江西省地市暴雨灾害特征及其灾损评估模型研究

辛佳洁 ,  胡菊芳 ,  董保华 ,  占龙飞 ,  李海俊

暴雨灾害 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3) : 436 -445.

PDF (985KB)
暴雨灾害 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3) : 436 -445. DOI: 10.12406/byzh.2024-166

江西省地市暴雨灾害特征及其灾损评估模型研究

作者信息 +

Characteristics of rainstorm disasters and disaster loss assessment models at prefectural-level city in Jiangxi Province

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1007K)

摘要

为精细化评估江西省 11 个地市的暴雨灾害造成的损失,本文利用 1961—2020 年暴雨过程数据、1984—2020 年暴雨灾情数据和 GDP 资料,对江西省 11 个地市开展暴雨特征及其灾损评估模型研究。首先,分析 11 个地市暴雨过程及其所造成灾害的时空分布特征;然后,通过显著相关系数法筛选区域差异化因子,构建地市暴雨综合强度指数 (I) 及灾损评估模型;最后,运用指数回归法和极端梯度提升法 (XGBoost) 构建灾损等级评估模型,并通过训练样本与独立样本检验模型效果。结果表明:(1) 江西省 11 个地市暴雨过程及其灾害特征存在区域差异,上饶、景德镇、鹰潭市为暴雨过程多发、重发区;地市平均暴雨过程频次、单站平均累积雨量及灾害频次均随年份增加呈显著上升趋势,灾损率则呈微弱下降趋势。(2) 11 个地市与暴雨灾害损失显著相关的因子数量和种类有所不同,其中单站过程累积雨量、区域过程累积雨量和持续天数是最核心的三个因子。各地市I 和灾损率均呈显著相关,相关系数介于 0.58~0.75 之间,建立的灾损评估模型在大多数地市有良好的拟合效果,其中抚州市和南昌市的拟合效果最优,决定系数 (R2) 分别为 0.82 和 0.80。(3) 对于灾损等级评估模型,两种方法在训练样本测试中误差均控制在 2 个等级以内,XGBoost 法在大多数地市中表现更优;在独立样本测试中,模型误差基本上在 1 个等级以内,指数回归法稳定性更佳。将两种方法结合能够有效确定暴雨灾害损失的等级区间,在实际业务中有较好的指导意义。

Abstract

To conduct a more refined assessment of rainstorm disasters at prefectural-level city scale in Jiangxi Province, this study utilizes precipitation data from 1961 to 2020, rainstorm disaster data from 1984 to 2020, and GDP data to investigate the characteristics of rainstorm events and their disaster loss assessment models for 11 prefectural-level cities in Jiangxi. Firstly, it systematically analyzes the temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of rainstorm events and their associated disasters across the 11 prefectural-level cities. Secondly, regionally differentiated factors are screened using the significant correlation coefficient method to construct a comprehensive rainstorm intensity index (I) and disaster loss assessment models for 11 prefectural-level cities. Finally, the exponential regression method and the extreme gradient boosting method (XGBoost) are employed to build disaster loss grade assessment models, with model performance validated using training samples and independent samples. The results are as follows. (1) Obvious differences exist in the characteristics of rainstorm events and disasters among 11 prefectural-level cities in Jiangxi.Shangrao, Jingdezhen, and Yingtan are areas where rainstorm events occur frequently and severely. The frequency, cumulative rainfall and disaster frequency in Jiangxi have a significant upward trend with the increase of years, but the disaster loss rate shows a weak downward trend. (2) The number and types of significant correlation factors in different prefectural-level cities have obvious differences, among which the maximum process rainfall of a station, cumulative rainfall and duration are the most common three significant correlation factors. The I is significantly correlated to the loss rate in 11 prefectural-level cities. And the loss assessment models exhibit good fitting results for most prefectural-level cities, particularly for Fuzhou and Nanchang, with determination coefficients (R2) of 0.82 and 0.80, respectively. (3) For the disaster loss grade assessment models, testing on training samples shows that errors of both methods are within 2 levels, with XGBoost performing better in most prefectural-level cities.Testing on independent samples indicates that the model errors were basically within the one level, and the exponential regression method demonstrates better stability. Moreover, combining these two methods could accurately provide the level range intervals of rainstorm disaster losses.

