TA1钛合金板材单向拉伸力学性能及各向异性研究
Study on unidirectional tensile mechanical properties and anisotropy of TA1 titanium alloy sheet
为探究TA1钛合金板材室温成形性能,采用单向拉伸试验系统研究了加载速度(1、3、5 mm/min)和取向角度(0°、45°、90°)对1 mm厚TA1板材力学性能的影响规律。结果表明:加载速度从1 mm/min增至5 mm/min时,0°方向变形量从48.92%降至40.31%,屈服强度从218.4 MPa降至196.9 MPa,呈现明显的应变速率敏感性;不同取向表现出显著各向异性,45°方向塑性最优(变形量51.85%)但强度最低(抗拉强度295.8 MPa),90°方向强度最高(屈服强度271.3 MPa)但塑性最差(变形量43.23%)。研究揭示了TA1板材各向异性与加载速度的耦合效应,为其室温成形工艺参数优化提供了理论依据。
To investigate the room-temperature forming properties of TA1 titanium alloy sheets, a unidirectional tensile testing system was employed to study the effects of loading speed (1, 3, 5 mm/min) and orientation angle (0°, 45°, 90°) on the mechanical performance of 1 mm thick TA1 sheets. Results showed that as loading speed increased from 1 mm/min to 5 mm/min, the 0° deformation decreased from 48.92% to 40.31%, while yield strength dropped from 218.4 MPa to 196.9 MPa, demonstrating significant strain rate sensitivity. Different orientations exhibited distinct anisotropy: the 45° orientation showed optimal plasticity (deformation 51.85%) but lowest strength (tensile strength 295.8 MPa), whereas the 90° orientation had highest strength (yield strength 271.3 MPa) but poorest plasticity (deformation 43.23%). This study revealed the coupled effect between TA1 sheet anisotropy and loading speed, providing a theoretical basis for optimizing room-temperature forming process parameters.
| [1] |
周廉, 赵永庆, 王向东. 中国钛合金材料及应用发展战略研究[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2012. |
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
原国森, 兖利鹏, 韩艳艳. 钛合金的应用进展[J]. 热加工工艺, 2017, 46(4):21-24. |
| [4] |
刘全明, 张朝晖, 刘世锋, |
| [5] |
李岩, 张晓臣, 宋美慧, |
| [6] |
贾蔚菊. 高强钛合金板材的室温成形[J]. 钛工业进展, 2014, 31(6):45-46. |
| [7] |
方波, 程明, 陈仲强, |
| [8] |
王忠金, 宋辉. 钛合金板材室温成形技术研究进展[J]. 塑性工程学报, 2010, 17(3):1-8. |
| [9] |
任家陶, 李岗陵. 板材不同取向的单向拉伸试验研究[J]. 岳阳大学学报, 1991, 22(2):80-83. |
| [10] |
高铁军, 刘青, 蔡晋, |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |