支持医保知证决策的肺癌新药多维价值评估框架

潘晨, 李逸天, 许钦雯, 孟静怡, 王国华, 耿劲松

中国新药杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (19) : 2061 -2066.

PDF (739KB)
中国新药杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (19) : 2061 -2066. DOI: 10.20251/j.cnki.1003-3734.2026.19.006
新药述评与论坛

支持医保知证决策的肺癌新药多维价值评估框架

    潘晨1, 李逸天1, 许钦雯1,2, 孟静怡1, 王国华3, 耿劲松1*
作者信息 +

Multidimensional value assessment framework for new anti-lung cancer drugs to support evidence-informed medical insurance decision-making

    PAN Chen1, LI Yi-tian1, XU Qin-wen1,2, MENG Jing-yi1, WANG Guo-hua3, GENG Jin-song1*
Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (756K)

摘要

目的: 构建肺癌新药的多维价值评估框架,以支持医保报销的知证决策。方法: 检索并获取评估肺癌新药价值的相关文献,通过文献分析和专题小组讨论初步构建框架。采用德尔菲法确定准则、子准则及权重以及价值评估方法。通过3种肺癌新药的价值评估验证框架的可行性。结果: 构建的肺癌新药多维价值评估框架由5个核心准则、2个情境化准则以及20个子准则组成。核心准则包含相对有效性、相对安全性、可负担性、经济性和证据质量,其中相对有效性具有最高的权重。在核心准则的子准则中,总生存期和无进展生存期具有最高的权重。情境化准则包括创新性和公平性。结论: 结构化的多维价值评估框架为医保决策者提供了决策支持工具,有助于提升决策的科学性和透明度。

Abstract

Objective: To construct a multidimensional value assessment framework for novel drugs for lung cancer, thereby supporting evidence-informed decision-making for medical insurance reimbursement. Methods: First, literature on the value assessment of novel drugs for lung cancer was searched and reviewed. Based on a literature review and a focus group discussion, the framework was preliminarily constructed. Then, the Delphi method was used to determine the criteria, sub-criteria, weights, and value assessment methods. Finally, the feasibility of framework was verified through the value assessment of three novel drugs for lung cancer. Results: The constructed multidimensional value assessment framework for novel drugs for lung cancer consists of five core criteria, two contextualized criteria, and 20 sub-criteria. The core criteria include comparative effectiveness, comparative safety, affordability, economic value, and evidence quality, with comparative effectiveness having the highest weight. Among the sub-criteria of the core criteria, overall survival and progression-free survival have the highest weights. The contextual criteria are innovation and equity. Conclusion: The structured multidimensional value assessment framework provides a decision-support tool for medical insurance policymakers and helps to improve the scientific rigor and transparency of decision-making.

关键词

肺癌新药 / 医保 / 知证决策 / 价值评估框架 / 多准则决策分析

Key words

new anti-lung cancer drugs / medical insurance / evidence-informed decision-making / value assessment framework / multi-criteria decision analysis

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
潘晨, 李逸天, 许钦雯, 孟静怡, 王国华, 耿劲松. 支持医保知证决策的肺癌新药多维价值评估框架[J]. 中国新药杂志, 2026, 35(19): 2061-2066 DOI:10.20251/j.cnki.1003-3734.2026.19.006

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1] YANG KH, HUA SS, WEI WT, et al. Economic burden of advanced lung cancer patients treated by gefitinib alone and combined with chemotherapy in two regions of China[J]. J Med Econ, 2023, 26(1): 1424-1431.
[2] CHERNY NI, OOSTING SF, DAFNI U, et al. ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 2.0 (ESMO-MCBS v2.0)[J]. Ann Oncol, 2025, 36(8): 866-908.
[3] 吴宏辉, 温雅璐, 张力, 等. 美国临床肿瘤学会价值评估框架简介及评价[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2021, 30(7): 452-456.
[4] LEE M, LAROSE H, GRÄBELDINGER M, et al. The evolving value assessment of cancer therapies: Results from a modified Delphi study[J]. Health Policy OPEN, 2024, 6: 100116.
[5] 戴泽琦, 徐思敏, 吴雪, 等. EVIDEM框架介绍及其在卫生决策中的应用[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2022, 28(4): 212-218.
[6] 耿劲松, 鲍海妮, 余小兰, 等. “证据与价值对决策的影响”框架在知证决策中应用的方法学[J]. 中国卫生资源, 2020, 23(4): 342-347.
[7] MITCHELL AP, DEY P, OHN JA, et al. The accuracy and usefulness of the national comprehensive cancer network evidence blocks affordability rating[J]. PharmacoEconomics, 2020, 38(7): 737-745.
[8] HA H, KANG JH, KIM DY, et al. The value measurement of emerging therapeutics in renal cell carcinoma: ASCO value framework and ESMO-MCBS[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2022, 22(1): 900.
[9] 耿劲松, 陈晓炜, 余小兰, 等. 基于EVIDEM的新技术医保报销循证决策框架探析[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2018, 11(4): 50-54.
[10] ZHAI XD, WANG CX, MA YJ, et al. Using the modified Delphi method to research the influencing factors of long-term health-related quality of life in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms after endovascular treatment[J]. Chin Neurosurg J, 2020, 6(1): 7.
[11] OOSTING SF, BARRIUSO J, BOTTOMLEY A, et al. Methodological and reporting standards for quality-of-life data eligible for European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) credit[J]. Ann Oncol, 2023, 34(4): 431-439.
[12] ZHANG L, ZHANG YC, LI H, et al. Improvements in the health-related quality-of-life benefit of cancer drugs approved in China, 2005-2020: an observational study[J]. Lancet Reg Health West Pac, 2024, 46: 101077.
[13] 鲍海妮, 余小兰, 耿劲松, 等. 医药卫生领域多准则决策分析的方法学[J]. 中国卫生资源, 2020, 23(4): 337-341, 372.
[14] 黄倩倩, 王涛, 康琪, 等. 多准则决策分析在药物效益风险评价领域的应用研究进展[J]. 中国新药杂志, 2021, 30(22): 2069-2074.

基金资助

国家自然科学基金面上资助项目(72374113)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (739KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