基于营养盐限制调控的藻华控制及生态修复技术

黄雨薇 ,  叶圣滢 ,  MUHAMMAD Yar ,  王佳慧 ,  王丽静 ,  潘纲

生态环境损害研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (3) : 47 -68.

生态环境损害研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (3) : 47 -68. DOI: 10.3724/j.issn.2097-4221.2025.03.004

基于营养盐限制调控的藻华控制及生态修复技术

作者信息 +

Nutrient Limitation-Based Techniques for Algal Bloom Control and Ecological Restoration

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

人为氮和磷营养盐的输入导致很多大型湖库发生不同程度的富营养化,严重威胁了饮用水安全和水生态系统的可持续性。判定浮游藻类生长繁殖的限制性营养盐并对其进行调控,能够有效地控制藻华暴发,从而恢复健康的生态系统。2021年10月,本研究在太湖梅梁湾实验塘实施了改性当地土壤(Modified Local Soil,MLS)生态修复技术,通过4组不同季节的营养盐原位添加实验结合长期监测,考察MLS技术实施后浮游植物生长营养盐限制的变化和生态系统恢复情况。与3#对照塘相比,4#处理塘因MLS技术的实施,总氮(TN)、总磷(TP)、溶解性无机氮(DIN)和溶解态活性磷(SRP)等营养盐被去除,至使浮游植物生长由不受氮和磷限制转变为磷限制,且磷限制阈值为0.2mg·L-1;6个月后(2022年3月),4#处理塘依然保持磷限制,由于春季SRP浓度有所提升,磷限制阈值降为0.1mg·L-1,虽然3#对照塘也表现为磷限制,但在相同磷(0.1mg·L-1)供应下所达到的最大Chl-a浓度为处理塘的1.8倍;进入夏季后(2022年6月),4#处理塘和3#对照塘均由磷限制转变为氮限制,磷为第二限制性营养盐,由于4#处理塘浮游植物种类增加,喜高氮和磷的绿藻和硅藻占比达44%,因此,4#处理塘氮限制阈值(1.0mg·L-1)高于以蓝藻为主的3#对照塘(0.5mg·L-1);冬季期间,尽管两塘均展现出氮和磷共同限制,但4#处理塘内依然保持绿藻、硅藻和隐藻等多种藻类并存状态,单一藻类暴发的可能性不大,而3#对照塘内以微囊藻为主的蓝藻大量存在,增加了春季蓝藻暴发风险。本研究表明,MLS技术可在短期内快速去除水体中的藻华,降低氮、磷营养盐浓度,将浮游植物生长由不受氮和磷限制转变为单一磷限制。从长期效应来看,由于MLS处理后的水体中沉水植物大量恢复,其与藻类生长竞争吸收营养盐,还能通过化感作用抑制藻类生长,使水体中的浮游植物由蓝藻为优势种群转变为多种浮游植物共存的状态;同时,营养盐浓度降低和浮游植物群落结构改变,使得氮和磷均成为限制性营养盐,进而抑制了蓝藻水华暴发;最终,以藻类为优势地位的藻华水体逆转为以沉水植被为主的健康水体,提升了氮磷营养盐的环境容量。本研究为藻华快速去除、生态系统恢复以及营养盐管理策略制定,提供了有效的技术手段,同时也为突发性外源氮、磷营养盐输入引发的藻华暴发等水生态系统环境损害,提供了快速可行的判定技术方法。

Abstract

Excessive anthropogenic inputs of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) led to varying degrees of eutrophication in many large lakes and reservoirs, seriously threatening drinking water safety and the sustainability of aquatic ecosystems. Identification and regulation of limiting nutrients for phytoplankton growth were considered effective strategies to control algal blooms and restore ecosystem health. In October 2021, Modified local soil (MLS) technique was implemented in experimental ponds in Meiliang Bay, Lake Taihu. Four sets of seasonal in situ nutrient addition experiments combined with long-term monitoring were conducted to evaluate changes in phytoplankton nutrient limitation and ecosystem recovery after MLS application. Compared with the control (No.3), after MLS treatment, the removal of nutrients including total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN), and soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) caused the growth of phytoplankton to shift from being non-limited by N and P to being P-limited, with a P limitation threshold of 0.2 mg·L-1. After six months (spring, Mar. 2022), the treated pond (No.4) still exhibited P limitation, but the threshold declined to 0.1 mg·L-1 because of elevated SRP. Although the control pond (No.4) also showed P limitation, its maximum Chl-a concentration under the same P supply (0.1 mg·L-1) was 1.8 times higher than that in the treated pond. In summer (Jun. 2022), both ponds shifted from P limitation to N limitation, with P acting as a secondary limiting nutrient. In the treatment pond (No.4), phytoplankton diversity increased, and green algae and diatoms (44% of the community) replaced cyanobacteria dominance, leading to a higher N limitation threshold (1.0 mg·L-1) compared with the control pond (0.5 mg·L-1). In winter, although both ponds exhibited N and P co-limitation, the treatment pond (No. 4) maintained a mixed community of green algae, diatoms, and cryptophytes, reducing the likelihood of single-species blooms. By contrast, the control pond remained dominated by Microcystis, creating a higher risk of cyanobacterial blooms in the following spring. Overall, MLS rapidly removed algal blooms and reduced N and P concentrations in the short term, shifting phytoplankton growth from non-limitation to P limitation. In the long term, submerged macrophytes restored substantially in the treatment pond, competing with algae for nutrients and suppressing algal growth through allelopathy. Consequently, the auqatic ecosystem shifted from cyanobacteria dominance to coexistence of diverse phytoplankton, nutrient concentrations declined, and both N and P became limiting nutrients. This transition suppressed cyanobacterial blooms and transformed an algal-dominated system into a macrophyte-dominated healthy ecosystem, thereby enhancing the environmental carrying capacity for N and P. This study provided an effective approach for rapid algal bloom removal, ecosystem restoration, and the development of nutrient management strategies. In addition, a rapid and feasible method was provided for assessing potential algal bloom outbreaks and associated environmental damage to aquatic ecosystems resulting from sudden external inputs of nitrogen and phosphorus.

关键词

改性当地土壤 / 营养盐限制 / 浮游植物 / 沉水植被 / 太湖

Key words

modified local soil / nutrient limitation / phytoplankton community structure / submerged macrophytes / Lake Taihu

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
黄雨薇,叶圣滢,MUHAMMAD Yar,王佳慧,王丽静,潘纲. 基于营养盐限制调控的藻华控制及生态修复技术[J]. 生态环境损害研究, 2025, 1(3): 47-68 DOI:10.3724/j.issn.2097-4221.2025.03.004

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

LIN S S, SHEN S L, ZHOU A, et al. Assessment and management of lake eutrophication: A case study in Lake Erhai, China [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 751, 141618.

[2]

HUISMAN J, CODD G A, PAERL H W, et al. Cyanobacterial blooms [J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2018, 16(8): 471-483.

[3]

HOU X J, FENG L, DAI Y H, et al. Global mapping reveals increase in lacustrine algal blooms over the past decade [J]. Nature Geoscience, 2022, 15(2): 130-134.

[4]

HEINO J, ALAHUHTA J, BINI L M, et al. Lakes in the era of global change: moving beyond single—lake thinking in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem services [J]. Biological Reviews, 2021, 96(1): 89-106.

[5]

YAN P, GUO J S, ZHANG P, et al. The role of morphological changes in algae adaptation to nutrient stress at the single—cell level [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 754, 142076.

[6]

MA J R, QIN B Q, WU P, et al. Controlling cyanobacterial blooms by managing nutrient ratio and limitation in a large hyper—eutrophic lake: Lake Taihu, China [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2015, 27: 80-86.

[7]

PAERL H W, SCOTT J T, MCCARTHY M J, et al. It Takes Two to Tango: When and Where Dual Nutrient (N & P) Reductions Are Needed to Protect Lakes and Downstream Ecosystems [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(20): 10805-10813.

[8]

SCHINDLER D W, HECKY R E, FINDLAY D L, et al. Eutrophication of lakes cannot be controlled by reducing nitrogen input: Results of a 37—year whole—ecosystem experiment [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008, 105(32): 11254-11258.

[9]

LI H Y, MILLER T, LU J R, et al. Nitrogen fixation contribution to nitrogen cycling during cyanobacterial blooms in Utah Lake [J]. Chemosphere, 2022, 302, 134784.

[10]

CHEN M Y, TENG W K, ZHAO L, et al. Phylogenomics Uncovers Evolutionary Trajectory of Nitrogen Fixation in Cyanobacteria [J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2022, 39(9): msac171.

[11]

SCHINDLER D W, CARPENTER S R, CHAPRA S C, et al. Reducing Phosphorus to Curb Lake Eutrophication is a Success [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(17): 8923-8929.

[12]

XU M N, WU Y H, ZHANG X, et al. Diel change in inorganic nitrogenous nutrient dynamics and associated oxygen stoichiometry along the Pearl River Estuary [J]. Water Research, 2022, 222, 118954.

[13]

CHENG Y X, JIAO L X, CHENG Q L, et al. The evolution of a typical plateau lake from macrophyte to algae leads to the imbalance of nutrient retention [J]. Water Research, 2023, 236, 119937.

