基于2-4模型与“5831班组安全屋”模型的事故隐患治理研究

Research on Hidden Danger Management Based on 2-4 Model and “5831 Team Safety House” Model

摘要

事故隐患是滋生生产安全事故的土壤，其治理效能的强弱直接决定了企业事故防范能力。针对现有大多数企业事故隐患治理碎片化、根源分析浅表化而导致治理工作“治标不治本”，同类隐患反复出现的现状。本文将“2-4”模型与“5831班组安全屋”模型的结构化管控框架进行有机融合，构建一套“根源分析-系统治理”的双轮驱动隐患治理新模式。实现隐患治理的精准化、系统化和长效化，为提升企业的事故隐患治理水平、保障安全生产提供有力的理论与实践参考。

Abstract

Hidden dangers in production serve as the breeding ground for safety incidents, with their management effectiveness directly determining an enterprise’s accident prevention capabilities. Addressing the current situation where most enterprises adopt fragmented hidden danger management and superficial root cause analysis that leads to “treating symptoms rather than causes” while recurring similar risks, this study integrates the structured control frameworks of the “2-4” model and the “5831 Team Safety House” model. We propose a dual-driven hidden danger governance model combining “root cause analysis and systematic management”, achieving precise, systematic, and long-term hazard control. This provides valuable theoretical and practical references for enhancing corporate hidden danger management and ensuring workplace safety.

关键词

“2-4”模型 / “5831班组安全屋”模型 / 事故隐患治理

Key words

2-4 model / 5831 Team Safety House model / hidden danger governance

参考文献

[1] 谢洪岭， 董菲菲， 王明光， 等. CMS隐患排查与治理体系在企业中的应用[J]. 化工管理， 2015(25): 12-113

[2] 孙翊锋. 公共安全治理模式转型的实践路径[J]. 中国应急管理, 2023(7): 58-61

[3] 黄小勇, 李霆, 刘琦晖, 等. HFACS在实验室安全隐患分类治理的应用 [J]. 实验室研究与探索, 2024, 43(05): 250-5.

[4] 傅贵, 陈奕燃, 许素睿, 等. 事故致因“2—4”模型的内涵解析及第6版的研究 [J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(01): 12-9.

[5] 傅贵. 安全科学学及其应用探讨[J]. 安全， 2019 , 40(2): 1-9.

[6] ISO. What is a management system? [EB/0L]. [2021—09—13]. https://www.iso.org/management—system—standards.html.