深部含结构面岩体动力扰动破坏特性试验研究
梁志强 , 孙恬 , 杨林 , 贾鹏飞 , 何本国
石家庄铁道大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2) : 39 -51.
深部含结构面岩体动力扰动破坏特性试验研究
Experimental Study on Failure Characteristics of Deep Rock Mass with Structural Planes Under Dynamic Disturbance
深埋隧道的稳定性受原生结构面、高应力环境、爆破损伤和动力扰动等多因素共同影响,不同扰动方向下岩体的失稳机理尚不明确。以钻爆法隧道开挖过程中发生的结构面控制型岩爆为工程背景,依据现场实测地应力为不同结构面倾角下的静态及扰动真三轴试验,系统分析含结构面岩石在不同扰动方向下的力学性质、裂纹演化及破坏模式。结果表明,中间主应力方向扰动使峰值强度降低1.32%~7.41%,并增强剪切破坏,而最小主应力方向扰动则更易促使裂纹扩展与聚集,使峰值强度降低4.61%~11.11%,并诱发张拉破坏。结构面倾角与动力扰动共同控制岩石的储能与失稳特征:倾角为 60°的试样虽更易失稳但岩爆效应较弱,倾角为80°的试样失稳阈值较高但可释放大量动能易诱发强烈岩爆。除倾角为 60∘ 外,含结构面试样普遍具有更高的储能极限和更大的破坏难度。
The stability of deep-buried tunnels is jointly affected by multiple factors,including inherent structural planes,high in-situ stress,blasting damage,and dynamic disturbances,while the instability mechanisms of surrounding rock under different disturbance directions remain unclear. Taking the structural plane-controlled rockburst during tunnel excavation by the drill-and-blast method as the engineering background,static and disturbed true triaxial tests were conducted on tunnel surrounding rocks containing natural structural planes with different dip angles,based on in-situ stress measurements.The mechanical properties,crack evolution,and failure modes of rock containing structural planes under various disturbance directions were systematically analyzed.The results show that disturbances in the σ2 direction reduce the peak strength by 1.32%∼7.41% and enhance shear failure,whereas disturbances in the σ3 direction more readily promote crack propagation and coalescence,reducing the peak strength by 4.61%~11.11%and inducing tensile failure.The dip angle of the structural plane and the dynamic disturbance jointly govern the energy storage and instability characteristics of the rock.Specimens with a dip angle of 60° are more prone to instability but exhibit weaker rockburst effects,while those with a dip angle of 80∘ have a higher instability threshold but can release substantial kinetic energy,making strong rockbursts more likely.Except for the 60° case, specimens containing structural planes generally show a higher energy-storage limit and greater failure resistance.
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
梁伟章, 赵国彦. 深部硬岩长短期岩爆风险评估研究综述[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2022, 41(1):19-39. |
| [4] |
兰恒星, 张宁, 李郎平, |
| [5] |
李邵军, 徐怀胜, 晏飞, |
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
蔡鑫, 陈立业, 周子龙, |
| [8] |
罗春, 张志强, 林迪睿, 唐泽林. 特长深埋隧道合修与分修对岩爆的影响研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022, 59(2): 28-37. |
| [9] |
陈炳瑞, 冯夏庭, 明华军, |
| [10] |
李立民, 唐烈先, 赵力. 超长深埋隧洞岩爆监测与预警技术应用:以引汉济渭工程秦岭输水隧洞为例[J]. 隧道建设, 2023, 43(9):1533-1540. |
| [11] |
欧阳林, 张如九, 刘耀儒, |
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
周琳, 杨新安, 陈小军, |
| [16] |
韩世迎, 王航龙, 彭俊, |
| [17] |
李明亮, 秦庆词, 李克钢, |
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
单仁亮, 柏皓博, 孙鹏, |
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
周雄, 孟凡震, 修占国, |
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
吴顺川, 张侦锐, 韩龙强, |
| [31] |
李占金, 杨思浩, 李群, |
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
刘岩鑫, 蒋剑青, 苏国韶, |
| [35] |
颜晓阳. 静力与弱动力扰动荷载下深埋隧洞结构面型岩爆孕育特征及机理研究[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2024:20-144. |
| [36] |
文志杰, 黄景, 蒋宇静, |
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
吕振利, 孙金山, 左昌群. 爆破地震波作用下深埋圆形隧道围岩质点振动规律研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2014, 51(1):38-44. |
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
国家自然科学基金青年资助项目A类(52525808)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |