数据驱动多层网络上传染病监测策略的效果评估

蔡云逸 ,  王睿潇 ,  余兰兰 ,  王唯一 ,  蔡世民 ,  刘权辉

电子科技大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (2) : 312 -320.

PDF (1471KB)
电子科技大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (2) : 312 -320. DOI: 10.12178/1001-0548.2024356
生物信息

数据驱动多层网络上传染病监测策略的效果评估

作者信息 +

Evaluating infectious disease surveillance on data-driven multilayer networks

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1506K)

摘要

当前传染病监测策略的效果评估研究主要基于单层网络建模,未能充分考虑真实接触模式的多层性以及传染病的流行病学特征。该文采用包含症前感染与无症状状态的机制模型刻画疾病状态转变,并用真实感染数据估计模型参数,开展了基于数据驱动多层网络上的传染病监测策略研究。从早期时滞、波峰时延、波峰比率3个维度评估不同监测策略的效果,同时提出了兼顾接触权重与流行病学特征的集体影响策略。结果表明,经典策略在数据驱动多层网络上仅能提前约3天感知疫情,而考虑网络结构的策略可将感知时间提升至7天。相比之下,集体影响策略能提前约14天感知疫情,且该策略受监测子集规模影响较小,具有鲁棒性。

Abstract

Current infectious disease surveillance studies often overlook the multi-layered nature of real-world contacts and disease characteristics. This paper presents a data-driven, multi-layer network approach that models disease transitions including pre-symptomatic and asymptomatic states and uses real infection data to estimate model parameters. The effectiveness of different monitoring strategies is evaluated from three dimensions of early latency, peak delay, and peak ratio. Subsequently, a collective influence strategy that takes into account both contact weights and epidemiological features is proposed. Findings show that traditional strategies can detect outbreaks about 3 days earlier, the strategies accounting for network structure can advance this to 7 days. In contrast, our proposed collective influence strategy can predict outbreaks up to 14 days in advance, demonstrating robustness to the size of the surveillance subset.

关键词

数据驱动 / 疾病监测 / 多层复杂网络 / 集体影响

Key words

data-driven / disease surveillance / multilayer complex network / collective influence

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
蔡云逸,王睿潇,余兰兰,王唯一,蔡世民,刘权辉. 数据驱动多层网络上传染病监测策略的效果评估[J]. 电子科技大学学报, 2026, 55(2): 312-320 DOI:10.12178/1001-0548.2024356

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

DI MARCO M, BAKER M, DASZAK P, et al. Sustainable development must account for pandemic risk[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2020, 117(8): 3888-3892.

[2]

孙皓宸, 刘肖凡, 许小可, . 基于连续感染模型的新冠肺炎疫情校园传播与防控策略分析[J]. 物理学报, 2020, 69(24): 74-83.

[3]

SUN H C, LIU X F, XU X K, et al. Analysis of COVID—19 spreading and prevention strategy in schools based on continuous infection model[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(24): 74-83.

[4]

KRETZSCHMAR M, ROZHNOVA G, BOOTSMA M, et al. Impact of delays on effectiveness of contact tracing stratgies for COVID—19: A modelling study[J]. The Lancet Public Health, 2020, 5(9): e452-e459.

[5]

HELLEWELL J, ABBOTT S, GIMMA A, et al. Feasibility of controlling COVID—19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts[J]. The Lancet Global Health, 2020, 8(5): e488-e496.

[6]

BUBAR K M, REINHOLT K, KISSLER S M, et al. Model—informed COVID—19 vaccine prioritization strategies by age and serostatus[J]. Science, 2021, 371(6532): 916-921.

[7]

ALETA A, MARTIN C, PASTORE Y P, et al. Modelling the impact of testing, contact tracing and household quarantine on second waves of COVID—19[J]. Nature Human Behaviour, 2020, 4(9): 964-971.

[8]

CHUNG S, MARLOW S, TOBIAS N, et al. Lessons from countries implementing find, test, trace, isolation and support policies in the rapid response of the COVID—19 pandemic: A systematic review[J]. BMJ Open, 2021, 11(3): e047832.

[9]

中国疾病预防控制中心 . 传染病预警与追踪系统 [EB/OL]. [2024—11—01]. https://www.phsciencedata.cn/warn1/index.jsp.

[10]

Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Infectious disease warning and tracking system [EB/OL]. [2024—11—01]. https://www.phsciencedata.cn/warn1/index.jsp.

[11]

CARNEIRO H A, MYLONAKIS E. Google trends: A web—based tool for real—time surveillance of disease outbreaks[J]. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2009, 49(10): 1557-1564.

[12]

BRONIATOWSKI D A, PAUL M J, DREDZE M. National and local influenza surveillance through Twitter: An analysis of the 2012—2013 influenza epidemic[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(12): e83672.

[13]

BOULOS M N K, SANFILIPPO A P, CORLEY C D, et al. Social web mining and exploitation for serious applications: Technosocial predictive analytics and related technologies for public health, environmental and national security surveillance[J]. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2010, 100(1): 16-23.

[14]

YUAN Q, NSOESIE E O, LYU B, et al. Monitoring influenza epidemics in China with search query from Baidu[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(5): e64323.

[15]

SALATHÉ M, JONES J H. Dynamics and control of diseases in networks with community structure[J]. PLoS Computational Biology, 2010, 6(4): e1000736.

