吡噁唑菌酮类似物的合成及杀菌活性

白慧 ,  刘彦斐 ,  傅滨 ,  肖玉梅 ,  覃兆海

高等学校化学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (7) : 91 -103.

PDF (5455KB)
高等学校化学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (7) : 91 -103. DOI: 10.7503/cjcu20260128
研究论文

吡噁唑菌酮类似物的合成及杀菌活性

作者信息 +

Synthesis and Fungicidal Activity of Pyramoxadone Analogues

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (5585K)

摘要

基于吡噁唑菌酮(噁唑菌酮的5-位吡啶类似物)的结构, 设计合成了一系列新型噁唑烷二酮衍生物(化合物2-2~2-30). 目标化合物的结构通过核磁共振氢谱(1H NMR), 核磁共振碳谱(13C NMR)和高分辨质谱仪(HRMS)进行了表征. 采用菌丝生长速率法, 以噁唑菌酮为阳性对照, 评价了所有化合物对9种植物病原真菌的体外抑制活性. 初步筛选结果显示, 50 mg/L浓度下大多数化合物表现出中等至优异的抑制活性, 尤其对立枯丝核菌(Rhizoctonia solani)、核盘菌(Sclerotinia sclerotiorum)、灰葡萄孢(Botrytis cinerea)和稻瘟病菌(Pyricularia grisea)的抑制效果显著. 构效关系(SARs)分析结果表明, 叔丁基、环己基等大位阻基团对活性提升不利, 含氟化合物的抗真菌活性普遍增强. 化合物2-16(EC50=3.78 mg/L)和2-26(EC50=1.61 mg/L)对立枯丝核菌的抑制活性优于对照药剂噁唑菌酮(EC50=4.38 mg/L)和先导化合物吡噁唑菌酮(EC50=9.67 mg/L). 体内保护活性实验结果表明, 200 mg/L浓度下化合物2-13, 2-16和2-18对棉花立枯病的防治效果分别达到88.3%, 89.5%和81.7%, 显著优于阳性对照药. 分子对接与静电表面图分析表明, 该类化合物的构效关系遵循疏水骨架决定结合取向、静电互补决定结合强度及取代基微调决定活性高低的规律.

Abstract

A series of novel oxazolidinedione derivatives(2-2-2-30) was designed and synthesized based on the structure of pyramoxadone, a 5-position pyridine analogue of famoxadone. The target compounds were characterized by means of 1H NMR, 13C NMR and high-resolution mass spectrometry(HRMS). Their in vitro antifungal activities were evaluated against nine plant pathogenic fungi using the mycelial growth rate method, with famoxadone as a positive control. Preliminary screening at 50 mg/L revealed that most compounds exhibited moderate to excellent inhibitory activity, particularly againstRhizoctonia solani, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Botrytis cinerea, and Pyricularia grisea. Structure-activity relationship(SAR) analysis indicated that bulky groups such as tert-butyl and cyclohexyl are detrimental to the enhancement of antifungal activity, while fluorine-containing compounds generally exhibited enhanced antifungal activity. Compounds 2-16(EC50=3.78 mg/L) and 2-26(EC50=1.61 mg/L) exhibited superior activity against R. solani compared to famoxadone(EC50=4.38 mg/L) and pyramoxadone(EC50=9.67 mg/L). In vivo protective efficacy assays demonstrated that compounds 2-13, 2-16 and 2-18 provided 88.3%, 89.5% and 81.7% control against cotton damping-off at 200 mg/L, respectively, significantly outperforming the positive control. Molecular docking and electrostatic surface map analysis revealed that the SAR of this class of compounds follows a pattern where the hydrophobic skeleton determines the binding orientation, electrostatic complementarity determines the binding strength, and substituent fine-tuning determines the activity level.

关键词

噁唑菌酮 / 噁唑烷二酮 / 抑菌活性 / 构效关系 / 分子对接

Key words

Famoxadone / Oxazolidinedione / Antifungal activity / Structure-activity relationship (SAR) / Molecular docking

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
白慧,刘彦斐,傅滨,肖玉梅,覃兆海. 吡噁唑菌酮类似物的合成及杀菌活性[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2026, 47(7): 91-103 DOI:10.7503/cjcu20260128

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Sternberg J. A., Geffken D., Adams J. B. Jr., Pöstages R., Sternberg C. G., Campbell C. L., Moberg W. K., Pest Manag. Sci., 2001, 57(2), 143-152

[2]

Ampomah-Wireko M., Chen S. C., Li R. R., Gao C., Wang M., Qu Y., Kong H. T., Nininahazwe L., Zhang E., Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2024, 269, 116326

[3]

Liu P. X., Jiang Y. H., Jiao L., Luo Y. F., Wang X. D., Yang T., J. Med. Chem., 2023, 66(20), 13860-13873

[4]

