社会心理因素对文化景观遗产地植被配置偏好与协同管理支持的影响机制^*

Influence Mechanism of Social Psychological Factors on Vegetation Configuration Preference and Collaborative Management Support in Cultural Landscape Heritage Sites

摘要

【目的】 文化景观遗产地作为城市生态空间的关键节点， 在植被配置中如何协调文化保护与生态修复目标是其管理的现实难点。 为此， 探讨秩序需求、 自然联结感与文化认同对植被配置偏好与植被协同管理支持 (公众对兼顾文化保护与生态修复的植被管理路径的认可与接纳程度) 的影响机制， 是制定差异化植被优化策略的关键。【方法】 以北京三山五园地区为例， 基于 459 份有效问卷， 综合运用潜在剖面分析、结构方程模型及 Bootstrap 中介效应检验， 识别公众类型特征， 并检验变量间的路径关系与中介效应。【结果】 1) 公众可划分为文化－生态协同型、 文化遗产守护型和自然生态导向型 3 类， 其中文化－生态协同型人数占比最高。 2) 秩序需求显著正向影响传统文化导向植被配置偏好； 自然联结感显著正向影响生态共生导向植被配置偏好； 文化认同对两类植被配置偏好均具有显著正向影响。 3) 生态共生导向与传统文化导向植被配置偏好均显著正向影响植被协同管理支持。【结论】 文化认同未表现为生态修复的阻碍因素，可成为推动文化景观保护与植被协同管理的重要社会心理资源。 未来应在尊重历史风貌的前提下， 推动文化叙事、 生态修复与公众参与的深度融合， 以实现文化景观保护与生态系统韧性提升的协同目标。

Abstract

【Objective】Cultural landscape heritage sites are the key nodes of urban ecological space, and how to coordinate cultural protection and ecological restoration goals in vegetation configuration is the primary challenge in their management. Therefore, exploring the influence mechanisms through which needs for order, a sense of nature connection, and cultural identity exert on vegetation configuration preferences and collaborative vegetation management support (the public's recognition and acceptance of vegetation management approaches that place the focus on both cultural protection and ecological restoration) is essential for formulating differentiated vegetation optimization strategies. 【Method】Taking the Three Hills and Five Gardens in Beijing as a case study, the study employs latent profile analysis, structural equation modeling and Bootstrap mediation effect tests to identify the characteristics of different types of the public and examine the path relationships and mediation effects among variables with 459 valid questionnaires collected. 【Result】1) The public can be classified into three categories, including cultural-ecological synergy, cultural heritage preservation, and natural ecosystem orientation, while the category of cultural-ecological synergy has the highest proportion; 2) Needs for order significantly positively influences the vegetation configuration preference for traditional culture; sense of nature connection significantly positively influences the vegetation configuration preference for ecological symbiosis; and cultural identity has a significant positive impact on both preferences over vegetation configuration; and 3) The vegetation configuration preferences for ecological symbiosis and for traditional culture significantly positively influence the vegetation collaborative management support. 【Conclusion】Cultural identity does not pose an obstacle to ecological restoration, and it could be an important social psychological resource for advancing cultural landscape protection and coordinated vegetation management. In the future, deep integration among cultural narratives, ecological restoration and public participation should be promoted under the precondition of respecting historical landscapes, so as to achieve the dual goals of cultural landscape protection and ecosystem resilience improvement.

关键词

文化景观遗产地 / 植被配置偏好 / 协同管理支持 / 社会心理因素 / 三山五园地区

Key words

cultural landscape heritage site / vegetation configuration preference / collaborative management support / socio-psychological factor / Three Hills and Five Gardens

参考文献

[1] NAVEH Z. Interactions of landscapes and cultures [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1995, 32(1): 43-54.

[2] ZOELLER K C, GURNEY G G, CUMMING G S. The influence of landscape context on the production of cultural ecosystem services [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2022, 37(4): 883-894.

[3] WANG W, FENG C, LIU F, et al. Biodiversity conservation in China: a review of recent studies and practices [J]. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 2020, 2: 100025.

[4] 祝晓雨, 王晨灏, 王忠君, 等 . 城市绿地生物多样性研究进展与展望 [J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(5): 131-143.

