基于Halcyon 3.0医用直线加速器的早期鼻腔NK/T细胞淋巴瘤放疗剂量学与放射诱发二次癌风险

肖鹏 ,  徐婷婷 ,  孙甫 ,  涂宏蕾 ,  田秀梅 ,  柳先锋

中国医学物理学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6) : 710 -715.

PDF (1736KB)
中国医学物理学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6) : 710 -715. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2026.06.002
医学放射物理

基于Halcyon 3.0医用直线加速器的早期鼻腔NK/T细胞淋巴瘤放疗剂量学与放射诱发二次癌风险

作者信息 +

Radiotherapy dosimetry and secondary radiation-induced cancer risk for early-stage nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma treated with the Halcyon 3.0 medical linear accelerator

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1776K)

摘要

目的:评估Halcyon 3.0医用直线加速器在早期鼻腔NK/T细胞淋巴瘤调强放射治疗(IMRT)中的剂量学特性及放射诱发二次癌风险。方法:回顾性纳入22例早期鼻腔NK/T细胞淋巴瘤患者,为每例患者均设计基于Varian Edge和Halcyon 3.0平台的固定野IMRT计划,分别为IMRT(Edge)与IMRT(Halcyon)。评估两组计划在靶区覆盖质量和危及器官受照剂量的差异,并采用超额绝对风险(EAR)模型对口咽、甲状腺及双侧唾液腺的放射所致二次癌风险进行量化比较。结果:与IMRT(Edge)相比,IMRT(Halcyon)在靶区剂量分布上表现出更优的均匀性(降低8.51%,P=0.018),但其适形度稍逊(降低1.70%,P=0.011)。在危及器官保护方面,IMRT(Halcyon)显著降低视交叉、视神经、眼球、晶状体、脊髓和脑干的受量(降幅5.22%~33.42%,P<0.01)。然而,该计划也导致双侧腮腺平均剂量显著增加(左侧增加32.71%,右侧增加36.13%,P<0.001)。值得注意的是,IMRT(Halcyon)还显著提高所有评估器官的二次癌风险,口咽、甲状腺、左侧唾液腺和右侧唾液腺的EAR值分别增加17.47%、53.42%、51.75%和55.23%(P<0.001)。结论:Halcyon 3.0平台在早期鼻腔NK/T细胞淋巴瘤放疗中表现出更优的靶区剂量均匀性和对多数危及器官的保护能力,但也存在腮腺受量增加和远处危及器官二次癌风险升高的问题。

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the dosimetric characteristics and secondary radiation-induced cancer risk in patients with early-stage nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) delivered on the Halcyon 3.0 medical linear accelerator. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 22 patients with early-stage nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma. For each patient, fixed-field IMRT plans were created on both Varian Edge and Halcyon 3.0 platforms, denoted IMRT (Edge) and IMRT (Halcyon), respectively. Differences in target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) doses were evaluated. An excess absolute risk (EAR) model was applied to quantify and compare secondary cancer risks for the oropharynx, thyroid, and bilateral salivary glands. Results Compared with IMRT (Edge), IMRT (Halcyon) demonstrated superior target dose homogeneity (reduced by 8.51%,P=0.018), though with slightly inferior conformity (reduced by 1.70%,P=0.011). Regarding OAR sparing, IMRT (Halcyon) significantly reduced doses delivered to the optic chiasm, optic nerves, ocular globes, lenses, spinal cord, and brainstem, with reductions ranging from 5.22% to 33.42% (P<0.01). However, it also led to a significant increase in the mean dose to the bilateral parotid glands, with increases of 32.71% in the left parotid and 36.13% in the right parotid (P<0.001). Notably, IMRT (Halcyon) significantly elevated secondary cancer risks across all evaluated organs, with EAR values rising by 17.47% for the oropharynx, 53.42% for the thyroid, 51.75% for the left salivary gland, and 55.23% for the right salivary gland (P<0.001). Conclusion The Halcyon 3.0 platform provides superior target dose homogeneity and better protection for most OAR in radiotherapy for early-stage nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma. However, it is associated with increased parotid gland doses and elevated secondary cancer risks in distant OAR.

关键词

鼻腔NK/T细胞淋巴瘤 / 调强放射治疗 / 放疗剂量 / 二次癌风险

Key words

nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma / intensity-modulated radiotherapy / radiotherapy dosimetry / secondary cancer risk

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
肖鹏,徐婷婷,孙甫,涂宏蕾,田秀梅,柳先锋. 基于Halcyon 3.0医用直线加速器的早期鼻腔NK/T细胞淋巴瘤放疗剂量学与放射诱发二次癌风险[J]. 中国医学物理学杂志, 2026, 43(6): 710-715 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2026.06.002

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Wu X, Li P, Zhao J, et al. A clinical study of 115 patients with extranodal natural killer/T—cell lymphoma, nasal type[J]. Clin Oncol, 2008, 20(8): 619-625.

[2]

Au WY, Weisenburger DD, Intragumtornchai T, et al. Clinical differences between nasal and extranasal natural killer/T—cell lymphoma: a study of 136 cases from the International Peripheral T—Cell Lymphoma Project[J]. Blood, 2009, 113(17): 3931-3937.

[3]

Liu XF, Huang EL, Wang Y, et al. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy, VMAT, fixed—field IMRT and 3D—conformal radiotherapy for stage I—II nasal natural killer T—cell lymphoma[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2017, 12(1): 76.

