基于SWAT-LUC模型与多灵敏度实验的密云水库上游径流变化归因

李新德 ,  李明然 ,  张世伟

南水北调与水利科技(中英文) ›› 2026, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3) : 562 -573.

PDF (1503KB)
南水北调与水利科技(中英文) ›› 2026, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3) : 562 -573. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2026.0055
水文水资源

基于SWAT-LUC模型与多灵敏度实验的密云水库上游径流变化归因

作者信息 +

Attribution analysis of runoff variation in the upstream of Miyun Reservoir based on SWAT-LUC model and multi-sensitivity experiments

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1538K)

摘要

为定量区分气候变化与人类活动对水库上游径流变化的贡献,以北京市重要饮用水源地潮白河流域密云水库上游为研究区,基于2006−2023年气象、土地利用变化、水库调水及土壤等数据,构建能够反映逐年土地利用动态变化的土壤与水评估工具-土地利用变化(soil and water assessment tool-land use change, SWAT-LUC)分布式水文模型,并设计多灵敏度数值实验,定量拆分气候变化(降水和气温)与人类活动(土地利用变化和水库调水)对白河与潮河水系径流变化的贡献。结果表明:研究期内白河与潮河水系径流量均呈不显著增加趋势;降水是径流变化最主要的驱动因素,其对白河与潮河径流增加的年贡献量分别为0.494 9和0.295 2 m3/s;植被面积增加对径流具有微弱的影响;水库调水减少则显著抑制了白河水系径流的增加。研究结果可为密云水库流域水资源管理与调控提供参考。

Abstract

Climate change and human activities have been identified as two major forces that are significantly altering runoff processes in reservoir upstream regions. However, quantifying their contributions is a challenge due to the complex interactions within hydrological systems. The Chaobai River basin upstream of the Miyun Reservoir was selected as the study area, which is an important drinking water source for Beijing. Existing research on runoff attribution in this region shows significant disparities, largely resulting from methodological differences, such as the use of static land use representations, neglect of reservoir regulation effects, and the difficulty in analyzing the impacts of short-term climate and human activities. This study aims to fill these gaps by developing a dynamic hydrological modelling framework that considers annual land use changes and reservoir operations to quantitatively attribute runoff variations to specific climatic and anthropogenic factors. A SWAT-LUC hydrological model, an enhanced version of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) capable of incorporating annual land use dynamics, was developed for the Miyun Reservoir's upstream basin. Input data included meteorological records, annual land use maps from the CLCD dataset, soil data from the World Soil Database and detailed reservoir operation parameters for the Yunzhou and Baihebao Reservoirs. Using monthly streamflow data from five hydrological stations in the Bai River and Chao River basins, the model was validated from 2016 to 2023 after being calibrated from 2007 to 2015. Model performance was evaluated using the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient and the coefficient of determination. A multi-sensitivity experimental framework was used, consisting of four scenario simulations with precipitation, temperature, land use, and reservoir diversion sequentially fixed at their 2006 levels and one control simulation with all factors changing naturally. These experiments used a joint solution method to distinguish between the individual contributions of climate change and human activities to the observed runoff trends. The calibrated SWAT-LUC model demonstrated acceptable performance in simulating the hydrological processes. During the calibration period, Nash-Sutcliffe coefficients ranged from 0.50 to 0.82, and coefficients of determination ranged from 0.67 to 0.88 across all five stations. During the validation period, these metrics ranged from 0.67 to 0.93 and 0.77 to 0.94, respectively. Between 2006 and 2023, both the Bai River and Chao River basins observed non-significant increasing trends in annual runoff. Precipitation was identified as the dominant driver of runoff variation, contributing an annual increase of 0.494 9 m3/s in the Bai River basin and 0.295 2 m3/s in the Chao River basin. Temperature exhibited opposing effects, contributing a slight increase in the Bai River basin but a decrease in the Chao River basin. Increased vegetation area had a weak impact on runoff in both basins. Reduced water diversion from the Baihebao Reservoir significantly suppressed the runoff increase in the Bai River basin, with an annual contribution of negative 0.012 7 m3/s, an effect greater than that of land use change. The results indicate that climate factors, especially precipitation, were the primary drivers of runoff variation in

关键词

径流变化 / 气候变化 / 土地利用变化 / 水库调水 / SWAT-LUC模型

Key words

runoff variation / climate change / land use change / reservoir water diversion / SWAT-LUC model

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
李新德,李明然,张世伟. 基于SWAT-LUC模型与多灵敏度实验的密云水库上游径流变化归因[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2026, 24(3): 562-573 DOI:10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2026.0055

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Gou Jiaojiao, Miao Chiyuan, Duan Qingyun, et al. Seasonality and impact factor analysis of streamflow sensitivity to climate change across China[J]. Earth's Future, 2022, 10(11): e2022EF003062. DOI: 10.1029/2022ef003062.

