替尔泊肽治疗超重/肥胖的系统评价与药物经济学分析

耿宏业, 李俐萱, 陆成远, 王淑玲

中国新药杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (13) : 1447 -1456.

PDF (1938KB)
中国新药杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (13) : 1447 -1456. DOI: 10.20251/j.cnki.1003-3734.2026.13.015
药物安全与合理应用

替尔泊肽治疗超重/肥胖的系统评价与药物经济学分析

    耿宏业, 李俐萱, 陆成远, 王淑玲*
作者信息 +

Systematic review and pharmacoeconomic evaluation of tirzepatide for the treatment of overweight/obesity

    GENG Hong-ye, LI Li-xuan, LU Cheng-yuan, WANG Shu-ling*
Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1984K)

摘要

目的: 评估替尔泊肽治疗超重/肥胖的有效性、安全性和经济性。方法: 采用网状Meta分析(network Meta-analysis,NMA)综合比较替尔泊肽与司美格鲁肽治疗超重/肥胖的疗效,并采用成本效果分析进行药物经济学评价。结果: 系统检索14项随机对照试验。NMA显示,疗效上替尔泊肽组的减重幅度[均数差(mean difference,MD)=-6.50%,95%CI:-8.13%~-4.87%]、腰围缩减(MD=-5.40%)及体质量降幅>15%的达标率[风险比(relative risk,RR)=1.28均显著优于司美格鲁肽组(P<0.001)],但血糖控制无统计学差异。安全性方面,两组胃肠道不良事件总体发生率相近,替尔泊肽的呕吐风险更低(RR=0.70,95%CI:0.55~0.89)。药物经济学结果显示,增量成本效果比(incremental cost-effectiveness ratio,ICER)值为87 714.55元,远低于意愿支付阈值,说明替尔泊肽相比于司美格鲁肽更具有经济性。结论: 替尔泊肽的减重疗效和经济性均显著优于司美格鲁肽,未来需进一步验证其长期安全性。

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and economics of tirzepatide in the treatment of overweight/obesity. Methods: A comprehensive comparison of the efficacy of tirzepatide and semaglutide in the treatment of overweight/obesity was performed using reticulated Meta-analysis (NMA), and cost-effectiveness analysis was used for pharmacoeconomic evaluation. Results: A total of 14 randomized controlled trials were searched. The NMA showed that for efficacy, the tirzepatide group was significantly better than the simelglutide group in terms of weight loss (MD=-6.50%, 95%CI: -8.13% to -4.87%), waist circumference reduction (MD=-5.40%), and the attainment rate of >15% weight loss (RR=1.28) (P<0.001), but the glycemic control was not statistically different. For safety, the overall incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events was similar in both groups, with a lower risk of vomiting with telbivudine (RR=0.70, 95%CI: 0.55~0.89). For the pharmacoeconomics, the ICER value of 87 714.55 yuan was well below the willingness-to-pay threshold, suggesting that tirzepatide was more cost-effective compared with semaglutide. Conclusion: The weight loss efficacy and economy of tirzepatide are significantly better than those of semaglutide, and its long-term safety needs to be further verified in the future.    

关键词

肥胖/超重 / 替尔泊肽 / 司美格鲁肽 / 网状Meta分析 / 系统评价 / 药物经济学评价

Key words

obesity/overweight / tirzepatide / semaglutide / network Meta-analysis / systematic review / pharmacoeconomic evaluation

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
耿宏业, 李俐萱, 陆成远, 王淑玲. 替尔泊肽治疗超重/肥胖的系统评价与药物经济学分析[J]. 中国新药杂志, 2026, 35(13): 1447-1456 DOI:10.20251/j.cnki.1003-3734.2026.13.015

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 成人体重判定: WS/T 428-2013[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2013.
[2] 世界肥胖联盟. 2024年世界肥胖报告[S]. 伦敦: 世界肥胖联盟, 2024: 10-12, 22.
[3] XIAO N, DING Y, CUI B, et al. Navigating obesity: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, pathophysiology, complications and management strategies[J]. Innov Med, 2024, 2(3): 100090.
[4] 朱洁云, 朱良峰, 潘冬赞, 等. 奥利司他治疗超重和肥胖2型糖尿病疗效和安全性的Meta分析[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2022, 22(9): 1020-1026.
[5] 黎秋萍, 郝小庆, 刘松. 胃肠道脂肪酶抑制剂治疗肥胖的药理药效研究进展: 以奥利司他为例[J]. 中国现代应用药学, 2022, 39(17): 2287-2292.
[6] 赵亚聪, 王晨, 狄建忠. GLP-1受体激动剂类药物在肥胖治疗中的研究现状[EB/OL].(2025-01-15)[2025-08-10].https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003722.
[7] PAGE MJ, MCKENZIE JE, BOSSUYT PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews[J]. BMJ, 2021, 372: n71.
[8] HUTTON B, SALANTI G, CALDWELL DM, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2015, 162(11): 777-784.
[9] 国家卫生健康委员会肥胖症诊疗指南编写委员会. 肥胖症诊疗指南(2024年版)[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2025, 40(1): 6-30.
[10] STERNE JAC, SAVOVIC J, PAGE MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials[J]. BMJ, 2019, 366: l4898.
[11] 李幼平. Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册(原书第5.1.0版)[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2011: 467-476.
[12] 中国药学会. 中国药物经济学评价指南2020: T/CPHARMA 003-2020[S]. 北京: 中国药学会, 2020.
[13] FITZGERALD S, MURPHY A, KIRBY A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a complex workplace dietary intervention: an economic evaluation of the Food Choice at Work study[J]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(3): e019182.
[14] ASSOCIATION AD. obesity management for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: Standards of medical care in diabetes-2020[J]. Diabetes Care, 2020, 43(Suppl 1): S89-S97.
[15] ALSHAHAWEY M, GHAZY M, EL MORSHEDY M, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of once-weekly semaglutide vs. once-daily liraglutide administered subcutaneously in patients with overweight and obesity: a decision analysis[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2024, 28(9): 3365-3374.
[16] ARONNE LJ, SATTAR N, HORN DB, et al. Continued treatment with tirzepatide for maintenance of weight reduction in adults with obesity: the SURMOUNT-4 randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2024, 331(1): 38-48.
[17] BUTLER J, SHAH SJ, PETRIE MC, et al. Semaglutide versus placebo in people with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pooled analysis of the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM randomised trials[J]. Lancet, 2024, 403(10437): 1635-1648.
[18] DAVIES M, FÆRCH L, JEPPESEN OK, et al. Semaglutide 2·4 Mg once a week in adults with overweight or obesity, and type 2 diabetes (STEP 2): a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet, 2021, 397(10278): 971-984.
[19] GARVEY WT, FRIAS JP, JASTREBOFF AM, et al. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity in people with type 2 diabetes (SURMOUNT-2): a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet, 2023, 402(10402): 613-626.
[20] GU WJ, LU YB, YE XH, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 Mg for weight management in participants from China: a prespecified analysis of the STEP 7 randomized clinical trial[J]. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2025, 27(5): 2540-2551.
[21] JASTREBOFF AM, ARONNE LJ, AHMAD NN, et al. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity[J]. N Engl J Med, 2022, 387(3): 205-216.
[22] MCGOWAN BM, BRUUN JM, CAPEHORN M, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide 2·4 Mg versus placebo in people with obesity and prediabetes (STEP 10): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2024, 12(9): 631-642.
[23] MU YM, BAO XL, ELIASCHEWITZ FG, et al. Efficacy and safety of once weekly semaglutide 2·4 Mg for weight management in a predominantly East Asian population with overweight or obesity (STEP 7): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2024, 12(3): 184-195.
[24] ARONNE LJ, HORN DB, LE ROUX CW, et al. Tirzepatide as compared with semaglutide for the treatment of obesity[J]. N Engl J Med, 2025, 393(1): 26-36.
[25] RUBINO D, ABRAHAMSSON N, DAVIES M, et al. Effect of continued weekly subcutaneous semaglutide vs placebo on weight loss maintenance in adults with overweight or obesity: the STEP 4 randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2021, 325(14): 1414-1425.
[26] WADDEN TA, BAILEY TS, BILLINGS LK, et al. Effect of subcutaneous semaglutide vs placebo as an adjunct to intensive behavioral therapy on body weight in adults with overweight or obesity: the STEP 3 randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2021, 325(14): 1403-1413.
[27] WADDEN TA, CHAO AM, MACHINENI S, et al. Tirzepatide after intensive lifestyle intervention in adults with overweight or obesity: the SURMOUNT-3 phase 3 trial[J]. Nat Med, 2023, 29(11): 2909-2918.
[28] WILDING JPH, BATTERHAM RL, CALANNA S, et al. Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity[J]. N Engl J Med, 2021, 384(11): 989-1002.
[29] ZHAO L, CHENG ZF, LU YB, et al. Tirzepatide for weight reduction in Chinese adults with obesity: the SURMOUNT-CN randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2024, 332(7): 551-560.

基金资助

辽宁省研究生教育教学改革研究资助项目(LNYJG2024253);辽宁省教育科学“十四五”规划2024年度课题立项名单项目(JG24DB452)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1938KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/