航空涡轴/涡桨发动机军民持久试验差异及先军后民适航采信路径

谷文博 ,  王剑波 ,  姚涓 ,  黄庆 ,  李鸣章 ,  李振磊 ,  綦蕾 ,  周惠敏 ,  李果 ,  丁水汀

中国民航大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5) : 1 -13.

PDF (1532KB)
中国民航大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5) : 1 -13. DOI: 10.27055/j.1674-5590.2026.05.001

航空涡轴/涡桨发动机军民持久试验差异及先军后民适航采信路径

作者信息 +

Differences between military and civil endurance tests for aircraft turboshaft/turboprop engines and a military-to-civil airworthiness crediting path

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1568K)

摘要

随着军民融合深度发展与军民两用航空发动机平台系列化发展,合理采信军民两用发动机的军用持久试验结果,对缩短民用适航验证周期、降低取证成本具有重要意义。本文以航空涡轴/涡桨发动机为对象,梳理了美国、欧洲和中国军用标准与民用适航规章中持久试验条款的演变脉络,重点对比了《航空涡轮螺桨和涡轮轴发动机通用规范》(GJB 242A—2018)与《航空发动机适航规定》(CCAR-33R2)在持久试验主体要求和附加要求等方面的异同,并从损伤机制与严苛度评价基准两个维度剖析了二者差异的物理内涵。研究表明,军民持久试验在结构完整性、耐久性与可靠性考核目标上具有一致性,且二者均向着基于安全效果的等效持久试验方向演变,但军用标准的试车谱更贴近多变任务剖面,民用适航规章则更强调典型任务循环与“三红线”考核。在此基础上,结合欧美等效持久试验的理念与实践,本文提出了面向先军后民适航采信的持久试验严苛度评价路径,为军民两用航空发动机先军后民适航采信提供方法参考与技术支撑。

Abstract

With the deepening of civil-military integration and the development of dual-use aero-engine platform families, rationally crediting the military endurance test results of dual-use engines is of great significance for shortening the civil airworthiness verification cycle and reducing certification costs. Taking aircraft turboshaft/turboprop engines as the object of study, this paper reviews the evolution of endurance test provisions in the military standards and civil airworthiness regulations of the United States, Europe and China. It then compares the General Specification for Aircraft Turboprop and Turboshaft Engines (GJB 242A-2018) and the Airworthiness Regulations for Aero-engines (CCAR-33R2) in terms of their main and additional endurance test requirements, so as to identify their similarities and differences. The physical connotation of these differences is analyzed from the two dimensions of damage mechanism and severity assessment criterion. The results show that military and civil endurance tests are consistent in their assessment objectives of structural integrity, durability and reliability. Both are evolving toward equivalent endurance tests based on safety outcomes. However, the test spectra specified in military standards are closer to variable mission profiles. In contrast, civil airworthiness regulations place greater emphasis on representative mission cycles and the "three red lines" assessment. On this basis, drawing on the concepts and practices of equivalent endurance tests in Europe and the United States, this paper proposes an endurance test severity assessment path oriented to military-to-civil airworthiness crediting. This path provides methodological reference and technical support for the military-to-civil airworthiness crediting of dual-use aero-engines.

关键词

航空涡轴/涡桨发动机 / 军用标准 / 民用适航规章 / 持久试验 / 严苛度评价 / 先军后民适航采信

Key words

aircraft turboshaft/turboprop engines / military standards / civil airworthiness regulations / endurance test / severity assessment / military-to-civil airworthiness crediting

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
谷文博,王剑波,姚涓,黄庆,李鸣章,李振磊,綦蕾,周惠敏,李果,丁水汀. 航空涡轴/涡桨发动机军民持久试验差异及先军后民适航采信路径[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2026, 44(5): 1-13 DOI:10.27055/j.1674-5590.2026.05.001

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

AC-33-AA-2024-01R1 航空发动机审定[S].

[2]

王粲, 张腾. 军用航空发动机标准发展概述[J]. 航空动力, 2020(3): 57-60.

[3]

Ogg J S, Taylor W R. Accelerated mission testing of gas turbine engines[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1979, 16(4): 247-249.

[4]

綦蕾, 李红琳, 陈智强. 浅谈民用航空发动机适航技术新要求[J]. 航空动力, 2020(1): 45-48.

[5]

AC 33.87-1A: 2015 Engine overtorque test, calibration test, endurance test, and teardown inspection for turbine engine certification[S].

[6]

于宏军. CCAR33 部、34 部与 GJB241 的试验要求对比分析[J]. 航空标准化与质量, 2006(5): 18-21.

[7]

唐伟, 刘启国, 朱瑾, 等. FAR 33 与 GJB 241A 技术要求对比分析[J]. 航空标准化与质量, 2012(4): 36-40.

[8]

朱晓斌, 吴晶峰. 军用航空发动机转民用适航可行性研究[J]. 民航学报, 2026, 10(3): 186-190.

[9]

AVIATION RULE MAKING ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Alternate test to 14 CFR 33. 87 endurance test[R]. Federal Aviation Administration.

[10]

CS-E Amendment 8: 2025 Certification specifications and acceptable means of compliance for engines[S].

[11]

王晓明, 綦蕾. 民用航空涡轮发动机持久试验条款发展历程[J]. 航空动力学报, 2021, 36(2): 431-439.

[12]

汤鑫豪, 窦英睿. 涡扇发动机等效持久试车谱适航符合性设计与验证[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2025, 51(1): 133-140.

[13]

MIL-E-5007A: 1951 Engines, aircraft, turbojet and turbofan[S].

[14]

MIL-E-5007D: 1973 Engines, aircraft, turbojet and turbofan[S].

