振动碾压作用下煤矸石路基压实规律及施工参数优化研究

任喆 ,  李玫颍 ,  张锐 ,  柳洪源 ,  黄林璇 ,  郑义科 ,  张健

山东农业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4) : 708 -720.

PDF (18481KB)
山东农业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4) : 708 -720. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2324.2026.04.012

振动碾压作用下煤矸石路基压实规律及施工参数优化研究

作者信息 +

Compaction Law and Construction Parameter Optimization of Coal Gangue Roadbed under Vibration Rolling

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (18923K)

摘要

煤矸石作为路基填料可实现资源化利用与成本控制,但其振动碾压压实效果与施工参数间的关联规律尚不明确。本文通过理论分析与离散元模拟相结合的方法,系统研究了碾压参数对压实效果的影响规律。通过理论推导,建立了碾压能量与施工参数的数学模型,揭示了平均沉降量 Z与行驶速度 v呈负相关关系,与激振频率 f和单次最大沉降 Z0呈正相关关系。 Z0由压实能量 W决定,而 W与激振力及碾压轮自重呈正相关。基于正交试验设计,使用PFC2D离散元软件对路基振动碾压进行数值模拟,结果表明:激振力从100 kN增至250 kN,经10遍碾压后干密度增长0.09 g/cm³,孔隙率下降8%;激振频率从20 Hz增至50 Hz,干密度增长0.06 g/cm³,孔隙率下降6.3%;行驶速度从1 m/s增至2.5 m/s,干密度下降0.03 g/cm³,孔隙率上升1.5%;松铺厚度从30 cm增至45 cm,干密度下降0.06 g/cm3,孔隙率上升4.7%,表现为激振力、激振频率与压实效果正相关,行驶速度、松铺厚度与压实效果负相关的变化规律。通过极差、方差分析得出影响碾压沉降率最关键的因素为松铺厚度,其次为激振力,而行驶速度、激振频率对碾压沉降率的影响较小。煤矸石路基最优碾压施工参数为松铺厚度35 cm、行驶速度2 m/s、激振频率40 Hz和激振力150 kN。研究结论可为提高煤矸石路基施工质量和效率以及促进煤矸石等矿业废弃物的资源化利用提供一定依据。

Abstract

Coal gangue can be used as a roadbed filler to achieve resource utilization and cost control. However, the correlation between its vibration compaction effect and construction parameters remains unclear. This study systematically investigates the influence of rolling parameters on the compaction effect by combining theoretical analysis with discrete element simulation. Firstly, it establishes a mathematical model of rolling energy and construction parameters by theoretical derivation. The results reveal that the average settlement Z exhibits a negative correlation with the driving speed v, and a positive correlation with both the excitation frequency f and the single maximum settlement Z0. Furthermore, Z0 is governed by the compaction energy W, which in turn shows a positive correlation with the excitation force and the roller weight. Based on orthogonal test design, the vibration rolling of subgrade is simulated by PFC2D discrete element software. The results show that when the excitation force increases from 100 kN to 250 kN, the dry density increases by 0.09 g/cm3 and the porosity decreases by 8% after 10 rolling passes. When the excitation frequency increases from 20 Hz to 50 Hz, the dry density increases by 0.06 g/cm3, and the porosity decreases by 6.3%. When the driving speed increases from 1 m/s to 2.5 m/s, the dry density decreases by 0.03 g/cm3, and the porosity increases by 1.5%. When the loose laying thickness increases from 30 cm to 45 cm, the dry density decreases by 0.06 g/cm3, and the porosity increases by 4.7%. This indicates a positive correlation between excitation force, excitation frequency, and compaction effectiveness, and a negative correlation between driving speed, loose laying thickness and compaction effect. Furthermore, through range and variance analysis, it is concluded that the most critical factor affecting the rolling settlement rate is loose laying thickness, followed by excitation force, while driving speed and excitation frequency have relatively minor effects. The optimal compaction construction parameters of coal gangue subgrade are a loose laying thickness of 35 cm, a driving speed of 2 m/s, an excitation frequency of 40 Hz, and an excitation force of 150 kN. The conclusions of this research can provide a basis for improving the construction quality and efficiency of coal gangue roadbed and promoting the resource utilization of mining waste such as coal gangue.

关键词

煤矸石 / 路基 / 振动碾压 / PFC 2D / 压实施工

Key words

Coal gangue / roadbed / vibration rolling / PFC 2D / compaction construction

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
任喆,李玫颍,张锐,柳洪源,黄林璇,郑义科,张健. 振动碾压作用下煤矸石路基压实规律及施工参数优化研究[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 57(4): 708-720 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2324.2026.04.012

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

张华林, 赵梦飞, 江晓亮, 等. 煤矸石改性方法及其资源环境利用研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2024, 82(05): 527-540.

[2]

王长龙, 郑永超, 刘世昌, 等. 煤矸石铁尾矿制备微晶玻璃的微观结构和力学性能[J]. 稀有金属材料与工程, 2015, 44(S1): 234-238.

[3]

李 康, 孟少伟,李 曼, 等. 煤矿固体废弃物的危害与治理[J]. 能源与节能, 2024(09): 91-94.

[4]

Li R,Yao J,Liu J, et al. Impact of steel slag, gypsum, and coal gangue on microbial immobilization of metal(loid)s in non-ferrous mine waste dumps[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2024, 480: 135750.

