城郊山岳地区生态系统游憩服务价值与福祉———以秦岭终南山世界地质公园为例

庞春蕊 ,  蔡君 ,  熊如玉

中国城市林业 ›› 2026, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3) : 25 -31.

PDF (1946KB)
中国城市林业 ›› 2026, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3) : 25 -31. DOI: 10.12169/zgcsly.2025.08.14.0001
城市森林暴露与居民健康

城郊山岳地区生态系统游憩服务价值与福祉———以秦岭终南山世界地质公园为例

作者信息 +

Value and Well-being of Recreational Ecosystem Services in Suburban Mountainous Areas: A Case Study of Qinling Zhongnanshan UNESCO Global Geopark

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1992K)

摘要

【目的】 明晰生态系统游憩服务及其价值与福祉之间的关系, 提升城郊山岳地区游憩服务水平, 推动生态保护与民生福祉的共同发展。【方法】 以秦岭终南山世界地质公园为研究对象, 运用个人旅行费用法 (ITCM)、 问卷调查法评估其游憩服务价值, 并通过相关分析, 探究游憩服务与福祉之间的相关关系, 最终构建游憩服务及其价值与福祉的关系模型。【结果】 1) 终南山世界地质公园年均游憩价值约为 105.22 亿元, 每人每次的消费者剩余为 1945.53 元; 2) 终南山世界地质公园游憩服务与游客福祉间存在显著的正相关关系 (P<0.05); 3) 游憩服务与福祉之间产生联系时, 创造出游憩价值, 游憩价值能够反映游憩服务的福祉效应。【结论】 游憩服务供给水平是影响游憩价值和游客福祉实现的重要因素。 未来应统筹生态保护与游憩利用, 完善游憩设施与活动, 优化游憩服务供给, 以促进游憩价值和游客福祉的协同提升。

Abstract

【Objective】 This study clarifies the relationship between recreational ecosystem services and their value and well-being, thereby leveling up the recreational services of suburban mountainous areas and promoting the coordination between ecosystem protection and residents' well-being. 【Method】 This study takes Qinling Zhongnanshan UNESCO Global Geopark as the research subject to evaluate its value of recreational services using the Individual Travel Cost Method (ITCM) and a questionnaire survey and explore the correlation between the services and well-being through correlation analysis. Finally, a relational model linking recreational services, their value and well-being is constructed. 【Result】 1) The average annual recreational value of Zhongnanshan is approximately 10.522 billion yuan, and the consumer surplus is 1945.53 yuan per visitor per trip; 2) There is a significant positive correlation between the recreational services provided by Zhongnanshan and tourists' well-being (P<0.05); and 3) Recreational value is generated through the interaction between recreational services and tourists' well-being, reflecting the impact of recreational services on well-being. 【Conclusion】 Recreational services supply is a key factor influencing the realization of recreational value and tourists' well-being. Future management should balance ecological protection and recreational use, improving recreational facilities and activities and optimizing recreational services supply so as to promote the coordinated improvement of recreational value and tourists' well-being.

关键词

生态系统游憩服务 / 游憩价值 / 游客福祉 / 城郊山岳地区 / 秦岭终南山世界地质公园

Key words

recreational ecosystem service / recreational value / tourists' well-being / suburban mountainous area / Qinling Zhongnanshan UNESCO Global Geopark

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
庞春蕊,蔡君,熊如玉. 城郊山岳地区生态系统游憩服务价值与福祉———以秦岭终南山世界地质公园为例[J]. 中国城市林业, 2026, 24(3): 25-31 DOI:10.12169/zgcsly.2025.08.14.0001

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

LUO Q Y, BAO Y, WANG Z T, et al. Potential recreation service efficiency of urban remnant mountain wilderness: a case study of Yunyan District of Guiyang city, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 141: 109081.

[2]

范颖佳, 金荷仙, 陆磊. 文化景观视域下的山地生态系统文化服务研究进展及启示[J]. 园林, 2023, 40(12): 74-81.

[3]

简钰清, 徐琨璟, 王志芳, 等 . 生态系统游憩服务研究综述及未来展望[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 59(5): 884-896.

[4]

POLASKY S, SEGERSOM K. Integrating ecology and economics in the study of ecosystem services: some lessons learned[J]. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2009, 1: 409-434.

[5]

MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT. Ecosystems and human well—being: scenarios: findings of the scenarios working group[M]. Washington: Island Press, 2005.

[6]

彭文静, 姚顺波, 冯颖. 基于 TCIA 与 CVM 的游憩资源价值评估: 以太白山国家森林公园为例[J]. 经济地理, 2014, 34(9): 186-192.

