北京市居民家庭用水行为的水-能-碳系统特征

张宇博 ,  朱永楠 ,  朱蓓 ,  李海红 ,  董霁萱 ,  王宣宣 ,  赵勇

南水北调与水利科技(中英文) ›› 2026, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3) : 762 -774.

PDF (790KB)
南水北调与水利科技(中英文) ›› 2026, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3) : 762 -774. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2026.0072
水资源高效利用

北京市居民家庭用水行为的水-能-碳系统特征

作者信息 +

Characteristics of water-energy-carbon system in household water use behavior in Beijing

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (808K)

摘要

为探究城市水-能-碳耦合系统中居民家庭这一关键终端单元在资源消费模式上的显著异质性,以北京市为例,开展典型家庭用水用能追踪调查,构建家庭生活水-能-碳综合核算框架,系统量化个人卫生、洗浴、冲厕、洗衣、环境清洁与饮食 6 类用水行为的人均日用水量、相关耗能量及碳排放量,并从行为习惯、器具效率、气象条件等方面对其特征进行系统解析。结果表明:北京市居民家庭人均日用水量、相关耗能量与 CO2 排放量分别为 140.2 L、3.2 kW·h/d 与 3.0 kg/d。行为维度上,资源消费结构呈明显年龄分异,中青年群体日人均用水量最高(144.6 L),而老年群体因热水使用比例较高,其耗能与 CO2 排放强度相对较高[3.4 kW·h/(人·d)、3.1 kg/(人·d)];饮食与洗浴是用水相关碳排放的主要来源,合计占比超过 75%。器具维度上,效率差异是碳排放基线分异的关键因素,不同类型热水器的单位用水耗能强度差异可达 80~110 kW·h/m3。气象维度上,资源消费呈现明显的季节波动,夏季日人均用水量最高(149.4 L),冬季受热水需求上升影响,人均用水耗能强度较全年均值高 18%,CO2 排放量达 3.4 kg/(人·d)。基于资源消费差异的多维成因探讨,提出居民生活水-能-碳协同管理应兼顾效率提升、资源节约与气候适应,并据此提出相关建议,以期为城市生活领域资源节约与低碳发展提供科学参考。

Abstract

Households constitute a critical terminal unit within the urban water-energy-carbon nexus, and their resource consumption patterns exhibit significant heterogeneity, posing challenges for precise management. This heterogeneity stems from the complex interplay of daily routines, appliance efficiency, and climatic conditions, which are often studied in isolation, leaving a gap in integrated assessments. To address this, a comprehensive investigation was conducted in Beijing, a megacity facing acute resource constraints, to quantify and unravel the synergistic drivers of household water use, related energy consumption, and carbon emissions. The study specifically focused on developing a holistic understanding of how behavioral, technological, and environmental dimensions jointly shape resource footprints. An integrated household water-energy-carbon accounting framework was developed for this purpose. Annual tracking data from 19,576 valid questionnaires, collected through a stratified multi-stage random sampling survey across Beijing from March 2020 to February 2021, served as the primary data source. The framework methodically disaggregated total household consumption into six water-use categories: personal hygiene, showering, toilet flushing, laundry, environmental cleaning, and dietary activities. The associated energy consumption and corresponding carbon emissions for each category were systematically calculated using an emission coefficient method, incorporating regional-specific carbon factors. All analyses were structured around a novel tripartite lens-daily routines, appliance efficiency, and climatic conditions-to elucidate the underlying drivers of observed consumption heterogeneity. The results indicated that the average daily per capita water use, direct energy consumption for water-related activities, and consequential carbon emissions for Beijing households were 140.2 L, 3.2 kW·h, and 3.0 kg CO2, respectively. A clear age-based differentiation in resource consumption patterns was identified. Middle-aged and young adult groups showed the highest water use volume (144.6 L/person·d). In contrast, the elderly group exhibited the highest energy and carbon intensities (3.4 kW·h/person·d and 3.1 kg CO2/person·d), a finding primarily attributed to their higher dependence on hot water across multiple behaviors. Dietary and showering activities were consistently identified as the two predominant sources of carbon emissions across all groups, jointly accounting for over three-quarters of the total household water-related carbon footprint. Appliance efficiency emerged as a fundamental technological factor determining the baseline energy and emission intensity. For instance, the unit water-related energy intensity varied dramatically among different water heater types, with a difference of 80~110 kW·h/m3 between conventional storage electric water heaters and efficient solar thermal systems. Furthermore, resource consumption demonstrated pronounced seasonal fluctuations intrinsically linked to meteorological conditions. Summer water use peaked at 149.4 L/person·d, driven by increased showering frequency. Meanwhile, winter energy intensity related to water use increased by 18% compared to the annual average, elevating carbon emissions to 3.4 kg CO2/person·d, largely due to increased energy demand for water heating in colder temperatures. This study concludes that the household water-energy-carbon nexus can be systematically characterized through a tripartite analytical framework linking behavioral patterns, appliance efficiency, and meteorological conditions. Behavioral preferences establish the spatiotemporal structure and intensity baseline of consumption. Appliance performance sets the thermodynamic efficiency boundaries for energy conversion during water use. Seasonal climate variations, particularly temperature, act as a critical systemic amplifier, modulating hot water demand and significantly magnifying periodic fluctuations in energy use and emissions. These findings provide a robust, systematic micro-scale perspective for deconstructing residential resource consumption heterogeneity. They offer strong empirical evidence to support the design and implementation of differentiated, targeted, and synergistic governance policies. For megacities like Beijing, implementing integrated management strategies that strategically combine appliance efficiency upgrades, tailored behavior-specific interventions, and forward-looking climate-adaptive regulatory measures is therefore crucial for achieving coordinated progress in water conservation, energy saving, and carbon emission reduction. Future research should integrate higher-resolution smart meter data and explore the potential of real-time feedback systems to further advance intelligent and adaptive household resource management pathways.

