“双碳”1+N政策体系下城市减污降碳协同增效特征及提升路径
Characteristics and Enhancement Pathways for Synergistic Effects in Urban Pollution and Carbon Reduction under “Dual Carbon” 1+N Policy Framework
【目的】系统梳理“双碳”1+N政策体系下中国城市减污降碳协同增效的研究基础、政策作用、时空特征、驱动因素、评价方法及提升路径,为城市尺度的污染治理、碳减排与生态基础设施建设提供参考。【方法】以中国知网和Web of Science为主要文献来源,检索2014年1月至2026年8月有关城市减污降碳、协同减排和协同治理的中英文文献,采用分类归纳和比较分析方法开展综述。【结果】温室气体与大气污染物具有同源性和过程关联性,并表现出明显的空间集聚与联动特征。“双碳”1+N政策体系为城市协同治理提供了制度保障,但政策效果受城市资源禀赋、经济发展水平和治理能力的影响,具有空间溢出、门槛效应和区域异质性。协同水平主要受能源与产业结构、技术创新、环境规制、人口集聚以及气象、地形和植被覆盖等因素共同驱动。城市森林与蓝绿空间可通过植被固碳、污染物沉降、微气候调节和绿地废弃物资源化等途径,为减污降碳协同增效提供生态基础。【结论】提升减污降碳协同效应需协同推进宏观政策保障、创新技术驱动、区域协同发展、社会参与监督4条路径。未来应将城市生态基础设施建设纳入“双碳”1+N政策实施体系,因地制宜优化城市森林结构与蓝绿空间格局,推动工程减排、生态增汇与城市治理协同实施。
【Objective】The study reviews the research basis, policy effects, spatiotemporal features, driving factors, evaluation methods and enhancement pathways of pollution control and carbon emission reduction in China’s cities under the “Dual Carbon” 1+N policy, with the aim to provide references for urban-scale pollution control, carbon emission reduction and ecological infrastructure development. 【Method】With CNKI and Web of Science as the primary literature sources, the study retrieves Chinese and English literature on urban pollution control and carbon reduction, synergistic emission reduction, and collaborative governance published from January 2014 to August 2026 and conducts a review with inductive and comparative analysis. 【Result】GHGs and pollutants share common sources and process-related linkages, and exhibit pronounced spatial clustering and coupling characteristics. The “Dual Carbon” 1+N policy framework offers institutional assurance for collaborative urban governance, but policy effectiveness is influenced by urban resource endowments, economic development levels, and governance capacity, showing spatial spillover effects, threshold effect and heterogeneity. The level of synergy is collectively driven by such factors as energy and industry structure, technology innovation, environmental regulation and population agglomeration, as well as meteorology, terrain and vegetation cover. Urban forests and blue-green spaces can provide ecological foundations for synergistic pollution and carbon reduction through vegetation carbon sequestration, pollutant deposition, microclimate regulation and green waste recycling. 【Conclusion】Four pathways are required to enhance the synergies between pollution control and carbon reduction, including macro-policy assurance, innovative technology driven, coordinated regional development, and public participation and oversight. We should incorporate the urban ecological infrastructure construction into the implementation framework of the “Dual Carbon” 1+N policies, optimize urban forest structure and blue-green space layout in accordance with local conditions, and promote the coordinated implementation of engineering-based emissions reductions, ecological carbon sinks and urban governance.
| [1] |
世界能源统计年鉴2025[EB/OL]. (2025—09—18)[2026—08—16]. https://kpmg.com/cn/zh/insights/2025/09/statistical—review—of—world—energy—2025.html. |
| [2] |
TAR climate change 2001: Mitigation—IPCC[EB/OL]. [ 2025—01—02]. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar3/wg3/. |
| [3] |
国家发展改革委发布碳达峰碳中和重大宣示三周年重要成果— 国家发展和改革委员会 [EB/OL]. (2023—08—17)[2025—01—02]. https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/fggz/hjyzy/stwmjs/202308/t20230817_1359890.html. |
| [4] |
生态环境状况公报[EB/OL]. (2025—06—04)[2026—07—19]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/sthjzk/. |
| [5] |
生态环境部发布《全国碳市场发展报告(2025)》[EB/OL]. (2025—09—27)[2026—07—18]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/ydqhbh/wsqt kz/202509/t20250927_1128352.shtml. |
| [6] |
全球空气质量报告[EB/OL]. [ 2026—07—18]. https://www.iqair.cn/cn/world—air—quality—report. |
| [7] |
IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories—IPCC[EB/OL]. [2025—01—02]. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/2006—ipcc—guidelines—for—national—greenhouse—gas—inventories/. |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
张为师, 徐颖, 惠婧璇. 中国城市CO2排放和空气质量协同变化特征及驱动因素研究 [J]. 中国环境管理, 2023, 15(2): 38-47. |
| [10] |
邵汉华, 王庆祥, 何铿辉. 绿色技术创新对省域减污与降碳协同水平的影响及其驱动机制[J]. 经济地理, 2025, 45(1): 17—24, 35. |
| [11] |
徐英启, 程钰, 王晶晶. 中国资源型城市碳排放效率时空演变与绿色技术创新影响[J]. 地理研究, 2023, 42(3): 878-894. |
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
积极稳妥推进碳达峰碳中和[EB/OL]. (2023—04—06)[2025—01—03]. https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/2023—04/06/content_5750183.htm. |
| [16] |
黄昱杰, 刘贵贤, 薄宇, |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
汪振双, 胡亭谕, 刘景矿, |
| [19] |
任晓松, 梁宇琪, 赵敏, |
| [20] |
汪振双, 王宇飞, 汪涛, |
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
孙亚男, 刘华军, 刘传明, |
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
原伟鹏, 孙慧, 王晶, |
| [28] |
杨雅涵, 张俊杰, 张德顺. 城市绿地植物固碳效益研究进展[J]. 中国城市林业, 2026, 24(3): 153-159. |
| [29] |
王志坤, 李新举, 胡晓. 基于无人机多光谱遥感的土壤有机碳可视化监测平台[J]. 中国农学通报, 2026, 42(11): 195-201. |
| [30] |
么嘉棋, 吴舒祺, 冀新慧, |
| [31] |
茹豪, 陈琦, 靳晓娟, |
| [32] |
张志强, 张璐. 城市建筑环境中绿色基础设施对大气颗粒物的影响[J]. 中国城市林业, 2021, 19(1): 1-5, 18. |
| [33] |
雷玉桃, 杨娟. 基于SFA方法的碳排放效率区域差异化与协调机制研究[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2014, 34(7): 13-22. |
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
侯静怡, 陈丹荷, 刘雯雯. 减污降碳协同度的概念、模型及优化路径: 基于全国31个省市的市政污泥数据[J]. 建筑经济, 2022, 43(增刊1): 566-569. |
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
邱问心, 李娟, 马亮亮, |
| [42] |
杨斌, 李先峰, 张军强, |
| [43] |
盛方媛, 王楠楠. 融合激光雷达与多光谱遥感的高精度地形测绘方法研究[J]. 科技与创新, 2026(13): 159-161. |
| [44] |
董丽, 王洪成, 石铁矛, |
| [45] |
邓雪纯, 胡启帆, 梁景慧, |
| [46] |
董晓, 赵忻桐, 韩森, |
| [47] |
段纪瀚, 周世豪, 乔毅豪, |
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
李强, 金川. 环境信息公开对减污降碳协同治理的影响[J]. 生态文明研究, 2026(2): 47-69. |
*国家自然科学基金面上项目(52478016)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |