约束与时滞影响下的重型矿用卡车路径跟踪控制

蒋先尧 ,  白国星 ,  孟宇 ,  谢意 ,  刘立 ,  顾青 ,  韩璐爽

工程科学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (8) : 1856 -1865.

PDF
工程科学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (8) : 1856 -1865. DOI: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2025.11.21.002
信息工程·控制科学与工程

约束与时滞影响下的重型矿用卡车路径跟踪控制

作者信息 +

Path tracking control of heavy mining trucks under constraint and time delay

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF

摘要

无人驾驶重型矿用卡车具有明显的转向机构约束和较长的信号时滞,在急弯与时滞共同作用下路径跟踪性能容易下降甚至失控. 针对急弯场景中系统响应滞后造成的误差增大问题,引入参考路径未来航向并结合关键参考点位移误差构建预瞄纠偏结合控制算法(Preview-correct control, PCC),提升入弯与出弯阶段的跟踪精度. 针对信号时滞导致的控制执行偏差,基于 PCC 输出结构与重型矿用卡车动力学特性,设计了多步运动补偿型时滞补偿器,用于预测时滞期间的车辆运动状态. 最终将 PCC 与时滞补偿器整合,构建面向重型矿用卡车的路径跟踪控制系统. 经过空载与满载两种工况的仿真测试与实车实验验证,所构建的控制系统在转向约束和信号时滞较为显著的条件下表现出较高精度和实时性. 在 20 km·h−1 空载仿真中,PCC 的位移误差最大幅值为 0.0892 m,而 PID(Proportional-integral-derivative)、预瞄 PID 等控制方法在入弯后误差发散,同时,PCC 的实时性指标明显优于非线性模型预测控制. 在满载且存在 0.4 s 时滞的情况下,结合时滞补偿器的 PCC 系统将位移误差最大幅值控制在 0.1537 m,而未补偿的 PCC 出现误差发散. 两组实车实验的位移误差最大幅值分别为 0.1976 m 和 0.2073 m,车辆均能稳定通过急弯,无失控情况. 结果表明,该控制系统能够在真实约束与长时滞场景下显著提升重型矿用卡车路径跟踪性能,具备工程应用与部署价值.

Abstract

Heavy mining trucks are key equipment in open-pit haulage systems, where the available roadway space is often narrow in relation to the vehicle’s size, resulting in extremely difficult driving. With the rapid advancement of mining intelligence, autonomous-driving technology has become an essential means of improving production efficiency to ensure operational safety and reduce operating costs. As a core component of autonomous-driving systems, path tracking control plays a decisive role in ensuring stable vehicle motion along a reference path. However, heavy mining trucks exhibit pronounced steering-mechanism constraints and significant signal transmission delays. Under the combined influence of sharp curves and long delays, path tracking systems tend to exhibit sluggish responses that rapidly increase tracking errors and even instability. Existing control methods struggle to simultaneously handle the compound effects of steering constraints and time delay, limiting their engineering applicability. To address the response lag caused by front-wheel steering-rate constraints in sharp-curve environments, a preview correct control (PCC) algorithm was developed by introducing the future heading of the reference path as preview information and incorporating the keypoint displacement error. The preview component improves steering proactiveness, while the correction component enhances responsiveness to current deviations to enable stable posture adjustments during curve entry, mid-curve, and exit. The PCC does not rely on complex models or high-performance computing platforms, making it suitable for the real-time operation of low-power onboard controllers. To address signal transmission delays in autonomous-driving systems, a multistep motion-compensation delay compensator is established by analyzing the PCC output structure and dynamic characteristics of a heavy mining truck to predict the vehicle’s posture evolution during the delay interval and generate new control inputs that counteract the delay effects. By integrating the PCC with the delay compensator, a path tracking control system capable of simultaneously handling steering mechanism constraints and long delays was achieved for heavy mining trucks. Simulations were conducted under no-load and full-load conditions, followed by full-load field experiments. In no-load simulations at 20 km·h−1 on a U-shaped curve with a radius of 35 m, the PCC achieved a maximum displacement error of 0.0892 m, which is significantly more accurate than proportional-integral-derivative (PID) and preview PID and close to the nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC). Its average computation time was only 0.1514 ms, outperforming NMPC in terms of real-time capability. Under fully loaded conditions with a 0.4 s signal delay, the PCC combined with the delay compensator maintained the maximum displacement error within 0.1537 m, while the uncompensated PCC showed error divergence in sharp-curve sections. This demonstrates the critical role of the proposed compensation strategy in ensuring system stability under long-delay conditions. The compensator increased the average computation time by only 0.0982 ms, which had a negligible impact on real-time performance. Two sets of full-load field tests were conducted, with an actual signal delay of approximately 0.4 s. The maximum displacement errors were 0.1976 and 0.2073 m. In both tests, the vehicle navigated the sharp curve stably, without any loss of control or noticeable yaw deviations. Overall, the simulation and experimental results demonstrate that the proposed control system maintained a stable and reliable path tracking performance under significant steering-mechanism constraints and long signal delays, achieving a favorable balance between accuracy, real-time capability, and engineering deployability. Therefore, it is well suited for practical autonomous-driving applications in heavy mining trucks.

