2021年5月14日武汉龙卷风暴的环流背景和涡度来源分析

韩雪蕾 ,  郑衍欣 ,  赵树云 ,  肖艳姣 ,  王五科 ,  李双林

暴雨灾害 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3) : 330 -339.

PDF (6849KB)
暴雨灾害 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3) : 330 -339. DOI: 10.12406/byzh.2023-138

2021年5月14日武汉龙卷风暴的环流背景和涡度来源分析

作者信息 +

Analysis of the circulation background and vorticity source for the Wuhan tornado storm on 14 May, 2021

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (7012K)

摘要

2021 年 5 月 14 日 20:39 (北京时),武汉发生了一次罕见的 EF3 级龙卷,造成严重人员伤亡和财产损失。中国地质大学 (武汉) 的 X 波段双偏振天气雷达和武汉市观象台的 S 波段天气雷达均显示,此次龙卷的母体风暴为一个具有钩状回波的超级单体。利用探空数据、ERA5 再分析数据,并结合中尺度数值模式,首先对此次龙卷风暴的雷达回波特征、环流背景和环境条件进行分析,并与湖北 1977 年 4 月 16 日的 EF3 级龙卷过程的环流背景进行对比,最后研究了此次过程的涡度来源。结果表明:(1) 此次龙卷风暴发生在西北太平洋副热带高压 (以下简称副高) 外围的南支气流中。青藏高原东侧低压系统的发展加强了其与副高之间的气压梯度,一方面有利于形成低空急流,另一方面也有利于低空垂直风切变的增强,为龙卷风暴的发生提供了有利的水汽和动力条件。高、低空急流的耦合为深对流的充分发展提供了有利的“低层辐合、高层辐散”条件,而江淮倒槽为风暴的形成提供了触发条件。(2) 此次龙卷风暴与 1977 年 4 月 16 日湖北另一次 EF3 级龙卷过程的环流背景有相似之处,主要体现在高低空急流的耦合、江淮倒槽的影响、以及强的西南—东北向低空垂直风切变。(3) 此次龙卷风暴产生过程中,低层风暴相对速度与环境水平涡度均为东南—西北向,环境水平涡度在风暴相对速度方向有着较大的投影分量,风暴相对螺旋度大值区由东南向西北伸入风暴内部,为中气旋的发展提供了涡度来源。这凸显了在龙卷风暴短时临近预报预警中,高时空分辨率垂直风廓线观测资料的重要性。

Abstract

At 20:39 BT on 14 May 2021, a rare EF3 tornado struck Wuhan, causing severe casualties and significant property damage. Both the X-band dual-polarization weather radar at China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) and the S-band weather radar at Wuhan Observatory indicated that the parent storm of this tornado was a supercell with a hook echo. Using ERA5 reanalysis data combined with a mesoscale numerical model, the radar echo characteristics, circulation background, and environmental conditions of this tornado event were analyzed. And the tornado’s circulation background was compared with that of another EF3 tornado which occurred in Hubei Province on 16 April 1977. The vorticity source during this event was analyzed at last. The results are as follows. (1) The tornado occurred within the southern branch flow on the periphery of the Western North Pacific Subtropical High (WNPSH). The development of a lowpressure system east of the Tibetan Plateau enhanced the pressure gradient between the low-pressure system and the WNPSH, which favored the formation of a low-level jet and strengthened low-level vertical wind shear, providing favorable moisture and dynamic conditions for the tornado storm. The coupling of upper- and low-level jets created an excellent environment for deep convection with low-level convergence and upper-level divergence, while the Jianghuai inverted trough served as a triggering mechanism for the convective storm. (2) The circulation background of this Wuhan tornado shares similarities with that of another EF3 tornado that occurred in Hubei on 16 April 1977, particularly in terms of the coupling of upper- and low-level jets, the influence of the Jianghuai inverted trough, and strong southwest-northeast oriented low-level vertical wind shear. (3) During the tornado storm genesis, both the low-level stormrelative velocity and the environmental horizontal vorticity were oriented southeast-northwest. The environmental horizontal vorticity had a large projection component along the storm-relative velocity direction, and a high-value area of storm-relative helicity extended from the southeast into the storm interior, providing a vorticity source for mesocyclone development. This underscores the importance of high spatiotemporal resolution vertical wind profile observations in the nowcasting and warning of tornadoes.