[16]

MAY R M, LLOYD A L. Infection dynamics on scale—free networks[J]. Physical Review E, 2001, 64(6): 066112.

[17]

NEWMAN M E J. Spread of epidemic disease on networks[J]. Physical Review E, 2002, 66(1): 016128.

[18]

COHEN R, HAVLIN S, BENA D. Efficient immunization strategies for computer networks and populations[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2003, 91(24): 247901.

[19]

WANG Z, BAUCH C, BHATTACHARYYA S, et al. Statistical physics of vaccination[J]. Physics Reports, 2016, 664: 1-113.

[20]

CHRISTAKIS N A, FOWLER J H. Social network sensors for early detection of contagious outbreaks[J]. PLoS One, 2010, 5(9): e12948.

[21]

SMIESZEK T, SALATHÉ M. A low—cost method to assess the epidemiological importance of individuals in controlling infectious disease outbreaks[J]. BMC Medicine, 2013, 11: 1-8.

[22]

HERRERA J L, SRINIVASAN R, BROWNSTEIN J S, et al. Disease surveillance on complex social networks[J]. PLoS Computational Biology, 2016, 12(7): e1004928.

[23]

BAI Y, YANG B, LIN L, et al. Optimizing sentinel surveillance in temporal network epidemiology[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 4804.

[24]

BROWNE A, BUTTS D, JARAMILLOR E, et al. Evaluating disease surveillance strategies for early outbreak detection in contact networks with varying community structure[J]. Social Networks, 2024, 79: 122-132.

[25]

MOSSONG J, HENS N, JIT M, et al. Social contacts and mixing patterns relevant to the spread of infectious diseases[J]. PLoS Medicine, 2008, 5(3): e74.

[26]

LIU Q, AJELLI M, ALETA A, et al. Measurability of the epidemic reproduction number in data—driven contact networks[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018, 115(50): 12680-12685.

[27]

TINDALE L, STOCKDALE J, COOMBE M, et al. Evidence for transmission of COVID—19 prior to symptom onset[J]. eLife, 2020, 9: e57149.

[28]

WEI W, LI Z, HIEW CJ, et al. Presymptomatic transmission of SARS—CoV—2[J]. Journal Watch Infectious Diseases, 2020, 23(6): 58.

[29]

国家统计局 . 微观家庭调查报告 [EB/OL]. [2024—12—01]. http://www.tcdc.sem.tsinghua.edu.cn/info/1098/1257.htm.

[30]

National Bureau of Statistics of China . Micro household survey report [EB/OL]. [2024—12—01]. http://www.tcdc.sem.tsinghua.edu.cn/info/1098/1257.htm.

[31]

国家统计局 . 第七次人口普查报告 [EB/OL]. [2024—11—01]. https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/pcsj/rkpc/7rp/indexch.htm.

[32]

National Bureau of Statistics of China . The seventh national population census report [EB/OL]. [2024—11—01]. https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/pcsj/rkpc/7rp/indexch.htm.

[33]

CAI Y, WANG W, YU L, et al. Assessing the effectiveness of test—trace—isolate interventions using a multi—layered temporal network[J]. Infectious Disease Modelling, 2025, 10(3): 775-786.

[34]

ZHANG J, KLEPAC P, READ J, et al. Patterns of human social contact and contact with animals in Shanghai, China[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9: 15141.

[35]

GUO D, LI K, PETERS T, et al. Multi—scale modeling for the transmission of influenza and the evaluation of interventions toward it[J]. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5: 8980.

[36]

MISTRY D, LITVINOVA M, PIONTTI A P Y, et al. Inferring high—resolution human mixing patterns for disease modeling[J]. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 323.

[37]

LIU Q, ZHANG J, PENG C, et al. Model—based evaluation of alternative reactive class closure strategies against COVID—19[J]. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 322.

[38]

HESTERBERG T. Bootstrap[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2011, 3(6): 497-526.

[39]

ZHANG K, XIA Z, HUANG S, et al. Evaluating the impact of test—trace—isolate for COVID—19 management and alternative strategies[J]. PLoS Computational Biology, 2023, 19(6): e1011423.

[40]

NEWMAN M E J. Random graphs with clustering[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2009, 103(5): 058701.

[41]

KERR C, STUART R, MISTRY D, et al. Covasim: An agent—based model of COVID—19 dynamics and interventions[J]. PLoS Computational Biology, 2021, 17(7): e1009149.

[42]

HU S, WANG W, WANG Y, et al. Infectivity, susceptibility, and risk factors associated with SARS—CoV—2 transmission under intensive contact tracing in Hunan, China[J]. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 1533.

[43]

SUN K, WANG W, GAO L, et al. Transmission heterogeneities, kinetics, and controllability of SARS—CoV—2[J]. Science, 2021, 371(6526): eabe2424.

[44]

DE DOMENICO M, SOLÉ—RIBALTA A, OMODEI E, et al. Ranking in interconnected multilayer networks reveals versatile nodes[J]. Nature Communications, 2015, 6(1): 6868.

[45]

MORONE F, MAKSE H A. Influence maximization in complex networks through optimal percolation[J]. Nature, 2015, 524(7563): 65-68.

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(62373264)

国家自然科学基金(T2293771)

四川省自然科学基金(2025ZNSFSC0473)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1471KB)

356

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/