关键词

矿用卡车 / 路径跟踪 / 预瞄控制 / 信号时滞 / 约束

Key words

mining trucks / path tracking / preview control / signal time delay / constraints

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
蒋先尧,白国星,孟宇,谢意,刘立,顾青,韩璐爽. 约束与时滞影响下的重型矿用卡车路径跟踪控制[J]. 工程科学学报, 2026, 48(8): 1856-1865 DOI:10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2025.11.21.002

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Zhang Z, Zhang R X, Sun J D. Research on the comprehensive evaluation method of driving behavior of mining truck drivers in an open—pit mine[J]. Appl Sci, 2023, 13(20): 11597

[2]

Ibañez Noriega I, Sagastume Gutiérrez A, Cabello Eras J J. Energy and exergy assessment of heavy—duty mining trucks. Discussion of saving opportunities[J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(3): e25358

[3]

Hong M Y, Wu B L, Wang J H, et al. A review of key technologies for unmanned driving systems in mining [J/OL]. Coal Sci Technol, 2025—09—19. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2402.TD.20250918.1809.030

[4]

(洪妙英, 吴保磊, 王佳慧, . 矿山无人驾驶系统关键技术研究综述[J/OL]. 煤炭科学技术, 2025—09—19. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2402.TD.20250918.1809.030

[5]

Meng D J, Tian B, Cai F, et al. Road slope real—time detection for unmanned truck in surface mine[J]. Acta Geod Cartographica Sin, 2021(11): 1628

[6]

(孟德将, 田滨, 蔡峰, . 面向无人驾驶矿车的露天矿山道路坡度实时检测方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2021(11): 1628)

[7]

Zhang L, Shan W X, Zhou B, et al. A dynamic dispatching problem for autonomous mine trucks in open—pit mines considering endogenous congestion[J]. Transp Res Part C Emerging Technol, 2023, 150: 104080

[8]

Yu X J, Huai Y H, Yao Z W, et al. Key technologies in autonomous vehicle for engineering[J]. J Jilin Univ (Eng Technol Ed), 2021, 51(4): 1153

[9]

(于向军, 槐元辉, 姚宗伟, . 工程车辆无人驾驶关键技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(4): 1153)

[10]

Xiong L, Yang X, Zhuo G R, et al. Review on motion control of autonomous vehicles[J]. J Mech Eng, 2020(10): 127

[11]

(熊璐, 杨兴, 卓桂荣, . 无人驾驶车辆的运动控制发展现状综述[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020(10): 127)

[12]

Lei Z Y, Ma X L, Yuan X W, et al. Research on automatic driving path tracking control of open—pit mine transportation vehicles with delay compensation[J]. World Electr Veh J, 2022, 13(8): 134

[13]

