土地工程新范式：生命系统视角下的自然资源治理与可持续转型

New Paradigm of Land Engineering: Natural Resource Governance and Sustainable Transformation from the Perspective of Life Systems

摘要

本文基于“土地生命系统”这一核心隐喻，系统审视当代土地工程面临的多重挑战与转型机遇。在自然资源确权登记领域，提出“数字孪生登记体系”与“区块链赋能的动态权属管理系统”，突破传统静态登记的局限；在国土资源管理保护方面，构建“空天地一体化智能监测网络”与“适应性土地修复框架”；在土地经济与规划维度，发展“生态产品价值实现机制”与“多中心协同规划模型”。论文通过国内外比较案例分析，揭示了中国土地工程正从“要素管理”向“系统治理”、从“静态管控”向“动态适应”、从“经济增长工具”向“生命共同体维护”的范式转变，最终提出面向2035年的“人地智能协同”土地工程新范式。

Abstract

Based on the core metaphor of “land life system,” this paper systematically examines the multiple challenges and transformation opportunities faced by contemporary land engineering. In the field of natural resource registration, it proposes the “digital twin registration system” and the “blockchain-enabled dynamic ownership management system” to break through the limitations of traditional static registration. In terms of land resource management and protection, it constructs the “integrated space-air-ground intelligent monitoring network” and the “adaptive land restoration framework.” In the dimensions of land economy and planning, it develops the “ecological product value realization mechanism” and the “multi-center collaborative planning model.” Through comparative case analyses at home and abroad, the paper reveals that China’s land engineering is transitioning from “factor management” to “system governance,” from “static control” to “dynamic adaptation,” and from “economic growth tools” to “sustaining a life community.” Ultimately, it proposes a new paradigm of “intelligent human-land collaboration” for land engineering by 2035.

关键词

土地生命系统 / 数字孪生 / 生态产品价值 / 适应性治理 / 人地协同

Key words

Land life system / Digital twin / Ecological product value / Adaptive governance / Human-land synergy

参考文献

[1] 中国自然资源部. (2023). 《中国自然资源公报2022》. 北京: 地质出版社.

[2] IPCC. (2022). Climate Change and Land:An IPCC Special Report. Geneva: IPCC.

[3] 吴次芳, 等. (2021). 《土地工程学原理》. 北京: 科学出版社.

[4] United Nations. (2021). The Global Land Outlook, 2nd edition.Bonn: UNCCD.

[5] 林坚, 等. (2020). “国土空间规划的十大理论问题”. 《城市规划》, 44(8), 9-17.

[6] World Bank. (2021). Land Governance Assessment Framework. Washington, DC: World Bank.