[5]

王彬宇,李 莉,李 菁, 等. 用工业固体废料合成沸石分子筛的研究进展[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(01): 40-59.

[6]

任连伟, 李 波, 邹友峰, 等. 废弃蒸压砌块与煤矸石在煤矿采空区地基加固中的试验研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2023, 51(11): 51-62.

[7]

郝洪顺, 徐利华,翟 玮, 等. 硅铝系固体废弃物合成Sialon 材料的研究进展[J]. 无机材料学报, 2010, 25(11): 1121-1127.

[8]

Wen P H, Wang C H, Chen M, et al. Engineering property evaluation and multiobjective parameter optimization of argillaceous gangue-filled subgrade based on grey relational analysis[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2023, 35(4): 04023007.

[9]

仝 佳. 煤矸石的路用性能及路基填筑施工技术[J]. 石材, 2024(07): 126-128.

[10]

Li L H, Long G C, Bai C N, et al. Utilization of coal gangue aggregate for railway roadbed construction in practice[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(11): 4583.

[11]

刘 晶, 刘生涛. 煤矸石的路用性能及其在路基填筑施工中的应用[J]. 黑龙江科学, 2024, 15(02): 100-102.

[12]

Ashfaq M, Lal H M, Moghal B A A, et al. Carbon footprint analysis of coal gangue in geotechnical engineering applications[J]. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 2019,(prepublish): 1-9.

[13]

Li J M, Huang Y L, Ouyang S Y, et al. Transparent characterization and quantitative analysis of broken gangue's 3D fabric under the bearing compression[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2022, 32(2): 335-345.

[14]

Chen Y, Jaksa M B, Kuo Y L, et al. Numerical investigation of the performance of the 3-sided impact roller[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2023, 157: 105331.

[15]

Bradley A C, Jaksa M B, Kuo Y L, et al. Finite element modelling of rolling dynamic compaction[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2023, 157: 105275.

[16]

Yang X, Zhang Y, Li Z. Embankment displacement PLAXIS simulation and microstructural behavior of treated-coal gangue[J]. Minerals, 2020, 10(3): 218- 218.

[17]

李文炜, 占鑫杰, 王保田, 等. 冲击碾压加固松散堰塞坝料的细观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(08): 2297-2307.

[18]

Song G Y, Hui B, Cui Y J, et al. Analysis of pH and conductivity variation characteristics of coal gangue used inFreeway subgrade and its correlation[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 632(2): 022010.

[19]

朱 晟, 卢知是,刘 纯, 等. 堆石体现场振动压实试验研究与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(09): 2569-2577.

[20]

Shen P, Lin S. Mathematic modeling and chaotic identification for practice construction in vibratory compacting[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering and Technologies, 2018, 6(1): 1-13.

[21]

徐红星, 周 飞. 高速铁路路基碾压三维有限元仿真分析[J]. 路基工程, 2007(06): 115-116.

[22]

Beainy F, Commuri S, Zaman M, et al. Viscoelastic-plastic model of asphalt-roller interaction[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2013, 13(5): 581-594.

[23]

Cundall P A, Strack O D L. A discrete numericalmodel for granular assemblies[J]. Geotechnique, 1979, 29(1): 47-65.

[24]

Zhou W, Yang L, Ma G, et al. DEM modeling of shear bands in crushable and irregularly shaped granular materials[J]. Granular Matter, 2017, 19(2): 1-12.

[25]

王大群, 秦金桥. 基于颗粒流程序的土石混合料振动压实特性数值分析[J]. 路基工程, 2020(05): 99-104.

[26]

李 杨, 佘成学, 朱焕春. 现场堆石体振动碾压的颗粒流模拟及验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 432-442.

[27]

顾晓强, 梁玉珍, 周奇辉, 等. 白鹤滩水电站高填方工程砾石填料的物理力学特性[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 50(04): 528-536.

[28]

周 忠, 秦长国, 徐永福, 等. 宕渣路堤碾压过程的数值模拟[J]. 中外公路, 2008, 28(06): 45-49.

[29]

徐 平, 何嘉雄, 乔世范, 等. 基于离散元法的块石填料摊铺层振动压实过程及效应研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2025, 36(01): 163-173.

[30]

He W J L, Gong M Q. PFC's application on the dynamic response analysis of high speed railway ballastless subgrade[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 2973(505-506): 9-14.

[31]

郭丽丽. 尾矿库地震动力响应分析中的阻尼问题研究[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2016.

[32]

张世英. 关于振动压路机设计中土的参数的确定方法[J]. 工程机械, 1998(01): 5-8+ 49.

[33]

王钕承. 高填方路堤强夯法施工数值模拟及力学分析[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2019.2.

[34]

母坤霖. 振动压路机压实质量检测系统研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2021.

[35]

张 革,曹 玲, 王成汤. 考虑各向异性影响的冻土修正线性黏结接触模型开发及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 645-654.

[36]

王鹏程, 刘建坤,李 旭, 等. 双轴压缩条件下碎石集料静力剪切特性研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2014, 36(06): 87-92.

[37]

崔晓艳,庄 妍, 张希栋, 等. 循环荷载下桩承式路堤中土拱效应动力折减系数离散元研究[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 49(09): 164-172.

[38]

史旦达. 单调与循环加荷条件下砂土力学性质细观模拟[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2007.

[39]

Jacob C . Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences[M].UK: Taylor and Francis, 2013-05-13.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (18481KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