关键词

居民用水 / 水-能-碳耦合 / 碳核算 / 行为习惯 / 器具效率 / 季节差异

Key words

household water use / water-energy-carbon nexus / carbon accounting / behavioral habit / appliance efficiency / seasonal variation

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
张宇博,朱永楠,朱蓓,李海红,董霁萱,王宣宣,赵勇. 北京市居民家庭用水行为的水-能-碳系统特征[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2026, 24(3): 762-774 DOI:10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2026.0072

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

王建华, 朱永楠, 李玲慧, . 社会水循环系统水-能-碳纽带关系及低碳调控策略研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2023, 23(9): 56-65. DOI: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2023.04.014.

[2]

王红瑞, 李晓军, 张力, . 水-能源-碳排放复杂关系研究进展及展望[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2023, 21(1): 13-21. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2023.0002.

[3]

王浩, 牛存稳, 赵勇. 流域“自然-社会”二元水循环与水资源研究[J]. 地理学报, 2023, 78(7): 1599-1607. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202307002.

[4]

王庆明, 张越, 赵勇, . 河北省井灌区灌溉用水与耗能变化规律研究[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2018, 16(4): 154-159. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2018.0109.

[5]

李嘉欣, 朱永楠, 彭少明, . 社会水循环碳排放综合测算模型: 以黄河流域为例[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 64(4): 626-637. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2024.22.008.

[6]

周露明, 谢兴华, 卢斌, . 基于生命周期理论的鄂尔多斯市水资源耗能计算[J]. 水电能源科学, 2020, 38(9): 39-43. DOI: 10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2020.09.011.

[7]

国家统计局. 2024 中国统计年鉴[Z]. 2024.

[8]

杨琪. 城市居民家庭生活用水过程中的能耗分析[D]. 兰州: 西北师范大学, 2014.

[9]

赵勇, 何国华, 王建华, . 我国用水基本规律与战略研判的认识思考[J]. 中国水利, 2025(9): 1-13.

[10]

李璐, 陈远生, 何希吾, . 城市水系统水-能关系研究进展[J]. 中国水利, 2012(6): 22-25. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1123.2012.06.011.

[11]

石红旺, 赵勇, 屈吉鸿, . 天津市城市居民用水行为调查及影响因素识别[J]. 水电能源科学, 2015, 33(6): 143-147. DOI: 10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2015.06.035.

[12]

王春艳, 张景翔, 龙洁, . 基于面板数据回归模型的家庭水-能消费时空特征与影响因素[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(3): 614-626. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2021.26.021.

[13]

张颖, 宋晓猛, 王小军, . 鄂尔多斯市用水结构演变及驱动因素分析[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2025, 56(11): 98-114. DOI: 10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2025.11.008.

[14]

刘志华, 徐军委. “双碳”目标下中国省域碳排放公平性及其影响因素[J]. 地理科学, 2023, 43(1): 92-100. DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2023.01.010.

[15]

宋子康, 黄甘霖. 中小城市家庭交通和饮食选择的碳排放差异: 以山东省滨城区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2025, 45(3): 1261-1274. DOI: 10.20103/j.stxb.202401250239.

[16]

李阳, 王春艳, 刘毅, . 城市典型居民社区水能消费碳排放核算与影响评价[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2022, 12(6): 1898-1904. DOI: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220426.

[17]

Wang Chunyan, Li Zonghan, Ni Xiaoyuan, et al. Residential water and energy consumption prediction at hourly resolution based on a hybrid machine learning approach[J]. Water Research, 2023, 246: 120733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.120733.

[18]

Frankel M, Xing Lu, Chewning C, et al. Water-energy benchmarking and predictive modeling in multi-family residential and non-residential buildings[J]. Applied Energy, 2021, 281: 116074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116074.

[19]

张巍, 韩军, 周绍杰. 中国城镇居民用水需求研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(3): 99-109. DOI: 10.12062/cpre.20180912.

[20]

Zhang Bing, Fang Kaihong, Baerenklau K A. Have Chinese water pricing reforms reduced urban residential water demand?[J]. Water Resources Research, 2017, 53(6): 5057-5069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020463.

[21]

师林蕊, 朱永楠, 李海红, . 北京居民用水调查及节水潜力[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2022, 20(5): 851-861. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2022.0086.

[22]

秦长海, 曲军霖, 孙华月, . 城市居民生活需水函数模型的构建与应用[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2022, 20(2): 209-217. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2022.0023.

[23]

朱华, 张晴, 徐力刚. 基于水资源全生命周期的浙江省水系统碳排放及情景预测[J]. 环境科学, 2025, 46(4): 2057-2068. DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202404095.

[24]

吴永强, 李明凯, 唐中楠, . 基于灰色动态模型群的衡水市居民年用水量预测[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2022, 12(1): 267-274. DOI: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210233.

[25]

王庆明, 赵勇, 王浩, . 自然和社会水循环的能量驱动机制及其综合评价[J]. 水资源保护, 2023, 39(6): 1-7. DOI: 10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2023.06.001.

[26]

何国华, 姜珊, 赵勇, . 我国现状能源与水纽带关系定量识别[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2020, 18(4): 54-70. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2020.0072.

[27]

赵霞, 朱永楠, 王艳朋, . 京津冀地区收入水平与家庭水能耦合差异研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2024, 42(3): 54-58. DOI: 10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2024.20231591.

[28]

王悦, 李锋, 孙晓. 城市家庭消费碳排放研究进展[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(7): 1201-1212. DOI: 10.18402/resci.2019.07.02.

[29]

赵荣钦, 余娇, 肖连刚, . 基于“水-能-碳”关联的城市水系统碳排放研究[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(12): 3119-3134. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202112017.

[30]

左其亭, 赵晨光, 马军霞, . 水资源行为的二氧化碳排放当量分析方法及应用[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2023, 21(1): 1-12. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2023.0001.

[31]

Zhuge Chengxiang, Yu Min, Wang Chunyan, et al. An agent-based spatiotemporal integrated approach to simulating in-home water and related energy use behaviour: A test case of Beijing, China[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2020, 708: 135086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135086.

[32]

Binks A N, Kenway S J, Lant P A, et al. Understanding Australian household water-related energy use and identifying physical and human characteristics of major end uses[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 135: 892-906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.091.

[33]

Escriva-Bou A, Lund J R, Pulido-Velazquez M. Modeling residential water and related energy, carbon footprint and costs in California[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2015, 50: 270-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.005.

[34]

詹力炜, 朱永楠, 赵勇, . 南水北调受水区生活用水影响因素与节水潜力[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2023, 21(1): 56-64. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2023.0007.

[35]

Price J I, Chermak J M, Felardo J. Low-flow appliances and household water demand: An evaluation of demand-side management policy in Albuquerque, New Mexico[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2014, 133: 37-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.025.

[36]

赵勇, 朱永楠, 师林蕊, . 中国居民家庭生活用水十点规律与认识[J]. 中国水利, 2024(4): 27-33. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1123.2024.04.008.

[37]

Yu Min, Wang Chaoran, Liu Yi, et al. Water and related electrical energy use in urban households: Influence of individual attributes in Beijing, China[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2018, 130: 190-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.11.004.