关键词

暴雨灾害 / 暴雨综合强度指数 / 损失评估 / GDP / 极端梯度提升法

Key words

rainstorm disaster / rainstorm comprehensive intensity index / loss assessment / GDP / extreme gradient boosting method

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
辛佳洁,胡菊芳,董保华,占龙飞,李海俊. 江西省地市暴雨灾害特征及其灾损评估模型研究[J]. 暴雨灾害, 2026, 45(3): 436-445 DOI:10.12406/byzh.2024-166

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

陈永仁. 2024.四川极端性暴雨的研究进展及新认识[J].高原山地气象研究,44(1):1-9.

[2]

Chen Y R. 2024. Research progress and new understanding of extreme rainstorms in Sichuan [J].Plateau and Mountain Meteorology Research,44(1):1-9 (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674−2184.2024.01.001

[3]

陈云峰,高歌. 2010.近 20 年中国气象灾害损失的初步分析[J].气象,36(2):76-80.

[4]

Chen Y F, Gao G. 2010. An analysis to caused by meteorological disasters in China during 1989-2008 [J].Meteorological Monthly,36(2):76-80 (in Chinese). doi:10.7519/j.issn.1000−0526.2010.2.0

[5]

郭帷,谢海涛,王旭,等. 2022. 1981-2019 年北疆暴雨洪涝灾害的时空变化特征分析[J].暴雨灾害,41(1):101-108.

[6]

Guo W, Xie H T, Wang X, et al. 2022. Spatio-temporal variation of rainstorm flooding disaster events in Northern Xinjiang from 1981 to 2019 [J].Torrential Rain and Disasters,41(1):101-108 (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004−9045.2022.01.012

[7]

韩秀君,孙晓巍,李爽,等. 2014.辽宁暴雨致灾指标及灾害影响预评估[J].气象与环境学报,30(6):80-84.

[8]

Han X J, Sun X W, Li S, et al. 2014. Disaster-causing index of rainstorm and pre-assessment of disaster effect in Liaoning province [J].Journal of Meteorology and Environment,30(6):80-84 (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673−503X.2014.06.012

[9]

黄天文,焦飞,伍志方. 2024.一种基于迁移学习和长短期记忆神经网络的降水预报方法[J].暴雨灾害,43(1):45-53.

[10]

Huang T W, Jiao F, Wu Z F. 2024. A precipitation forecast method based on transfer learning and long short term memory [J].Torrential Rain and Disasters,43(1):45-53 (in Chinese). doi:10.12406/byzh.2023−118

[11]

黄治勇,龙利民,邵末兰,等. 2011.类比法在暴雨灾害损失定量预估中的应用[J].大气科学学报,34(2):246-250.

[12]

Huang Z Y, Long L M, Shao M L, et al. 2011. Application of analogy method in quantitative preestimate of heavy rain disaster loss [J].Transactions of Atmospheric Sciences,34(2):246-250 (in Chinese). doi:10.13878/j.cnki.dqkxxb.2011.02.016

[13]

孔锋. 2024.加强气象防灾减灾助力乡村振兴高质量发展[J].中国减灾,2024(7):18-19.

[14]

Kong F. 2024. Strengthening Meteorological disaster prevention and reduction to support high quality development of rural revitalization [J].China Disaster Reduction,2024(7):18-19 (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002−4549.2024.07.006

[15]

李春梅,刘锦銮,潘蔚娟,等. 2008.暴雨综合影响指标及其在灾情评估中的应用[J].广东气象,2008(4):1-4.

[16]

Li C M, Liu J L, Pan W J, et al. 2008. Integrated index for rainstorm impact and its application in disaster assessment [J].Guangdong Meteorology,2008(4):1-4 (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007−6190.2008.04.001

[17]

刘伟东,扈海波,程丛兰,等. 2007.灰色关联度方法在大风和暴雨灾害损失评估中的应用[J].气象科技,35(4):563-566.

[18]

Liu W D, Hu H B, Cheng C L, et al. 2007. Application of grey correlation degree to disaster loss evaluation of strong wind and heavy rainfall [J].Meteorological Science and Technology,35(4):563-566 (in Chinese). doi:10.19517/j.1671−6345.2007.04.023

[19]

吕新生,周雅蔓,余行杰,等. 2021. 1961-2019 年新疆暴雨山洪灾害损失的时空变化特征[J].沙漠与绿洲气象,15(4):42-49.

