19种杀菌剂对甜瓜细菌性果斑病菌的杀菌活性评价

张媛媛; 付欣; 冯岗; 金永玲; 张静

doi:10.16861/j.cnki.zggc.202423.0454

中国瓜菜 ›› 2024, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4) : 115 -120. DOI: 10.16861/j.cnki.zggc.202423.0454

试验研究

19种杀菌剂对甜瓜细菌性果斑病菌的杀菌活性评价

张媛媛 ¹^,² ,
付欣 ¹^,² ,
冯岗 ² ,
金永玲 ¹ ,
张静 ²

作者信息 +

Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of 19 bactericides against bacterial fruit blotch

Yuanyuan ZHANG ¹^,² ,
Xin FU ¹^,² ,
Gang FENG ² ,
Yongling JIN ¹ ,
Jing ZHANG ²

Author information +

文章历史 +

PDF (1060K)

摘要

瓜类细菌性果斑病是由西瓜噬酸菌引起的一种种传病害，在生产上的危害极为严重，可造成大面积的减产甚至绝产，但目前在生产中还缺乏有效的防治药剂。为筛选出高效防治细菌性果斑病的杀菌剂，在室内筛选了19种杀菌剂的离体活性成分，并对高活性杀菌剂进行毒力评价和活体盆栽验证。室内研究结果表明，0.3%四霉素水剂等8种杀菌剂离体杀菌活性显著，毒力强度依次为0.3%四霉素水剂>1%申嗪霉素悬浮剂>5%噻霉酮悬浮剂>20%辛菌胺醋酸盐水剂>20%丙硫唑悬浮剂>4%春雷霉素水剂>0.4%蛇床子素水剂>0.5%小檗碱水剂。活体盆栽试验结果表明，0.5%小檗碱水剂、20%丙硫唑悬浮剂、4%春雷霉素水剂和5%噻霉酮悬浮剂这4种药剂对甜瓜细菌性果斑病有较好的防治效果，其中0.5%小檗碱水剂对甜瓜细菌性果斑病的保护和治疗作用最强，在供试质量浓度为100 mg·L^-1时的保护和治疗防效分别为79.66%和73.24%。上述研究试验表明，0.5%小檗碱水剂、20%丙硫唑悬浮剂、4%春雷霉素水剂和5%噻霉酮悬浮剂可作为田间防治甜瓜细菌性果斑病的有效候选药剂。

Abstract

Bacterial fruit blotch (Acidovorax citrulli) is a severe disease in melon, resulting in significant yield reductions and even complete crop failure. Despite its significant impact, effective chemical control strategies for this disease remain elusive. To address this issue, the author conducted an evaluation of 19 bactericides to identify highly efficient agents against A. citrulli. Both in vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activity of the bactericides were assessed. From the initial in vitro screening, eight fungicides showing higher sensitivity were for further investigation of their bactericidal toxicity. The results revealed the following ranking of toxicity strengths: 0.3% Tetracycline AS > 1% Shenqinmycin SC > 5% Benziothiazolinone SC > 20% Dioctyldiethylenetriamine AS > 20% Albendazole SC > 4% Kasugamycin AS > 0.4% Cnidium lactone AS > 0.5% Berberine AS. Subsequent greenhouse experiments confirmed the effectiveness of 0.5% Berberine AS, 20% Albendazole SC, 4% Kasugamycin AS, and 5% Benziothiazolinone SE in preventing and treating BFB in melon seedlings. Particularly, 0.5% Berberine AS exhibited the highest efficacy, with prevention and treatment rates of 79.66% and 73.24%, respectively, at a concentration of 100 mg·L ^-1. The findings in this research suggest that 0.5% Berberine AS, 20% Albendazole SC, 4% Kasugamycin AS, and 5% Benziothiazolinone SC hold promise as potential effective agents for the field control of bacterial fruit blotch.

关键词

甜瓜 / 细菌性果斑病 / 杀菌剂 / 活性评价

Key words

Melon / Bacterial fruit blotch / Bactericides / Evaluation

引用本文

引用格式 ▾

张媛媛,付欣,冯岗,金永玲,张静. 19种杀菌剂对甜瓜细菌性果斑病菌的杀菌活性评价[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2024, 37(4): 115-120 DOI:10.16861/j.cnki.zggc.202423.0454

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

参考文献

原文顺序 | 出版日期 | 本文引用

[1]	季苇芹, 叶云峰, 张爱萍, 等. 我国瓜类细菌性果斑病研究新进展[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2022, 35(9): 1-8.

[2]	张兴平, BILLY B R. 一种毁灭性的西瓜新病害:细菌性果实腐斑病[J]. 中国瓜菜, 1990, 3(2): 44-45.

[3]	武建华, 刘甲琦, 刘宝玉, 等. 7种杀菌剂对甜瓜细菌性果斑病的防效分析[J]. 农业技术与装备, 2021(9): 7-8.

