不同微贮剂对伊犁河谷地区小麦秸秆、玉米秸秆微贮的影响

杨劲松 ,  赛迪阿合买提·吾买尔江 ,  李建国 ,  法茹孜·吐尔洪 ,  范坤江 ,  何立雄

绿洲农业科学与工程 ›› 2026, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03) : 116 -121.

PDF (1133KB)
绿洲农业科学与工程 ›› 2026, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03) : 116 -121. DOI: 10.26941/j.cnki.2096-2177.2026.03.018
畜牧兽医·水产

不同微贮剂对伊犁河谷地区小麦秸秆、玉米秸秆微贮的影响

作者信息 +

Effects of Different Microbial Inoculants on the Micro-silage of Wheat Straw and Corn Straw in the Yili River Valley

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1159K)

摘要

为评价不同商品化微生物发酵菌剂对伊犁河谷地区小麦秸秆和玉米秸秆的微贮效果,为当地秸秆饲料化资源高效利用提供理论依据与技术参考,以该区域小麦秸秆、玉米秸秆为原料,分别搭配甜菜丝、苹果渣作为发酵辅料,选用3种菌剂(新疆沃润牧田复合菌剂、成都与康植物乳杆菌单一菌剂、石河子市动科畜牧复合菌剂)设置6个试验组,采用裹包微贮方式发酵60 d后,测定各组微贮饲料的营养成分及发酵品质指标。结果表明:(1)小麦秸秆微贮中,新疆沃润牧田组(MN)与石河子动科组(MS)粗蛋白含量显著高于成都与康组(MC)(P<0.05),最高达5.16%;MC组粗脂肪含量(2.17%)及乳酸含量(6.34 mmol·L-1)显著最优,MS组可溶性碳水化合物含量(2.25%)最高。(2)玉米秸秆微贮中,石河子动科组(YS)粗蛋白含量(7.87%)最高且木质素含量(6.24%)最低;成都与康组(YC)中性洗涤纤维含量(60.09%)最低显著低于其他组及可溶性碳水化合物含量(3.67%)显著优于其他组;新疆沃润牧田组(YN)pH值(2.27)最低且乳酸含量(4.17 mmol·L-1)最高。不同微贮剂对秸秆微贮效果的影响存在显著差异,且与发酵底物特性存在明显适配性——玉米秸秆微贮优先选择石河子市动科畜牧复合菌剂,小麦秸秆微贮可选用新疆沃润牧田或石河子市动科畜牧复合菌剂。

Abstract

To evaluate the micro-silage effects of different commercial microbial fermentation agents on wheat straw and corn straw in the Yili River Valley,and to provide theoretical basis and technical reference for the efficient utilization of local straw resources as feed,wheat straw and corn straw from this region were used as raw materials,with beet shreds and apple pomace as fermentation auxiliary materials respectively.Three microbial agents(Xinjiang Worunmutian compound microbial agent,Chengdu Yukang Lactobacillus plantarum single microbial agent,Shihezi Animal Science and Animal Husbandry compound microbial agent)were selected to set up 6 experimental groups.After 60 days of fermentation by bale micro-silage method,the nutritional components and fermentation quality indicators of micro-silage feed in each group were determined.The results showed that:(1)In wheat straw micro-silage,the crude protein content of Xinjiang Worunmutian group(MN)and Shihezi Animal Science group(MS)was significantly higher than that of Chengdu Yukang group(MC)(P<0.05),peaking at 5.16%;MC group had the significantly optimal crude fat content(2.17%)and lactic acid content(6.34 mmol·L-1),while MS group had the highest soluble carbohydrate content(2.25%).(2)In corn straw micro-silage,Shihezi Animal Science group(YS)had the highest crude protein content(7.87%)and the lowest lignin content(6.24%);Chengdu Yukang group(YC)had the lowest neutral detergent fiber content(60.09 %),which was significantly lower than that of the other groups. Meanwhile,the soluble carbohydrate content (3.67%) in this group was significantly higher than that of the other groups;Xinjiang Worunmutian group(YN)had the lowest pH value(2.27)and the highest lactic acid content(4.17 mmol·L-1).Different microbial silage additives have significant differences in their effects on straw micro-silage quality,and exhibit obvious adaptability to the characteristics of fermentation substrates.Specifically,Shihezi Animal Science and Animal Husbandry compound microbial agent is preferred for corn straw micro-silage,while Xinjiang Worunmutian or Shihezi Animal Science and Animal Husbandry compound microbial agent can be used for wheat straw micro-silage.