[20]

Lü X S, Zhou Y M, Yu X J, et al. 2021. Temporal and spatial variation characteristics of rainstorm and flash flood disaster losses in Xinjiang from 1961 to 2019 [J].Desert and Oasis Meteorology,15(4):42-49 (in Chinese). doi:10.12057/j.issn.1002−0799.2021.04.006

[21]

孙继松. 2017.短时强降水和暴雨的区别与联系[J].暴雨灾害,36(6):498-506.

[22]

Sun J S. 2017. Differences and relationship between flash heavy rain and heavy rainfall [J].Torrential Rain and Disasters,36(6):498-506 (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004−9045.2017.06.002

[23]

孙素琴,吴静,唐春燕,等. 2024.基于智能网格预报的江西暴雨灾害风险预评估研究[J].灾害学,39(1):37-44.

[24]

Sun S Q, Wu J, Tang C Y, et al. 2024. Research on risk pre-assessment of rainstorm disaster based on intelligent grid forecasting in Jiangxi Province [J].Journal of Catastrophology,39(1):37-44 (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000−811X.2024.01.007

[25]

王莉萍,王秀荣,王维国. 2015.中国区域降水过程综合强度评估方法研究及应用[J].自然灾害学报,24(2):186-194.

[26]

Wang L P, Wang X R, Wang W G. 2015. Research and application of comprehensive intensity evaluation method for regional rainfall process in China [J].Journal of Natural Disasters,24(2):186-194 (in Chinese). doi:10.13577/j.jnd.2015.0224

[27]

袭祝香,纪玲玲,张硕. 2014.吉林省重大暴雨过程影响损失评估模型的建立[J].气象与环境学报,30(5):141-145.

[28]

Xi Z X, Ji L L, Zhang S. 2014. Development of a model for evaluation of disaster loss due to heavy rainstorm in Jilin province [J].Journal of Meteorology and Environment,30(5):141-145 (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673−503X.2014.05.020

[29]

袭祝香,张晨琛,吕忠,等. 2016.吉林省重大暴雨过程灾害损失风险预评估[J].冰川冻土,38(2):395-401.

[30]

Xi Z X, Zhang C C, Lü Z. 2016. The risk pre-estimation of the flood casualty loss caused by heavy rainstorm in Jilin Province [J].Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology,38(2):395-401 (in Chinese). doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000−0240.2016.0043

[31]

徐澯,宫阿都,包文轩. 2023.基于机器学习的不可移动文物暴雨灾害风险评估-以山西省为例[J].自然灾害学报,32(4):25-35.

[32]

Xu C, Gong A D, Bao W X. 2023. Machine learning-based storm disaster risk assessment of immovable cultural relics: A case study of Shanxi Province [J].Journal of Natural Disasters,32(4):25-35 (in Chinese). doi:10.13577/j.jnd.2023.0403

[33]

鄢晓茜, 肖天贵, 王静. 2024.西南地区暴雨灾害集中度变化特征及其与环流指数的关系[J].高原山地气象研究,44(2):91-97.

[34]

Yan X Q, Xiao T G, Wang J. 2024. Characteristics of rainstorm disaster concentration index in southwest China and its relationship with circulation index [J].Plateau and Mountain Meteorology Research,44(2):91-97 (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674−2184.2024.02.011

[35]

张超美,黄彩婷,赵冠男. 2020. 1961-2016 年江西不同量级暴雨的时空分布特征[J].气象与减灾研究,43(4):249-255.

[36]

Zhang C M, Huang C T, Zhao G N. 2020. Spatio-temporal variations of rainstorms with different magnitudes in Jiangxi province during1961-2016 [J].Meteorology and Disaster Reduction Research,43(4):249-255 (in Chinese). doi:10.12013/qxyjzyj2020−036

[37]

张柳红,郑璟,伍红雨,等. 2021.广东暴雨洪涝灾害损失定量评估[J].暴雨灾害,40(1):87-93.

[38]

Zhang L H, Zheng J, Wu H Y, et al. 2021. Quantitative assessment of disaster loss caused by rainstorms and floods in Guangdong [J].Torrential Rain and Disasters,40(1):87-93 (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004−9045.2021.01.011

[39]

张顺谦,王春学,陈文秀,等. 2019.四川省暴雨过程强度及损失评估方法研究[J].暴雨灾害,38(1):79-85.