[38]

章恒全, 高圆, 张陈俊. 城镇化进程中水资源消耗的影响因素研究[J]. 水利经济, 2020, 38(1): 36-41. DOI: 10.3889/j.issn.1003-9511.2020.01.006.

[39]

Qin Ping, Chen Shuai, Tan-Soo J, et al. Urban household water usage in adaptation to climate change: Evidence from China[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2022, 136: 486-496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.07.019.

[40]

Balling R C, Gober P. Climate variability and residential water use in the city of Phoenix, Arizona[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 2007, 46(7): 1130-1137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2518.1.

[41]

Shi Tie, Chen Hanyi, Xu Junbing, et al. The effect of temperatures on household electricity consumption in northern China: Evidence from smart meters[J]. Utilities Policy, 2025, 96: 102022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2025.102022.

[42]

李玲燕, 张晨, 胡伟. 中国西北地区老旧住宅家庭用电影响因素及其作用机理研究: 基于西安、兰州、西宁 1462 户家庭的调研数据[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(11): 91-96. DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2020.303.

[43]

沈恬, 陈远生, 杨琪. 城市家庭用水能耗强度及其影响因素分析[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(4): 744-753.

[44]

洪思扬, 王红瑞, 梁俊芬, . 京津冀地区水-能源利用效率与资源压力核算[J]. 水资源保护, 2021, 37(5): 102-111. DOI: 10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2021.05.016.

[45]

张娜, 李波, 刘子慧, . 南水北调京津冀豫受水区水资源供需新形势及对策[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2023, 21(6): 1223-1234. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2023.0121.

[46]

李小雨. 北京高密度居住社区居民生活碳排放特征研究[D]. 北京: 北方工业大学, 2022.

[47]

左其亭, 吴青松, 马军霞, . “双碳”目标下水资源行为调控研究框架及展望[J]. 水资源保护, 2023, 39(1): 8-14. DOI: 10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2023.01.002.

[48]

国家发展改革委应对气候变化司. 省级温室气体清单编制指南(试行)[R]. 北京, 2011.

[49]

中华人民共和国水利部. 中国水资源公报 2020[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2021.

[50]

北京市统计局, 国家统计局北京调查总队. 北京统计年鉴 2021[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2021.

[51]

GB 12021.4−2013 电动洗衣机能效水效限定值及等级[S].

[52]

GB 21519−2008 储水式电热水器能效限定值及能效等级[S].

[53]

GB 20665−2015 家用燃气快速热水器和燃气采暖热水炉能效限定值及能效等级[S].

[54]

Hall R, Kenway S, O'Brien K, et al. Quantification of residential water-related energy needs cohesion, validation and global representation to unlock efficiency gains[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2024, 207: 114906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114906.

[55]

Flörke M, Schneider C, Mcdonald R I. Water competition between cities and agriculture driven by climate change and urban growth[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2018, 1(1): 51-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-017-0006-8.

[56]

何凡, 顾冰, 何国华, . 中国用水量变化的驱动效应[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2022, 20(3): 417-428. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2022.0042.

[57]

刘心男, 宋来昊, 纪颖波. 城镇住宅家庭用能画像构建: 以京津冀地区为例[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 64(8): 1482-1491. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2024.22.027.

[58]

Fang Delin, Chen Bin. Linkage analysis for the water-energy nexus of city[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 189: 770-779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.020.

[59]

张力小, 张鹏鹏, 郝岩, . 城市食物-能源-水关联关系: 概念框架与研究展望[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(4): 1144-1153. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201809081926.

[60]

Wang Xuechao, Klemeš J J, Wang Yutao, et al. Water-Energy-Carbon Emissions nexus analysis of China: An environmental input-output model-based approach[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 261: 114431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114431.

[61]

许嘉俊, 杨晓军, 李睿. 城市居民生活碳排放及影响因素的时空异质性[J]. 中国环境科学, 2024, 44(3): 1732-1742. DOI: 10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.2024.0070.

[62]

陈喜阳, 周程, 王田. 多情景视角下中国能源消费和碳达峰路径[J]. 环境科学, 2023, 44(10): 5464-5477. DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202211293.

[63]

李虹, 王帅. 中国行业隐含能源消费及其强度的变动与影响因素[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2021, 31(5): 47-57. DOI: 10.12062/cpre.20201006.

[64]

郝瑞军, 魏伟, 刘春芳, . 中国能源消费碳排放的空间化与时空动态[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(11): 5305-5314. DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202112066.

基金资助

国家自然科学基金面上项目(52479031)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (790KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/