断层破碎带隧道围岩变形及支护受力特征
Deformation characteristics of surrounding rock and support stress in tunnels crossing fault fracture zones
针对断层破碎带隧道围岩易发生大变形的问题,以甘肃黑马关隧道穿越断层破碎带工程为研究背景,基于23个监测断面的围岩压力、拱顶沉降及水平收敛等现场监测数据,对围岩变形演化规律及支护结构受力特征进行系统分析。结果表明,断层破碎带段围岩变形显著,监测断面单侧最大水平收敛达787.7 mm,最大拱顶沉降达472.6 mm,表现出典型软岩大变形特征;围岩变形及压力在空间上具有明显离散性,拱顶沉降和水平收敛变异系数分别为83.2%和93.0%,反映出断层破碎带围岩结构高度非均质;施工阶段二次衬砌荷载分担比为5.18%~38.46%,平均为20.29%,表明围岩荷载主要由初期支护承担,二次衬砌承担约20%的荷载;在高地应力、顺层结构及地下水软化等多因素耦合作用下,围岩变形及支护受力呈现明显的空间非均匀性。研究成果可为类似断层破碎带隧道围岩大变形控制及支护设计提供参考。
To address the problem of large deformation of surrounding rock in tunnels crossing fault fracture zones, the Heimaguan Tunnel in Gansu was taken as the engineering background. Based on the field monitoring data of surrounding rock pressure, crown settlement, and horizontal convergence obtained from 23 monitoring sections, the deformation evolution characteristics of the surrounding rock and the mechanical behavior of the supporting structures were systematically analyzed. The results showed that significant deformation occurred in the fault fracture zone section. The maximum unilate ral horizontal convergence reached 787.7 mm, while the maximum crown settlement reached 472.6 mm, exhibiting typical characteristics of large deformation in fault fracture zones. The deformation and pressure of the surrounding rock exhibited significant spatial discreteness, with the coefficients of variation of crown settlement and horizontal convergence reaching 83.2% and 93.0%, respectively, indicating the highly heterogeneous nature of the surrounding rock within the fault fracture zone. During the construction stage, the load-sharing ratio of the secondary lining ranged from 5.18% to 38.46%, with an average 20.29%, indicating that the surrounding rock load was mainly borne by the primary support, while approximately 20% of the load was carried by the secondary lining. Under the coupled effects of high in-situ stress, bedding-controlled structure, and groundwater softening, the surrounding rock deformation and support stress exhibited pronounced spatial non-uniformity. The research results can be referred to for the control of large deformation and the support design of similar tunnels crossing fault fracture zones.
| [1] |
杨建辉, 沈恺, 周杰, |
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
刘高, 张帆宇, 李新召, |
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
刘志春, 李文江, 孙明磊, |
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
王东剑 . 隧道穿越断层带围岩超前小导管预加固措施参数研究[J]. 公路, 2022, 67(6): 395-400. |
| [8] |
颉永斌, 董建华. 断层破碎带内隧道纵向受荷特征和变形分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2021, 34(11): 211-224. |
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
王宝东, 赵文, 王鑫, |
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
张帆舸, 黄昌富, 李文兵, |
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
万飞, 谭忠盛, 马栋. 关角隧道F2—1断层破碎带支护结构优化设计[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(3): 531-538. |
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
丁远振, 谭忠盛, 马栋. 高地应力断层带软岩隧道变形特征与控制措施研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2017, 50(增刊1): 129-134. |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
刘银, 张志强, 赵梓彤, |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
马栋, 闫肃, 王武现. 赣深高铁龙南隧道大型富水断层破碎带施工技术[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2020, 40(11): 1634-1641. |
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
蔡遵乐, 梁庆国, 曹生慧, |
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
陈孔福, 申玉生, 赵何霖, |
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
杨立, 夏增选, 娄文杰, |
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
杨拯. 断层破碎带影响下山岭隧道施工力学行为研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2012: 7-13. |
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
常伟学, 梁庆国, 李奇伟, |
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局 . 工程岩体分级标准: GB/T 50218—2014[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2014: 10-12. |
| [33] |
中华人民共和国交通运输部 . 公路隧道施工技术规范: JTG/T 3660—2020[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社股份有限公司, 2020: 43. |
| [34] |
国家铁路局 . 铁路富水隧道技术规程: TB 10123—2025[S]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2025: 6. |
| [35] |
马思琦. 湛江湾海底隧道施工的岩土工程风险评价与控制[J]. 特种结构, 2025, 42(6): 111-117. |
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
PANTELIDIS L. The equivalent modulus of elasticity of layered soil mediums for designing shallow foundations with the Winkler spring hypothesis: a critical review[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 201: 109452. |
| [39] |
杜家庆, 杨捷, 杨振兴, |
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
丁保新. 地铁荷载作用下浅埋黄土隧道围岩动力沉降及累积效应研究[D]. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学, 2022: 30-35. |
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
徐平, 杨益新, 朱志豪. 运营地铁盾构隧道基底沉降的影响因素分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2024, 51(4): 157-166. |
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
甘肃路桥建设集团有限公司科研资助项目(2023-KLZCB-QT27)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |