PDF (1161K)
摘要
随着生成式人工智能技术快速迭代,AIGC在各行各业得到广泛运用,如何对其进行知识产权保护是当前学界和实务界的热点问题之一。目前我国现有的知识产权法律体系是以人的智力成果为核心的,无法适应AIGC的技术特点,在权利客体认定、权利归属划分以及侵权责任界定、数据训练合法性的方面都存在着许多争议或空白之处。本文结合AIGC技术和司法实践,对AIGC知识产权保护存在的突出问题进行梳理分析并深入挖掘产生这些问题的原因,从法律完善、制度构建等多个角度提出了完善的建议,力求实现技术创新激励与权利人权益保护之间的平衡,促进人工智能产业发展健康有序发展。
Abstract
With the rapid iteration of generative artificial intelligence technology, AIGC has been widely used in various industries. How to protect its intellectual property rights is currently one of the hot issues in academia and practice. At present, the existing intellectual property legal system in China is centered around human intellectual achievements and cannot adapt to the technical characteristics of AIGC. There are many controversies or gaps in the identification of rights objects, division of rights ownership, definition of infringement liability, and legality of data training. This article combines AIGC technology and judicial practice to sort out and analyze the prominent problems in AIGC intellectual property protection, and deeply explore the reasons for these problems. From multiple perspectives such as legal improvement and institutional construction, suggestions for improvement are proposed, aiming to achieve a balance between technological innovation incentives and the protection of rights holders’ interests, and promote the healthy and orderly development of the artificial intelligence industry.
关键词
Key words
[Author(id=1324004325370732952, tenantId=1045748351789510663, journalId=1253638430942068904, articleId=1324004324569620869, orderNo=0, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=null, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1324004325429453210, tenantId=1045748351789510663, journalId=1253638430942068904, articleId=1324004324569620869, authorId=1324004325370732952, language=EN, stringName=Laiyong Xu, firstName=Laiyong, middleName=null, lastName=Xu, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=Anhui Wan Zheng (Suzhou) Law Firm, Suzhou, Anhui, 234000, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1324004325483979163, tenantId=1045748351789510663, journalId=1253638430942068904, articleId=1324004324569620869, authorId=1324004325370732952, language=CN, stringName=许来永, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=安徽皖正(宿州)律师事务所, 中国·安徽 宿州 234000, bio={"content":"许来永(1975-),男,中国安徽宿州人,本科,三级律师,从事民商法研究。
"}, bioImg=null, bioContent=许来永(1975-),男,中国安徽宿州人,本科,三级律师,从事民商法研究。
, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1324004325286846868, tenantId=1045748351789510663, journalId=1253638430942068904, articleId=1324004324569620869, xref=null, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1324004325307818389, tenantId=1045748351789510663, journalId=1253638430942068904, articleId=1324004324569620869, companyId=1324004325286846868, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=Anhui Wan Zheng (Suzhou) Law Firm, Suzhou, Anhui, 234000, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1324004325324595606, tenantId=1045748351789510663, journalId=1253638430942068904, articleId=1324004324569620869, companyId=1324004325286846868, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=安徽皖正(宿州)律师事务所, 中国·安徽 宿州 234000)])])]
许来永.
人工智能生成物知识产权保护现存问题与完善建议[J].
科技创新与工程, 2026, 3(9): 55-57 DOI:10.12349/tie.v3i9.11795
| [1] |
王迁. 三论人工智能生成的内容在著作权法中的定位[J]. 法商研究, 2024, 41(3):182-200.
|
| [2] |
吴汉东. 人工智能生成作品的著作权法之问[J]. 中外法学, 2020, 32(3):653-673.
|
| [3] |
张平. 生成式人工智能著作权问题的制度回应[J]. 南方传媒研究, 2024,(5):21-31.
|
| [4] |
张新宝, 卞龙. 生成式人工智能训练语料的著作权保护[J]. 荆楚法学, 2024,(5):77-90.
|