关键词

龙卷风暴 / 环流背景 / 涡度来源 / WRF 模式模拟

Key words

tornado storm / circulation background / source of vorticity / WRF model simulation

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
韩雪蕾,郑衍欣,赵树云,肖艳姣,王五科,李双林. 2021年5月14日武汉龙卷风暴的环流背景和涡度来源分析[J]. 暴雨灾害, 2026, 45(3): 330-339 DOI:10.12406/byzh.2023-138

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

陈锋,董美莹,冀春晓,等. 2019.雷达资料同化对 2016 年 6 月 23 日阜宁龙卷模拟的改进[J].气象学报,77(3):405-426.

[2]

Chen F, Dong M Y, Ji C X, et al. 2019. Improving the simulation of the tornado occurring in Funing on 23 June 2016 by using radar data assimilation [J].Acta Meteorologica Sinica,77(3):405-426 (in Chinese). doi:10.11676/qxxb2019.025

[3]

陈小华,李华宏,何钰,等. 2023.云南两次非超级单体天气特征分析[J].高原山地气象研究,43(1):81-89.

[4]

Chen X H, Li H H, He Y, et al. 2023. Characteristics of two non-supercell tornadoes in Yunnan [J].Plateau and Mountain Meteorology Research,43(1):81-89 (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674−2184.2023.01.010

[5]

范雯杰,俞小鼎. 2015.中国龙卷的时空分布特征[J].气象,41(7):793-805.

[6]

Fan W J, Yu X D. 2015. Characteristics of spatial-temporal distribution of tornadoes in China [J].Meteorological Monthly,41(7):793-805 (in Chinese). doi:10.7519/j.issn.1000−0526.2015.07.001

[7]

郭泽勇,张弘豪,胡胜,等. 2021.华南一次非中气旋海面龙卷的大气条件和雷达特征分析[J].热带气象学报,37(4):541-555.

[8]

Guo Z Y, Zhang H H, Hu S, et al. 2021. Analysis of atmospheric conditions and radar characteristics of a non-mesocyclone waterspout in South China [J].Journal of Tropical Meteorology,37(4):541-555 (in Chinese). doi:10.16032/j.issn.1004−4965.2021.052

[9]

黄舒婷,王东海,李国平,等. 2021.采用不同背景场的龙卷模拟结果对比分析[J].高原山地气象研究,41(2):61-76.

[10]

Huang S T, Wang D H, Li G P, et al. 2021. Comparative analysis of tornado simulation results with different backgroud fields [J].Plateau and Mountain Meteorology Research,41(2):61-76 (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674−2184.2021.02.007

[11]

黄先香,俞小鼎,炎利军,等. 2019a. 1804 号台风“艾云尼”龙卷分析[J].气象学报,77(4):645-661.

[12]

Huang X X, Yu X D, Yan L J, et al. 2019a. An analysis on tornadoes in typhoon Ewiniar [J].Acta Meteorologica Sinica,77(4):645-661 (in Chinese). doi:10.11676/qxxb2019.055

[13]

黄先香,俞小鼎,炎利军,等. 2019b.珠江三角洲台风龙卷的活动特征及环境条件分析[J].气象,45(6):777-790.

[14]

Huang X X, Yu X D, Yan L J, et al. 2019b. Analysis of typhoon-tornado activity characteristics and environmental condition in the Pearl River Delta [J].Meteorological Monthly,45(6):777-790 (in Chinese). doi:10.7519/j.issn.1000−0526.2019.06.004

[15]

姬雪帅,黄山江,张曦丹,等. 2022.河北张家口一次超级单体龙卷雷达回波特征分析[J].气象科技,50(4):545-553.

[16]

Ji X S, Huang S J, Zhang X D, et al. 2022. Analysis of Radar Echo characteristics of a supercell tornado in Zhangjiakou, Hebei Province [J].Meteorological Science and Technology,50(4):545-553 (in Chinese). doi:10.19517/j.1671−6345.20210401

[17]

李彩玲,杨波,姚聃,等. 2022. 2021 年 5 月 14 日武汉龙卷现场调查及雷达探测特征分析[J].暴雨灾害,41(2):142-150.

