基于AHP—模糊评价法的管理类人才素质校企供需差异分析

摘要

目的 从高校企业供需双视角探究其对管理人才素质的要求，为高校管理型人才培养提供建议。方法 根据管理人才素质设置二级指标问卷，对50位相关专业的高校工作者以及50位医药相关企业的管理者进行线上线下访谈和问卷调查，通过AHP层次法构建管理人才评价体系计算各指标权重，并依据模糊综合评价法以药事管理为例计算管理人才要求的评分，探究两者差异。结果 根据AHP层次分析法计算四大素质权重，高校与企业角度一级指标权重分别为：政治道德素质47%、36%，专业素质23%、24%，心理素质18%、25%，身体素质12%、16%。高校与企业二级指标排名前三位及其权重分别为：政治信仰29.14%、14.76%，实践能力17.25%、12.24%，学业道德品行9.40%、13.32%，高校角度第四、五位分别为日常行为品行和机能素质；企业角度第四、五位分别为专业知识和压力耐受能力。根据模糊综合评价结果，高校与企业对药事管理人才的评分分别为78.8与85.8。结论 高校与企业在对管理人才素质的评价上存在差异，人才从高校过渡到企业是一个不断成长的过程，高校在管理人才培养中要考虑企业的需求，将实践、理论、心理等素质与政治道德素质培养相结合，培养出既具有较高道德品行，又能够更好满足企业需求的高素质人才。

Abstract

Objective To explore the requirements for the quality of management talents, and provide suggestions for the cultivation of pharmaceutical management talents in universities from the perspective of supply and demand of universities and enterprises. Methods Based on the quality of managerial talents, a secondary indicator questionnaire was set up. Interviews and questionnaires were conducted online and offline with 50 college workers in related majors and 50 managers from pharmaceutical-related enterprises. The AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method was used to construct an evaluation system for managerial talents, calculate the weight of each indicator, and use the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to calculate the scores of managerial talent requirements with pharmaceutical management as an example, exploring the differences between the two. Results The weights of the four major qualities calculated by the AHP method are as follows: political and moral quality 47% and 36%; professional quality 23% and 24%; psychological quality 18% and 25% and physical quality 12% and 16% for colleges and enterprises respectively. The top three secondary indicators of universities and enterprises and their weights are: political belief 29.14%, 14.76%; practical ability 17.25%, 12.24%; academic morality 9.40%, 13.32%. From the perspective of colleges and universities, the fourth and fifth places are daily behavior and functional quality; from the perspective of enterprises, the fourth and fifth places are professional knowledge and stress tolerance. According to the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation results, the scores of pharmaceutical management talents in universities and enterprises are 78.8 and 85.8 respectively. Conclusion There are differences between universities and enterprises in the evaluation of the quality of management talents. The transition of talents from colleges to enterprises is a continuous growth process. Universities should consider the needs of enterprises in the cultivation of management talents, combining practical, theoretical, and psychological qualities with the cultivation of political and moral quality to cultivate high-quality talents who not only have high moral conduct but also better meet the needs of enterprises.

关键词

企业高校双角度 / 药事管理人才 / AHP层次分析法 / 模糊综合评价

/ "> dual perspectives of enterprises and universities / pharmaceutical management talents / AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method / fuzzy comprehensive evaluation