10份西南山区常用玉米自交系白斑病抗性鉴定及遗传多样性分析

王寒蕾 ,  唐远宗 ,  谢杰 ,  林部 ,  张习良 ,  邱红波 ,  张晓梅

山东农业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (3) : 389 -397.

PDF (6735KB)
山东农业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (3) : 389 -397. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2324.2026.03.001

10份西南山区常用玉米自交系白斑病抗性鉴定及遗传多样性分析

作者信息 +

Identification of White Spot Resistance and Genetic Diversity Analysis of 10 Commonly Used Maize Inbred Lines from Southwest Mountainous Regions

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (6895K)

摘要

本研究以10份贵州省常用玉米自交系为材料,系统评估了其对白斑病的抗性水平,并基于SSR分子标记开展了群体遗传多样性分析,旨在挖掘贵州地区玉米白斑病抗性相关遗传资源,为构建高效抗病种质体系提供基础。白斑病抗性鉴定于2022-2024年度,在云南省德宏州江东乡与勐嘎镇进行。利用69对条带清晰、稳定性好的SSR引物进行PCR扩增,运用POPGENE 32与NTSYS-2.10e软件进行遗传多样性及聚类分析。抗性鉴定结果表明,自交系T32表现为稳定高抗,自交系交51表现为高感。SSR标记分析共检测到308个等位基因,每位点平均等位基因数(Na)为4.46。群体遗传参数显示:Nei’s 基因多样性指数(H)变幅为0.320-0.860,平均值为0.680;Shannon’s 信息指数(I)变幅为0.500 4-2.025 3,平均值为1.311 2;多态性信息含量(PIC)变幅为0.320-0.860,平均值为0.678。其中,标记umc1753多态性最高。基于遗传相似系数进行聚类分析,在相似系数0.356处,S37、苏11和双M9聚为一亚类,均具有热带血缘;在0.312处,齐319、J106、郑58及QL16聚为一亚类,均具有温带血缘;在0.269处,交51与HC聚为一亚类;在0.257处,T32与其余自交系(交51和HC除外)聚为一亚类。研究结果表明,本研究所用10份自交系具有较丰富的遗传多样性,可满足玉米育种中对亲本遗传差异的需求。其中自交系T32对白斑病表现高抗,同时对灰斑病和丝黑穗病亦具一定抗性,可作为贵州地区抗病基因挖掘、杂交种改良及抗性种质创制的重点材料。

Abstract

This study systematically evaluates the resistance levels of 10 commonly used maize inbred lines in Guizhou Province to southern maize white spot and conducts a population genetic diversity analysis based on SSR molecular markers. The research aims to explore genetic resources related to southern maize white spot resistance in the Guizhou region, providing a foundation for constructing an efficient disease-resistant germplasm system. The resistance identification of southern maize white spot was carried out in Jiangdong Township and Mengga Town, Dehong Prefecture, Yunnan Province, during the 2022–2024 period. PCR amplification was performed using 69 pairs of SSR primers with clear and stable bands, and genetic diversity and cluster analyses were conducted using POPGENE 32 and NTSYS-2.10e software. The resistance identification results showed that inbred line T32 exhibited stable high resistance, while inbred line Jiao51 showed high susceptibility. SSR marker analysis detected a total of 308 alleles, with an average number of alleles per locus (Na) of 4.46. Population genetic parameters revealed the following: Nei's gene diversity index (H) ranged from 0.320 to 0.860, with an average of 0.680; Shannon's information index (I) ranged from 0.500 4 to 2.025 3, with an average of 1.311 2; and the polymorphism information content (PIC) ranged from 0.320 to 0.860, with an average of 0.678. Among these, marker umc1753 showed the highest polymorphism. Based on genetic similarity coefficients, cluster analysis was performed. At a similarity coefficient of 0.356, S37, Su11, and Shuang M9 clustered into one subgroup, all of which possess tropical ancestry. At 0.312, Qi319, J106, Zheng58, and QL16 formed another subcategory, all with temperate ancestry. At 0.269, Jiao51 and HC clustered into a subcategory. At 0.257, T32 grouped with the remaining inbred lines (except Jiao51 and HC) into a separate subcategory. The results indicate that the 10 inbred lines used in this study exhibit relatively rich genetic diversity, which can meet the demand for parental genetic variation in maize breeding. Among them, inbred line T32 shows high resistance to southern maize white spot, along with certain resistance to gray leaf spot and head smut, making it a key material for disease resistance gene mining, hybrid improvement, and resistant germplasm development in the Guizhou region.