[18]

Li C L, Yang B, Yao D, et al. 2022. Damage survey and radar characteristics of the 14th May 2021 Wuhan tornado in Hubei Province [J].Torrential Rain and Disasters,41(2):142-150 (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004−9045.2022.02.004

[19]

毛以伟,方思达,吴翠红,等. 2022.武汉 5·14 罕见龙卷风天气气象服务回顾[J].城市与减灾,2022(2):23-25.

[20]

Mao Y W, Fang S D, Wu C H, et al. 2022. Meteorological service review on tornado weather in Wuhan city of Hubei province on May, 14th of 2021 [J].City and Disaster Reduction,2022(2):23-25 (in Chinese)

[21]

石燕茹,寿绍文,王丽荣,等. 2011.风暴相对螺旋度与强对流天气类型的关系分析[J].气象与环境学报,27(1):65-71.

[22]

Shi Y R, Shou S W, Wang L R, et al. 2011. Relationship between storm relative helicity and types of strong convective weather [J].Journal of Meteorology and environment,27(1):65-71 (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673−503X.2011.01.013

[23]

唐嘉蕙,冉令坤,沈新勇,等. 2019.广东佛山 EF3 级龙卷超级单体风暴高分辨率数值模拟[J].地球物理学报,62(11):4082-4097.

[24]

Tang J H, Ran L K, Shen X Y, et al. 2019. High-resolution numerical simulation of the EF3 tornadic storm in Foshan city, Guandong Province [J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,62(11):4082-4097 (in Chinese). doi:10.6038/cjg2019M0478

[25]

汤洁,徐芬,吴海英,等. 2021. 1710 号台风“海棠”外围龙卷大气环境条件和雷达特征分析[J].气象科技,49(2):235-243.

[26]

Tang J, Xu F, Wu H Y, et al. 2021. Synoptic situation and radar characteristics of tornado in outside-region of typhoon Haitang [J].Meteorological Science and Technology,49(2):235-243 (in Chinese). doi:10.19517/j.1671−6345.20200144

[27]

王东海,李兆慧,高枞亭,等. 2018.中国与欧美龙卷统计特征比较分析及研究进展[J].气象科技进展,8(2):8-23.

[28]

Wang D H, Li Z H, Gao Z T, et al. 2018. A comparison of statistical characteristic and research progress of tornadoes in China to that in Europe and USA [J].Advances in Meteorological Science and Technology,8(2):8-23 (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095−1973.2018.02.001

[29]

王珏,肖艳姣,冷亮,等. 2022. 2021 年 5 月武汉两次对流性大风天气的多普勒雷达观测分析[J].大气科学,41(2):119-129.

[30]

Wang J, Xiao Y J, Leng L, et al. 2022. Doppler radar observation and analysis of two convective gale weather events in Wuhan in May 2021 [J].Torrential Rain and Disasters,41(2):119-129 (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004−9045.2022.02.002

[31]

王学强,李晓坤,李林惠,等. 2023.内蒙古一次强龙卷天气的中尺度特征分析[J].沙漠与绿洲气象,17(4):125-131.

[32]

Wang X Q, Li X K, Li L H, et al. 2023. Mesoscale characteristics analysis of a strong tornado weather in Inner Mongolia [J].Desert and Oasis Meteorology,17(4):125-131 (in Chinese). doi:10.12057/j.issn.1002−0799.2023.04.017

[33]

王艺娟,姚聃,梁旭东,等. 2023. 2021 年苏州与武汉两地龙卷的环境条件与雷达特征对比分析[J].暴雨灾害,42(4):415-426.

[34]

Wang Y J, Yao D, Liang X D, et al. 2023. Comparative analysis of environmental conditions and radar characteristics for two tornadoes occurred in Suzhou and Wuhan in 2021 [J].Torrential Rain and Disasters,42(4):415-426 (in Chinese). doi:10.12406/byzh.2023−044

[35]

项阳,吴林林. 2021.一次超级单体龙卷双偏振多普勒天气雷达分析[J].气象科技,49(4):579-588.

