1960−2024 年长江流域高温与干旱事件同步特征
谭卓颜 , 赵茹欣 , 孙洪泉 , 余慧倩 , 邢立松 , 葛琛玉 , 王茂根
南水北调与水利科技(中英文) ›› 2026, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4) : 1017 -1031.
1960−2024 年长江流域高温与干旱事件同步特征
Synchronous characteristics of heat and drought events in the Yangtze River basin from 1960 to 2024
为揭示全球气候变暖背景下长江流域不同等级高温与干旱复合极端事件的时空分异性演变规律,利用1960−2024 年长江流域月降水量和月平均气温观测数据,采用标准化降水指数及标准化温度指数识别干旱与高温事件,通过 Pettitt 突变检验划分气候背景时段,结合事件同步法,从同步频次、强度与时滞 3 个维度,解析近 65 a长江流域各省高温与干旱事件同步性的时空分布与演变规律。结果表明:1996−2024 年长江流域高温干旱事件同步频次明显上升(与 1960−1995 年相比),江苏、上海、云南增幅达 49%~59%,复合事件群发风险加剧;流域整体同步强度呈上升态势,极端高温干旱事件同步强度存在明显空间分异,中下游增幅明显高于西南地区,风险增长更为突出;同步时序模式由高温先于干旱向二者趋于同步转变,同步时滞明显缩短,仅下游部分区域仍维持高温领先特征。长江流域高温干旱同步性存在清晰阶段性演变特征,可为流域尺度复合极端事件风险识别与适应性管理提供参考。
The frequency and severity of extreme weather events have been found to significantly increase under global climate change. Concurrent heat and drought events, in particular, pose severe threats to the Yangtze River basin's ecosystem, agricultural production, and social economy. Previous research focused primarily on individual heat or drought events, leaving little understanding of the two events' synchronous evolutionary characteristics, particularly their phased changes in frequency, intensity, and time lag. Therefore, studying the spatiotemporal evolution of synchronization between heat and drought events in the Yangtze River basin is extremely important. Clarifying the long-term phased evolution patterns of heat-drought synchronization is crucial for improving regional risk prevention capabilities and formulating scientific adaptive management strategies is crucial. The Climatic Research Unit Time Series version 4.09 dataset provided monthly precipitation and mean temperature data from 1960 to 2024 with a spatial resolution of 0.5°×0.5°. The standardized precipitation index and the standardized temperature index were used to identify drought and heat events, respectively. Drought events were defined as index values less than or equal to −0.5, while heat events were defined as index values greater than or equal to 0.5. The Pettitt's test was used to detect abrupt changes in temperature and precipitation series, with 1996 serving as the climatic turning point, dividing the study period into two sub-periods: 1960-1995 and 1996-2024. The event synchronization method was used to quantify the synchronicity between heat and drought events based on three core aspects: synchronization frequency (standardized as the count of events per decade), synchronization intensity (ranging from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating tighter coupling), and synchronization time delay (ranging from −1 to 1, where positive values denoted heat preceding drought and negative values denoted drought preceding heat). Eleven key provinces (municipalities) in the Yangtze River basin were examined further for spatial distributions and provincial comparisons. The synchronization frequency of heat and drought events increased dramatically after 1996 in the majority of the Yangtze River basin. The increase ranged from 49% to 59%, with significantly increased risks of compound events in Jiangsu, Shanghai, and Yunnan. However, synchronization frequency decreased by about 10.43% in Qinghai. The probability density distribution of synchronization frequency shifted to the right from 1960-1995 to 1996-2024, indicating an overall increase in synchronization levels. After 1996, there was a significant increase in the intensity of synchronization across all events, with Jiangsu and Shanghai showing the most notable increase of more than 20%. Yunnan maintained the highest synchronization intensity of any province, with average values of 0.53 and 0.56 for the two periods, respectively. When events of different severity levels were compared, distinct spatial patterns emerged. For mild events, an increase in synchronization intensity was mainly found in the lower reaches. The intensity of synchronization for moderate and severe events decreased in the majority of regions. Extreme events revealed a strong east-west divergence: the middle and lower reaches experienced a sharp increase in synchronization intensity, Anhui showed a 318.52% increase, and the southwestern region saw a significant decrease. A significant change was also observed in the synchronization time delay: heat events used to occur before drought events, but the two types of events gradually became nearly synchronous. The mean time delay approached zero in the second period, and a shortened temporal lag was implied. The lower reaches, including Jiangsu and Shanghai, maintained the pattern where heat events preceded drought events, while the upstream region showed the most noticeable decrease in time delay. This study revealed phased evolutionary characteristics of heat and drought synchronization in the Yangtze River basin from 1960 to 2024. The findings confirmed that following the climatic shift around 1996, synchronization frequency, intensity, and the tendency to occur nearly simultaneously all increased significantly across the basin. The middle and lower reaches were identified as new sensitive areas with rapidly increasing compound disaster risks, particularly during extreme events. The spatial heterogeneity and severity-dependent patterns found are a scientific reference for the identification, early warning, and risk assessment of compound heat-drought events in the Yangtze River basin.