[5] 朱强, 张云路, 李雄. 北京“三山五园” 整体性研究新思考 [J]. 中国城市林业, 2017, 15(1): 29-32.

[6] 肖金亮, 林玉军, 倪瑞锋. 历史文化名城中的文化景观: 双轮驱动下的北京三山五园地区整体性初探 [J]. 中国文化遗产, 2019(3): 56-65.

[7] 张梦真, 苏明明, 刘婕, 等 . 城市生物多样性感知对居民主观幸福感的影响: 以北京市为例 [J]. 生态学报, 2025, 45(18): 9114-9129.

[8] MADERA F, OLCESSE M, CARDINALI P, et al. Nature connectedness in adolescents and young adults: a systematic review [J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2025, 107: 102761.

[9] MAURICE A C, DEGUINES N, BAUDRY E. Preference for more informal vegetation in urban parks: the impeding role of need for structure among the French population [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2025, 253: 105177.

[10] GAO Q, JONES S. Authenticity and heritage conservation: seeking common complexities beyond the ‘Eastern’ and ‘Western’ dichotomy [J]. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2021, 27(1): 90-106.

[11] DENG Y, YAN X, HOU M, et al. Reassessing the ecological effectiveness of ecological restoration programs: evidence from a quasi—natural experiment in China [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2025, 212: 107506.

[12] MUNNÉ—BOSCH S, SANTOS J A S. The dramatic effects of well—intentioned but ill—designed management strategies in plant biological invasions [J]. Nature Plants, 2024, 10(8): 1148-1152.

[13] EGERER M, PHILPOTT S M. ‘Tidy’ and ‘messy’ management alters natural enemy communities and pest control in urban agroecosystems [J]. PLoS ONE, 2022, 17(9): e0274122.

[14] 丛昕, 殷敏, 丁绍刚, 等 . 游客视角的中国古典园林景点热度感知评价与传播途径研究: 以苏州古典园林留园为例 [J]. 中国园林, 2021, 37(8): 56-61.

[15] ZHANG G, YANG J, WU G, et al. Exploring the interactive influence on landscape preference from multiple visual attributes: openness, richness, order, and depth [J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2021, 65: 127363.

[16] MAYER F S, FRANTZ C M. The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of individuals' feeling in community with nature [J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2004, 24(4): 503-515.

[17] BARRAGAN—JASON G, PARMESAN C, LOREAU M, et al. Psychological and physical connections with nature improve both human well—being and nature conservation: a systematic review of meta—analyses [J]. Biological Conservation, 2023, 277: 109842.

[18] 夏哲一, 袁承程, 魏雪, 等 . 城市公园生产性景观价值对游客场所依恋的影响 [J]. 中国城市林业, 2023, 21(4): 164-170.

[19] 陈康琳, 钱云. 北京西郊“三山五园”文化景观遗产价值剖析 [J]. 中国园林, 2018, 34(5): 115-118.

[20] COIMBRA I, CONCEIÇÃO P S, SOUSA A R, et al. The management of urban World Heritage Sites: a semi—systematic literature review [J]. npj Heritage Science, 2025, 13(1): 610.

[21] LI X P, FAN S X, KÜHN N, et al. Residents' ecological and aesthetical perceptions towards spontaneous vegetation in urban parks in China [J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2019, 44: 126397.

[22] MACKAY C M L, SCHMITT M T. Do people who feel connected to nature do more to protect it? A meta—analysis [J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2019, 65: 101323.

[23] SVOBODOVA K, CHANG P, OLAFSSON A S, et al. Advancing social—ecological restoration through elicitation of cultural ecosystem services and landscape feature perceptions in restored quarries: a Flickr data analysis [J]. Restoration Ecology, 2025, 33(1): e70009.

[24] 张远兵, 何小弟, 路程, 等 . 城市林业的生态文化景观: 以扬州古典园林植物配置为例 [J]. 中国城市林业, 2005(6): 56-58.

[25] GRÖNLUND E, SEILER J. Negotiating authenticity and biodiversity in heritage gardens [J]. FORM Akademisk, 2023, 16(4).

基金资助

*北京城市规划学会三山五园分会 2025 年度开放课题(FH [2025] 04)

国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFF1304600)