山水林田湖草沙复合系统治理演进与多目标优化研究综述

曾小红 ,  叶爱中 ,  赵晨光

南水北调与水利科技(中英文) ›› 2026, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3) : 632 -644.

PDF (1024KB)
南水北调与水利科技(中英文) ›› 2026, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3) : 632 -644. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2026.0061
生态与环境

山水林田湖草沙复合系统治理演进与多目标优化研究综述

作者信息 +

A review on the governance evolution and multi-objective optimization in the mountains-waters-forests-farmlands-lakes-grasslands-deserts complex system

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1047K)

摘要

山水林田湖草沙系统是生态-经济-社会协同发展的典型复合系统,但该系统的治理演进与多目标优化研究仍缺乏归纳。我国过去76年治理历程可分为5个逐步深化阶段:萌芽探索期(1949−1978年)奠定单目标治理基础;系统治理初期(1979−1998年)形成多目标协同治理雏形;系统治理推进期(1999−2012年)治理上升为国家战略;生态文明深化期(2013−2020年)确立“生命共同体”理论;智慧治理新时期(2021年至今)推动技术融合创新。结果表明:面向该系统的“综合最优”目标,通常需依托基于自然的解决方案与跨部门协同,并在保障生态系统服务功能稳定的前提下,刻画生态-经济-社会效益的帕累托最优权衡关系。进一步归纳多目标优化方法在该系统多个领域的应用模式及效益目标函数设置,涉及经济效益、生态效益、适宜性与土地紧凑性等维度的综合权衡。当前研究总体呈现智能算法与系统治理需求深度融合的发展趋势。系统总结了山水林田湖草沙复合系统的治理理论与实践演进及相关优化研究进展,可为类似系统治理研究提供科学借鉴。

Abstract

The mountains, waters, forests, farmlands, lakes, grasslands, and deserts form a typical complex system that supports the coordinated development of ecology, economy, and society. However, there is still a lack of comprehensive studies on how governance evolves and how to optimize multiple objectives within this system. This study reviews China's 76-year governance process: the budding and exploratory phase (1949-1978) laid the foundation for single-objective governance; the initial phase of systematic governance (1979-1998) formed the prototype of multi-objective coordinated governance; the advancement phase (1999-2012) elevated governance to the level of a national strategy; the deepening of ecological civilization phase (2013-2020) established the "community of life" theory; and the new era of intelligent governance (2021-present) promotes technological integration and innovation. Related research indicates that achieving "comprehensive optimality" for this system typically requires reliance on nature-based solutions and cross-sectoral collaboration, while safeguarding the stability of ecosystem service functions and identifying Pareto-optimal trade-offs among ecological, economic, and social benefits. This paper further summarizes the application patterns and objective function specifications of multi-objective optimization methods across multiple domains in this system, covering comprehensive trade-offs across dimensions such as economic and ecological benefits, suitability and land compactness. Current research indicates a trend toward deep integration of intelligent algorithms and governance requirements. This systematic review of the theoretical and practical evolution of governance for the mountains-waters-forests-farmlands-lakes-grasslands-deserts complex system, as well as related optimization research progress, serves as a valuable resource for similar system governance studies.

关键词

生命共同体 / 治理 / 生态修复 / 历程 / 多目标优化

Key words

community of life / governance / ecological restoration / process / multi-objective optimization

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
曾小红,叶爱中,赵晨光. 山水林田湖草沙复合系统治理演进与多目标优化研究综述[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2026, 24(3): 632-644 DOI:10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2026.0061

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

成金华, 尤喆. “山水林田湖草是生命共同体”原则的科学内涵与实践路径[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(2): 1-6. DOI: 10.12062/cpre.20181121.

[2]

李月辉, 胡远满, 王正文. 山水林田湖草沙一体化保护和修复工程与景观生态学[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 249-256. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202301.026.

[3]

孙晶, 王俊, 杨新军. 社会-生态系统恢复力研究综述[J]. 生态学报, 2007(12): 5371-5381. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.12.050.

[4]

李义天, 邓金运, 孙昭华. 长江流域自然生态环境破坏与水沙灾害的关系[J]. 水土保持学报, 2002(6): 31-35. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2002.06.010.

[5]

周妍, 苏香燕, 应凌霄, . “双碳”目标下山水林田湖草沙一体化保护和修复工程优先区与技术策略研究[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(9): 3371-3383. DOI: 10.5846/stxb202201280266.