[40]

Zhang S Q, Wang C X, Chen W X, et al. 2019. Study on evaluation method of intensity and loss of rainstorm in Sichuan Province [J].Torrential Rain and Disasters,38(1):79-85(in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004−9045.2019.01.010

[41]

章国材. 2010.气象灾害风险评估与区划方法[M].北京:气象出版社:96-97.

[42]

Zhang G C. 2010. Risk Assessment and Zoning Methods for meteorological disasters [M]. Beijing:Meteorological Publishing House:96-97 (in Chinese)

[43]

赵小芳,史瑞琴,洪国平,等. 2023.暴雨洪涝受灾人口与雨涝危险性指数关系模型研究[J].暴雨灾害,42(1):79-87.

[44]

Zhao X F, Shi R Q, Hong G P, et al. 2023. The relationship model between flood-hit population and rainstorm waterlogging risk index [J].Torrential Rain and Disasters,42(1):79-87 (in Chinese). doi:10.12406/byzh.2022−223

[45]

郑美霞,刘玲. 2022. 2011-2020 年江西省自然灾害灾情时空特征分析[J].自然灾害学报,31(2):233-241.

[46]

Zheng M X, Liu L. 2022. Spatial-temporal distribution characteristics of natural disasters in Jiangxi Province from 2011 to 2020 [J].Journal of Natural Disasters,31(2):233-241 (in Chinese). doi:10.13577/j.jnd.2022.0225

[47]

邹燕, 叶殿秀, 林毅, 等. 2014.福建区域性暴雨过程综合强度定量化评估方法[J].应用气象学报,25(3):360-364.

[48]

Zou Y, Ye D X, Lin Y, et al. 2014. A quantitative method for assessment of regional heavy rainfall Intensity [J].Journal of Applied Meteorological Science,25(3):360-364 doi:10.11898/1001−7313.20140313

[49]

Breinl K, Lun D, Müller-Thomy H, et al. 2021. Understanding the relationship between rainfall and flood probabilities through combined intensity-duration-frequency analysis [J].Journal of Hydrology,602:126759. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126759

[50]

Chen T, Guestrin C. 2016. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system [C].In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '16). New York:Association for Computing Machinery,785-794. doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785

[51]

Ji X, Dong W, Wang W, et al. 2024. Impacts of climate change on extreme precipitation events and urban waterlogging: a case study of Beijing [J].Natural Hazards Review,25(1):5023014.1-5023014.16. doi:10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG−1889

[52]

Li J, Wang B. 2018. Predictability of summer extreme precipitation days over eastern China [J].Climate Dynamics,51(11):4543-4554. doi:10.1007/s00382−017−3848−x

[53]

Ma L, Zhang G, Lu E. 2018. Using the gradient boosting decision tree to improve the delineation of hourly rain areas during the summer from advanced Himawari imager data [J].Journal of Hydrometeorology,19(5):761-776. doi:10.1175/JHM−D−17−0109.1

[54]

Natekin A, Knoll A. 2013. Gradient boosting machines, a tutorial [J].Frontiers in Neurorobotics,4(7):21. doi:10.3389/fnbot.2013.00021

[55]

Ren F M, Cui D L, Gong Z Q, et al. 2012. An objective identification technique for regional extreme events [J].Journal of Climate,25(20):7015-7027. doi:10.1175/JCLI−D−11−00489.1

[56]

Shen G Q, Hwang S N. 2019. Spatial-temporal snapshots of global natural disaster impacts revealed from EM-DAT for 1900-2015 [J].Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 10(1): 912-934. doi:10.1080/19475705.2018.1552630

[57]

Trigg M A, Birch C E, Neal J C, et al. 2016. The credibility challenge for global fluvial flood risk analysis [J].Environmental Research Letters,11(9):094014. doi:10.1088/1748−9326/11/9/094014

[58]

Willner S N, Levermann A, Zhao F, et al. 2018. Adaptation required to preserve future high-end river flood risk at present levels [J].Science Advances,4(1):eaao1914. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aao1914

基金资助

中国气象局创新发展专项(CXFZ2024Q007)

江西省科技厅“科技+应急”联合计划项目(S2023KJSLG0003)

江西省气象局灾害风险普查项目(JX2022ZHFXPC06)

江西省气象局青年项目(JX2023Q07)

南昌国家气候观象台专项(JX2023Z09)

珠江流域气象科研开放基金项目(ZJLY202312)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (985KB)

9

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