[7]

殷楠, 王帅, 刘焱序. 生态系统服务价值评估: 研究进展与展望[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(1): 233-244.

[8]

SCHEUFELE G, PASCOE S. Ecosystem accounting: reconciling consumer surplus and exchange values for free—access recreation[J]. Ecological Economics, 2023, 212: 107905.

[9]

BROWN T C. The concept of value in resource allocation[J]. Land Economics, 1984, 60(3): 231.

[10]

董雪旺, 张捷, 章锦河. 旅行费用法在旅游资源价值评估中的若干问题述评[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26(11): 1983-1997.

[11]

NEILL J R. Using consumer's surplus to bound willingness to pay for non—market goods[J]. Resource and Energy Economics, 2022, 67: 101276.

[12]

RAUDSEPP—HEARNE C, PETERSON G D, TENGO M, et al. Untangling the environmentalist's paradox: why is human well—being increasing as ecosystem services degrade[J]. BioScience, 2010, 60(8): 576-589.

[13]

ZHOU W J, CAI J, CHEN K. Connecting recreational service to visitor's well—being: a case study in Qianjiangyuan National Park[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(18): 11366.

[14]

HERMES J, VAN BERKEL D, BURKHARD B, et al. Assessment and valuation of recreational ecosystem services of landscapes[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018, 31: 289-295.

[15]

UNITED NATIONS, EUROPEAN COMMISSION, FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS, et al. System of Environmental—Economic Accounting Ecosystem Accounting[M]. New York: United Nations, 2025.

[16]

殷程强, 杨兴柱. 旅游视角下自然价值与人类福祉关系研究进展和启示[J]. 旅游学刊, 2025, 40(4): 134-149.

[17]

谭铃千, 郝培尧. 高密度城市面向人类福祉的生态系统文化服务研究进展[J]. 中国园林, 2024, 40(4): 36-42.

[18]

CREEL M D, LOOMIS J B. Theoretical and empirical advantages of truncated count data estimators for analysis of deer hunting in California[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1990, 72(2): 434-441.

[19]

郭茹, 胡一可, 王洪成. 游憩服务视角下的绿色空间研究现状与展望[J]. 中国城市林业, 2023, 21(2): 152-159.

[20]

杨柳, 刘骏. 重庆四山地区森林公园游憩服务能力评价及优化策略研究[J]. 园林, 2023, 40(8): 117-126.

[21]

林媚珍, 纪少婷, 吴华清, 等 . 广州白云山风景区森林游憩价值评估[J]. 广州大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 14(6): 78-83.

[22]

时少华, 吴泰岳, 李享, 等 . 基于 ITCM 和 CVM 的运河公园游憩价值评估研究: 以北京通州大运河森林公园为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(1): 201-208.

[23]

LANSDALL N, GANGADHARAN L. Comparing travel cost models and the precision of their consumer surplus estimates: albert park and maroondah reservoir[J]. Australian Economic Papers, 2003, 42(4): 399-417.

[24]

于沛鑫, 王兆峰. 南山国家公园生态系统服务对居民福祉的影响及其异质性研究[J]. 中国生态旅游, 2024, 14(1): 61-78.

[25]

王大尚, 郑华, 欧阳志云. 生态系统服务供给、消费与人类福祉的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(6): 1747-1753.

[26]

DICKINSON D C, HOBBS R J. Cultural ecosystem services: Characteristics, challenges and lessons for urban green space research[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 25: 179-194.

[27]

MEINARD Y, DERENIOWSKA M, GHARBI J S. The ethical stakes in monetary valuation methods for conservation purposes[J]. Biological Conservation, 2016, 199: 67-74.

[28]

SALLES J M. Valuing biodiversity and ecosystem services: why put economic values on Nature[J]. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 2011, 334(5/6): 469-482.

[29]

LIN K M, ZHANG Q, LU Q, et al. Linking protected areas with health and well—being: reconstructing the recreational amenity experience model in the Chinese context[J]. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 2025, 50: 100867.

[30]

HEAGNEY E C, ROSE J M, ARDESHIRI A, et al. Optimising recreation services from protected areas—Understanding the role of natural values, built infrastructure and contextual factors[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018, 31: 358-370.

[31]

白晓航, 陈洁萍. 城市森林公园生态系统文化服务的公众偏好与感知[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(6): 99-108.

[32]

赵雨晴, 游巍斌, 林雪儿, 等 . 游客和居民视角下武夷山市生态系统文化服务感知比较研究[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(10): 4011-4022.

[33]

FELIPE—LUCIA M R, DE FRUTOS Á, CROUZAT E, et al. Differences in the experience of cultural ecosystem services in mountain protected areas by clusters of visitors[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2024, 70: 101663.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1946KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