Yang C Y, Chen J Y, Zhang X, et al. Mine truck trajectory tracking based on road adaptive model predictive control[J]. Control Theory Appl, 2023, 40(6): 1061

[14]

(杨春雨, 陈佳怡, 张鑫, . 矿用卡车路面自适应模型预测轨迹跟踪控制[J]. 控制理论与应用, 2023, 40(6): 1061)

[15]

Chen L, Qin Z B, Hu M J, et al. Trajectory tracking control of autonomous heavy—duty mining dump trucks with uncertain dynamic characteristics[J]. Sci China Inf Sci, 2023, 66(10): 202203

[16]

Wang R C, Wan J N, Ye Q, et al. Path tracking and anti—roll control of unmanned mining trucks on mine site roads[J]. World Electr Veh J, 2024, 15(4): 167

[17]

Xia Q, Chen P, Xu G Y, et al. Reinforcement learning—based adaptive safety tracking controller for autonomous mining trucks[J]. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2025, 74(7): 10122

[18]

Bai G X, Meng Y, Liu L, et al. Path tracking control of unmanned ground vehicles considering the signal time delay[J]. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D J Automob Eng, 2024, 238(8): 2338

[19]

Bai G X, Liu L, Meng Y, et al. Real—time path tracking of mobile robot based on nonlinear model predictive control[J]. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach, 2020, 51(9): 47

[20]

(白国星, 刘丽, 孟宇, . 基于非线性模型预测控制的移动机器人实时路径跟踪[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(9): 47)

[21]

Mohammadzadeh A, Taghavifar H, Zhang C W, et al. A non—linear fractional—order type—3 fuzzy control for enhanced path—tracking performance of autonomous cars[J]. IET Control Theory Appl, 2024, 18(1): 40

[22]

Hashemi E, Khajepour A. Integrated path—tracking and combined—slip force controls of autonomous ground vehicles with safe constraints adaptation[J]. IEEE Trans Intell Veh, 2024, 9(3): 4265

[23]

Liu X Y, Ou J, Yan D H, et al. Path tracking control of automated vehicles based on adaptive MPC in variable scenarios[J]. IET Intel Transport Syst, 2024, 18(6): 1031

[24]

Liu W L, Guo R, Zhao J Y. Adaptive sliding mode predictive control for path tracking of wheeled agricultural vehicles[J]. Machines, 2025, 13(2): 157

[25]

Chen Q P, Yu B H, Min S L, et al. Study on intelligent vehicle trajectory planning and tracking control based on improved APF and MPC[J]. Int J Automot Technol, 2025, 26(3): 715

[26]

Song C Y, Guo X M, Sui J H. Improved model predictive control algorithm for the path tracking control of ship autonomous berthing[J]. J Mar Sci Eng, 2025, 13(7): 1273

[27]

Li C X, Jiang H B, Yang X F, et al. Path tracking control strategy based on adaptive MPC for intelligent vehicles[J]. Appl Sci, 2025, 15(10): 5464

[28]

Jin L Q, Qiu N, Tian D Y, et al. MPC—based path tracking strategy for 4WID&4WIS vehicles using B—spline approximation and state—dependent reference[J]. Control Eng Pract, 2025, 165: 106546

[29]

Li W H, Zhang X X. Data—driven model predictive control for underactuated USV path tracking with unknown dynamics[J]. Ocean Eng, 2025, 333: 121457

[30]

Zhang J N, Bai G X. Path tracking control of vehicles based on preview Stanley control considering system constraints[J]. Mod Manuf Eng, 2023(9): 61

[31]

(张俊娜, 白国星. 考虑系统约束的预瞄 Stanley 车辆路径跟踪控制[J]. 现代制造工程, 2023(9): 61)

[32]

Y, Qi X, Liu Q Z, et al. Path tracking control method with steering lag for autonomous vehicles[J]. Automot Eng, 2023, 45(12): 2234

[33]

(吕颖, 祁旭, 刘秋铮, . 考虑转向延迟特性的自动驾驶车辆路径跟踪控制方法[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(12): 2234)