[6]

于贵瑞, 王永生, 杨萌. 生态系统质量及其状态演变的生态学理论和评估方法之探索[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(4): 865-877. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202204.026.

[7]

邵全琴, 刘树超, 宁佳, . 2000−2019年中国重大生态工程生态效益遥感评估[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(9): 2133-2153. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202209001.

[8]

Bryan B A, Gao Lei, Ye Yangqing, et al. China's response to a national land-system sustainability emergency[J]. Nature, 2018, 559(7713): 193-204. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0280-2.

[9]

耿庆玲, 陈晓青, 赫晓慧, . 中国不同植被类型归一化植被指数对气候变化和人类活动的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(9): 3557-3568. DOI: 10.5846/stxb202012313335.

[10]

宋立宁, 朱教君, 郑晓. 基于沙地樟子松人工林衰退机制的营林方案[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(11): 3249-3256. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201711.002.

[11]

刘志民, 余海滨, 汪海洋. 科尔沁沙地“山水林田湖草沙”一体化治理原理及实施重点[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3441-3447. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202212.026.

[12]

孔凡婕, 应凌霄, 文雯, . 基于国土空间生态修复的固碳增汇探讨[J]. 中国国土资源经济, 2021, 34(12): 70-76. DOI: 10.19676/j.cnki.1672-6995.000679.

[13]

Ouyang Zhiyun, Zheng Hua, Yi Xiao, et al. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital[J]. Science, 2016, 352(6292): 1455-1459. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf2295.

[14]

财政部、自然资源部、生态环境部召开山水林田湖草沙一体化保护和修复工程推进会[EB/OL]. (2023-10-16)[2026-02-12]. https://www.mof.gov.cn/zhengwuxinxi/caizhengxinwen/202310/t20231016_3911245.htm.

[15]

赵富德. 黄河流域水土保持科技工作的回顾与展望[J]. 中国水土保持, 1996(10): 36-39. DOI: 10.14123/j.cnki.swcc.1996.10.012.

[16]

王涛. 中国防沙治沙实践与沙漠科学发展的70年: Ⅰ. 初创篇[J]. 中国沙漠, 2022, 42(1): 1-4. DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2021.00152.

[17]

陶格斯. 中国环境问题的历史变化[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2009, 34(8): 188-192. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1212.2009.08.052.

[18]

刘培哲. 可持续发展理论与《中国21世纪议程》[J]. 地学前缘, 1996(1): 1-9. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.1996.01.001.

[19]

欧阳志云, 郑华, 岳平. 建立我国生态补偿机制的思路与措施[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(3): 686-692. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201212071759.

[20]

宋昌素. 山水林田湖草沙一体化保护和系统治理[J]. 行政管理改革, 2024(10): 64-71. DOI: 10.14150/j.cnki.1674-7453.2024.10.005.

[21]

黄艳, 喻杉, 罗斌, . 面向流域水工程防灾联合智能调度的数字孪生长江探索[J]. 水利学报, 2022, 53(3): 253-269. DOI: 10.13243/j.cnki.slxb.20210865.

[22]

自然资源部. 服务国家重大战略 我国“山水工程”持续稳步推进[EB/OL]. (2024-08-12)[2026-02-12]. https://www.gov.cn/lianbo/bumen/202408/content_6968753.htm.

[23]

余新晓, 贾国栋. 统筹山水林田湖草系统治理带动水土保持新发展[J]. 中国水土保持, 2019(1): 5-8. DOI: 10.14123/j.cnki.swcc.2019.0005.

[24]

胡春宏, 张晓明. 山水林田湖草沙系统治理与水土保持高质量发展[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024, 44(4): 441-447. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.04.044.

[25]

祁闯, 陆继来, 王国祥, . 太湖流域山水林田湖草一体化保护修复[J]. 环境监测管理与技术, 2024, 36(6): 1-6. DOI: 10.19501/j.cnki.1006-2009.2024.06.011.

[26]

余露, 刘源. 自然资源系统治理的创新模式探索[J]. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(9): 2386-2402. DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20230913.

[27]

李川辉, 侯方淼, 吴成亮. 林长制助推森林生态产品价值实现的理论逻辑与实践路径[J]. 世界林业研究, 2025, 38(3): 92-99. DOI: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2025.0045.y.