关键词

玉米 / 自交系 / 白斑病 / SSR分子标记 / 抗性鉴定

Key words

Maize / Inbred lines / Maize white spot / SSR molecular markers / Resistance identification

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
王寒蕾,唐远宗,谢杰,林部,张习良,邱红波,张晓梅. 10份西南山区常用玉米自交系白斑病抗性鉴定及遗传多样性分析[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 57(3): 389-397 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2324.2026.03.001

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

李爱明. 优质高产玉米种植技术推广的问题及途径探讨[J]. 农业灾害研究, 2023, 13(04): 52-54.

[2]

王萍, 任金华, 李双印. 现代农业高产玉米种植技术[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2025(07): 226-228.

[3]

王红霞. 玉米白斑病的田间防治试验[J]. 特种经济动植物, 2024, 27(12): 33-35.

[4]

Chen T M, Xie Y J, Sun Q, et al. First report of Epicoccum sorghinum causing leaf sheath and leaf spot on maize in China[J]. Plant Disease, 2021, 105(12): 3741-3747.

[5]

张珊, 朱自萍, 何鹏搏, . 云南省玉米白斑病病原菌鉴定与品种田间抗性评价[J]. 植物保护学报, 2022, 49(03): 840-847.

[6]

Carson M L . Vulnerability of US maize germ plasm to phaeosphaeria leaf spot[J]. Plant Disease, 1999, 83(5): 462-464.

[7]

Girardi P D, Fernandes B N J, Kessler D S F, et al. Herança da resistência à mancha-foliar de feosféria em milho[J]. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 2002, 37(3): 329-336.

[8]

Silva H P, Roberto M J . Diallel analysis of maize resistance to phaeosphaeria maydis[J]. Scientia Agricola, 2004, 61(1): 1-16.

[9]

Derera J, Tongoona P, Vivek B S, et al. Gene action determining phaeosphaeria leaf spot disease resistance in experimental maize hybrids[J]. South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 2007, 24(3): 138-143.

[10]

Sibiya J . Breeding investigations for resistance to phaeosphaeria leaf spot (PLS) and other important foliar diseases and a study of yield stability in African maize germplasm[D]. KwaZulu-Natal : University of KwaZulu-Natal, 2009.

[11]

Guimarães P D S, Paterniani M E A G Z, Dudienas C, et al. Capacidade combinatória para resistência à mancha branca em linhagens endogâmicas de milho[J]. Summa Phytopathologica, 2009, 35(4): 282-287.

[12]

Camargos R B, Souza J C D, Alves E, et al. Evaluation of maize hybrids tolerant to phaeosphaeria leaf spot gray leaf spot and common rust and yield[J]. Revista Brasileira De Milho E Sorgo, 2017, 16(1): 72-81.

[13]

冉腾飞. 玉米抗白斑病资源筛选与转录组学解析耐性机制[D].贵阳:贵州大学, 2024.

[14]

Wang D, He Y, Nie L, et al. Integrated IBD analysis, GWAS analysis and transcriptome analysis to identify the candidate genes for white spot disease in maize[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2023, 24(12): 10005.

[15]

何雨航, 何鹏搏, 张珊, . 山东玉米白斑病鉴定及我国白斑病发生流行风险分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2024, 32(08): 120-126.

[16]

张仕伟, 马艳, 杨丽, . 巍山县不同玉米品种田间白斑病抗病性评价[J]. 云南农业科技, 2024(05): 67-70.

[17]

宗明磊. 玉米品种对白斑病的抗性评价及化学防控技术研究[D].昆明: 云南农业大学, 2023.