[4]	陈亮, 颜克成, 刘君丽, 等. 几种药剂对农作物细菌性病害的防治效果[J]. 农药, 2017, 56(11): 856-858.

[5]	阎莎莎, 王铁霖, 赵廷昌. 瓜类细菌性果斑病研究进展[J]. 植物检疫, 2011, 25(3): 71-76.

[6]	李英梅, 张伟兵, 杨艺炜, 等. 瓜类细菌性果斑病症状识别与防控[J]. 西北园艺(综合), 2020(2): 46.

[7]	王雪, 高洁, 张静, 等. 63种杀菌剂对西瓜、甜瓜细菌性果斑病菌的室内毒力测定[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2012, 34(6): 612-617.

[8]	唐炎英, 成娟, 童龙, 等. 干热处理对西瓜种子活力及抑制细菌性果斑病的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2014, 27(增刊1): 49-51.

[9]	武芳, 李勇, 路兆军, 等. 6株拮抗细菌对哈密瓜细菌性果斑病的大田防效[J]. 种业导刊, 2019(12): 19-24.

[10]	王雪妍, 岳丹丹, 潘梦诗, 等. 瓜类细菌性果斑病生防菌的筛选、鉴定及发酵液抑菌稳定性研究[J]. 河南科学, 2022, 40(7): 1071-1075.

[11]	王雪妍, 马焕, 岳丹丹, 等. 一株西瓜细菌性果斑病生防菌的筛选、鉴定及其培养基优化[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2022, 35(9): 9-15.

[12]	李菊芬, 林涛, 马国斌, 等. 甜瓜种子细菌性果斑病菌PCR检测方法的研究[J]. 上海农业学报, 2020, 36(2): 77-81.

[13]	陆占军, 李宗泽, 张彦茹, 等. 不同药剂防治拱棚西瓜细菌性果斑病效果初探[J]. 中国农技推广, 2022, 38(8): 77-79.

[14]	刘克贞, 王凯航, 章建华. 不同杀菌剂对甜瓜细菌性果斑病的防治效果[J]. 农村科技, 2020(6): 34-36.

[15]	王玥双. 不同药剂对瓜类幼苗细菌性果斑病防治效果比较[J]. 中国果业信息, 2017, 34(7): 58.

[16]	农业部农药检定所. 农药室内生物测定试验准则杀菌剂第16部分:抑制细菌生长量试验浑浊度法:NY/T 1156.16-2008[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2008.

[17]	姜珊珊, 辛志梅, 吴斌, 等. 春雷霉素与叶枯唑对黄瓜细菌性角斑病菌的联合毒力[J]. 山东农业科学, 2016, 48(9): 103-106.

[18]	于海博, 毕馨月, 夏博, 等. 辽宁西瓜和甜瓜细菌性果斑病的病原鉴定[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2019, 50(3): 345-350.

[19]	HOPKINS D L, THOMPSON C M. Seed transmission of Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli in cucurbits[J]. HortScience, 2002, 37(6): 924-926.

[20]	王爽, 杨礼哲, 罗丰, 等. 不同药剂处理对西甜瓜细菌性果斑病的抑菌效果初探[J]. 热带农业科学, 2011, 31(11): 45-48.

[21]	张璇, 吴娟, 孙卫斌, 等. 小檗碱对牙龈卟啉单胞菌的体外抑制作用研究[J]. 口腔生物医学, 2023, 14(2): 92-96.

[22]	GUO W H, YAN H, REN X Y, et al. Berberine induces resistance against tobacco mosaic virus in tobacco[J]. Pest Management Science, 2020, 76(5): 1804-1813.

[23]	PENG L C, KANG S, YIN Z Q, et al. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of berberine against Streptococcus agalactiae[J]. Interantional Journal Clinical Experimental Pathology, 2015, 8(5): 5217-5223.

[24]	戴为光, 周小军, 凌士鹏, 等. 0.5%小檗碱水剂防治葡萄霜霉病效果简报[J]. 上海农业科技, 2012(3): 142-143.

[25]	王帅, 刘召阳, 高小宁, 等. 10种生物源杀菌剂对苹果树腐烂病菌的室内活性评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(1): 150-156.

[26]	ZHU Y, MA N, LI H X, et al. Berberine induces apoptosis and DNA damage in MG-63 human osteosarcoma cells[J]. Molecular Medicine Reports, 2014, 10(4): 1734-1738.

[27]	XU B B, JIANG X J, XIONG J. Structure-activity relationship study enables the discovery of a novel berberine analogue as the RXRα activator to inhibit colon cancer[J]. Journal of Medicinal Chemstry, 2020, 63(11): 5841-5855.

[28]	ZHANG L, AVULA S R, ZHOU C H, et al. Design synthesis and biological evaluation of berberine-benzimidazole hybrids as new type of potentially DNA-targeting antimicrobial agents[J]. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2016, 122: 205-215.