[28]

崔桂鹏, 肖春蕾, 雷加强, . 大国治理: 中国荒漠化防治的战略选择与未来愿景[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(7): 943-955. DOI: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20230706002.

[29]

傅伯杰, 王军. 基于自然的解决方案理论内涵与中国实践[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2025, 40(7): 1157-1167. DOI: 10.3724/j.issn.1000-3045.20250513005.

[30]

Eckart K, Mcphee Z, Bolisetti T. Performance and implementation of low impact development: A review[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 607-608: 413-432. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.254.

[31]

Liu Yaoze, Engel B A, Flanagan D C, et al. A review on effectiveness of best management practices in improving hydrology and water quality: Needs and opportunities[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 601-602: 580-593. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.212.

[32]

江恩慧, 王远见, 田世民, . 流域系统科学初探[J]. 水利学报, 2020, 51(9): 1026-1037. DOI: 10.13243/j.cnki.slxb.20200573.

[33]

李涛, 唐涛, 邓红兵, . 湖北省三峡地区山水林田湖草系统原理及生态保护修复研究[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(23): 8896-8902. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201905301131.

[34]

吴虹. 贵州省赤水市大同河流域山水林田湖草生态保护修复工程研究[J]. 安徽地质, 2024, 34(3): 236-240. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6157.2024.03.010.

[35]

李正, 赵林. 西北干旱区山水林田湖草沙系统治理研究实践: 以塔里木河重要源流区为例[J]. 中国国土资源经济, 2022, 35(12): 13-18. DOI: 10.19676/j.cnki.1672-6995.000782.

[36]

Shi Tianyu, Jing Liandong, Liu Jia, et al. Periphyton as a nature-based solution for remediation of degraded Zoige alpine wetlands: Process, effects and evaluation[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2025, 377: 124647. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124647.

[37]

Kim Y, Oh J, Bartos M. Stormwater digital twin with online quality control detects urban flood hazards under uncertainty[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2025, 118: 105982. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105982.

[38]

李玉强, 王旭洋, 郑成卓, . 科尔沁沙地防沙治沙实践与生态可持续修复浅议[J]. 中国沙漠, 2024, 44(4): 302-314. DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2024.00102.

[39]

包玉斌, 王耀宗, 路锋, . 六盘山区国土空间生态安全格局构建与分区优化[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(7): 1172-1183. DOI: 10.13866/j.azr.2023.07.14.

[40]

王波, 王夏晖, 张笑千. “山水林田湖草生命共同体”的内涵、特征与实践路径: 以承德市为例[J]. 环境保护, 2018, 46(7): 60-63. DOI: 10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2018.07.014.

[41]

靳玉莹, 赵勇, 张金萍, . 基于多目标优化模型的承德市初始水权分配[J]. 水电能源科学, 2017, 35(1): 156-159. DOI: 10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2017.01.039.

[42]

张兆民, 宋王芳, 窦凤珂, . 泰山区域山水林田湖草生态保护修复研究与实践[J]. 测绘科学, 2025, 50(1): 144-151. DOI: 10.16251/j.cnki.1009-2307.2025.01.014.

[43]

周惠成, 彭慧, 张弛, . 基于水资源合理利用的多目标农作物种植结构调整与评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2007(9): 45-49. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2007.09.008.

[44]

李彦彬, 马嘉彤, 李道西, . 改进粒子群算法在农业种植结构优化中的应用[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2022, 41(1): 62-71. DOI: 10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2021405.

[45]

孟梅, 崔雪莹, 王志强. 低碳视角下乌鲁木齐市土地利用结构优化研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(19): 261-265. DOI: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2019.19.059.

[46]

马瑞, 范燕敏, 武红旗, . 耦合Gmop与Plus模型的干旱区土地利用格局模拟[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2023, 40(1): 143-153. DOI: 10.13254/j.jare.2021.0865.

[47]

王世忠, 刘卫东, 曹振宇. 基于NSGA-Ⅱ的土地利用数量结构优化研究: 以舟山市定海区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2010, 30(2): 290-294. DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2010.02.018.

[48]

沙宇聪, 田付玮, 戴江玉, . 河湖水生态产品价值核算与实现机制研究进展[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2025, 23(4): 858-872. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2025.0087.

[49]

黄海. 土地利用结构多目标优化遗传算法[J]. 山地学报, 2011, 29(6): 695-700. DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.2011.06.011.

[50]

黄苏宁, 黄显峰, 方国华, . 基于多目标遗传算法的水土资源优化配置研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2013(5): 33-36. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2284.2013.05.008.

[51]

刘菁华, 李伟峰, 周伟奇, . 权衡城市扩张、耕地保护与生态效益的京津冀城市群土地利用优化配置情景分析[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(12): 4341-4350. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201712312369.

[52]

Li Wen, Chen Zejian, Li Mingcheng, et al. Carbon emission and economic development trade-offs for optimizing land-use allocation in the Yangtze River Delta, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 147: 109950. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109950.

[53]

Ding Tianran, Steubing B, Achten W M J. Coupling optimization with territorial LCA to support agricultural land-use planning[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, 328: 116946. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.116946.

[54]

Ma Shuhua, Wen Zhuzhu. Optimization of land use structure to balance economic benefits and ecosystem services under uncertainties: A case study in Wuhan, China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 311: 127537. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127537.

[55]

Hildemann M, Verstegen J A. Quantifying uncertainty in Pareto fronts arising from spatial data[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2021, 141: 105069. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105069.

[56]

Strauch M, Cord A F, Pätzold C, et al. Constraints in multi-objective optimization of land use allocation-repair or penalize?[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2019, 118: 241-251. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.05.010.

[57]

江恩慧, 李洁玉, 王远见, . 黄河流域系统可持续运行的“139+”水沙调控指标体系[J]. 水利学报, 2025, 56(4): 423-432. DOI: 10.13243/j.cnki.slxb.20240509.

[58]

徐爽, 朱永明. 基于土地利用功能最大化的多情景土地利用优化研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2022, 43(11): 90-100. DOI: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20221110.

[59]

付银环, 李新旺, 徐宝同, . 不确定性多目标模糊规划在水资源优化配置中的应用[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2023, 21(3): 470-479. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2023.0047.

[60]

陈文苑, 张明, 赵伟. 不确定条件下水资源系统多目标优化配置研究[J]. 水力发电学报, 2021, 40(12): 12-24. DOI: 10.11660/slfdxb.20211202.

[61]

白文静, 刘淑英, 王平, . 基于灰色多目标线性规划的武威市古浪县土地利用结构优化研究[J]. 中国集体经济, 2019(21): 6-8.

[62]

齐鹏, 孙佳歆, 章光新, . 东北黑土区水土资源配置及其空间格局优化[J]. 科学通报, 2024, 69: 4063-4078. DOI: 10.1360/TB-2023-1270.

[63]

温贝, 刘玉成. 农业生态系统优化: 基于多模型耦合的土地利用多样性与生态服务价值最大化策略[J]. 天津农业科学, 2024, 30(5): 49-58. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6500.2024.05.009.

[64]

张家欣, 黄会平, 韩宇平, . 水足迹视角下西北旱区种植结构协同调整[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2023, 21(4): 751-760. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2023.0073.

[65]

宋志红, 刘渊, 江生金, . 引江济淮工程(河南段)多目标水量优化调度[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2024, 22(1): 39-47. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2024.0006.

[66]

唐晓宇, 刘铁, 黄粤, . 开都河流域水-能源-生态综合收益下的水资源优化配置[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2025, 23(1): 90-98. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2025.0009.

[67]

杨国轩, 傅志敏, 王亚坤, . 考虑适宜生态流量的水库多目标优化调度研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2025, 43(1): 192-196. DOI: 10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2025.20241653.

[68]

赵丞豪, 张学霞, 姜东旸, . 基于NSGA-Ⅱ算法的若尔盖高原高寒湿地生态修复格局优化[J]. 中国水土保持科学(中英文), 2024, 22(2): 55-64. DOI: 10.16843/j.sswc.2022021.

[69]

郭文贤, 郭萍, 潘琦, . 基于Pareto解集的治沙区非线性分式多目标水土资源优化配置模型[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2023, 28(2): 172-185. DOI: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2023.02.15.

[70]

王昊煜, 高培超, 谢一茹, . 基于改进型NSGA-Ⅱ算法的西宁市土地利用多目标优化[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2020, 36(6): 84-89. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0504.2020.06.013.