[36]

Xiang Y, Wu L L. 2021. Analysis of a supercell tornado with dual-polarization doppler radar [J].Scientia Meteorologica Sinica,49(4):579-588 (in Chinese). doi:10.19517/j.1671−6345.20200563

[37]

俞小鼎,赵娟,范雯杰. 2021.中国龙卷的时空分布与关键环境参数特征[J].热带气象学报,37(Z1):681-692.

[38]

Yu X D, Zhao J, Fan W J. 2021. Tornadoes in China: Spatiotemporal distribution and environmental characteristics [J].Journal of Tropical Meteorology,37(Z1):681-692 (in Chinese). doi:10.16032/j.issn.1004−4965.2021.064

[39]

张桂莲,李一平,江靖,等. 2023.多个超级单体风暴诱发的 EF3 级强龙卷特征分析[J].气象,49(11):1315-1327.

[40]

Zhang G L, Li Y P, Jiang J, et al. 2023. Characteristic analysis of EF3 strong tornado induced by multiple supercell storms [J].Meteorological Monthly,49(11):1315-1327 (in Chinese). doi:10.7519/j.issn.1000−0526.2023.083001

[41]

张一平,牛淑贞,郑世林,等. 2019. “07·06”周口龙卷现场调查和可预警性综合分析[J].大气科学,45(8):1135-1148.

[42]

Zhang Y P, Niu S Z, Zheng S L, et al. 2019. Investigation and warning praticability analysis of the 6 July 2017 tornado in Zhoukou city [J].Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences,45(8):1135-1148 (in Chinese). doi:10.7519/j.issn.1000−0526.2019.08.010

[43]

郑永光. 2020.中国龙卷气候特征和环境条件研究进展综述[J].气象科技进展,10(6):69-75.

[44]

Zheng Y G. 2020. Review of climatology and favorable environmental conditions of tornado in China [J].Advances in Meteorological Science and Technology,10(6):69-75 (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095−1973.2020.06.012

[45]

植江玲,黄先香,白兰强,等. 2022. 2021 年中国龙卷活动与灾情特征[J].气象科技进展,12(1):26-36.

[46]

Zhi J L, Huang X X, Bai L Q, et al. 2022. Tornado activity and disaster characteristics in China in 2021 [J].Advances in Meteorological Science and Technology,12(1):26-36 (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095−1973.2022.01.004

[47]

周玥滢,方娟. 2024.热带气旋发展增强过程中龙卷尺度涡旋活动特征[J].南京大学学报 (自然科学),60(2):230-243.

[48]

Zhou Y Y, Fang J. 2024. Characteristics of tornado-scale vortices in an intensifying tropical cyclone [J].Journal of Nanjing University (Natural Science),60(2):230-243 (in Chinese). doi:10.13232/j.cnki.jnju.2024.02.005

[49]

Gower J C. 1975. Generalized procrustes analysis [J].Psychometrika,40:33-51. doi:10.1007/BF02291478

[50]

Hong S Y, Noh Y, Dudhia J, et al. 2006. A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes [J].Monthly Weather Review,134(9):2318-2341. doi:10.1175/MWR3199.1

[51]

Mahrt L, Pan H. 1984. A two-layer model of soil hydrology [J].Boundary Layer Meteorology,29(1):1-20. doi:10.1007/BF00119116

[52]

Markowski P, Richadson Y. 2010. Mesoscale Meteorology in Midlatitudes [M]. Bognor Regis, England: John Wiley and Sons, Limited:240

[53]

Mlawer E J, Clough S A, et al. 1998. Shortwave and longwave enhancements in the rapid radiative transfer model [C]//In Proceedings of the 7th Atomospheric Radiation Measurement Science Team Meeting,41(15): 31-94

[54]

Thompson R L, Edwards R, Hart J A, et al. 2000. An assessment of supercell and tornado forecast parameters with RUC-2 model close proximity sounding [C]//Preprints, 21st Conf on Severe Local Storms. San Antonio: American Meteorological Society:595-598

基金资助

中国气象局流域强降水重点开放实验室(2023BHR-Y28)

国家自然科学基金项目(42075055)

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(G1323521141)

山东省气象局面上课题(2020sdqxm20)

山东省气象局预报员专项(SDYBY2021-04)

全国暴雨研究开放项目(BYKJ2025Q04)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (6849KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