Sternberg J. A., Geffken D., Adams J. B. Jr., Jordan D. B., Pötages R., Sternberg C. G., Campbell C. L., Moberg W. K., Livingston R. S., Synthesis and Chemistry of Agrochemicals, American Chemical Society: Washington DC, 1998, 686, 216-227

[5]

Xu G. F., Jia X. H., Wu X. H., Xu J., Liu X. G., Pan X. L., Li R. A., Li X. H., Dong F. S., J. Sep. Sci., 2018, 41(20), 3871-3880

[6]

Jordan D. B., Livingston R. S., Bisaha J. J., Duncan K. E., Pember S. O., Picollelli M. A., Schwartz R. S., Sternberg J. A., Tang X. S., Pestic. Sci., 1999, 55(2), 105-118

[7]

Jin B., Wang T., Chen J. Y., Liu X. Q., Zhang Y. X., Zhang X. Y., Sheng Z. L., Yang H. L., Front. Chem., 2022, 10, 949813

[8]

Gao X. G., Wen X. L., Yu C. A., Esser L., Tsao S., Quinn B., Zhang L., Yu L., Xia D., Biochemistry, 2002, 41(39), 11692-11702

[9]

Esser L., Quinn B., Li Y. F., Zhang M. Q., Elberry M., Yu L., Yu C. A., Xia D., J. Mol. Biol., 2004, 341(1), 281-302

[10]

Esser L., Zhou F., Zhou Y. H., Xiao Y. M., Tang W. K., Yu C. A., Qin Z. H., Xia, D., J. Biol. Chem., 2016, 291(48), 25019-25031

[11]

Andrieu N., Jaworska G., Genet J. L., Bompeix G., Crop Prot., 2001, 20(3), 253-260

[12]

Wang F., Li H., Wang L., Yang W. C., Wu J. W., Yang G. F., Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2011, 19(15), 4608-4615

[13]

Muthulakshmi G., Selvakumar M., Mohanapriya K., Antony V. V., Aruna K. S., Priya S. D., Devi B. D., Asian J. Res. Chem., 2025, 18(1), 105-114

[14]

Liu Y. F., Fu B., Xu Y. J., Ren B., Qin Z. H., Molecules, 2022, 27(20), 6803

[15]

Liu X. L., Yang D. Y., Yin F. H., Li J. Q., Xiao Y. M., Fu B., Qin Z. H., RSC Adv., 2020, 10(70), 42804-42809

[16]

Liu Y. F., Esser L., Bai H., Fu B., Xia D., Zhou Y. H., Hong S., Yang S. H., Xiao Y. M., Qin Z. H., J. Agric. Food Chem., 2023, 71(39), 14199-14210

[17]

Cao X. F., Li F., Hu M., Lu W. C., Yu G. A., Liu S. H., J. Agric. Food Chem., 2008, 56(23), 11367-11375

[18]

Gu B. G., Liu X. , Standard Operating Practice for Pesticide Biological Activity Test-Fungicide Roll, Chemical Industry Press, Beijing, 2016, 1-206

[19]

(顾宝根, 刘学. 农药生物活性测试标准操作规范——杀虫剂卷, 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2016, 1-206)

[20]

Yin X. D., Ma K. Y., Wang Y. L., Sun Y., Shang X. F., Zhao Z. M., Wang R. X., Chen Y. J., Zhu J. K., Liu Y. Q., J. Agric. Food Chem., 2020, 68(40), 11096-11104

[21]

Beautement K., Clough J. M., de Fraine P. J., Godfrey C. R. A., Pestic. Sci., 1991, 31(4), 499-519

[22]

Hunte C., Koepke J., Lange C., Roßmanith T., Michel H., Structure, 2000, 8(6), 669-684

[23]

Trott O., Olson A. J., J. Comput. Chem., 2010, 31(2), 455-461

[24]

Cons B. D., Twigg D. G., Kumar R., Chessari G., J. Med. Chem., 2022, 65(11), 7476-7488

[25]

Heugebaert T. S. A., Roman B. I., de Blieck A., Stevens C. V., Tetrahedron Lett., 2010, 51(32), 4189-4191

[26]

Motokura K., Tada M., Iwasawa Y., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129(31), 9540-9541

[27]

Li F., Widyan K., Wingstrand E., Moberg C., Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2009, 2009(23), 3917-3922

[28]

Kikukawa Y., Suzuki K., Sugawa M., Hirano T., Kamata K., Yamaguchi K., Mizuno N., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2012, 51(15), 3686-3690

[29]

Akber M. A., Fang X. L., Agronomy-Basel, 2024, 14(7), 1483

[30]

Pan H. Y., Li Y. L., Sun H. Y., Xiao K. Q. , J. Jilin Univ. Sci., 2025, 63(1), 253-261

[31]

(潘洪玉, 李亚岚, 孙洪宇, 肖坤钦. 吉林大学学报 (理学版), 2025, 63(1), 253-261)

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(21877125)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (5455KB)

5

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/