[71]

Mcnulty A, Ombuki-berman B, Engelbrecht A. A comparative study of evolutionary algorithms and particle swarm optimization approaches for constrained multi-objective optimization problems[J]. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 2024, 91: 101742. DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2024.101742.

[72]

Pareto V. Cours d'économie politique[M]. Lausanne: F. Rouge, 1896: 34-36.

[73]

Miller B W, Eaton M J, Symstad A J, et al. Scenario-based decision analysis: Integrated scenario planning and structured decision making for resource management under climate change[J]. Biological Conservation, 2023, 286: 110275. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110275.

[74]

Liu Qinghua, Sun Xiao, Huang Qingxu, et al. Optimizing the landscape in grain production and identifying trade-offs between ecological benefits based on production possibility frontiers: A case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2025, 377: 124583. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124583.

[75]

Mo Ran, Xu Bin, Zhang Jianyun, et al. Multiobjective risk-based optimization for real-time interbasin water diversion under decomposed chance-constrained total water use[J]. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2025, 58: 102252. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102252.

[76]

Groetzner P, Werner R. Multiobjective optimization under uncertainty: A multiobjective robust (relative) regret approach[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2022, 296: 101-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.03.068.

[77]

Gao Peichao, Wang Haoyu, Cushman S A, et al. Sustainable land-use optimization using NSGA-Ⅱ: Theoretical and experimental comparisons of improved algorithms[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2021, 36: 1877-1892. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-020-01051-3.

[78]

Song Mingjie, Chen Dongmei. A comparison of three heuristic optimization algorithms for solving the multi-objective land allocation (MOLA) problem[J]. Annals of GIS, 2018, 24: 19-31. DOI: 10.1080/19475683.2018.1424736.

[79]

Liu Hongjiang, Yan Fengying, Tian Hua. Towards low-carbon cities: Patch-based multi-objective optimization of land use allocation using an improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-Ⅱ[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 134: 108455. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108455.

[80]

Luan Chaoxu, Liu Renzhi, Zhang Qiyang, et al. Multi-objective land use optimization based on integrated NSGA-Ⅱ-PLUS model: Comprehensive consideration of economic development and ecosystem services value enhancement[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 434: 140306. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140306.

[81]

Chen Ning, Xin Cunlin, Zhang Bo, et al. Contribution of multi-objective land use optimization to carbon neutrality: A case study of northwest China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 157: 111219. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111219.

[82]

Opricovic S, Tzeng G H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 156: 445-455. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1.

[83]

Romero C. Handbook of critical issues in goal programming[M]. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1991.

[84]

Marglin S. Public investment criteria[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1967.

[85]

Haimes Y Y. Integrated system identification and optimization[A]. Control and Dynamic Systems[C]. New York: Academic Press, 1973: 435-518. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-012710-8.50013-3.

[86]

Zeng Zhenghong, Lyu Dongwen. Mini-max multi-objective optimization in structural design[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1990, 30: 1213-1228. DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620300609.

[87]

Das I. Nonlinear multicriteria optimization and robust optimality[D]. Houston: Rice University, 1999.

[88]

Fonseca C M, Fleming P J. Multi-objective optimization and multiple constraint handling with evolutionary algorithms-part Ⅱ: Application example[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 1998, 28(1): 38-47. DOI: 10.1109/3468.650320.

[89]

Srinivas N, Deb K. Multi-objective optimization using non-dominated sorting in genetic algorithms[J]. Evolutionary Computation, 1994, 2: 221-248. DOI: 10.1162/evco.1994.2.3.221.

[90]

Deb K, Agrawal S, Pratap A, et al. A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-Ⅱ[A]. Parallel problem solving from nature-PPSN VI[C]. Berlin: Springer, 2000: 849-858.

[91]

Kennedy J, Eberhart R C. Particle swarm optimization[A]. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks[C]. Piscataway: IEEE, 1995: 1942-1948.

[92]

代金汕, 葛恒军, 阚永庚, . 泵站单机组优化调度组合改进粒子群算法[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2024, 22(5): 978-986. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2024.0097.

[93]

Dorigo M. New perspectives about default hierarchies formation in learning classifier systems[C]. Advances in Artificial Intelligence-AI*IA 1991. Berlin: Springer, 1991: 218-227.

基金资助

国家重点研发计划项目(2024YFF1306305)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1024KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/