[2]

Padrón R S, Gudmundsson L, Decharme B, et al. Observed changes in dry-season water availability attributed to human-induced climate change[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2020, 13(7): 477-481. DOI: 10.1038/s41561-020-0594-1.

[3]

Zeng Feng, He Qiulan, Li Yao, et al. Reduced runoff in the upper Yangtze River due to comparable contribution of anthropogenic and climate changes[J]. Earth's Future, 2024, 12(7): e2023EF004028. DOI: 10.1029/2023ef004028.

[4]

Lorenzo-lacruz J, Morán-tejeda E, Vicente-serrano S M, et al. Streamflow frequency changes across western Europe and interactions with north Atlantic atmospheric circulation patterns[J]. Global and Planetary Change, 2022, 212: 103797. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2022.103797.

[5]

Sun Yuchen, Knorr G, Zhang Xu, et al. Ice sheet decline and rising atmospheric CO2 control AMOC sensitivity to deglacial meltwater discharge [J]. Global and Planetary Change, 2022, 210: 103755. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2022.103755.

[6]

Wu Yiping, Yin Xiaowei, Zhou Guoyi, et al. Rising rainfall intensity induces spatially divergent hydrological changes within a large river basin[J]. Nat Commun, 2024, 15(1): 823. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-44562-8.

[7]

Piao Shilong, Wang Xuhui, Park T, et al. Characteristics, drivers and feedbacks of global greening[J]. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2019, 1(1): 14-27. DOI: 10.1038/s43017-019-0001-x.

[8]

Khan M, Khan A U, Khan S, et al. Assessing the impacts of climate change on streamflow dynamics: A machine learning perspective[J]. Water Science Technology, 2023, 88(9): 2309-2331. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2023.340.

[9]

Sha Jian, Zhao Yue, Li Xue, et al. Assessing impacts of future climate change on hydrological processes in an urbanizing watershed with a multimodel approach[J]. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 2021, 12(4): 1023-1042. DOI: 10.2166/wcc.2020.142.

[10]

Hou Yiping, Wei Xiaohua, Zhang Mingfang, et al. A global synthesis of hydrological sensitivities to deforestation and forestation[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2023, 529: 120718. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120718.

[11]

Tan Xuejin, Tan Xuezhi, Liu Bingjun, et al. Impacts of anthropogenic climate change and vegetation variations on global changes in baseflow and stormflow[J]. Water Resources Research, 2025, 61(11): e2025WR040309. DOI: 10.1029/2025wr040309.

[12]

Khan T, Al-khayri J M, Mansoo S. Forests and their crucial roles in hydrological systems, ecosystem services, and restoration efforts[J]. Sylwan, 2025, 169(2): 126-140. DOI: 10.26202/sylwan.2024074.

[13]

Van der Sande M T, Powers J S, Kuyper T W, et al. Soil resistance and recovery during neotropical forest succession[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2023, 378(1867): 20210074. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0074.

[14]

Wu Liyu, Zhang Xuan, Hao Fanghua, et al. Evaluating the contributions of climate change and human activities to runoff in typical semi-arid area, China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 590: 125555. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125555.

[15]

Gao Ju, Li Chunhui, Zhou Xiong, et al. Climate change and human activities amplify runoff variability risks in lower reaches of large rivers[J]. Communications Earth & Environment, 2025, 6(1): 794. DOI: 10.1038/s43247-025-02759-3.

[16]

Li Mingqian, Gu Hongbiao, Wang He, et al. Quantifying the impact of climate variability and human activities on streamflow variation in Taoer River basin, China[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2023, 30(19): 56425-56439. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-26271-3.

[17]

East A E, Warrick J A, Li Dongfeng, et al. Measuring and attributing sedimentary and geomorphic responses to modern climate change: Challenges and opportunities[J]. Earth's Future, 2022, 10(10): e2022EF002983. DOI: 10.1029/2022ef002983.

[18]

Karesdotter E, Destouni G, Ghajarnia N, et al. Distinguishing direct human-driven effects on the global terrestrial water cycle[J]. Earth's Future, 2022, 10(8): e2022EF002848. DOI: 10.1029/2022EF002848.

[19]

刘畅, 唐海蓉, 计璐艳, . 长时间序列1984年−2020年密云水库水面信息遥感监测与分析[J]. 遥感学报, 2023, 27(2): 335-350. DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20220489.

[20]

锐熊, 赵永军, 邱云霄. 密云水库上游潮白河流域丰平枯特征及其与入库水量的定量关系[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024, 44(4): 151-156. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.04.016.

[21]

门宝辉, 蔡斌, 田巍. 基于SPEI的潮白河流域气象干旱时空特征分析[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 43(2): 10-20. DOI: 10.19760/j.ncwu.zk.2022016.