[18]

王晓鸣, 晋齐鸣, 石洁, . 玉米病害发生现状与推广品种抗性对未来病害发展的影响[J]. 植物病理学报, 2006(01): 1-11.

[19]

董怀玉, 姜钰, 王丽娟, . 玉米种质资源抗灰斑病鉴定与评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2005(04): 441-443.

[20]

Saghai-Maroof M A, Biyashev R M, Yang G P, et al. Extraordinarily polymorphic microsatellite DNA in barley: Species diversity, chromosomal locations, and population dynamics[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 1994, 91(12): 5466-5470.

[21]

Wang C Y, Ji W Q, Zhang G S, et al. SSR makers and preliminary chromosomal location of a powdery mildew resistance gene in common wheat germplasm N9134[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007, 33(1): 163-166.

[22]

谭康, 李春红, 杨梅, . 10份贵州常用玉米自交系丝黑穗病抗性鉴定及遗传多样性分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 2019, 50(11): 2384-2391.

[23]

王栋. 基于全基因组选择的玉米白斑病抗性区段挖掘与评价[D].贵阳:贵州大学, 2024.

[24]

Chen Z, Zhu Y, Wang A, et al. Effects of reciprocal recurrent selection ongrain yield in two tropical-temperate maize synthetic populations Tuxpeño-Reid andSuwan-Lancaster[J]. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2019, 10(2): 298-308.

[25]

郭向阳, 陈泽辉, 祝云芳, . 贵州省玉米种质和杂种优势模式的演化[J]. 种子, 2015, 34(05): 75-79.

[26]

陈泽辉, 祝云芳, 王安贵, . 玉米 Tuxpeno-Reid 和 Suwan-Lancaster 合成群体相互轮回选择效果及杂种优势研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2013, 21(04): 1-5+10.

[27]

Fato P, Derera J, Tongoona P, et al. Heterotic orientation of tropical maizeinbred lines towards populations ZM523 and Suwan-1 under downy mildew infestation[J]. Euphytica, 2012, 187(3): 381-392.

[28]

Wang D, He Y, Nie L, et al. Integrated IBD analysis, GWAS analysis and transcriptome analysis to identify the candidate genes for white spot disease in maize[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2023, 24(12): 10005.

[29]

毛双林, 谢彬, 顾勇, . 四川省玉米品种DNA 指纹检测及遗传多样性分析[J]. 种子, 2024, 43(04): 136-140.

[30]

刘少荣, 杨扬, 田红丽, . 基于农艺及品质性状与SSR标记的青贮玉米品种遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2362-2370.

[31]

程宇坤, 白建荣, 李锐, . 山西省86 个审定玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 山西农业科学, 2018, 46(04): 487-493.

[32]

赵文明, 王森, 陈艳萍, . 基于60 个核心SSR 标记的糯玉米自交系遗传多样性分析[J]. 江西农业学报, 2018, 30(12): 1-8.

[33]

胡萍, 杨恩琼, 施文娟, . 贵州108份地方玉米品种的SSR遗传多样性分析[J] 种子, 2012, 31(09): 61-65.

[34]

常宏兵, 王晨, 何美敬, . 60 份玉米种质资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(04): 1162-1168.

[35]

刘海忠, 宋炜, 王宝强, . 120份欧美玉米自交系的遗传多样性分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2018, 19(04): 676-684.

[36]

徐立明, 吴锋锴, 冷益丰. 基于SSR标记的29份玉米自交系遗传多样性分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2025, 53(03): 44-48.

[37]

申涛. 玉米自交系T32 抗丝黑穗病主效QTL 的精细定位[D].贵阳:贵州大学, 2022.

[38]

蒋滔. 玉米抗灰斑病主效QTL-qGLS8候选基因的功能鉴定与分析[D].贵阳:贵州大学, 2023.

[39]

张志. 玉米抗灰斑病基因QTL-qGLS4的精细定位与候选基因预测分析[D].贵阳: 贵州大学, 2023.

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(32560488)

贵州省粮油作物优质高效增产全省重点实验室(黔科合平台 ZSYS [2025]037)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (6735KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/