[14]

ZHANG Y, CHANG F Q, ZHANG X N, et al. Release of Endogenous Nutrients Drives the Transformation of Nitrogen and Phosphorous in the Shallow Plateau of Lake Jian in Southwestern China [J]. Water, 2022, 14(17), 2064.

[15]

DOMINGUES R B, NOGUEIRA P, BARBOSA A B . Co—Limitation of Phytoplankton by N and P in a Shallow Coastal Lagoon (Ria Formosa): Implications for Eutrophication Evaluation [J]. Estuaries and Coasts, 2023, 46(6): 1557-1572.

[16]

JIANG M Q, NAKANO S I . The crucial influence of trophic status on the relative requirement of nitrogen to phosphorus for phytoplankton growth [J]. Water Research, 2022, 222, 118868.

[17]

ZHOU Z J, LIU Y Q, WANG S Y, et al. Interactions between Phosphorus Enrichment and Nitrification Accelerate Relative Nitrogen Deficiency during Cyanobacterial Blooms in a Large Shallow Eutrophic Lake [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2023, 57(7), 2992-3001.

[18]

TONG Y D, XU X W, QI M, et al. Lake warming intensifies the seasonal pattern of internal nutrient cycling in the eutrophic lake and potential impacts on algal blooms [J]. Water Research, 2021, 188, 116570.

[19]

ZHENG L W, ZHAI W D . Nutrient dynamics in the Bohai and North Yellow seas from seasonal to decadal scales: Unveiling Bohai Sea eutrophication mitigation in the 2010s [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 905, 167417.

[20]

GUO C X, ZHU G W, QIN B Q, et al. Climate exerts a greater modulating effect on the phytoplankton community after 2007 in eutrophic Lake Taihu, China: Evidence from 25 years of recordings [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 105: 82-91.

[21]

HARTIG J H, KRANTZBERG G, MUNAWAR M, et al. Achievements and lessons learned from the 32—year old Canada—US effort to restore Impaired Beneficial Uses in Great Lakes Areas of Concern [J]. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 2018, 21(4): 506-520.

[22]

HUANG Y, MA R W, SHI H B, et al. Centennial Lake Environmental Evolution Reflected by Diatoms in Yilong Lake, Yunnan Province, China [J]. Applied Sciences—Basel, 2023, 13(9), 5288.

[23]

ZHU G, XU H, ZHU M, et al. Changing characteristics and driving factors of trophic state of lakes in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River in the past 30 years [J]. Hupo Kexue, 2019, 31(6): 1510-1524.

[24]

曹晶, 田泽斌, 储昭升, . 太湖蓝藻水华暴发的氮磷控制阈值分析 [J]. 湖泊科学, 2022, 34(4): 1075-1089.

[25]

LI H, ZHANG H, DUAN L, et al. Spatiotemporal variations in water quality parameters and assessment of the current status and challenges of eutrophication in Lake Dian [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2025, 177: 113821.

[26]

MACKAY E B, MABERLY S C, PAN G, et al. Geoengineering in lakes: welcome attraction or fatal distraction? [J]. Inland Waters, 2014, 4(4): 349-356.

[27]

HUSER B J, FUTTER M, LEE J T, et al. In—lake measures for phosphorus control: The most feasible and cost—effective solution for long—term management of water quality in urban lakes [J]. Water Research, 2016, 97: 142-152.

[28]

LU S Y, JIN X C, LIANG L L, et al. Influence of inactivation agents on phosphorus release from sediment [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2013, 68(4): 1143-1151.

[29]

LI L, PAN G . A universal method for flocculating harmful algal blooms in marine and fresh waters using modified sand [J]. Environmental science & technology, 2013, 47(9): 4555-4562.

[30]

SHI W, TAN W, WANG L, et al. Removal of Microcystis aeruginosa using cationic starch modified soils [J]. Water research, 2016, 97: 19-25.

[31]

CHEN J, PAN G . Harmful algal blooms mitigation using clay/soil/sand modified with xanthan and calcium hydroxide [J]. Journal of applied phycology, 2012, 24(5): 1183-1189.

[32]

ZHANG H, LYU T, LIU L, et al. Exploring a multifunctional geoengineering material for eutrophication remediation: Simultaneously control internal nutrient load and tackle hypoxia [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 406: 127206.

[33]

PAN G, DAI L C, LI L, et al. Reducing the Recruitment of Sedimented Algae and Nutrient Release into the Overlying Water Using Modified Soil/Sand Flocculation—Capping in Eutrophic Lakes [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(9): 5077-5084.

[34]

ZHANG H, SHANG Y, LYU T, et al. Switching harmful algal blooms to submerged macrophytes in shallow waters using geo—engineering methods: evidence from a15N tracing study [J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2018, 52(20): 11778-11785.