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
周波涛, 钱进. IPCC AR6 报告解读: 极端天气气候事件变化[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2021, 17(6): 713-718. DOI: 10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2021.167. |
| [3] |
王倩, 翟盘茂, 张强. 1961 年以来中国区域性气候与极端事件变化格局[J]. 气象学报, 2025, 83(4): 980-989. DOI: 10.11676/qxxb2025.20240143. |
| [4] |
袁宇锋, 廖圳, 周佰铨, |
| [5] |
舒章康, 李文鑫, 张建云, |
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
徐慧, 江善虎, 任立良, |
| [8] |
郝增超, 陈阳. 地球系统视角下的多圈层复合极端事件研究进展与展望[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2024, 54(2): 360-393. DOI: 10.1360/SSTe-2023-0060. |
| [9] |
夏军. 变化环境下长江流域滨海城市供水安全与适应性对策[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2024, 22(2): 209-214. DOI: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2024.0022. |
| [10] |
姜雨彤, 郝增超, 冯思芳, |
| [11] |
武新英, 郝增超, 张璇, |
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
卫仁娟, 潘妮, 钟馨, |
| [14] |
张义桐, 郝增超, 陈阳, |
| [15] |
回佩晨, 徐旻天, 时延锋, |
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
俞昕, 张琪, 杨再强, |
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
王荣, 赵珊珊, 陈鲜艳. 1961−2022 年三峡地区复合高温干旱事件气候变化特征[J]. 地球物理学报, 2026, 69(1): 46-54. DOI: 10.6038/cjg2025T0004. |
| [20] |
郝增超, 张璇, 郝芳华, |
| [21] |
张仪萱, 王怡璇, 刘廷玺, |
| [22] |
梅梅, 高歌, 李莹, |
| [23] |
郑博福, 肖德利, 万炜, |
| [24] |
向大享, 姜莹, 陈喆, |
| [25] |
张蕾, 钱拴, 曹云, |
| [26] |
夏军, 陈进, 佘敦先. 2022 年长江流域极端干旱事件及其影响与对策[J]. 水利学报, 2022, 53(10): 1143-1153. DOI: 10.13243/j.cnki.slxb.20220730. |
| [27] |
李喆, 崔长露, 向大享, |
| [28] |
冯宝飞, 邱辉, 纪国良. 2022 年夏季长江流域气象干旱特征及成因初探[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(12): 6-15. DOI: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2022.12.002. |
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
周波涛, 涂雁冰, 谢文欣, |
| [31] |
孙亚卿, 李春, 石剑. 长江流域夏季极端高温的年代际变化特征及其与大西洋多年代际振荡的关系[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 52(2): 13-22. DOI: 10.16441/j.cnki.hdxb.20210079. |
| [32] |
彭京备, 孙淑清, 林大伟. 2022 年 8 月长江流域持续性极端高温事件成因[J]. 应用气象学报, 2023, 34(5): 527-539. DOI: 10.11898/1001-7313.20230502. |
| [33] |
杨肖丽, 崔周宇, 任立良, |
| [34] |
吴志勇, 施怡然, 刘杨合, |
| [35] |
邓翠玲, 佘敦先, 张利平, |
| [36] |
朱世峰, 王卫光, 丁一民, |
| [37] |
靖娟利, 刘癸良, 王永锋, |
| [38] |
汪德根, 翟云利, 赵美风, |
| [39] |
郭家力, 丁光旭, 杨旭, |
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
熊少堂, 赵铜铁钢, 郭成超, |
| [42] |
闻新宇, 王绍武, 朱锦红, |
| [43] |
温婷婷, 郭英香, 董少睿, |
| [44] |
魏萌, 舒启, 宋振亚, |
| [45] |
王毅, 张晓美, 周宁芳, |
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
李琼芳, 方凯悦, 韩幸烨, |
| [48] |
王洁, 李王成, 李晨, |
| [49] |
张美娜, 王发信, 吕海深, |
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
GB/T 20481−2017 气象干旱等级[S]. |
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
乌日娜, 张海霞, 赵金名, |
| [54] |
黄茂伟, 章红颖, 陈一鸣, |
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
肖莺, 张俊, 杜良敏, |
| [59] |
丁一汇, 柳艳菊, 徐影, |
| [60] |
周建琴, 陶云, 符睿, |
| [61] |
杨瑀露, 陈杰. 长江与黄河流域复合型水文干旱-热浪事件空间分布特征及成因分析[J]. 水科学进展, 2026, 37(2): 247-261. DOI: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2026.02.005. |
| [62] |
尹泽疆, 魏维, 杨崧. 北大西洋涛动和英国-鄂霍次克海走廊型遥相关对 2022 年盛夏长江中下游极端高温的影响[J]. 大气科学学报, 2023, 46(3): 345-353. DOI: 10.13878/j.cnki.dqkxxb.20230116013. |
| [63] |
郝立生, 马宁, 何丽烨. 2022 年长江中下游夏季异常干旱高温事件之环流异常特征[J]. 干旱气象, 2022, 40(5): 721-732. DOI: 10.11755/j.issn.1006-7639(2022)-05-0721. |
| [64] |
祝亚丽, 刘洋, 孔祥慧, |
| [65] |
贺山峰, 柏钦冕, 李铮, |
国家自然科学青年基金项目(42307124)
国家自然科学青年基金项目(42501108)
应急管理部国家自然灾害防治研究院基本科研业务专项项目(ZDJ2025-57)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |