的证据总结[J]. 中华护理教育, 2020, 17(3): 226-232.

[22]

张锐, 叶向红, 王慧君, . 成人住院患者经鼻行管饲喂养中口鼻腔护理的最佳证据总结[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2022, 28(13): 1687-1692.

[23]

中华护理学会. 成人呼吸支持治疗器械相关压力性损伤的预防[EB/OL]. (2023-10-14)[2024-08-11]. http://hltb.kxj.org.cn/uploads/admin/202310/652f4ad332d6a.pdf.

[24]

中华护理学会. 成人鼻肠管的留置与维护[EB/OL]. (2021-12-31)[2024-07-29]. http://hltb.kxj.org.cn/uploads/admin/202403/65e16e72cbb73.pdf.

[25]

中华护理学会. 成人肠内营养支持的护理[EB/OL]. (2021-02-01)[2023-08-13]. http://hltb.kxj.org.cn/index/tuanti/standard.html team_standard_id=26.

[26]

Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals. Nasogastric tube management and care[EB/OL]. (2017-07-07)[2024-07-25]. https://www.dbth.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/PAT-T-17-v-5-Nasogastric-Tube-Management-and-Care-Final.pdf.

[27]

周英凤, 朱政, 胡雁, . 推动证据向临床转化(八)审查指标的构建[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2020, 35(14): 1281-1284.

[28]

Beck J, Greenwood D A, Blanton L, et al. 2017 national standards for diabetes self-management education and support[J]. Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care, 2021, 47(1): 14-29.

基金资助

昆明医科大学硕士研究生教育创新基金(2025S211)

昆明医科大学教育教学研究课题(2024-JY-Y-152)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (822KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/