[35]

PAN G, YANG B, WANG D, et al. In—lake algal bloom removal and submerged vegetation restoration using modified local soils [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2011, 37(2): 302-308.

[36]

PAN G, MIAO X, BI L, et al. Modified local soil (MLS) technology for harmful algal bloom control, sediment remediation, and ecological restoration [J]. Water, 2019, 11(6): 1123.

[37]

LI H, PAN G . Simultaneous Removal of Harmful Algal Blooms and Microcystins Using Microorganism— and Chitosan—Modified Local Soil [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(10): 6249-6256.

[38]

BI L, PAN G . From harmful Microcystis blooms to multi—functional core—double—shell microsphere bio—hydrochar materials [J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7, 15477.

[39]

秦伯强 . 富营养化湖泊治理的理论与实践 [M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2011.

[40]

李华歆, 殷春雨, 杨国梁, . 不同功能型沉水植物对溶解氧影响及环境效应 [J]. 水生生物学报, 2024, 48(02): 232-241.

[41]

JUNG C, HEO J, HAN J, et al. Hexavalent chromium removal by various adsorbents: powdered activated carbon, chitosan, and single/multi—walled carbon nanotubes [J]. Separation and purification technology, 2013, 106: 63-71.

[42]

WANG L, PAN G, SHI W, et al. Manipulating nutrient limitation using modified local soils: A case study at Lake Taihu (China) [J]. Water Research, 2016, 101: 25-35.

[43]

XU H, PAERL H W, QIN B, et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus inputs control phytoplankton growth in eutrophic Lake Taihu, China [J]. Limnol Oceanogr, 2010, 55(1): 420-432.

[44]

YIN H B, YIN P, YANG Z . Seasonal sediment phosphorus release across sediment—water interface and its potential role in supporting algal blooms in a large shallow eutrophic Lake (Lake Taihu, China) [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 896, 165252.

[45]

XU H, PAERL H W, QIN B, et al. Determining Critical Nutrient Thresholds Needed to Control Harmful Cyanobacterial Blooms in Eutrophic Lake Taihu, China [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(2): 1051-1059.

[46]

SHI W Q, ZHU L, VAN DAM B, et al. Wind induced algal migration manipulates sediment denitrification N—loss patterns in shallow Taihu Lake, China [J]. Water Research, 2022, 209, 117887.

[47]

ZHAO L S, WANG P, LI K, et al. Structural basis and evolution of the photosystem I—light—harvesting supercomplex of cryptophyte algae [J]. Plant Cell, 2023, 35(7): 2449-2463.

[48]

YUAN H Z, WANG H X, ZHOU Y W, et al. Water—level fluctuations regulate the availability and diffusion kinetics process of phosphorus at lake water—sediment interface [J]. Water Research, 2021, 200, 117258.

[49]

CAI Y W, WANG H X, ZHANG T X, et al. Seasonal variation regulate the endogenous phosphorus release in sediments of Shijiuhu Lake via water—level fluctuation [J]. Environmental Research, 2023, 238, 117247.

[50]

任俊宏 . 太湖藻型和草型湖区2—MIB时空分布特征及驱动因子研究 [D]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2024.

[51]

LIU X, LI Y, SHEN R J, et al. Reducing nutrient increases diatom biomass in a subtropical eutrophic lake, China—Do the ammonium concentration and nitrate to ammonium ratio play a role? [J]. Water Research, 2022, 218, 118493.

[52]

PAERL H W, XU H, HALL N S, et al. Nutrient limitation dynamics examined on a multi—annual scale in Lake Taihu, China: implications for controlling eutrophication and harmful algal blooms [J]. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 2015, 30(1): 5-24.

[53]

PAN J—Y, YANY Y, HAN B—P . Responses of Phytoplankton Communities to N/P Ratio Changes in Phosphorus—limited Subtropical Reservoir in Southern China [J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 2021, 29(1): 20-30.

[54]

ZHU X Q, DAO G H, TAO Y, et al. A review on control of harmful algal blooms by plant—derived allelochemicals [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 401, 123403.

[55]

ZHANG Y, WU H, WU X, et al. Revisiting Cyanobacteria—Temperature Dynamics: Intraspecific Competition and Trait Diversity as Keys to Predicting Harmful Algal Blooms under Climate Change [J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2025: 17811-17821.

[56]

LIU X, SUN T, YANG W, et al. Meta—analysis to identify inhibition mechanisms for the effects of submerged plants on algae [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 355: 120480.

[57]

陈清锦 . 沉水植物对污染水体的水质改善效应研究 [D]. 南京: 河海大学 2005.

[58]

郭雅倩, 薛建辉, 吴永波, . 沉水植物对富营养化水体的净化作用及修复技术研究进展 [J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2020, 29(3): 58-68.

AI Summary AI Mindmap

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/