[22]

Qiu Jiali, Shen Zhenyao, Hou Xiaoshu, et al. Evaluating the performance of conservation practices under climate change scenarios in the Miyun Reservoir watershed, China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2020, 143: 105700. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.105700.

[23]

Zhang Jing, Ma Sijie, Song Yongyu. Hydrological and water quality simulation and future runoff prediction under CMIP6 scenario in the upstream basin of Miyun Reservoir[J]. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 2022, 13(7): 2505-2530. DOI: 10.2166/wcc.2022.389.

[24]

Yan Tiezhu, Bai Jianwen, Lee A Z Y, et al. SWAT-simulated streamflow responses to climate variability and human activities in the Miyun Reservoir basin by considering streamflow components[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(4): 941. DOI: 10.3390/su10040941.

[25]

黄俊雄, 刘兆飞, 张航, . 土地利用与气候变化对密云水库来水量变化的影响研究[J]. 水文, 2021, 41(1): 1-6. DOI: 10.19797/j.cnki.1000-0852.20190431.

[26]

李珠, 桑燕芳, 杨默远, . 基于多因素分析的密云水库流域径流变化归因[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2024, 22(3): 482-490. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2024.0050.

[27]

李珠, 杨默远, 桑燕芳, . 密云水库流域降水径流非平稳特征识别及归因[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2024, 22(2): 331-338. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2024.0004.

[28]

王泽勇, 廖卫红, 丁星臣, . 气候变化和人类活动对密云水库上游流域径流变化的影响[J]. 水电能源科学, 2020, 38(6): 13-16. DOI: 10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2020.06.004.

[29]

张治倩, 施东妤, 李春丽, . 密云水库入库水沙变化特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 水电能源科学, 2025, 43(10): 83-87. DOI: 10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2025.20250711.

[30]

康永德, 陈佩, 许尔文, . 基于BO-LSTM的排露沟流域气象水文演变分析及径流预测模型建立[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2025, 56(4): 1-11. DOI: 10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2025.04.001.

[31]

王晓颖. 基于改进新安江模型的密云水库流域径流变化归因研究[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2020.

[32]

章燕喃. 密云水库流域近三十年径流变化及归因分析[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2014.

[33]

王赛超, 薛万来, 吴卿, . 密云水库上游流域产水服务时空变化及驱动因素分析[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 46(3): 88-97. DOI: 10.19760/j.ncwu.zk.2025045.

[34]

彭慧. 基于地理信息技术和SWAT模型的城市水资源评价方法研究[J]. 南京信息工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 14(6): 686-693. DOI: 10.13878/j.cnki.jnuist.2022.06.007.

[35]

张乐开, 左其亭, 钟涛, . 基于SWAT的沁河流域水源涵养能力分析及预测[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2023, 21(5): 862-872. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2023.0084.

[36]

Yang Jie, Huang Xin. The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019[J]. Earth System Science Data, 2021, 13(8): 3907-3925. DOI: 10.5194/essd-13-3907-2021.

[37]

Lee D J, Han J H, Park M J, et al. Development of advanced web-based SWAT LUC system considering yearly land use changes and recession curve characteristics[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2019, 128: 39-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.01.001.

[38]

Sun Shanlei, Chai Rongfan, Zhang Yifang, et al. On the attribution of historical and future dryness/wetness changes in China incorporating surface resistance response to elevated CO2 [J]. Global and Planetary Change, 2024, 234: 104380. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2024.104380.

[39]

Sun Shanlei, Chen Haishan, Ju Weimin, et al. On the attribution of the changing hydrological cycle in Poyang Lake basin, China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2014, 514: 214-225. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.013.

[40]

郭军庭. 潮河流域土地利用气候变化的水文响应研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2012.

[41]

Fan Yuting, Chen Yaning, Li Weihong, et al. Impacts of temperature and precipitation on runoff in the Tarim River during the past 50 years[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2011, 3(3): 220-230. DOI: 10.3724/sp.J.1227.2011.00220.

[42]

Xie Jiaxin, Liu Xiaomang, Jasechko S, et al. Majority of global river flow sustained by groundwater[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2024, 17(8): 770-777. DOI: 10.1038/s41561-024-01483-5.

[43]

Meier R, Schwaab J, Seneviratne S I, et al. Empirical estimate of forestation-induced precipitation changes in Europe[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2021, 14(7): 473-478. DOI: 10.1038/s41561-021-00773-6.

[44]

Cui Jiangpeng, Lian Xu, Huntingford C, et al. Global water availability boosted by vegetation-driven changes in atmospheric moisture transport[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2022, 15(12): 982-988. DOI: 10.1038/s41561-022-01061-7.

基金资助

河北省重点研发计划项目(22374205D)

河北省省级水利科技计划项目(HBSL2025-04)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1503KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/