[4]

Ma XJ, Guo Y, Pang ZQ, et al. A randomized phase II study of CEOP with or without semustine as induction chemotherapy in patients with stage IE/IIE extranodal NK/T—cell lymphoma, nasal type in the upper aerodigestive tract[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2009, 93(3): 492-497.

[5]

Huang MJ, Jiang Y, Liu WP, et al. Early or up—front radiotherapy improved survival of localized extranodal NK/T—cell lymphoma, nasal—type in the upper aerodigestive tract[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2008, 70(1): 166-174.

[6]

Isobe K, Uno T, Tamaru J, et al. Extranodal natural killer/T—cell lymphoma, nasal type: the significance of radiotherapeutic parameters[J]. Cancer, 2006, 106(3): 609-615.

[7]

Shen QW, Ma XJ, Hu WG, et al. Intensity—modulated radiotherapy versus three—dimensional conformal radiotherapy for stage I—II natural killer/T—cell lymphoma nasal type: dosimetric and clinical results [J]. Radiat Oncol, 2013, 8: 152.

[8]

Deasy JO, Moiseenko V, Marks L, et al. Radiotherapy dose—volume effects on salivary gland function[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2010, 76(Suppl 3): S58-S63.

[9]

Toda K, Shibuya H, Hayashi K, et al. Radiation—induced cancer after radiotherapy for non—Hodgkin's lymphoma of the head and neck: a retrospective study[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2009, 4: 21.

[10]

Grantzau T, Mellemkjær L, Overgaard J . Second primary cancers after adjuvant radiotherapy in early breast cancer patients: a national population based study under the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG)[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2013, 106(1): 42-49.

[11]

Bartkowiak D, Humble N, Suhr P, et al. Second cancer after radiotherapy, 1981—2007[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2012, 105(1): 122-126.

[12]

Schneider U. Modeling the risk of secondary malignancies after radiotherapy[J]. Genes (Basel), 2011, 2(4): 1033-1049.

[13]

Schneider U. Mechanistic model of radiation—induced cancer after fractionated radiotherapy using the linear—quadratic formula[J]. Med Phys, 2009, 36(4): 1138-1143.

[14]

Schneider U, Zwahlen D, Ross D, et al. Estimation of radiation—induced cancer from three—dimensional dose distributions: concept of organ equivalent dose[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2005, 61(5): 1510-1515.

[15]

Pedicini P, Nappi A, Strigari L, et al. Correlation between EGFr expression and accelerated proliferation during radiotherapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2012, 7: 143.

[16]

Bakhshandeh M, Hashemi B, Mahdavi SR, et al. Normal tissue complication probability modeling of radiation—induced hypothyroidism after head—and—neck radiation therapy[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2013, 85(2): 514-521.

[17]

Murdoch—Kinch CA, Kim HM, Vineberg KA, et al. Dose—effect relationships for the submandibular salivary glands and implications for their sparing by intensity modulated radiotherapy[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2008, 72(2): 373-382.

[18]

Zwahlen DR, Bischoff LI, Gruber G, et al. Estimation of second cancer risk after radiotherapy for rectal cancer: comparison of 3D conformal radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy using different high dose fractionation schemes[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2016, 11(1): 149.

[19]

李阔, 李成强, 祝婷, . Halcyon在30例鼻咽癌固定野调强计划中计划质量研究[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2021, 28(8): 612-615.

[20]

Li K, Li CQ, Zhu T, et al. Dosimetric study of nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on Halcyon accelerator fixed field inverse intensity modulation plan[J]. Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment, 2021, 28(8): 612-615.

[21]

杨继明, 陆婷, 马敏, . 三种固定野调强计划在鼻腔及鼻旁窦肿瘤放疗中的对比研究[J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志, 2022, 42(12): 950-957.

[22]

Yang JM, Lu T, Ma M, et al. Comparison of three fixed—field IMRT plans for nasal cavity and paranasal sinus tumors[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection, 2022, 42(12): 950-957.

[23]

魏夏平, 苏洁洪, 黄小伟, . 基于Halcyon加速器的乳腺癌IMRT计划设计方法[J]. 中国医学物理学杂志, 2022, 39(7): 817-822.

[24]

Wei XP, Su JH, Huang XW, et al. IMRT planning for breast cancer based on Halcyon accelerator[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Physics, 2022, 39(7): 817-822.

[25]

Li TR, Scheuermann R, Lin A, et al. Impact of multi—leaf collimator parameters on head and neck plan quality and delivery: a comparison between HalcyonTM and Truebeam® treatment delivery systems[J]. Cureus, 2018, 10(11): e3648.

[26]

Huang YL, Du Y, Li CG, et al. Pediatric cone beam CT on Varian Halcyon and TrueBeam radiotherapy systems: radiation dose and positioning accuracy evaluations[J]. J Radiol Prot, 2019, 39(3): 739-748.

[27]

Berrington de Gonzalez A, Gilbert E, Curtis R, et al. Second solid cancers after radiation therapy: a systematic review of the epidemiologic studies of the radiation dose—response relationship[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2013, 86(2): 224-233.

[28]

Liu XF, Wu FR, Guo QS, et al. Estimation of radiotherapy modalities for patients with stage I—II nasal natural killer T—Cell lymphoma[J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2019, 11: 7219-7229.

[29]

Joosten A, Bochud F, Baechler S, et al. Variability of a peripheral dose among various linac geometries for second cancer risk assessment[J]. Phys Med Biol, 2011, 56(16): 5131-5151.

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(82203821)

重庆市自然科学基金(cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0587)

重庆市科研机构绩效激励引导专项(cstc2019jxjl130031)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1736KB)

3

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/