[15]

MIL-E-8593A: 1975 Engines, aircraft, turboshaft and turboprop[S].

[16]

MIL-E-87231: 1985 Engines, aircraft, turbojet and turbofan[S].

[17]

MIL-HDBK-1783: 1997 Engine structural integrity program (ENSIP)[S].

[18]

JSGS-87231A Engines, aircraft, turbine[S].

[19]

JSSG-2007 Engines, aircraft, turbine[S].

[20]

JSSG-2007A Engines, aircraft, turbine[S].

[21]

JSSG-2007B Engines, aircraft, turbine[S].

[22]

JSSG-2007C Engines, aircraft, turbine[S].

[23]

JSSG-2007D Engines, aircraft, turbine[S].

[24]

Pittini M, Kourousis K I. Harmonising and standardising military airworthiness in Europe: A review of key aspects and achievements[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2024, 128(1323): 911-927.

[25]

DEF STAN 00-971 Issue 1 General specification for aircraft gas turbine engines[S].

[26]

DEF STAN 00-970 Part 11 Issue 1 Design and airworthiness requirements for service aircraft-Part 11: Engines[S].

[27]

DEF STAN 00-970 Part 11 Issue 3 Design and airworthiness requirements for service aircraft-part 11: Engines[S].

[28]

DEF STAN 00-970 Part 11 Issue 4 Design and airworthiness requirements for service aircraft-part 11: Engines[S].

[29]

DEF STAN 00-970 Part 11 Issue 5 Design and airworthiness requirements for service aircraft-part 11: Engines[S].

[30]

DEF STAN 00-970 Part 11 Issue 6 (2015) Design and airworthiness requirements for service aircraft-part 11: Engines[S].

[31]

DEF STAN 00-970 Part 11 Issue 7 Design and airworthiness requirements for service aircraft-part 11: Engines[S].

[32]

DEF STAN 00-970 Part 11 Issue 8 Certification specifications for airworthiness-part 11: Engines[S].

[33]

GJB 241-1987 航空涡轮喷气和涡轮风扇发动机通用规范[S].

[34]

GJB 242-1987 航空涡轮螺桨和涡轮轴发动机通用规范[S].

[35]

GJB 241A-2010 航空涡轮喷气和涡轮风扇发动机通用规范[S].

[36]

GJB 242A-2018 航空涡轮螺桨和涡轮轴发动机通用规范[S].

[37]

CS-E Initial issue Certification specifications for engines[S].

[38]

CAR Chapter 13: 1937 Aircraft engine airworthiness[S].

[39]

CAR Part 13: 1941 Aircraft engine airworthiness[S].

[40]

CAR Part 13: 1952 Aircraft engine airworthiness[S].

[41]

Amendment 33-36: 2023 Medium flocking bird test at climb condition[S].

[42]

Airworthiness Handbook for Civil Aircraft (A. P. 1208) Amendment List No. 46[M]. London: His Majesty's Stationery Office, 1936.

[43]

JAR-E: 1972 Joint airworthiness requirements: Engines[S].

[44]

CS-E Amendment 1: 2007 Certification specifications and acceptable means of compliance for engines[S].

[45]

CS-E amendment 2: 2009 Certification specifications and acceptable means of compliance for engines[S].

[46]

CS-E Amendment 3: 2010 Certification specifications and acceptable means of compliance for engines[S].

[47]

CS-E Amendment 4: 2015 Certification specifications and acceptable means of compliance for engines[S].

[48]

CS-E amendment 5: 2018 Certification specifications and acceptable means of compliance for engines[S].

[49]

CS-E Amendment 6: 2020 Certification specifications and acceptable means of compliance for engines[S].

[50]

CS-E Amendment 7: 2023 Certification specifications and acceptable means of compliance for engines[S].

[51]

CS-E Amendment 9: 2026 Certification specifications and acceptable means of compliance for engines[S].

[52]

Amendment 33 -11: 1986 Airworthiness standards: aircraft engines; turboprop engine propeller brake[S].

[53]

Amendment 33-20: 2000 Airworthiness standards: bird ingestion[S].

[54]

Amendment 33-30:2009 Airworthiness standards: aircraft engine overtore limits[S].

[55]

CCAR-33: 1988 航空发动机适航标准[S].

[56]

CCAR-33R2: 2011 航空发动机适航规定[S].

[57]

CCAR-33R1: 2002 航空发动机适航规定[S].

[58]

Amendment 33-10: 1984 Aircraft engine regulatory review program; aircraft engine and related powerplant installation amendments[S].

[59]

Amendment 33-18: 1996 Airworthiness standards: aircraft engines new one-engine-inoperative (OEI) ratings, definitions and type certification standards[S].

[60]

CAR amendment 13-1: 1956 Aircraft engine airworthiness: miscellaneous amendments resulting from the 1956 annual airworthiness review[S].

[61]

Amendment 33-3: 1967 Powerplant design requirements for aircraft engines and propellers[S].

[62]

Amendment 33-6: 1974 Aircraft and aircraft engines: Certification procedures and type certification standards[S].

[63]

Amendment 33-12 : 1988 Airworthiness standards: aircraft engines[S].

[64]

Amendment 33-25: 2008 Airworthiness standards: rotorcraft turbine engines one-engine-inoperative (OEI) ratings, type certification[S].

[65]

Amendment 33-32: 2012 Technical amendment; airworthiness standards: aircraft engines[S].

[66]

AC-33-AA-2022-01 航空发动机审定[S].

[67]

尹泽勇, 丁水汀, 李果, 等. 航空发动机下一代适航规章制定策略和技术路径[J]. 中国工程科学, 2022, 24(4): 230-239.

基金资助

国家科技重大专项(MJG3-1N24)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1532KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