关键词

植物乳杆菌 / 酿酒酵母 / 微贮

Key words

Lactobacillus plantarum / Saccharomyces cerevisiae / micro-silage

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
杨劲松,赛迪阿合买提·吾买尔江,李建国,法茹孜·吐尔洪,范坤江,何立雄. 不同微贮剂对伊犁河谷地区小麦秸秆、玉米秸秆微贮的影响[J]. 绿洲农业科学与工程, 2026, 11(03): 116-121 DOI:10.26941/j.cnki.2096-2177.2026.03.018

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

李骅, 赵汝东, 李超, . 水稻秸秆微贮制备饲料的试验[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报202152(3):329-335.

[2]

LI HuaZHAO RudongLI Chao ,et al. Experiment on the preparation of feed by rice straw micro storage[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University202152(3):329-335.

[3]

任鑫茹, 赵宏璐, 李雅静, . 混菌低温发酵对玉米秸秆黄贮饲料品质的影响[J]. 生物技术通报202541(3):330-342.

[4]

REN XinruZHAO HongluLI Yajing ,et al. Effect of low temperature fermentation of mixed bacteria on the quality of corn straw yellow silage[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin202541(3):330-342.

[5]

陈卫锋, 徐升运, 秦涛, . 玉米秸秆黄贮工艺研究[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医2018(18):151-154.

[6]

CHEN WeifengXU ShengyunQIN Tao ,et al. Study on yellow storage technology of corn straw[J]. HeilongJiang Animal Husbandry and veterinary2018(18):151-154.

[7]

魏万爱, 保青泰, 吴海鸿, . 红笋叶与玉米秸秆混贮工艺条件优化[J]. 甘肃农业科技2021, 52(6):48-52.

[8]

WEI WanaiBAO QingtaiWU Haihong ,et al. Optimization of process conditions for mixed storage of red shoot leaves and corn straw[J]. Gansu Agricultural Science and technology2021, 52(6):48-52.

[9]

刘海燕, 王秀飞, 王彦靖, . 秸秆黄贮的研究进展[J]. 饲料研究202144(19):153-156.

[10]

LIU HaiyanWANG XiufeiWANG Yanjing ,et al. Research progress of straw yellow storage[J]. Feed Research202144(19):153-156.

[11]

吴风. 蒸汽爆破结合酶解从苹果渣中制备可发酵糖[D]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2024

[12]

WU Feng . Preparation of fermentable sugar from apple pomace by steam explosion and enzymatic hydrolysis[D].Wuxi: Jiangnan University2024

[13]

青格尔, 于晓芳, 高聚林, . 复合菌系GF—20低温降解玉米秸秆过程中群落演替与理化特性[J]. 微生物学通报202148(8):2 681—2 694.

[14]

QIN Ge'erYU XiaofangGAO Julin ,et al. Community succession and physicochemical properties of composite strain GF—20 during low temperature degradation of corn straw[J]. Microbiological Bulletin202148(8):2 681—2 694.

[15]

陈海军, 孙剑, 齐树森, . 甜菜粕在饲料中的应用进展[J]. 中国果菜202545(8):74-79.

[16]

CHEN HaijunSUN JianQI Shusen ,et al. Application progress of beet pulp in feed[J]. China Fruit and Vegetable202545(8):74-79.

[17]

余俊洋, 张玉琳, 王旭哲, . 植物乳杆菌和屎肠球菌对杂交构树青贮发酵品质及细菌群落的影响[J]. 动物营养学报202537(8):5 617—5 630.

[18]

YU JunyangZHANG YulinWANG Xuzhe ,et al. Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum and Enterococcus faecium on fermentation quality and bacterial community of hybrid Broussonetia papyrifera silage[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition202537(8):5 617—5 630.

[19]

贾冬文, 曹阳. 优质安全青贮饲料用添加剂研究进展[J]. 饲料工业202445(12):53-58.

[20]

JIA DongwenCAO Yang . Research progress on additives for high quality and safe silage[J]. Feed Industry202445(12):53-58.

[21]

王诚, 张莹, 王玲, . 同/异型发酵乳酸菌对玉米秸秆青贮品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 湖南饲料2023(3):35-39.

[22]

WANG ChengZHANG YingWANG Ling ,et al. Effects of homo/heterotypic lactic acid bacteria on the quality and aerobic stability of corn straw silage[J]. Hunan Feed2023(3):35-39.

[23]

岳碧娥, 孙飞飞, 付东青, . 同/异型发酵乳酸菌对全株玉米青贮营养特征变化的影响[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医2022(3):7-14.

[24]

YUE Bi'eSUN FeifeiFU Dongqing ,et al. Effects of homo/heterotypic lactic acid bacteria on the changes of nutritional characteristics of whole plant corn silage[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Husbandry and Veterinary2022(3):7-14.

基金资助

多胎肉羊健康高效养殖技术推广示范(2024GG008)

肉毛兼用细毛羊健康养殖关键配套技术的应用与推广(2024AB0172—2)

饲草优质高效生产及加工应用技术集成与示范(2024GG008)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1133KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/