[34]

Zhou W Q, Zhao Y H, Liu Q C, et al. Lateral control strategy of vehicle path tracking based on improved LQR[J]. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol (Nat Sci Ed), 2024, 52(3): 135

[35]

(周卫琪, 赵羿寒, 刘擎超, . 基于改进 LQR 的车辆路径跟踪横向控制策略[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 52(3): 135)

[36]

Bai G X, Elham E, Fu X J, et al. Path tracking of car—like robots based on feed—forward model predictive control[J]. Chin J Eng, 2024, 46(6): 1130

[37]

(白国星, 伊力夏提·伊力哈木江, 付薛洁, . 基于前馈模型预测控制的类车机器人路径跟踪[J]. 工程科学学报, 2024, 46(6): 1130)

[38]

Chen Q P, Cao T H, Huang S T, et al. Model predictive control for intelligent vehicles fusing feed—forward and state feedback[J]. J Hunan Univ Nat Sci , 2024, 51(8): 165

[39]

(陈齐平, 曹天恒, 黄少堂, . 融合前馈及状态反馈的智能汽车模型预测控制[J]. 2024, 51(8): 165)

[40]

Elham E, Meng Y, Bai G X, et al. Path tracking for car—like robots based on feed—forward nonlinear model predictive control[J]. Chin J Eng, 2025, 47(1): 101

[41]

(伊力夏提·伊力哈木江, 孟宇, 白国星, . 基于前馈非线性模型预测控制的类车机器人路径跟踪[J]. 工程科学学报, 2025, 47(1): 101)

[42]

Bai G X, Elxat E, Wang J P, et al. Influence mechanism and elimination method of signal time delay on NMPC—based path tracking systems[J]. Chin J Eng, 2026, 48(1): 129

[43]

(白国星, 伊力夏提·伊力哈木江, 王俊朋, . 信号时滞对 NMPC 路径跟踪系统的影响机理与消减方法[J]. 工程科学学报, 2026, 48(1): 129)

[44]

Bai G X, Liu S C, Meng Y, et al. Time—delay path tracking of car—like robots based on multi—step motion compensation[J]. Acta Sci Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2026, 62(2): 297

[45]

(白国星, 刘绍冲, 孟宇, . 基于多步运动补偿的类车机器人时滞路径跟踪[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 62(2): 297)

[46]

Cheng J, Zhang B L, Zhang C B, et al. A model—free adaptive predictive path—tracking controller with PID terms for tractors[J]. Biosyst Eng, 2024, 242: 38

[47]

Chen B S, Liu H T, Wu R S. Robust H fault—tolerant observer—based PID path tracking control of autonomous ground vehicle with control saturation[J]. IEEE Open J Veh Technol, 2024, 5: 298

[48]

Zhang S C, Liu Q S, Xu H H, et al. Path tracking control of a large rear—wheel—steered combine harvester using feedforward PID and look—ahead Ackermann algorithms[J]. Agriculture, 2025, 15(7): 676

[49]

Liu Z B, Chen Y L, Xu Z F, et al. Four—wheel differential steering AGV navigation control system based on double variable limiters PID algorithm[J]. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2025(5): 27

[50]

(刘梓博, 陈羽立, 徐梓峰, . 基于双变量限幅 PID 算法的四轮差速转向 AGV 导航控制系统[J]. 农业工程学报, 2025(5): 27)

[51]

Chatzikomis C I, Spentzas K N. Apath—following driver model with longitudinal and lateral control of vehicle’s motion[J]. Forsch Ingenieurwes, 2009, 73(4): 257

[52]

Marino R, Scalzi S, Netto M. Nested PID steering control for lane keeping in autonomous vehicles[J]. Control Eng Pract, 2011, 19(12): 1459

基金资助

国家重点研发计划资助项目(2023YFC3806603)

国家自然科学基金资助项目(52202505)

中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2022M710354)

唐山市人才资助项目(C202503022)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/